18.04.2014 Views

Fall 1996 – Issue 50 - Stanford Lawyer - Stanford University

Fall 1996 – Issue 50 - Stanford Lawyer - Stanford University

Fall 1996 – Issue 50 - Stanford Lawyer - Stanford University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Moot (ourt<br />

Justice Breyer Heads<br />

Kirkwood Bench<br />

Judges Archer, Rich, and Newman with 2Ls Giddings and Kuo<br />

Hons. Norris '54, Breyer, and Werdegar at <strong>Stanford</strong><br />

Justice Stephen Breyer<br />

(AB '59) of the United<br />

States Supreme Court<br />

presided over the School's<br />

<strong>1996</strong> moot court finals, the<br />

Marion Rice Kirkwood<br />

Competition, on May 3 in<br />

Kresge Auditorium.<br />

While at <strong>Stanford</strong>, the<br />

High Court justice also<br />

gave a talk to students attending<br />

the Law School's<br />

annual Board of Visitorssponsored<br />

lL Dinner (see<br />

page 17).<br />

Justice Breyer was<br />

joined for the moot court<br />

competition by Judge<br />

William A. Norris '54 of<br />

the U.S. Ninth Circuit<br />

Court of Appeals and Justice<br />

Kathryn Mickle Werdegar<br />

of the California<br />

Supreme Court.<br />

This year's finals pitted<br />

a 2L team against a 3L<br />

team. Ultimately, secondyears<br />

Ara Lovitt and Colin<br />

Moran were adjudged the<br />

best team of advocates;<br />

Lovitt also won the Walter<br />

J. Cummings Award for<br />

Best Oral Advocate.<br />

Third-years Alan Smith<br />

and Diane Kelleher were<br />

awarded the Walter J.<br />

Cummings Award for Best<br />

Brief.<br />

As finalists in the yearlong<br />

moot court program,<br />

both teams also received<br />

Mr. and Mrs. Duncan L.<br />

Matteson, Sr. Awards.<br />

Members of the Moot<br />

Court Board receive recognition<br />

in the form of Lawrason<br />

Driscoll Moot Court<br />

Awards. _<br />

Intellectual Property<br />

<strong>Stanford</strong> Shines in National<br />

Moot Competition<br />

Two <strong>Stanford</strong> law students-Bart<br />

Giddings<br />

and Erica Kuo-bested<br />

nearly <strong>50</strong> other teams nationwide<br />

to place second in<br />

the national Giles Sutherland<br />

Rich Moot Court<br />

Competition last April in<br />

Washington, D.C. Sponsored<br />

by the American<br />

Intellectual Property Law<br />

Association, the annual<br />

competition is school-blind,<br />

so that teams are judged<br />

without regard to the reputation<br />

of their respective institutions.<br />

Before proceeding to<br />

the national finals, Giddings<br />

and Kuo competed in<br />

the western regionals,<br />

where the <strong>Stanford</strong> 2Ls<br />

topped seven teams to win<br />

best brief, best team, and<br />

best oralist (Giddings).<br />

Their second-place win<br />

in the finals earned them<br />

the Association's Irving<br />

Marcus Award for <strong>1996</strong>.<br />

The judges for the final<br />

round included the influential<br />

Judge Rich for whom<br />

the competition was<br />

named, plus two other<br />

members of the First<br />

Circuit Court of Appeals:<br />

Glenn Archer, Jr., and<br />

Pauline Newman.<br />

Giddings and Kuo<br />

both came to law school<br />

with strong science backgrounds.<br />

Giddings has a<br />

PhD in biology from MIT,<br />

while Kuo followed undergraduate<br />

work at MIT<br />

with an MS from UC­<br />

Berkeley in physical chemistry.<br />

At <strong>Stanford</strong>, they have<br />

been studying with intellectual<br />

property experts Paul<br />

Goldstein, William Baxter,<br />

and John Barton. "Bart<br />

and Erica showed great initiative<br />

in entering this competition,"<br />

says Prof. Goldstein.<br />

"We're very proud of<br />

their achievement." _<br />

26 STANFORD LAWYER FALL <strong>1996</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!