Fall 1996 – Issue 50 - Stanford Lawyer - Stanford University
Fall 1996 – Issue 50 - Stanford Lawyer - Stanford University
Fall 1996 – Issue 50 - Stanford Lawyer - Stanford University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Moot (ourt<br />
Justice Breyer Heads<br />
Kirkwood Bench<br />
Judges Archer, Rich, and Newman with 2Ls Giddings and Kuo<br />
Hons. Norris '54, Breyer, and Werdegar at <strong>Stanford</strong><br />
Justice Stephen Breyer<br />
(AB '59) of the United<br />
States Supreme Court<br />
presided over the School's<br />
<strong>1996</strong> moot court finals, the<br />
Marion Rice Kirkwood<br />
Competition, on May 3 in<br />
Kresge Auditorium.<br />
While at <strong>Stanford</strong>, the<br />
High Court justice also<br />
gave a talk to students attending<br />
the Law School's<br />
annual Board of Visitorssponsored<br />
lL Dinner (see<br />
page 17).<br />
Justice Breyer was<br />
joined for the moot court<br />
competition by Judge<br />
William A. Norris '54 of<br />
the U.S. Ninth Circuit<br />
Court of Appeals and Justice<br />
Kathryn Mickle Werdegar<br />
of the California<br />
Supreme Court.<br />
This year's finals pitted<br />
a 2L team against a 3L<br />
team. Ultimately, secondyears<br />
Ara Lovitt and Colin<br />
Moran were adjudged the<br />
best team of advocates;<br />
Lovitt also won the Walter<br />
J. Cummings Award for<br />
Best Oral Advocate.<br />
Third-years Alan Smith<br />
and Diane Kelleher were<br />
awarded the Walter J.<br />
Cummings Award for Best<br />
Brief.<br />
As finalists in the yearlong<br />
moot court program,<br />
both teams also received<br />
Mr. and Mrs. Duncan L.<br />
Matteson, Sr. Awards.<br />
Members of the Moot<br />
Court Board receive recognition<br />
in the form of Lawrason<br />
Driscoll Moot Court<br />
Awards. _<br />
Intellectual Property<br />
<strong>Stanford</strong> Shines in National<br />
Moot Competition<br />
Two <strong>Stanford</strong> law students-Bart<br />
Giddings<br />
and Erica Kuo-bested<br />
nearly <strong>50</strong> other teams nationwide<br />
to place second in<br />
the national Giles Sutherland<br />
Rich Moot Court<br />
Competition last April in<br />
Washington, D.C. Sponsored<br />
by the American<br />
Intellectual Property Law<br />
Association, the annual<br />
competition is school-blind,<br />
so that teams are judged<br />
without regard to the reputation<br />
of their respective institutions.<br />
Before proceeding to<br />
the national finals, Giddings<br />
and Kuo competed in<br />
the western regionals,<br />
where the <strong>Stanford</strong> 2Ls<br />
topped seven teams to win<br />
best brief, best team, and<br />
best oralist (Giddings).<br />
Their second-place win<br />
in the finals earned them<br />
the Association's Irving<br />
Marcus Award for <strong>1996</strong>.<br />
The judges for the final<br />
round included the influential<br />
Judge Rich for whom<br />
the competition was<br />
named, plus two other<br />
members of the First<br />
Circuit Court of Appeals:<br />
Glenn Archer, Jr., and<br />
Pauline Newman.<br />
Giddings and Kuo<br />
both came to law school<br />
with strong science backgrounds.<br />
Giddings has a<br />
PhD in biology from MIT,<br />
while Kuo followed undergraduate<br />
work at MIT<br />
with an MS from UC<br />
Berkeley in physical chemistry.<br />
At <strong>Stanford</strong>, they have<br />
been studying with intellectual<br />
property experts Paul<br />
Goldstein, William Baxter,<br />
and John Barton. "Bart<br />
and Erica showed great initiative<br />
in entering this competition,"<br />
says Prof. Goldstein.<br />
"We're very proud of<br />
their achievement." _<br />
26 STANFORD LAWYER FALL <strong>1996</strong>