20.04.2014 Views

The Anthology

The Anthology

The Anthology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Anthology</strong><br />

48<br />

our work, 58 or to ask for information) he would also<br />

contact us by phone.<br />

It was repeatedly suggested to us that we would<br />

receive more precise information, and receive it<br />

continuously, if we could also send observers to the<br />

Police Administration Centre next to the Operational<br />

Corps. It was also suggested, for the same reason,<br />

that it would be expedient to use a “Unified Digital<br />

Radio” (TETRA Police Radio) set during our observations.<br />

We discarded both ideas, however, because<br />

they would have meant merging different constitutionally<br />

based functions. We are convinced that, in<br />

order to preserve the separation of the branches of<br />

state power, the Ombudsman and his staff should<br />

only be present in or next to the Operational Corps in<br />

extraordinary cases. 59<br />

<strong>The</strong> issue of the police radio (and we wish to stress<br />

that this is completely theoretical) raised serious<br />

questions to do with the safety of the observers.<br />

On the one hand, there is no doubt that in cases of<br />

trouble the police radio would have been the fastest<br />

way to ask for help. On the other hand, possessing<br />

a police radio set in a dangerous context in which<br />

there is animosity and aggression towards the police<br />

itself seemed to pose an unacceptable risk. And<br />

thirdly, and this was perfectly supported by practice,<br />

the police radio system, ensuring the possibility<br />

of precisely determining location, would not have<br />

served the success of our observations.<br />

For our very first inquiry, the Chief of the National<br />

Police appointed an officer of the police corps as<br />

the contact person; we were then in direct commu-<br />

58 One such instance was when we received information in<br />

this way about an event planned by a radical nationalist<br />

youth organisation on the evening of October 23, 2008; this<br />

group was armed and the police was to block them in the<br />

city, and this measure was likely to be interesting for us.<br />

59 Such extraordinary cases would include situations in which<br />

the bodily safety of the associates could not be ensured by<br />

other means, situations in which there was wide scope for<br />

street fights, or when information could not be acquired<br />

from any other source.<br />

nication with that officer, could ask him for all the<br />

information we needed in every situation, and could<br />

tell him immediately if we experienced a problem<br />

anywhere. To be very clear, we want to stress that<br />

the only way we exchanged any information with the<br />

police during any of the announced investigations<br />

was through this contact person. In addition, based<br />

on our experiences in these investigations, we can say<br />

that it was definitely unfortunate for us when it was<br />

the commander responsible for the safety and security<br />

of the event who was also appointed as our contact<br />

person, because his ability to give us information<br />

was then naturally limited due to his own executive<br />

tasks. 60<br />

<strong>The</strong> designated contact person received precise<br />

information about our movements, including which<br />

of us would participate in which event and when, 61<br />

in almost every case. It was obviously a priority to<br />

ensure that the observation should in no way disturb<br />

or obstruct police measures (especially the dispersion<br />

of the crowd or the use of coercion). It was also very<br />

important that, aside from what was required for<br />

the concerns of the inquiry, our presence not create<br />

further tasks for the police or, as they put it, that we<br />

should “take care of yourselves and not make trouble”.<br />

In the interest of fully observing these priorities,<br />

we tried to respect all the security recommendations<br />

given to us by the police. And we kept our contact<br />

person informed about our accurate location except<br />

when it seemed expedient to carry out the observation<br />

without disclosing who we were. 62<br />

As a general rule, we received all the information<br />

about a given event that was necessary for our obser-<br />

60 This only happened once, when the Ombudsman requested<br />

information directly from the chief of the national police<br />

headquarters.<br />

61 It was quite simple to identify us, and for the police to<br />

inform us about safety measures, because the members of<br />

our inquiry team (3 or 4 people), as well as the staff of the<br />

Operational Corps, are permanent staff members.<br />

62 We only did this three times during our inquiries.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!