18.04.2014 Views

Fall 1996 – Issue 50 - Stanford Lawyer - Stanford University

Fall 1996 – Issue 50 - Stanford Lawyer - Stanford University

Fall 1996 – Issue 50 - Stanford Lawyer - Stanford University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Board of Visitors<br />

School Invites Practitioner Input<br />

Some 80 alumni and<br />

friends converged on<br />

the School in May for the<br />

annual Board of Visitors<br />

meeting. Their mission, in<br />

the words of Chairman<br />

Pamela Ann Rymer '64:<br />

"To shed light on issues of<br />

real concern, where our input<br />

can be valuable."<br />

ew members of the<br />

Board received a special<br />

welcome from Judge<br />

Rymer, who was completing<br />

her third year at the<br />

helm. Incoming chair<br />

James Koshland '78 and<br />

Professor Robert Weisberg<br />

'79 also attended the newmember<br />

orientation session.<br />

Speaking for the<br />

Dean and faculty, Weisberg<br />

said: "Visitors are people<br />

who are very good at giving<br />

advice to their clients,<br />

and we are your client."<br />

The focus of this year's<br />

Board of Visitors meeting<br />

was new realities in the<br />

working world and how<br />

<strong>Stanford</strong> Law School can<br />

best prepare students for<br />

this world. Three sessions<br />

were devoted to the subject,<br />

including one on the path<br />

from associate to partner.<br />

Participants in the day-long<br />

meeting included not only<br />

senior law firm partners<br />

and mid-career attorneys,<br />

but also recent graduates<br />

with fresh experience of the<br />

transition from schooling<br />

to practice.<br />

The strong representation<br />

of younger alumni is<br />

part of a conscious effort by<br />

the Board's executive committee<br />

and the School to increase<br />

the range of advice<br />

and perspectives the Board<br />

is able to provide. Linked to<br />

this are increased opportunities<br />

for Board members to<br />

interact with current students.<br />

Other features of the<br />

annual meeting included<br />

Supreme Court Justice<br />

Stephen Breyer's talk at the<br />

lL Dinner (see page 17);<br />

the Dean's State of the<br />

School report and discussion;<br />

informal talks by recently<br />

arrived professors.<br />

John Donohue and George<br />

Judge Pamela Ann Rymer '64 (then Board chair) with Judge Susan IIIston '73,<br />

James Koshland '78 (incoming Board chair), Carlos Watson '95, and G. Bradford (Brad) Jones '81<br />

in a breakout discussion.<br />

Robert Keller '58, Elaine Chiew (then 3L), and J. Sanford<br />

(Sandy) Miller '75 at one of several Visitor-student events.<br />

Fisher; a report on the recent<br />

telephone survey of<br />

<strong>Stanford</strong> Law alumni (see<br />

STANFORD LAWYER, Spring<br />

<strong>1996</strong>, pp. 18-19); and a<br />

music-filled Cinco de Mayo<br />

celebration.<br />

FRUITFUL DISCUSSION<br />

The working sessions were<br />

introduced and moderated<br />

by Dean Brest. Noting that<br />

there is much talk about<br />

"the decline of satisfaction<br />

in being a lawyer," he invited<br />

the Visitors to give<br />

their views on trends in the<br />

legal profession. The Dean<br />

specifically mentioned the<br />

increased emphasis on bill-<br />

able hours; recruitment<br />

and retention of minorities;<br />

and barriers to the<br />

advancement of women.<br />

Can the profession and legal<br />

educators do anything<br />

to improve present conditions?<br />

he asked. Or is it<br />

"just the way the market<br />

is?-a conclusion that we<br />

should be reluctant to<br />

reach."<br />

Here is a sampling of<br />

comments from the Visitors:<br />

"We never heard the term<br />

'quality of life' five or six<br />

years ago. We worked<br />

2<strong>50</strong>0 hours. 'I had to do<br />

it; Why shouldn't you?'­<br />

It's an emotional reaction.<br />

We had a young guy who<br />

said he was burned out after<br />

six months with the<br />

firm. Give me a break!"<br />

-LeRoy Bobbitt '69<br />

"The '60s and '80s are<br />

over. The economy is<br />

changing due to globalization<br />

and computerization.<br />

Work is going to be different.<br />

We're not going to see<br />

the collegiality of the '60s<br />

and '70s or the income of<br />

the '80s again. There's<br />

nothing the School can do<br />

about it except to make<br />

sure students understand<br />

it. "<br />

-Robert Keller '58<br />

FALL <strong>1996</strong> STANFORD LAWYER 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!