10.04.2014 Views

7 Lakes North, South cast vote for change - Seven Lakes Times

7 Lakes North, South cast vote for change - Seven Lakes Times

7 Lakes North, South cast vote for change - Seven Lakes Times

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NEWS March 21, 2008 <strong>Seven</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong> <strong>Times</strong> 37<br />

Area A<br />

(Continued from page 6)<br />

as a special rural place,” he said,<br />

“and the Country Life Culture<br />

is our legacy brand.”<br />

“As you review the plans <strong>for</strong><br />

Area A, and development in our<br />

region, I ask you to consider<br />

what it is that makes us special,<br />

and weight its economic<br />

potential just as any CEO would<br />

do in the corporate world.”<br />

“No great wave of sameness<br />

need sweep over this place,”<br />

Owen added.<br />

Area A Steering Committee<br />

member Leonard Tufts urged the<br />

Commissioners to “Accept our<br />

report. It represents a consensus<br />

of the members as to what Area<br />

A needs.” Tufts said the “most critical<br />

recommendation is the adoption<br />

of an Adequate Public Facilities<br />

Ordinance, which would<br />

require that developers establish<br />

that the county has adequate<br />

water, roads, schools, and other<br />

infrastructure to meet the needs<br />

of those who would live in proposed<br />

developments.<br />

Public hearing<br />

Rob Evans of the <strong>North</strong> Carolina<br />

Department of Agriculture<br />

told the Commissioners that the<br />

state has already acquired 200<br />

acres in Area A <strong>for</strong> preservation<br />

and plans to acquire additional<br />

acreage to be preserved in a<br />

natural state.<br />

Area A resident Ben<strong>for</strong>d Graham<br />

question the plans recommendation<br />

that private irrigation<br />

wells not be allowed in major<br />

developments and subdivisions<br />

that are served by public water<br />

supplies. He asked whether<br />

using well water <strong>for</strong> irrigation<br />

might not help ease the demand<br />

<strong>for</strong> treated water.<br />

Bruce Sorrie of the states<br />

Natural Heritage Program reminded<br />

Commissioners that Area A<br />

includes unique ecosystems and<br />

endangered species of both<br />

state and national significance.<br />

Area A includes “the largest and<br />

best quality block of Longleaf<br />

pine remaining in the whole<br />

Sandhills region outside of Ft.<br />

Bragg and the Game Lands —<br />

which is why we are so keen<br />

on protecting it,” he said.<br />

William Arthur Williams of<br />

Eagle Springs, a member of the<br />

Voluntary Agricultural District<br />

Board, spoke in support of the<br />

Area A plan.<br />

Planning Board member Ron<br />

Jackson, a builder, said he<br />

would have had liked to have<br />

more time to study the Area A<br />

plan at the Planning Board level,<br />

noting that he personally had<br />

had only two days to look at the<br />

plan be<strong>for</strong>e being asked to <strong>vote</strong><br />

on it. He said the open space and<br />

setback requirements suggested<br />

in the plan were too restrictive<br />

and could prevent land from<br />

being developed. “You’re taking<br />

someone’s value of their land<br />

away from them,” Jackson added.<br />

Speaking a second time, Ruth<br />

Stolting of Save Our Sandhills<br />

also sugested that more time<br />

was needed to study the Area A<br />

plan, which “has already been<br />

short<strong>change</strong>d by the way it is<br />

being presented. The Commissioners<br />

didn’t have enough time.<br />

The Public has little or no time to<br />

examine the plan.” Stolting said<br />

the key points in the plan will<br />

need to be backed up by ordinances.<br />

Earl Ingram of the Lake Diamond<br />

community told the Commissioners<br />

that the Area A plan<br />

represented “high but reasonable<br />

standards. We need high<br />

standards, because if we do not<br />

start with high standards we will<br />

get a product which is mediocre<br />

or unsatisfactory. I don’t see<br />

anyhting in this plan which can<br />

cause harm to anyone . . . . The<br />

people who live in Area A made<br />

the input into the plan. Those<br />

people deserve consideration<br />

of their input, and I urge you to<br />

approve this plan and allow the<br />

process to begin to allow staff to<br />

prepare ordinances necessary to<br />

get the ball rolling.”<br />

Densel Williams of the Moore<br />

County Home Builders Association<br />

said he was present to<br />

serve “as a conduit between<br />

our industry and the good work<br />

citizens are trying to do. There are<br />

several people from our industry<br />

here tonight who have had to<br />

lay off people and are worrying<br />

about keeping their doors open<br />

. . . . We are concerned about<br />

more regulation because more<br />

regulation right now certainly<br />

means there will be more people<br />

out of work.”<br />

Williams said he was not clear<br />

on the legal standing of the plan<br />

and whether it will create a second<br />

set of rules that the planning<br />

staff will need to administer. He<br />

suggested that <strong>Seven</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong>, if<br />

it wants a different set of development<br />

standards than the rest<br />

of the county, may need to incorporate<br />

in order to achieve that.<br />

<strong>Seven</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong> builder Bill<br />

Reaves thanked the Area A<br />

Steering Committee <strong>for</strong> their<br />

work, but asked how the Area<br />

Plan fits into the Countywide<br />

Land Use Plan approved in 1999.<br />

“This plan suggests concerns<br />

with growth outpacing infrastructure,”<br />

Reaves said. “But<br />

infrastructure was never provided<br />

in this area. It should have<br />

been done 20 years ago.”<br />

Noting the open space and<br />

setback requirements recommended<br />

in the plan, Reaves<br />

said “Most property under this is<br />

going to become unusable or<br />

unbuildable. Are you going to<br />

pay <strong>for</strong> the value you have<br />

taken?” The plan may include<br />

“some good ideas and good<br />

UP TO FORTY PERCENT<br />

intentions, but has it been vetted,”<br />

Reaves added, asking the Commissioners<br />

to “review and consider<br />

seriously.”<br />

Joe McDonald of Save our<br />

Sandhills asked whether it is<br />

time the county required environmental<br />

impact statements<br />

from developers, a requirement<br />

already in place in Chatham<br />

(See“Area A,” p. 38)<br />

DRIVE<br />

DOWN<br />

PREMIUMS<br />

Please Call My Office <strong>for</strong><br />

24 Hour Good Neighbor Service ®<br />

Call 215-8150 For Appt. And Quote. Many Discounts Available.<br />

Located 1/4 Mile West of Olmsted Village. On Hwy. 211 West

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!