26.04.2014 Views

Lake George Watershed Lake Steward Program End of Season ...

Lake George Watershed Lake Steward Program End of Season ...

Lake George Watershed Lake Steward Program End of Season ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DRAFT<br />

Norowal Marina and Mossy Point were the launches with the highest rate <strong>of</strong> traffic. <strong>Steward</strong>s<br />

had been located at these two marinas for the past two years, for this very reason. However,<br />

this year Dunham’s Bay was added on as a third major marina location. We thought it would<br />

have a similarly high traffic level. Based on these numbers, it actually appears to be the<br />

second slowest launch location. These results are based on the assumption that the <strong>Lake</strong><br />

<strong>Steward</strong> spent the same amount <strong>of</strong> time, 8 hours, each day at each location. This is most<br />

likely not the case, as weather and occasional personal conflicts would sometimes affect the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> hours spent at a location. However, most <strong>of</strong> the time the <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Steward</strong>s were at a<br />

launch for 8 hours each day.<br />

Time <strong>of</strong> year could also affect these results, especially for the launches that the <strong>Lake</strong><br />

<strong>Steward</strong>s spent only a few days at. Some launches could be busy in July and not in August,<br />

while it could be the opposite for others. There is no way to correct for such seasonality in<br />

this data. We have to rely on local knowledge and coordination with marina owners to work<br />

out such fine details.<br />

We had also selected Dunham’s Bay since users must pass under a bridge to reach the lake,<br />

which limits the size <strong>of</strong> the boat that can be launched there. We thought that since smaller<br />

boats would most likely be trailered greater distance than larger boats, this marina might<br />

get more traffic from farther away, increasing the risk <strong>of</strong> the spread <strong>of</strong> an invasive species.<br />

28 samples were removed from 13 boats at Dunham’s Bay, for a total <strong>of</strong> 11 identified<br />

invasive species. This was the third highest number <strong>of</strong> invasive specimens removed from a<br />

launch. There are many more launch locations on <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>George</strong> than we can find funding for<br />

a steward for, so launches need to be prioritized in some way. This data about launch traffic<br />

rates will help us prioritize launch locations for 2009.<br />

Where are the boats coming from?<br />

2,489 boats were inspected that had been in 159 different waterbodies in 19 different<br />

states. <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>George</strong> itself was the most common previously visited body <strong>of</strong> water at 1,770.<br />

After that, the Hudson River was the most common, with 89 boats (figure 3). New York was<br />

the state with the most waterbodies at 56, while Massachusetts was second at 19 and New<br />

Jersey was third at 18 (figure 4).<br />

Waterbody<br />

Most Common Previously Vistited Waterbodies<br />

for all Launches (excluding LG)<br />

L o ng Is la nd S o und (NY )<br />

G re e nw o o d L a ke (NY )<br />

C a ndle w o o d L a ke (C T)<br />

C o nne c tic ut R iv e r (C T)<br />

S c hro o n L a ke (NY )<br />

S a c a nda ga L a ke (NY )<br />

S a ra to ga L a ke (NY )<br />

L a ke C ha mpla in (NY )<br />

Atla ntic O c e a n<br />

L a ke Ho pa tc o ng (NJ )<br />

Huds o n R iv e r (NY )<br />

22<br />

22<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

47<br />

51<br />

52<br />

54<br />

89<br />

0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Boats<br />

Figure 3: Most common previously visited waterbodies.<br />

56<br />

# <strong>of</strong> Previously Visited Waterbodies by State<br />

1 11<br />

11 1<br />

9<br />

3 2 2 2 4<br />

Figure 4: Number <strong>of</strong> waterbodies by state.<br />

18<br />

7<br />

2<br />

8<br />

12<br />

19<br />

New Jers ey<br />

Rhode Is land<br />

Connec tic ut<br />

Mas s ac hus etts<br />

New Hamps hire<br />

V ermont<br />

Maine<br />

North Carolina<br />

Mary land<br />

Mic higan<br />

Florida<br />

Penns ly v ania<br />

Illinois<br />

Tennes s ee<br />

Ohio<br />

Delaw are<br />

Ontario<br />

Quebec<br />

New Y ork<br />

10 <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>George</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Steward</strong> <strong>Program</strong> <strong>End</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Season</strong> Report 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!