25.03.2014 Views

Dutch students in Singapore - Association of Dutch Businessmen

Dutch students in Singapore - Association of Dutch Businessmen

Dutch students in Singapore - Association of Dutch Businessmen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Know your tax<br />

Upcom<strong>in</strong>g changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Dutch</strong> tax law?<br />

By Pieter de Ridder and Nicolien Luijsterburg / Loyens & Loeff, tax advisers, S<strong>in</strong>gapore<br />

In a recent article published <strong>in</strong> <strong>Dutch</strong> tax literature 1 ,<br />

three <strong>Dutch</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essors made recommendations to<br />

improve the structure <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Dutch</strong> 1969 Corporate<br />

Income Tax Act (“CITA”) and the <strong>Dutch</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

climate. The article was published <strong>in</strong> a weekly tax<br />

law journal and the recommendations were made<br />

<strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> a ‘legislative proposal’, discuss<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the different new articles <strong>of</strong> a bill that would be<br />

required to amend the CITA and related laws.<br />

Publication <strong>of</strong> the article attracted a great<br />

deal <strong>of</strong> attention from the national media to the<br />

content <strong>of</strong> the recommendations, which give the<br />

impression that the recommendations are be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

supported by the <strong>Dutch</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance (the<br />

“M<strong>in</strong>istry”).<br />

The recommendations do not have the same<br />

implications as a formal legislative proposal<br />

or a draft bill. Besides, it is not yet even clear<br />

whether the M<strong>in</strong>istry will support any <strong>of</strong> these<br />

recommendations. Nevertheless, for those<br />

<strong>in</strong>terested, please be <strong>in</strong>formed about the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> the mentioned recommendations.<br />

The recommendations made can be summarized<br />

as follows:<br />

• ‘Defiscalisation’ <strong>of</strong> group related <strong>in</strong>terest,<br />

which implies no taxation on <strong>in</strong>terest received<br />

from group entities and no deductibility <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terest paid to group entities.<br />

• Renewed implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

restrictions on deductibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest (and costs) on<br />

liabilities to third parties<br />

to the extent that these<br />

liabilities are connected<br />

with participations <strong>in</strong><br />

related entities. This<br />

restriction <strong>of</strong> deductibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest will only apply<br />

<strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> a shortage<br />

<strong>of</strong> equity (which exists,<br />

basically, if the average<br />

equity <strong>of</strong> the taxpayer is<br />

less than the average value<br />

<strong>of</strong> the participations it has<br />

<strong>in</strong> related entities).<br />

• Simplification <strong>of</strong> the rules<br />

for the participation<br />

exemption. The exemption<br />

will, <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, apply<br />

to participations <strong>of</strong> at<br />

least 5%; the rules for low<br />

taxed passive subsidiaries<br />

(as <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> 2007,<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a credit <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> an exemption)<br />

will be abolished.<br />

• Reduction <strong>of</strong> the general corporate <strong>in</strong>come tax<br />

rate from 25.5% to 20%.<br />

• Abolition <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Dutch</strong> Dividend Tax Act 1965<br />

(based on which, currently, 15% dividend<br />

withhold<strong>in</strong>g tax is levied).<br />

If the M<strong>in</strong>istry is to support any <strong>of</strong> the<br />

aforementioned recommendations we shall<br />

certa<strong>in</strong>ly keep you <strong>in</strong>formed.<br />

1<br />

Weekblad voor fiscaal recht dated 28 August 2008,<br />

page 891 et seq.<br />

15<br />

Vol.18 • No. 9 • November 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!