SAJC--report of inquiry into suitability of close associates - Portellos ...
SAJC--report of inquiry into suitability of close associates - Portellos ...
SAJC--report of inquiry into suitability of close associates - Portellos ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Inquiry <strong>into</strong> the <strong>suitability</strong> <strong>of</strong> certain <strong>close</strong> <strong>associates</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />
South Australian Jockey Club<br />
Report<br />
4.2 First round<br />
4.2.1 Brenton Wilkinson<br />
Mr Brenton Wayne Wilkinson was, at the time <strong>of</strong> examination, the acting chief<br />
executive <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SAJC</strong>, a position he had held since 5 December 2008. Mr<br />
Wilkinson had commenced with the <strong>SAJC</strong> in December 2002 in the capacity <strong>of</strong><br />
operations and facilities manager.<br />
As operations and facilities manager, Mr Wilkinson stated that he was essentially the<br />
second in charge to the chief executive and, while his principal responsibilities related<br />
to race day operations, his executive duties involved him in routine attendance at<br />
board meetings from the time <strong>of</strong> his appointment.<br />
The board chairs in his time had been Mr Peter Lewis and Mr John Naffine. Mr<br />
Wilkinson observed that the conduct <strong>of</strong> meetings was “very <strong>of</strong>ficial”. He understood<br />
that all the necessary formalities were attended to, and that the agenda was completed.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> the functionality <strong>of</strong> the board, Mr Wilkinson observed that there were<br />
sources <strong>of</strong> aggression principally relating to questions being asked by a group <strong>of</strong><br />
board members about the CEO’s employment contract. These queries were not<br />
answered, on Mr Wilkinson’s understanding, because the information was<br />
confidential and privileged—being confined to the board chair, his deputy and the<br />
chief executive.<br />
It was Mr Wilkinson’s opinion that the board was generally unified on questions <strong>of</strong><br />
broad strategy. In terms <strong>of</strong> day-to-day operations, there was a board policy that board<br />
members were not to engage staff except through the CEO or the operations and<br />
facilities manager, a protocol which was basically followed. In summary, Mr<br />
Wilkinson regarded the board as functional in its discharge <strong>of</strong> day-to-day operational<br />
matters.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> personalities, Mr Wilkinson accepted that some board members were<br />
more demanding than others for information in meetings. He accepted the suggestion<br />
that this might have arisen from some members being better briefed prior to the<br />
meeting than others. However, he noted that John Naffine as chairman had insisted on<br />
more details <strong>of</strong> projects being included in the plenary 7 papers presented to the board.<br />
Mr Wilkinson was asked about a strategic need to address a missing generation <strong>of</strong><br />
race goers. He responded that the issue had been discussed in marketing plans going<br />
back to mid-2006, with a number <strong>of</strong> initiatives put forward. When asked about any<br />
structured activity to recruit numbers <strong>of</strong> new members in September and October<br />
2008, Mr Wilkinson responded that there was nothing in the plenary papers about a<br />
membership drive in that period.<br />
Mr Wilkinson was asked whether any process existed within the <strong>SAJC</strong> to ascertain<br />
whether membership forms, and other materials provided to new members, formally<br />
7<br />
Mr Wilkinson explained that this was the internal language used to describe the covering<br />
paper presented to the board in support <strong>of</strong> an agenda item.<br />
13