21.04.2014 Views

TECHNOLOGY FORESIGHT SUMMIT - Unido

TECHNOLOGY FORESIGHT SUMMIT - Unido

TECHNOLOGY FORESIGHT SUMMIT - Unido

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

70 Technology Foresight Summit<br />

hazards or accidents involving GMO or its products must be reported to the<br />

Ministry of Environment. According to the GMO Act, public participation in<br />

decision-making on matters involving GMO is conducted by participation of<br />

two members representing NGO organizations in the GMO Commission with<br />

full access to all information.<br />

The predominant opinion among biotech industry and research community<br />

is that EU regulations and also Poland domestic regulations on GMO utilization<br />

are very restrictive, based on unproved assumptions and voluntarily<br />

use of precautionary principle. In effect these factors severely hamper technological<br />

progress in Europe with serious consequences for the future. Despite<br />

some small signs that the acceptance of modern biotechnology in Europe is<br />

slowly increasing there is little hope for a real breakthrough in the near future.<br />

All elements of National Biosafety Framework elaborated in Poland, the<br />

biosafety policy, regulations and decision-making mechanisms are already<br />

implemented incorporating the essential provisions of EU respective regulations<br />

as well as the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on<br />

Biological Diversity. Similar situation is found in other countries of the CEE<br />

region, which are going to be member states of EU, especially in eight socalled<br />

accession countries.<br />

The Environmental Protection Act was amended in July 1997 and was followed<br />

by the new act “On Genetically Modified Organisms” which entered into<br />

force on 26 October 2001. Future trends in Poland will be highly dependent<br />

on tendencies in the EU but in NIS countries the development might be different<br />

and a more liberal approach to utilization of gene technologies in agriculture<br />

and industry will be taken.<br />

Comments on the presentations and debate<br />

Prof. Marc Van Montagu (Belgium): “Plant Biotechnology for Developing<br />

Countries. What Is Needed and What Can Be Done?”, one of the pioneers of<br />

this field, started with an overview of the achievements of plant biotechnology,<br />

what are the main GM crops already in production, what developments<br />

are in the pipeline, and what are the foreseeable possibilities in the<br />

future. Based on his personal experience he emphasized the significance of<br />

GM crops especially for the third world. This is a contentious issue because<br />

the opponents of GM-technology frequently say that GM crops offer no<br />

advantage for the developing countries, they benefit only the multinational<br />

companies that develop and sell the seeds. The speaker expounded the view<br />

that this should not be the case.<br />

Developing countries must develop their own GM-varieties, according to<br />

their specific needs (Mexico and China were cited as positive examples), train<br />

their own specialists (in this, the developed countries can help a lot), and<br />

help the farmers in the appropriate use of the technology. If the European<br />

countries want to help the third world, they should stop heavily subsidizing<br />

their agriculture instead of opposing GM-technology.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!