16.04.2014 Views

efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water

efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water

efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chromium in <strong>food</strong> and <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong><br />

149.8 ng/kg b.w. per day (maximum UB, infants). The 95 th percentile exposure ranged from<br />

0.0 (minimum LB) to 148.7 ng/kg b.w. per day (maximum UB, ‘Toddlers’).<br />

An additional contribution to the exposure to Cr(VI) was considered from the <strong>water</strong> used to prepare<br />

certain <strong>food</strong>s (coffee, tea infusions, and infant dry and follow-on <strong>food</strong> mainly, but also some others<br />

such as instant soup, evaporated and dried milk, and dehydrated fruit juice). A worst-case scenario,<br />

with no reduction of the Cr(VI) present in <strong>water</strong> into Cr(III) when the <strong>food</strong>s are ingested immediately<br />

after their preparation, was assumed. This scenario led to an increase up to two-fold in the exposure<br />

levels to Cr(VI), in comparison to those estimated via the consumption of <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong> only.<br />

The CONTAM Panel concluded that the exposure via the diet likely represents the most important<br />

contribution to the overall exposure to Cr in the general population. Inhalation of Cr compounds<br />

present in particular in cigarette smoke may contribute to the overall exposure levels but the currently<br />

available information does not allow quantification of its relative contribution.<br />

Cr(III) compounds present low oral toxicity because they are poorly absorbed. Cr(III) compounds<br />

have the potential to react with DNA in acellular systems, however restricted cellular access limits or<br />

prevents genotoxicity. The CONTAM Panel decided to use the data from the chronic toxicity studies<br />

of the National Toxicology Programme (NTP) on <strong>chromium</strong> picolinate monohydrate to derive a<br />

health-based guidance value (HBGV) for the risk characterization of Cr(III). In the two year NTP<br />

chronic oral toxicity study in rats and mice, no carcinogenic or other adverse effects have been<br />

observed. The lowest no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) value derived from these studies<br />

amounted to 286 mg/kg b.w. per day in rats, which was the highest dose tested. Effects of Cr(III) on<br />

reproduction and developmental toxicity have been reported in some studies with the lowest lowestobserved-adverse-effect<br />

levels (LOAELs) in the order of 30 mg/kg b.w. per day, but the Panel noted<br />

that these studies had methodological limitations. In addition, no effects have been reported on<br />

reproductive organ weights, sperm parameters and oestrous cyclicity in subchronic dietary studies in<br />

rats or mice at the highest doses tested (506 mg/kg b.w. per day and 1090 mg/kg b.w. per day,<br />

respectively) (NTP studies). Taking these observations together, the Panel derived a Tolerable Daily<br />

Intake (TDI) of 300 µg Cr(III)/kg b.w. per day from the relevant NOAEL in the long-term rat NTP<br />

study of 286 mg/kg b.w. per day, applying a default uncertainty factor of 100 to account for species<br />

differences and human variability and an additional uncertainty factor of 10 to account for the absence<br />

of adequate data on reproductive and developmental toxicity.<br />

Under the assumption that all <strong>chromium</strong> in <strong>food</strong> is Cr(III), the CONTAM Panel noted that the mean<br />

dietary exposure levels across all age groups (minimum LB of 0.6 μg/kg b.w. per day and maximum<br />

UB of 5.9 μg/kg b.w. per day) as well as the 95 th percentile exposure (minimum LB of<br />

1.1 μg/kg b.w. per day and maximum UB of 9.0 μg/kg b.w. per day) are well below the TDI of<br />

300 µg Cr(III)/ kg b.w. per day.<br />

Regarding the vegetarian population, although based on limited consumption data, the dietary<br />

exposure to Cr(III) seems to be similar to that estimated for the general population. Thus, also the<br />

dietary exposure of vegeterians is well below the TDI of 300 µg Cr(III)/ kg b.w. per day.<br />

A significant exposure to Cr(III) may occur via dietary supplement intake. Considering the exposure<br />

via dietary supplement intake (13 g/kg b.w. per day and 22 g/kg b.w. per day, for typical and upper<br />

intake from fortified <strong>food</strong>s, PARNUTS and <strong>food</strong> supplements, respectively, for an adult of 70 kg b.w.)<br />

and the maximum estimated contribution coming from the diet for adults (95 th percentile of<br />

2.6 µg/kg b.w. per day), the total exposure remains below the TDI of 300 µg Cr(III)/ kg b.w. per day.<br />

After oral exposure, Cr(VI) has been shown to be carcinogenic in rats and mice of both sexes and<br />

genotoxic in some in vivo studies. The data available so far support that the reduction of Cr(VI) to<br />

Cr(III) along the gastrointestinal tract is efficient but it cannot be excluded that even at low dose levels<br />

a small percentage of Cr(VI) escapes gastrointestinal reduction to Cr(III). Once taken up in the cells,<br />

Cr(VI) is reduced to Cr(III) with formation of Cr-DNA adducts and production of oxidative stress (due<br />

to formation of reactive intermediates). Both modes of action can contribute to the genotoxicity and<br />

carcinogenicity of Cr(VI).<br />

EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3595 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!