Debate Topic: Canada is a big country - EcoKids
Debate Topic: Canada is a big country - EcoKids
Debate Topic: Canada is a big country - EcoKids
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Great Garbage <strong>Debate</strong> Page 1<br />
Using debates in the classroom can encourage critical thinking, personal expression, tolerance of<br />
others' opinions and improve presentation skills. In th<strong>is</strong> activity, your students will hold a roleplay<br />
debate on how Canadians feel about the amount of garbage we produce by examining<br />
various different points of view. In advance of the debate, we suggest that your students v<strong>is</strong>it the<br />
waste section of our web site (ecokids.ca) called “It’s not Waste Until You Waste It.”<br />
<strong>Debate</strong> <strong>Topic</strong>: Should the government charge us for each bag of garbage we put on the curb or<br />
down the garbage chute?<br />
Objectives:<br />
• D<strong>is</strong>cuss the <strong>is</strong>sue up for debate.<br />
• L<strong>is</strong>t various people with a stake in the debate.<br />
• Play the role of a stakeholder in the debate.<br />
• Assess their own and/or their peers' performances in the debate.<br />
Materials Needed:<br />
• Index cards or scrap paper of uniform size<br />
• Photocopies of the debate rubric (on reverse side)<br />
Key Words:<br />
• <strong>Debate</strong><br />
• Issues<br />
• Controversy<br />
• Stakeholder<br />
• Role play<br />
• Persuasive<br />
• Argument vs. Rebuttal<br />
• Fact vs. Opinion<br />
Lesson Plan:<br />
1. Identify (or ask students to help you identify) the stakeholders in the debate. Suggestions<br />
include the government, an average citizen, an environmental<strong>is</strong>t, a garbage-collecting<br />
company, a moose (or other wildlife) and another <strong>country</strong> (e.g. the U.S.)<br />
2. Then gather the index cards and count one card for each student. Write the roles of the<br />
stakeholders on the index cards, one stakeholder per card. Be sure you have at least three<br />
index cards for each stakeholder role.<br />
3. Let students randomly draw an index card. Then have students gather with classmates<br />
holding the same stakeholder cards. Those small groups of students are responsible for<br />
putting themselves in the position of their assigned stakeholder and formulating the<br />
arguments they will present in a classroom debate on the topic.<br />
4. Assign an appropriate period of time in which the groups have to d<strong>is</strong>cuss, prepare and present<br />
their point of view. A persuasive argument should have a strong introductory statement,<br />
relevant supporting facts and a compelling closing. Refer the students to the rubric<br />
beforehand to ensure that these and other points are addressed.<br />
5. When it <strong>is</strong> time to debate, each stakeholder group presents their point of view. After the<br />
presentations, the entire class can ask questions of the various stakeholders. In the end,<br />
students decide which side of the debate -- the Affirmative or Negative -- presented the<br />
strongest case.<br />
6. Lastly, students can use the debate rubric to assess their own and/or their classmates' debating<br />
skills.<br />
ecokids.ca
The Great Garbage <strong>Debate</strong> Page 2<br />
DEBATE RUBRIC*<br />
Instructions:<br />
1. Use the following rubric to evaluate your peers on their debating ability.<br />
2. Give a score of 1 to 4 for each of the five categories. Giving someone a score of 4<br />
means that you think they are excellent at debating. Giving someone a score of 1,<br />
however, means that you think they need a lot more practice!<br />
3. When you are fin<strong>is</strong>hed scoring, add up all the numbers to obtain a total score.<br />
Category<br />
Excellent Good Sat<strong>is</strong>factory Needs<br />
Improvement<br />
Addresses<br />
Issues<br />
Support with<br />
Facts<br />
Persuasiveness<br />
Teamwork<br />
Organization<br />
Always<br />
addresses<br />
topic<br />
Uses many<br />
facts<br />
that support<br />
topic<br />
Arguments<br />
clear and<br />
convincing<br />
4 3 2 1<br />
Used team<br />
member<br />
effectively<br />
and each had<br />
equal air time<br />
Electrifies<br />
audience in<br />
opening<br />
statement and<br />
closure<br />
convinces<br />
audience<br />
Usually addresses<br />
topic<br />
Uses some facts<br />
that support topic<br />
Arguments are<br />
sometimes clear<br />
and convincing<br />
One member does<br />
the talking 75%<br />
of the time<br />
Grabs attention<br />
and brings<br />
closure to the<br />
debate<br />
Rarely<br />
addresses topic<br />
Uses few facts<br />
that support<br />
topic<br />
Arguments are<br />
rarely clear<br />
and<br />
convincing<br />
One member<br />
does the<br />
talking 100%<br />
of the time<br />
Introduces<br />
topic and<br />
brings some<br />
closure to the<br />
debate<br />
Did not address<br />
topic<br />
Does not use<br />
facts that<br />
support topic<br />
Arguments are<br />
never clear and<br />
convincing<br />
No one talks<br />
Does not<br />
introduce topic;<br />
no closure<br />
Score<br />
* Adapted from Education World (educationworld.com).<br />
TOTAL SCORE __________<br />
ecokids.ca