19.04.2014 Views

SAJC--report of inquiry into suitability of close associates - Portellos ...

SAJC--report of inquiry into suitability of close associates - Portellos ...

SAJC--report of inquiry into suitability of close associates - Portellos ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Inquiry <strong>into</strong> the <strong>suitability</strong> <strong>of</strong> certain <strong>close</strong> <strong>associates</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

South Australian Jockey Club<br />

Report<br />

4.2 First round<br />

4.2.1 Brenton Wilkinson<br />

Mr Brenton Wayne Wilkinson was, at the time <strong>of</strong> examination, the acting chief<br />

executive <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> the <strong>SAJC</strong>, a position he had held since 5 December 2008. Mr<br />

Wilkinson had commenced with the <strong>SAJC</strong> in December 2002 in the capacity <strong>of</strong><br />

operations and facilities manager.<br />

As operations and facilities manager, Mr Wilkinson stated that he was essentially the<br />

second in charge to the chief executive and, while his principal responsibilities related<br />

to race day operations, his executive duties involved him in routine attendance at<br />

board meetings from the time <strong>of</strong> his appointment.<br />

The board chairs in his time had been Mr Peter Lewis and Mr John Naffine. Mr<br />

Wilkinson observed that the conduct <strong>of</strong> meetings was “very <strong>of</strong>ficial”. He understood<br />

that all the necessary formalities were attended to, and that the agenda was completed.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> the functionality <strong>of</strong> the board, Mr Wilkinson observed that there were<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> aggression principally relating to questions being asked by a group <strong>of</strong><br />

board members about the CEO’s employment contract. These queries were not<br />

answered, on Mr Wilkinson’s understanding, because the information was<br />

confidential and privileged—being confined to the board chair, his deputy and the<br />

chief executive.<br />

It was Mr Wilkinson’s opinion that the board was generally unified on questions <strong>of</strong><br />

broad strategy. In terms <strong>of</strong> day-to-day operations, there was a board policy that board<br />

members were not to engage staff except through the CEO or the operations and<br />

facilities manager, a protocol which was basically followed. In summary, Mr<br />

Wilkinson regarded the board as functional in its discharge <strong>of</strong> day-to-day operational<br />

matters.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> personalities, Mr Wilkinson accepted that some board members were<br />

more demanding than others for information in meetings. He accepted the suggestion<br />

that this might have arisen from some members being better briefed prior to the<br />

meeting than others. However, he noted that John Naffine as chairman had insisted on<br />

more details <strong>of</strong> projects being included in the plenary 7 papers presented to the board.<br />

Mr Wilkinson was asked about a strategic need to address a missing generation <strong>of</strong><br />

race goers. He responded that the issue had been discussed in marketing plans going<br />

back to mid-2006, with a number <strong>of</strong> initiatives put forward. When asked about any<br />

structured activity to recruit numbers <strong>of</strong> new members in September and October<br />

2008, Mr Wilkinson responded that there was nothing in the plenary papers about a<br />

membership drive in that period.<br />

Mr Wilkinson was asked whether any process existed within the <strong>SAJC</strong> to ascertain<br />

whether membership forms, and other materials provided to new members, formally<br />

7<br />

Mr Wilkinson explained that this was the internal language used to describe the covering<br />

paper presented to the board in support <strong>of</strong> an agenda item.<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!