Dutch students in Singapore - Association of Dutch Businessmen
Dutch students in Singapore - Association of Dutch Businessmen
Dutch students in Singapore - Association of Dutch Businessmen
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Know your tax<br />
Upcom<strong>in</strong>g changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Dutch</strong> tax law?<br />
By Pieter de Ridder and Nicolien Luijsterburg / Loyens & Loeff, tax advisers, S<strong>in</strong>gapore<br />
In a recent article published <strong>in</strong> <strong>Dutch</strong> tax literature 1 ,<br />
three <strong>Dutch</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essors made recommendations to<br />
improve the structure <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Dutch</strong> 1969 Corporate<br />
Income Tax Act (“CITA”) and the <strong>Dutch</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />
climate. The article was published <strong>in</strong> a weekly tax<br />
law journal and the recommendations were made<br />
<strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> a ‘legislative proposal’, discuss<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the different new articles <strong>of</strong> a bill that would be<br />
required to amend the CITA and related laws.<br />
Publication <strong>of</strong> the article attracted a great<br />
deal <strong>of</strong> attention from the national media to the<br />
content <strong>of</strong> the recommendations, which give the<br />
impression that the recommendations are be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
supported by the <strong>Dutch</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance (the<br />
“M<strong>in</strong>istry”).<br />
The recommendations do not have the same<br />
implications as a formal legislative proposal<br />
or a draft bill. Besides, it is not yet even clear<br />
whether the M<strong>in</strong>istry will support any <strong>of</strong> these<br />
recommendations. Nevertheless, for those<br />
<strong>in</strong>terested, please be <strong>in</strong>formed about the ma<strong>in</strong><br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> the mentioned recommendations.<br />
The recommendations made can be summarized<br />
as follows:<br />
• ‘Defiscalisation’ <strong>of</strong> group related <strong>in</strong>terest,<br />
which implies no taxation on <strong>in</strong>terest received<br />
from group entities and no deductibility <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>terest paid to group entities.<br />
• Renewed implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
restrictions on deductibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest (and costs) on<br />
liabilities to third parties<br />
to the extent that these<br />
liabilities are connected<br />
with participations <strong>in</strong><br />
related entities. This<br />
restriction <strong>of</strong> deductibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest will only apply<br />
<strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> a shortage<br />
<strong>of</strong> equity (which exists,<br />
basically, if the average<br />
equity <strong>of</strong> the taxpayer is<br />
less than the average value<br />
<strong>of</strong> the participations it has<br />
<strong>in</strong> related entities).<br />
• Simplification <strong>of</strong> the rules<br />
for the participation<br />
exemption. The exemption<br />
will, <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, apply<br />
to participations <strong>of</strong> at<br />
least 5%; the rules for low<br />
taxed passive subsidiaries<br />
(as <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> 2007,<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a credit <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> an exemption)<br />
will be abolished.<br />
• Reduction <strong>of</strong> the general corporate <strong>in</strong>come tax<br />
rate from 25.5% to 20%.<br />
• Abolition <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Dutch</strong> Dividend Tax Act 1965<br />
(based on which, currently, 15% dividend<br />
withhold<strong>in</strong>g tax is levied).<br />
If the M<strong>in</strong>istry is to support any <strong>of</strong> the<br />
aforementioned recommendations we shall<br />
certa<strong>in</strong>ly keep you <strong>in</strong>formed.<br />
1<br />
Weekblad voor fiscaal recht dated 28 August 2008,<br />
page 891 et seq.<br />
15<br />
Vol.18 • No. 9 • November 2008