20.04.2014 Views

Integrability of Nonlinear Systems

Integrability of Nonlinear Systems

Integrability of Nonlinear Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Nonlinear</strong> Waves, Solitons, and IST 23<br />

derivative <strong>of</strong> (4.18), i.e. operating on (4.18) by<br />

∂<br />

∂k = 1 ( ∂<br />

+ i ∂ )<br />

, and<br />

2 ∂k R ∂k I<br />

using, as we sometimes do, the notation G(x, y, k) to denote G(x, y, k R ,k I ) etc.,<br />

we find that<br />

∂G<br />

∂k (x, y, k) =sgn (−k R)<br />

e i(p0x+iq0y)<br />

2π<br />

(4.22a)<br />

G(x, y; −¯k) =G(x, y, k) exp(−i(p 0 x + q 0 y)) (4.22b)<br />

p 0 = −2k R , q 0 =4k R k I . (4.22c)<br />

We find that m satisfies the following ¯∂ equation,<br />

∂m<br />

∂k (x, y, k) =R(k R,k I )e ip0x+iq0y m(x, y, −¯k), (4.23)<br />

where R(k R ,k I ) plays the role <strong>of</strong> the scattering data, and is related to the potential<br />

via<br />

R(k R ,k I )= sgn (−k ∫∫<br />

R)<br />

u(x, y)m(x, y, k)e −ip0x−iq0y dx dy. (4.24)<br />

2π<br />

Thus, given an appropriate potential u(x, y) vanishing sufficiently fast at infinity<br />

(cf. [12]), the direct problem establishes relations (4.23)–(4.24). The inverse<br />

problem is fixed by giving R(k R ,k I ) (there are no discrete state solutions known<br />

which lead to real, nonsingular, decaying states for KPII) in order to determine<br />

m(x, y, k) and then u(x, y). The inverse problem is developed by using the<br />

generalized Cauchy integral formula (cf. [13]),<br />

m(x, y, k) = 1 ∫ ∫<br />

∂m ∧ d¯z<br />

(x, y, z)dz<br />

2πi R ∞<br />

∂¯z z − k + 1 ∫<br />

m(x, y, z)<br />

dz,<br />

2πi C ∞<br />

z − k<br />

(4.25)<br />

where R ∞ is the entire complex plane, C ∞ is a circular contour at infinity,<br />

z = z R + iz I , and dz ∧ d¯z =2idz R dz I .Ask →∞, we can establish that m ∼ 1,<br />

hence the second term on the right-hand side <strong>of</strong> (4.26) is unity. Using (4.23) we<br />

find that<br />

m(x, y, k) =1+ 1 ∫∫<br />

i(p0x+q0y) m(x, y, −¯z)<br />

R(z R ,z I )e dz ∧ d¯z. (4.26)<br />

2πi<br />

z − k<br />

Once m(x, y, k) is found, the potential is reconstructed from<br />

u(x, y) =− ∂ ( ∫∫ 2i<br />

∂x π<br />

)<br />

R(z R ,z I )e i(p0x+q0y) m(x, y, −¯z)dz R dz I . (4.27)<br />

The latter formula is obtained by comparing the limit as k →∞in (4.26) and<br />

(4.18).<br />

Finally, the time-dependence <strong>of</strong> the scattering data is shown from (4.1b) to<br />

be<br />

∂R<br />

∂t = −4i(k3 + ¯k 3 )R. (4.28)<br />

Thus, the IST framework for KPII is complete; namely at t = 0, u(x, y, 0)<br />

determines R(k R ,k I , 0); (4.28) gives R(k R ,k I ,t) and from (4.26)–(4.27) the eigenfunction<br />

m(x, y, t, k) and solution u(x, y, t) are obtained.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!