7 Lakes North, South cast vote for change - Seven Lakes Times
7 Lakes North, South cast vote for change - Seven Lakes Times
7 Lakes North, South cast vote for change - Seven Lakes Times
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NEWS March 21, 2008 <strong>Seven</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong> <strong>Times</strong> 37<br />
Area A<br />
(Continued from page 6)<br />
as a special rural place,” he said,<br />
“and the Country Life Culture<br />
is our legacy brand.”<br />
“As you review the plans <strong>for</strong><br />
Area A, and development in our<br />
region, I ask you to consider<br />
what it is that makes us special,<br />
and weight its economic<br />
potential just as any CEO would<br />
do in the corporate world.”<br />
“No great wave of sameness<br />
need sweep over this place,”<br />
Owen added.<br />
Area A Steering Committee<br />
member Leonard Tufts urged the<br />
Commissioners to “Accept our<br />
report. It represents a consensus<br />
of the members as to what Area<br />
A needs.” Tufts said the “most critical<br />
recommendation is the adoption<br />
of an Adequate Public Facilities<br />
Ordinance, which would<br />
require that developers establish<br />
that the county has adequate<br />
water, roads, schools, and other<br />
infrastructure to meet the needs<br />
of those who would live in proposed<br />
developments.<br />
Public hearing<br />
Rob Evans of the <strong>North</strong> Carolina<br />
Department of Agriculture<br />
told the Commissioners that the<br />
state has already acquired 200<br />
acres in Area A <strong>for</strong> preservation<br />
and plans to acquire additional<br />
acreage to be preserved in a<br />
natural state.<br />
Area A resident Ben<strong>for</strong>d Graham<br />
question the plans recommendation<br />
that private irrigation<br />
wells not be allowed in major<br />
developments and subdivisions<br />
that are served by public water<br />
supplies. He asked whether<br />
using well water <strong>for</strong> irrigation<br />
might not help ease the demand<br />
<strong>for</strong> treated water.<br />
Bruce Sorrie of the states<br />
Natural Heritage Program reminded<br />
Commissioners that Area A<br />
includes unique ecosystems and<br />
endangered species of both<br />
state and national significance.<br />
Area A includes “the largest and<br />
best quality block of Longleaf<br />
pine remaining in the whole<br />
Sandhills region outside of Ft.<br />
Bragg and the Game Lands —<br />
which is why we are so keen<br />
on protecting it,” he said.<br />
William Arthur Williams of<br />
Eagle Springs, a member of the<br />
Voluntary Agricultural District<br />
Board, spoke in support of the<br />
Area A plan.<br />
Planning Board member Ron<br />
Jackson, a builder, said he<br />
would have had liked to have<br />
more time to study the Area A<br />
plan at the Planning Board level,<br />
noting that he personally had<br />
had only two days to look at the<br />
plan be<strong>for</strong>e being asked to <strong>vote</strong><br />
on it. He said the open space and<br />
setback requirements suggested<br />
in the plan were too restrictive<br />
and could prevent land from<br />
being developed. “You’re taking<br />
someone’s value of their land<br />
away from them,” Jackson added.<br />
Speaking a second time, Ruth<br />
Stolting of Save Our Sandhills<br />
also sugested that more time<br />
was needed to study the Area A<br />
plan, which “has already been<br />
short<strong>change</strong>d by the way it is<br />
being presented. The Commissioners<br />
didn’t have enough time.<br />
The Public has little or no time to<br />
examine the plan.” Stolting said<br />
the key points in the plan will<br />
need to be backed up by ordinances.<br />
Earl Ingram of the Lake Diamond<br />
community told the Commissioners<br />
that the Area A plan<br />
represented “high but reasonable<br />
standards. We need high<br />
standards, because if we do not<br />
start with high standards we will<br />
get a product which is mediocre<br />
or unsatisfactory. I don’t see<br />
anyhting in this plan which can<br />
cause harm to anyone . . . . The<br />
people who live in Area A made<br />
the input into the plan. Those<br />
people deserve consideration<br />
of their input, and I urge you to<br />
approve this plan and allow the<br />
process to begin to allow staff to<br />
prepare ordinances necessary to<br />
get the ball rolling.”<br />
Densel Williams of the Moore<br />
County Home Builders Association<br />
said he was present to<br />
serve “as a conduit between<br />
our industry and the good work<br />
citizens are trying to do. There are<br />
several people from our industry<br />
here tonight who have had to<br />
lay off people and are worrying<br />
about keeping their doors open<br />
. . . . We are concerned about<br />
more regulation because more<br />
regulation right now certainly<br />
means there will be more people<br />
out of work.”<br />
Williams said he was not clear<br />
on the legal standing of the plan<br />
and whether it will create a second<br />
set of rules that the planning<br />
staff will need to administer. He<br />
suggested that <strong>Seven</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong>, if<br />
it wants a different set of development<br />
standards than the rest<br />
of the county, may need to incorporate<br />
in order to achieve that.<br />
<strong>Seven</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong> builder Bill<br />
Reaves thanked the Area A<br />
Steering Committee <strong>for</strong> their<br />
work, but asked how the Area<br />
Plan fits into the Countywide<br />
Land Use Plan approved in 1999.<br />
“This plan suggests concerns<br />
with growth outpacing infrastructure,”<br />
Reaves said. “But<br />
infrastructure was never provided<br />
in this area. It should have<br />
been done 20 years ago.”<br />
Noting the open space and<br />
setback requirements recommended<br />
in the plan, Reaves<br />
said “Most property under this is<br />
going to become unusable or<br />
unbuildable. Are you going to<br />
pay <strong>for</strong> the value you have<br />
taken?” The plan may include<br />
“some good ideas and good<br />
UP TO FORTY PERCENT<br />
intentions, but has it been vetted,”<br />
Reaves added, asking the Commissioners<br />
to “review and consider<br />
seriously.”<br />
Joe McDonald of Save our<br />
Sandhills asked whether it is<br />
time the county required environmental<br />
impact statements<br />
from developers, a requirement<br />
already in place in Chatham<br />
(See“Area A,” p. 38)<br />
DRIVE<br />
DOWN<br />
PREMIUMS<br />
Please Call My Office <strong>for</strong><br />
24 Hour Good Neighbor Service ®<br />
Call 215-8150 For Appt. And Quote. Many Discounts Available.<br />
Located 1/4 Mile West of Olmsted Village. On Hwy. 211 West