11.04.2014 Views

Debate Topic: Canada is a big country - EcoKids

Debate Topic: Canada is a big country - EcoKids

Debate Topic: Canada is a big country - EcoKids

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Great Garbage <strong>Debate</strong> Page 1<br />

Using debates in the classroom can encourage critical thinking, personal expression, tolerance of<br />

others' opinions and improve presentation skills. In th<strong>is</strong> activity, your students will hold a roleplay<br />

debate on how Canadians feel about the amount of garbage we produce by examining<br />

various different points of view. In advance of the debate, we suggest that your students v<strong>is</strong>it the<br />

waste section of our web site (ecokids.ca) called “It’s not Waste Until You Waste It.”<br />

<strong>Debate</strong> <strong>Topic</strong>: Should the government charge us for each bag of garbage we put on the curb or<br />

down the garbage chute?<br />

Objectives:<br />

• D<strong>is</strong>cuss the <strong>is</strong>sue up for debate.<br />

• L<strong>is</strong>t various people with a stake in the debate.<br />

• Play the role of a stakeholder in the debate.<br />

• Assess their own and/or their peers' performances in the debate.<br />

Materials Needed:<br />

• Index cards or scrap paper of uniform size<br />

• Photocopies of the debate rubric (on reverse side)<br />

Key Words:<br />

• <strong>Debate</strong><br />

• Issues<br />

• Controversy<br />

• Stakeholder<br />

• Role play<br />

• Persuasive<br />

• Argument vs. Rebuttal<br />

• Fact vs. Opinion<br />

Lesson Plan:<br />

1. Identify (or ask students to help you identify) the stakeholders in the debate. Suggestions<br />

include the government, an average citizen, an environmental<strong>is</strong>t, a garbage-collecting<br />

company, a moose (or other wildlife) and another <strong>country</strong> (e.g. the U.S.)<br />

2. Then gather the index cards and count one card for each student. Write the roles of the<br />

stakeholders on the index cards, one stakeholder per card. Be sure you have at least three<br />

index cards for each stakeholder role.<br />

3. Let students randomly draw an index card. Then have students gather with classmates<br />

holding the same stakeholder cards. Those small groups of students are responsible for<br />

putting themselves in the position of their assigned stakeholder and formulating the<br />

arguments they will present in a classroom debate on the topic.<br />

4. Assign an appropriate period of time in which the groups have to d<strong>is</strong>cuss, prepare and present<br />

their point of view. A persuasive argument should have a strong introductory statement,<br />

relevant supporting facts and a compelling closing. Refer the students to the rubric<br />

beforehand to ensure that these and other points are addressed.<br />

5. When it <strong>is</strong> time to debate, each stakeholder group presents their point of view. After the<br />

presentations, the entire class can ask questions of the various stakeholders. In the end,<br />

students decide which side of the debate -- the Affirmative or Negative -- presented the<br />

strongest case.<br />

6. Lastly, students can use the debate rubric to assess their own and/or their classmates' debating<br />

skills.<br />

ecokids.ca


The Great Garbage <strong>Debate</strong> Page 2<br />

DEBATE RUBRIC*<br />

Instructions:<br />

1. Use the following rubric to evaluate your peers on their debating ability.<br />

2. Give a score of 1 to 4 for each of the five categories. Giving someone a score of 4<br />

means that you think they are excellent at debating. Giving someone a score of 1,<br />

however, means that you think they need a lot more practice!<br />

3. When you are fin<strong>is</strong>hed scoring, add up all the numbers to obtain a total score.<br />

Category<br />

Excellent Good Sat<strong>is</strong>factory Needs<br />

Improvement<br />

Addresses<br />

Issues<br />

Support with<br />

Facts<br />

Persuasiveness<br />

Teamwork<br />

Organization<br />

Always<br />

addresses<br />

topic<br />

Uses many<br />

facts<br />

that support<br />

topic<br />

Arguments<br />

clear and<br />

convincing<br />

4 3 2 1<br />

Used team<br />

member<br />

effectively<br />

and each had<br />

equal air time<br />

Electrifies<br />

audience in<br />

opening<br />

statement and<br />

closure<br />

convinces<br />

audience<br />

Usually addresses<br />

topic<br />

Uses some facts<br />

that support topic<br />

Arguments are<br />

sometimes clear<br />

and convincing<br />

One member does<br />

the talking 75%<br />

of the time<br />

Grabs attention<br />

and brings<br />

closure to the<br />

debate<br />

Rarely<br />

addresses topic<br />

Uses few facts<br />

that support<br />

topic<br />

Arguments are<br />

rarely clear<br />

and<br />

convincing<br />

One member<br />

does the<br />

talking 100%<br />

of the time<br />

Introduces<br />

topic and<br />

brings some<br />

closure to the<br />

debate<br />

Did not address<br />

topic<br />

Does not use<br />

facts that<br />

support topic<br />

Arguments are<br />

never clear and<br />

convincing<br />

No one talks<br />

Does not<br />

introduce topic;<br />

no closure<br />

Score<br />

* Adapted from Education World (educationworld.com).<br />

TOTAL SCORE __________<br />

ecokids.ca

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!