Grandparents & Grandchildren - College of Human Sciences

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References • Balzer, C. L. (1994). Grandparent visitation rights – constitutional considerations and the Need to define the “best interest of the child standard.” Land and Water Law Review, 29, 593-613. • Black, H. C., Nolan, J. R., & Nolan-Haley, J. M. (1991). Black’s Law Dictionary. St. Paul. MN: West. • Bostock, C. (1994). Does the expansion of grandparent rights promote the best interests of the child?: A survey of grandparent visitation laws in the fifty states. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 27, 319 - 373. • Bohl, J. C. (1996). The unprecedented intrusion: A survey and analysis of selected grandparent visitation cases. Oklahoma Law Review, 33. Retrieved on April 8, 2008 from http://web.lexis-nexis.com. (1 March 1999). • Gillman, C. M. (1995). One big, happy family? In search of a more reasoned approach to grandparent visitation in Minnesota. Minnesota Law Review, 79: Retrieved on April 8, 2008 from http://web.lexis-nexis.com. (1 March 1999). • Grandparent Resource Center. (n. d.). Grandparent visitation rights. Retrieved on Ma 19, 2009 from http://www.grc4usa.org/. • Hartfield, B. W. (1996). Legal recognition of the value of intergenerational nurturance: Grandparent visitation statutes in the nineties. Generations, 20, 53-56. • Harvard Law Review. (1980). Developments in the law: The Constitution and the family. Boston, MA: author.
References Cont… • Henderson, T. L. (2005). Grandparent visitation rights: Circumstances of their success. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 107-137. • Henderson, T. L., & Moran, P. B. (2001). Grandparent visitation rights: Testing the parameters of parental rights. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 619-638. • In the Matter of the Grandparental Visitation of C. G. F., H. F., T. F. v. T. F. & D. L., 168 Wis. 2d 62; 483 N.W.2d 803; 1992 Wisc. LEXIS 199. Retrieved on October 15, 1998, from http://web.lexis-nexis.com. • Jackson, A. M., (1994). The coming of age of grandparent visitation rights. The American University Law Review, 563, 563-600. • Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1; 87 S. Ct. 1817; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1082; 18 L. Ed. 2d 1010. http://web.lexis-nexis.com. (1 March 1999). • Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923). • Michaels, B. (1993). Grandparent visitation rights. Digest of Recent Judicial Decisions, 14, 194-199. • Mnookin, R. B., & Weisburg, D. K. (2005). Child, Family, and State: Problems and Materials on Children and the Law (5th Edition). New York: Aspen. • Moore v. the City of East Cleveland, 431 U.S. 494; 97 S. Ct. 1932; 1977 U.S. LEXIS 17; 52 L. Ed. 2d 531. • Pierce v. the Society of Sisters, 268 U S. 510; 45 S. Ct. 571; 1925 U.S. LEXIS 589; 69 L. Ed. 1070; 39 A.L.R. 468.
Page 1 and 2: Grandparents & Grandchildren Around
Page 3 and 4: Profile of Oklahoma 2003 • 70,116
Page 5 and 6: Reasons for GRG • Help their gran
Page 7 and 8: Rewards • Feeling a sense of sati
Page 9 and 10: GRG tend to: Challenges • Experie
Page 11 and 12: Challenges Accessing Services • G
Page 13 and 14: Challenges Accessing Services • N
Page 15 and 16: Two of Five Fundamental Rights •
Page 17 and 18: Restrictive Grandparent Visitation
Page 19 and 20: OK’s Grandparent Visitation Law
Page 21 and 22: OK’s Grandparent Visitation Law
Page 23 and 24: Denied Visitation Rights? •If the
Page 25: Resources • http://humansciences.

Grandparents & Grandchildren - College of Human Sciences

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?