Inver 3, Holywell Hospital - 31 July and 1 August 2012
Inver 3, Holywell Hospital - 31 July and 1 August 2012
Inver 3, Holywell Hospital - 31 July and 1 August 2012
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5.0 Additional Concerns Noted by Inspectors<br />
Ward Environment<br />
The staff toilets were accessed through the patients’ toilet <strong>and</strong> the windows<br />
opened onto the patients’ garden area. This is unsuitable. Staff had requested<br />
that a partition be erected to provide for privacy. Inspectors were informed that<br />
plans have been agreed to relocate staff WCs to an area off the link corridor<br />
to the ward.<br />
Patient toilet had a strong odour of stale urine. The ward has recently been<br />
refurbished with new flooring <strong>and</strong> plumbing installed. This had failed to solve<br />
the problem. Inspectors were informed that the works docket had not been<br />
signed off <strong>and</strong> contractors had been asked to return to find a permanent<br />
solution to the problem. There was also evidence of a leak in the ceiling of the<br />
main assisted bathroom.<br />
There was ripped flooring at the doorway from the ward to the dining area.<br />
This is hazardous particularly given the level of mobility impairment in several<br />
of the patients.<br />
Inappropriate usage of patients’ bathroom to store wheelchairs.<br />
Four of the patients on the ward were diabetic <strong>and</strong> it was noted that the<br />
vending machine had no low sugar options that would be suitable for those<br />
patients. Staff had previously raised this issue with the suppliers.<br />
Restrictions<br />
In relation to one patient (discussed during inspection feedback) RQIA<br />
suggested a range of safeguarding provisions <strong>and</strong> requested feedback once<br />
completed.<br />
11