28.03.2014 Views

Sample Chapter - United Nations University

Sample Chapter - United Nations University

Sample Chapter - United Nations University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 RENAUD, SUDMEIER-RIEUX AND ESTRELLA<br />

based on an original paper by Kathiresan and Rajendran in 2005 that was<br />

subsequently debated by Kathiresan and Rajendran, 2006; Kerr et al.,<br />

2006; Vermaat and Thampanya, 2006, 2007; as well as further results and<br />

discussions by Cochard et al., 2008; Danielsen et al., 2005; Kaplan et al.,<br />

2009; Kerr and Baird, 2007; Renaud 2013; <strong>Chapter</strong>s 3 and 4 in this volume).<br />

Nonetheless, in the interval between the Indian Ocean tsunami disaster<br />

and the systematic and scientific collection of evidence on the role<br />

of coastal vegetation in protecting populations against tsunami waves,<br />

millions of dollars were spent in replanting mangroves in various affected<br />

countries, sometimes with disappointing results (see Cochard, 2011).<br />

Even in areas where mangroves were successfully established, further research<br />

is required to ascertain whether populations are more protected<br />

from tsunami waves.<br />

Another example where further scientific analysis is required relates to<br />

determining linkages between vegetation/forest cover and flooding. It is<br />

often perceived that the greater the forest cover the less the likelihood of<br />

floods. However, this is a subject that is still scientifically debated (Bradshaw<br />

et al., 2007; van Dijk et al., 2009; WWF, 2008). For example, the<br />

Food and Agriculture Organization and the Center for International<br />

Forestry Research (FAO and CIFOR, 2005) showed that the cause–effect<br />

relationship will vary depending on the scale of the flood-generating<br />

weather event and of the catchment considered. This was confirmed further<br />

by Bathurst et al. (2011a, 2011b) through rigorous empirical and<br />

modelling catchment-scale studies in Latin America.<br />

The two examples above point to areas where more research is required<br />

to establish the role of ecosystems in DRR. As mentioned in the<br />

previous section, there are, however, many examples where greater certainties<br />

exist and where ecosystems have been integrated in risk prevention<br />

actions. In order for the role of ecosystems to be considered seriously<br />

by decision-makers at various governance scales, research gaps need to<br />

be addressed by the science community and implementation experiences<br />

upscaled and better communicated by practitioners in terms of what<br />

works and what does not work (see <strong>Chapter</strong> 18 in this volume).<br />

Another potential pitfall is to overemphasize the role of ecosystems in<br />

DRR. That ecosystems and society are intertwined goes without saying<br />

but, in order to reduce future disaster risks, we need to analyse complex<br />

vulnerability, risk and environmental factors in a more systematic manner.<br />

As an example we can consider the situation on the island of Hispaniola,<br />

which is divided between Haiti and the Dominican Republic. In<br />

2004 both countries were affected by intense rainfall brought about by a<br />

low pressure system, which generated flooding in the south-central, crossborder<br />

region of the island on 24–25 May (Gubbels and Brakenridge,<br />

2004), and by Hurricane/Tropical Storm Jeanne, which affected the island

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!