03.04.2014 Views

THE ORDER OF MELCHISEDECH A Defence of ... - Rore Sanctifica

THE ORDER OF MELCHISEDECH A Defence of ... - Rore Sanctifica

THE ORDER OF MELCHISEDECH A Defence of ... - Rore Sanctifica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to omit those prayers, <strong>of</strong> course. We are quite free to hold-----as I hold too-----that it was deplorable<br />

to make such confusing, ambiguous, and even scandalous omissions." But he insists, as Dr. Clark<br />

does, and as I accept without reservation, that Pope Paul VI did not have Cranmer's heretical<br />

intention in excising these prayers. Father Harrison believes the Pope's motives to have been a "zeal<br />

for ecumenism" which prompts the expression <strong>of</strong> Catholic doctrine in a "way that gives as little<br />

<strong>of</strong>fence as possible to the separated brethren. Ill advised? Many <strong>of</strong> us would say so. Invalid? No<br />

way."<br />

Conclusion<br />

I am, if anything, even more adamant than I was in 1979 that the new rite <strong>of</strong> ordination in both the<br />

1968 and 1989 versions represents an unacceptable ecumenical compromise. In this respect the<br />

closing passage <strong>of</strong> Dr. Clark's review is very pertinent:<br />

Time after time Mr. Davies brings into the open questionable tendencies, reforms gone awry, and<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> theological confusion within the Church, <strong>of</strong> which most <strong>of</strong> the faithful are scarcely aware.<br />

There is need for much more vigilant scrutiny <strong>of</strong> what is being done to the Church's heritage <strong>of</strong><br />

faith, worship, ritual and devotion in the name <strong>of</strong> post-conciliar renewal. This book sharpens the<br />

scrutiny. By asking very awkward questions Mr. Davies is not opposing but serving the cause <strong>of</strong><br />

authentic post-conciliar renewal.<br />

Given that the New Catholic Ordinal, even in its amended 1989 version, represents an unacceptable<br />

ecumenical compromise, what should be the attitude <strong>of</strong> Catholics who believe that maintaining<br />

authentic Catholic Tradition necessitates not simply the preservation <strong>of</strong> the pre-conciliar liturgical<br />

books but their restoration as the norm in the Roman Rite? It would be unrealistic to hope for the<br />

abrogation <strong>of</strong> the New Ordinal in the foreseeable future. The Vatican has never liked to admit that it<br />

has erred, let alone erred gravely. The most realistic policy for obtaining the eventual complete<br />

restoration <strong>of</strong> the Traditional Ordinal is to press for its use on every possible occasion now that it<br />

has become a Vatican-recognized option since the publication <strong>of</strong> the Motu proprio "Ecclesia Dei" in<br />

1988. It is <strong>of</strong> no little significance that the use <strong>of</strong> the Traditional Ordinal alongside the new one<br />

would certainly impart a very important ex adiunctis signification to the new rite, as its weak<br />

doctrinal content would have to be interpreted within the unambiguous sacrificial ethos <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Traditional Ordinal. The fact that the Tridentine Missal is now recognized by the Holy See as an<br />

authorized rite within the Church performs the same function for the 1970 Missal.<br />

The background to Ecclesia Dei is as follows. On 5 May 1988, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, on<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> the Vatican, joined with Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in signing a protocol designed to<br />

bring the Society <strong>of</strong> St. Pius X, founded by the Archbishop, back within the <strong>of</strong>ficial structures <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Church. All the Society establishments, seminaries, schools, churches, priories and convents would<br />

have been given <strong>of</strong>ficial recognition, and "the Fraternity would have been given the faculty to use<br />

the liturgical books in use until the post-conciliar reforms" (L'Osservatore Romano, English edition,<br />

27 June 1988). Other traditional communities not recognized by the Vatican were also given the<br />

opportunity to accept the protocol. Archbishop Lefebvre eventually decided not to go through with<br />

the agreement as he had grave doubts as to the resolution which the pope would show in<br />

implementing its terms when faced with the almost universal opposition <strong>of</strong> the world's bishops.<br />

Other communities did accept the protocol, and new ones have been set up since the promulgation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ecclesia Dei, which means that the Traditional Ordinal and all the pre-conciliar liturgical books<br />

are now being used with increasing frequency with the full approval <strong>of</strong> the Vatican. There seems to<br />

be no reason, apart from malice on the part <strong>of</strong> their superiors, why ordinands from any seminary<br />

should not have a request to be ordained in the traditional rite granted. Every Catholic who loves<br />

the Church must pray earnestly that the day will not be long delayed when the Vatican is able to<br />

negotiate an acceptable basis for the recognition <strong>of</strong> the Society <strong>of</strong> St. Pius X. When this happens the<br />

ordinations which take place in the Society's six flourishing seminaries will raise the number <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>ficially recognized priests ordained with the Traditional Ordinal to a very significant proportion

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!