17.04.2014 Views

Stories of Ambition and Guilt: Five Character Types in Dostoevsky's ...

Stories of Ambition and Guilt: Five Character Types in Dostoevsky's ...

Stories of Ambition and Guilt: Five Character Types in Dostoevsky's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 <br />

for Raskolnikov when Raskolnikov is sick. Pip’s friend, Herbert, undertakes very similar duties<br />

<strong>in</strong> Great Expectations. He st<strong>and</strong>s by Pip’s decisions, even though Pip’s need to establish himself<br />

as a gentleman pressures them both to spend more on luxuries than they can afford. He also takes<br />

care <strong>of</strong> Pip when Pip burns his own arm rescu<strong>in</strong>g someone from a fire. Razumikh<strong>in</strong>’s <strong>and</strong><br />

Herbert’s actions appear almost identical <strong>in</strong> many ways; the difference, which makes these<br />

similarities all the more strange, is <strong>in</strong> their personalities—specifically <strong>in</strong> Razumikh<strong>in</strong>’s hot<br />

temper <strong>and</strong> Herbert’s mildness.<br />

Razumikh<strong>in</strong> is described as “subject to violent fits <strong>of</strong> rage, [with] a reputation for great<br />

physical strength.” 7 He argues with Raskolnikov’s fevered reason<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong>, when Raskolnikov<br />

tries to escape a confrontation, shouts questions <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>sults after him. In fact, whenever<br />

Razumikh<strong>in</strong> gives Raskolnikov advice or tries to help him with his troubles <strong>in</strong> the novel, he is<br />

blunt, brief, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten loud.<br />

Contrast<strong>in</strong>gly, Herbert is diplomatic <strong>and</strong> tactful, never rais<strong>in</strong>g his voice or criticiz<strong>in</strong>g Pip<br />

harshly. He is “wonderfully hopeful” 8 but lack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> “natural strength” 9 <strong>and</strong> unlikely to be “very<br />

successful or rich” 10 —nearly the opposite <strong>of</strong> Razumikh<strong>in</strong>, who knows “a thous<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> one ways<br />

<strong>of</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g money” 11 even if he is currently poor. When Pip needs correction, Herbert treats his<br />

advice like improvement <strong>of</strong> someth<strong>in</strong>g already good, while Razumikh<strong>in</strong> usually emphasizes<br />

Raskolnikov’s faults, at least at first, to get him to change.<br />

The question is, what do these opposite but equally successful methods <strong>of</strong> encouragement<br />

tell us about the k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> support Raskolnikov <strong>and</strong> Pip need? Though they are <strong>in</strong> similar positions,<br />

torn by ambition <strong>and</strong> guilt, Raskolnikov values Razumikh<strong>in</strong>’s fierce, berat<strong>in</strong>g manner while Pip<br />

responds well to Herbert’s gentle coax<strong>in</strong>g. One explanation for the success <strong>of</strong> such different<br />

tactics h<strong>in</strong>ges on whether the protagonists, follow<strong>in</strong>g their flawed goals, are primarily runn<strong>in</strong>g

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!