Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...
Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...
Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Orders the Public Utilities Commission<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Ohio</strong> to revisit a previously adopted<br />
plan approving the setting <strong>of</strong> service<br />
rates for three <strong>Ohio</strong> electric companies<br />
owned by FirstEnergy Corporation to<br />
comply with certain legislative provisions.<br />
Public Utilities Commission, No. 03-<br />
2144-EL-ATA. Decision affirmed in<br />
part and reversed in part, and cause<br />
remanded.<br />
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer,<br />
Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell,<br />
JJ., concur.<br />
O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., concur<br />
in part and dissent in part.<br />
Smith v. Conley<br />
Case no. 2005-0247<br />
Web cite <strong>2006</strong>-<strong>Ohio</strong>-2035<br />
Holds that, in calculating the time<br />
limit within which a client must<br />
file a malpractice action against an<br />
attorney, the date on which the lawyerclient<br />
relationship was terminated is<br />
determined by reference to the actions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the parties under statutory provisions<br />
and case law, not by the date <strong>of</strong> the<br />
attorney’s compliance with a local rule<br />
<strong>of</strong> court governing withdrawal from<br />
representation.<br />
Stark App. No. 2004CA00068, 2004-<br />
<strong>Ohio</strong>-7057. Judgment reversed.<br />
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer,<br />
O’Connor, O’Donnell and<br />
Lanzinger, JJ., concur.<br />
Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.<br />
Davenport v. Montgomery Cty.<br />
Case no. 2005-0074<br />
Web cite <strong>2006</strong>-<strong>Ohio</strong>-2034<br />
To invoke the state law granting public<br />
employees the option to convert unused<br />
sick-leave hours to cash at the time <strong>of</strong><br />
retirement from active service, a worker<br />
must remain in public employment until<br />
meeting eligibility requirements for the<br />
public employee retirement program.<br />
The provision does not apply to workers<br />
who leave before they are eligible to<br />
retire.<br />
Montgomery App. No. 20350, 2004-<br />
<strong>Ohio</strong>-6781. Judgment reversed.<br />
Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton,<br />
O’Connor, O’Donnell and<br />
Lanzinger, JJ., concur.<br />
Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.<br />
Reading v. Pub. Util. Comm.<br />
Case no. 2005-0245<br />
Web cite <strong>2006</strong>-<strong>Ohio</strong>-2181<br />
The state law authorizing the Public<br />
Utilities Commission <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ohio</strong> to close<br />
a railroad grade crossing within the<br />
boundaries <strong>of</strong> a municipality, despite<br />
the opposition <strong>of</strong> local <strong>of</strong>ficials, does<br />
not violate the municipality’s right to<br />
exercise police powers within its borders<br />
under the home-rule provision <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Ohio</strong> Constitution.<br />
Public Utilities Commission, No. 02-<br />
589-RR-UNC. Order affirmed.<br />
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg<br />
Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and<br />
Lanzinger, JJ., concur.<br />
Pfeifer, J., concurs in judgment only.<br />
Sharonville v. Am. Employers Ins. Co.<br />
Case no. 2004-1735<br />
Web cite <strong>2006</strong>-<strong>Ohio</strong>-2180<br />
If an insurance company issues a<br />
law enforcement liability policy, the<br />
insurance company has a duty to defend<br />
the policyholder against a lawsuit<br />
when a claimant’s complaint contains<br />
an allegation <strong>of</strong> conduct arguably<br />
considered covered by the policy.<br />
Hamilton App. No. C-030905, 158<br />
<strong>Ohio</strong> App.3d 576, 2004-<strong>Ohio</strong>-4664.<br />
Judgment affirmed.<br />
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer,<br />
Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and<br />
Lanzinger, JJ., concur.<br />
89