29.04.2014 Views

II - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

II - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

II - National Criminal Justice Reference Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(j. "\<br />

~,<br />

If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov.<br />

'{4'<br />

1,1<br />

" )~<br />

o<br />

NaJloflal <strong>Criminal</strong> <strong>Justice</strong> <strong>Reference</strong> <strong>Service</strong><br />

nCJrs<br />

This microfiche was produced from documentS received for<br />

inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise<br />

control over the physical condition of the documents submitted,<br />

the individual f~ame quality will vary. Thec;.resolution chart on<br />

this frame may be used t evaluate the' document quality.<br />

~ ,;:<br />

'-1k<br />

, ,.J::J"<br />

'",<br />

MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART<br />

,NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A<br />

,~:<br />

,<br />

~ "<br />

.; .<br />

'.;:,";:.;;:,-<br />

..<br />

~<br />

nD<br />

'I<br />

:' UJ~.<br />

.r.<br />

~t of Justicf. .<br />

Natiunallnstitute 6f Justic;;e·<br />

Publications of the ...<br />

,(~:,r,;···<br />

i.'<br />

<strong>National</strong> Institu~<br />

of JustiCe<br />

1980 Supplement<br />

--------------------------------------~'~-----------------.-------------------<br />

A Comprebemive<br />

BibUograpby<br />

J<br />

;b~-4~:;~~<br />

~ '. ,<br />

J' • -~~ I<br />

) Q::<br />

"<br />

; (<br />

\<br />

Microfilming procedures used to create this fiche comply ,with<br />

the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504.<br />

(;"<br />

' .. !.l''l..;,<br />

Points of view or opinions stated in this document ar~;"'~ ;;<br />

those of the author(s) and do not represeri! the official<br />

pOSition or policies of the U. S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong>.<br />

't<br />

J~<br />

.'<br />

Ii<br />

"<br />

l~:<br />

<strong>National</strong> Institute of <strong>Justice</strong><br />

United States Qepartment ofJ~stic,e<br />

Washington~ [J~' C. 20531 '<br />

t1 ~,<br />

10/14/82<br />

). If"


;i<br />

• ~


,'j.<br />

\,'--<br />

~I<br />

()<br />

l<br />

l'<br />

TABLE 9FCONTENTS<br />

I<br />

J ' ,<br />

' fl! '" r ••••••••••• V<br />

I nt,rod,UCtiOn , ••• I I, I ... I I. I I. ',~"t'"<br />

~It~". In'<br />

! • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • <strong>II</strong><br />

I... , • Ii ••• /I •••••••••• I,'V<br />

I I. I<br />

How ' ' Th Documents~ " ••••••••••••••••••• 1<br />

"1'10 Obtain 818 ..... .:) "


'I.<br />

I .<br />

, I<br />

:.JM, \} ':,',<br />

j ... , ,i' .', ',H_e' ;.;~~:' >" ' .. '" ;."<br />

, ,<br />

• " ~ !<br />

c<br />

<strong>II</strong><br />

I)<br />

("<br />

LJ<br />

<strong>II</strong><br />

. )<br />

'/'<br />

,<br />

',\<br />

INTRODUOTION<br />

,.-;:,<br />

,,' . ~<br />

"<br />

.-<br />

," '<br />

q.,<br />

\<br />

I ,<br />

", I<br />

" Th,ls vC)lume IS t~ secOnd ann~aI s~ppl~U"8nt to Pllb/leationsat the Nationa//n;titute of<br />

JI!.t/cs*, a ,comprehen$IVe blbIlogr~y pUbll$t1ed in 1~7e to provide criminal justice<br />

prof",nals .W.1th a ,key to researct)" $PQnsored and publlahedby' the <strong>National</strong> Institute<br />

d, urlog Its,' fI, rat, dec,',' ,ada. Thlt suppktrnen, t .contai,n";\;1l8,··-)iQ!",~ for docu~ents publlshid In, 19, 79<br />

"JlJ1ddlstributed prlrnarlly through the U.S, Gove'nm~t, Printing 'Offi~or ttle <strong>National</strong><br />

Criml"aI <strong>Justice</strong> <strong>Reference</strong> <strong>Service</strong>. A small number of/such documents published prior to<br />

\",~~}: 1979 are alao cited.<br />

. '<br />

T~ .cIt8tions Bfa <strong>II</strong>steCt In Part I In alphabetical ort,jer by title. A complete bibliographic<br />

cltation!Jlyallablli!Ylnfo[llp.!!Cm, @n~~~.@,tr@9!,-",prQvJflfJd fg' each publication. Subject and<br />

_uthOr Ind~~es are apperKJed. , " ,<br />

,,-d/ o· •<br />

Part <strong>II</strong> contains listings of several specialized types of publications:<br />

• Program Models and Prescriptive Packages --- Compilations of the most successful<br />

approaches being used to address particular criminal justice problems.<br />

• Test Designs - Detailed sPecifications for field testing program strategies In varied<br />

·settlngs to assess effectlvelless and transfBrabllity. . <strong>II</strong>'<br />

• Exemplary Projects-Ou18tandlng loc.lcrin'llm~I'justlce projects suitable ,for adaptation<br />

In Qther communities. '<strong>II</strong><br />

• <strong>National</strong> Evaluation Program - Pr.-ctlcallnformatlon on the effectiveness, cost, and<br />

problems of certain wldfJly I.l~ criminal justice programs.<br />

• Selected BibliOgraPhies - TC)pIcal bibliographies that reflect current Interests and<br />

developments In law enforcement and criminal justice.<br />

Infatmatlon 00 how to obt81n the documents cited may be found on the folloy/lng page .<br />

()<br />

..<br />

'v''<br />

" .<br />

' ..<br />

"<br />

"<br />

".<br />

"<br />

• PubNc.tIoIJ. of the N.tIonal In.tltut.o' l.,<strong>II</strong>w Entorc,,,,,ntand Crimln.' Justlc~: A Comprehensive Bibliography<br />

(HCJ 48700): ~ Publlc.tIons of~. N.tI()<strong>II</strong>" In.tltUteof LAlw Enforc.",.nt and Crimln.' <strong>Justice</strong>: A Oomprehenlive<br />

BlbIJo~,.phy-1878 Sl!pple/ne~t (NCJ 57981). A limited number of copl.s of ",.~ document. are available<br />

wIthoUt charge from NCJRS. CopIes may alOC) be purch.18d from the Glov.mment Printing Office.<br />

v<br />

11<br />

,/<br />

,<br />

" '<br />

,"<br />

,,' , »-'-" ~ " •<br />

i<br />

. .<br />

.,<br />

.. ,.'i


"1 C<br />

,,' ¢.<br />

c<br />

')<br />

c,<br />

"<br />

=--~=.<br />

'.::.:<br />

, 'r<br />

. INTRODUCTION<br />

A~) U ",,/='<br />

If t . I<br />

'0<br />

.'. ' •<br />

,"<br />

This volume Is ttj~ second annual supplement to Publications of the Natlomj./lnstltute of<br />

<strong>Justice</strong> *. a comprehensive bibliography .. published in ~ ..97e to provide criminal justice<br />

profeeslonals with a key to .re$8arch spgnsored and publis.hed bY the Natj(malln~tltute<br />

during Ita first de.cade. fhl' supplement contalnscit~tioi1sfor d9Cuments publi$hec;t in 1979<br />

, and dlltrlbu,ed primarily through ~he U.S. ~.O'lernment Printing Office or ,the <strong>National</strong><br />

.Crlmlnal <strong>Justice</strong> <strong>Reference</strong> Servi~8~"A small number of such documents published prior to<br />

1979 are also clted~ C'<br />

o.<br />

The clt,~ions are listed In Part I in alphabetipal ord~r by)itle. A co.rhplete bibliographic<br />

clt4ltlon: availability Info,rmatlon, and abstract are Ptovide~"lor e~ch pul,)licatlon. Subje~t and<br />

v author Indexes are apPended.<br />

, I<br />

, ,<br />

(;<br />

1/<br />

,:.. ,<br />

J,<br />

"<br />

()<br />

. Part <strong>II</strong> contains listings of several specialized types of publications: ,<br />

". PrOQram Models and Prescriptive Packages..,.,. Compil4ltions 9f .themost successful<br />

approaches being used to address particular criminal justice problems. "<br />

<strong>II</strong> T,8t Deslpns -:- Det~U,d specifications for field testing program strategies in varied<br />

settings to assess,effectlvene-M anc;t transferability.<br />

. c.'<br />

<strong>II</strong> Exemplary Projects-Outstanding locill{:riminal justice proj~ts suitable for adaptation<br />

In other cQmm",nitles." . c.. ,,'"<br />

411 <strong>National</strong> Evaluation Program .;....Practical information on.the effectiveness, cost, and<br />

.problems of certain widely used criminal justic~ programs. .<br />

.Select~ Blbliographle§ - Topical bibliographies that reflect current int,erests and<br />

davelopmentsin law enforcement and criminal ,justice.<br />

Inforr~atlon on how to obtain the doc~ments cited may be found on the following page.<br />

o<br />

" , I:'<br />

if'<br />

" ~:<br />

~;"<br />

~) ,<br />

• Publication. of the fo/at/.pniilln.tJtute of Law Enforceiftent and <strong>Criminal</strong> <strong>Justice</strong>: A Co,mprehenslve Bibliography<br />

(Nc.J 4~700): and Put,llcatlolJlJ of the <strong>National</strong>ln,tJtute of Law Enforcement ,and Orimlmll <strong>Justice</strong>: A Cpmprehen­<br />

" .We Blbllopraphy-1979'Supplement (NCJ ~7987):':'>" <strong>II</strong>",lted number of copies of the,. ~()Cum,n'e area\(~lIable'<br />

(\ wlthol.lt charge from NcJF'S. CopIes may also:be purc~ from the Govemment Prlntlnlll OffIce. ,<br />

, .<br />

I'<br />

tj , ,. ~ ~'"" '\<br />

~P<strong>II</strong>CIdinI _c~I.' i<br />

, ".... ,t f •. ~ ... .L.~- '•. ~ ....._,." • ,t.". • 1<br />

v<br />

,\<br />

I)'<br />

,',


i;<br />

-f q<br />

,;»1°<br />

:_~1/<br />

%'~'"<br />

(/<br />

o<br />

I) •.<br />

I;;<br />

!)<br />

,-


. '~""....,."....,.,..,."..0"":,...,...,.,·<br />

'~"'~~;r"'''''-.,.-=...,..""""..,...,.."."<br />

... ~"'"'~-,-, -,-,-,"""~',"""'-~~~~<br />

I,)'<br />

J!<br />

'~',<br />

,tlb<br />

,<br />

(;<br />

(I ~<br />

"<br />

o<br />

ii'<br />

"<br />

<strong>II</strong><br />

o<br />

If<br />

f -<br />

':\<br />

;;.<br />

'I'<br />

""<br />

r-f"<br />

,:;", '::J<br />

I<br />

./<br />

"<br />

.:~. ~~~<br />

.~--<br />

._~.;c-~~~;~-­<br />

11:<br />

c<br />

,~<br />

""1,,,<br />

,J~!<br />

ii,<br />

L<br />

...-~",,:,<br />

,\<br />

i,<br />

//<br />

If<br />

<strong>II</strong><br />

i'<br />

"<br />

<strong>II</strong> "<br />

r/<br />

I'<br />

il<br />

"<br />

:.'ct"<br />

~I,<br />

,.<br />

,~<br />

;~~;1~i~~;;·1:;!'· ,<br />

.(<br />

;;~ ~1-'<br />

. ~ ,'" :/)<br />

\\ I<br />

~<br />

~'<br />

;<br />

<strong>II</strong>,<br />

,9<br />

p ~.<br />

!/<br />

,/j "<br />

ii,<br />

. "<br />

,P<br />

fj·<br />

,,'<br />

'I<br />

Ji<br />

, r.:'·:<br />

;/<br />

()<br />

q,<br />

"'",


".' ><br />

reI",,!,<br />

..,. 'e :<br />

a\\"<br />

.~ '; )<br />

~I' ., ':<br />

',I<br />

!I<br />

~, I<br />

'J<br />

i<br />

, .. ,<br />

: .. ".', J.<br />

q, '~<br />

'.<br />

-- -' ~.~.;:-'~' (ir<br />

~'~i<br />

, , ~<br />

< ~1<br />

J ~ ....<br />

~~, !.<br />

...-r!<br />

" ';'<br />

Jfn:l< ' -,'<br />

',:.<br />

PUBLICATIONS OF THENIJ<br />

If';<br />

. .,:;<br />

'~';.:~,<br />

. ~ """.,<br />

1. AFFIRMAnve ACTION IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.<br />

NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE, BOX<br />

6000, ROCKVILLE MD 20850. 1(; p. 1979. HCH11~'<br />

tHE RELATIONSHIP OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT<br />

LAWS TO THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IS DISCUSSED, IN·<br />

CLUDING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAMS, BARRIERS TO<br />

CHAlroE, AND ESTABLISHM/:NT OF GOALS AND GRIEVANCE<br />

PROCEDURES. THE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY<br />

ACT OF 1972 MAY BE THE MOST .IMPORTANT LAW AFFECT·<br />

ING JOB DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE IT SPECIFIES THAT<br />

RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, AND NATIONAL ORIGIN<br />

CANNOT BE FACTORS IN EMPLOYMENT. FOR CRIMINAL JUS­<br />

TICE AGENCIES, HOWEVER, ADDITIONAL PROHIBITIONS BAR·<br />

RING DISCRIMINATION WERE WRITTEN INTO THE 1973 OMNI·<br />

BUS CRIME CONTROL· AND SAFE STREETS Ar:i.BASED ON<br />

THIS ACT, THE LElIA EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY<br />

PROGRAMS REQUIRE THAT THE MAKEUP OF THE POPULA·<br />

TION SERVED MUST BE REFI.ECTED 'IN THE EQUAL-EMPLOY·<br />

MENT OPPORTUNITY EFFORTS OF A GRANTEE.IMPLEMEN.<br />

TATION. DIFFICULTIES ARE lilGHLIGHTED BY EXCERPTS<br />

FROM SEVERAL NEWS STORIES. BARRIERS TO AFFIRMATIVE<br />

AOTION PROGRAMS FALL INTO THREE GROUPS: ORGANIZA·<br />

TIONAL BARRIERS WITHIN THE AGENCY, MANAGERIAL BAR·<br />

RIERS WITHIN INDIVIDUAL MANAGERS, AND INTRAPER·<br />

SONAL BARRIERS, I.E., BARRIERS WITHIN MINORITIES AND<br />

WqMEN THEMSELVES. IDEAS FOR OVERCOMING EACH TYPE<br />

OF BARRIER ARE LISTED. SUGGESTIONS FOR DESIGNING<br />

AND IMP~EMENTING AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN IN·<br />

ClUDE 1'~E FOLLOWING ,STEPS: DEVELOP OR REAFFIRM<br />

THE POLICY TO ELIMINATE DISCRIMINATORY SYSTEMS, DIS·<br />

SEMINATe THI;-~LICY WITHIN THE ORGANIZATION AND TO<br />

OUTSIDE ORtiA"NIZAi1\>.NS, ASSIGN RESPONSIBILITY TO 1M·<br />

PLEMENT TH~ POLICY 70 THE C~OEF EXECUTIVE AND AN AF·<br />

FIRMATIVE ACTION OFFICER, PEFOtiM A"l.mLIZATION ANAL·<br />

YSIS, IDENTIFY PROBI£M AREAS, ESTM,LlSH GOALS AND TI·<br />

METABLES, PERFORM AN INTERNAL A~OIT, ORGANIZE ARE·<br />

PORTING SYSTEM,ANO PFtOVIDE EMrlLOYEES WITH GRIEV·<br />

ANCE PROCEDURES, GRAPHS AND t, LIST OF RESOURCE<br />

AGf;NCIES ARE INCLUDED.<br />

~ Not..: GENERAL INFORMATION PAMPHLET.<br />

<strong>II</strong>poMorfnfI ~: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTiCe LEM NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE,833 INDIANA AVENUE 1fN, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Avl<strong>II</strong>Iaib<strong>II</strong>Ity: GPO Siock Order No. 0270000.()()849-6: NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM, NCJRS.'<br />

1<br />

2. ALTERNATIVES TO ItmlTUTIONAUZATIOH-A DEFINITIVE<br />

BlILIOGRAPHY. J. A. BRANTLEY end M. KRAVITZ, Eda.<br />

NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE, BO)(<br />

8000, RockvILLE MD 20850, 253 p, 1979. MCJ.5I51.<br />

ALL OF THE LITEHATURE IN THE NATIONAL CRIMltML JUS­<br />

TICE REF.ERENCE SERVICE DATA BASE (OVER 2,~100 EN·<br />

TRIES) CONCERNING THE BROAD SUBJECT OF AL:TERNA·<br />

TIVES TO INSTITUTIONALIZATION ARE CITED IN TH<strong>II</strong>S BIB·<br />

LIOGRAPHY. THE BIBLIOGRAPHV,IN FACT, DOCUMENl'S THE<br />

DIVERSE NATURE Of. ALTE~NA1ii<strong>II</strong>!S TO<br />

INSTITUTIONALIZATION, ,ALL DESIGNED TO VOID, MINIMize,<br />

HALT, OR SUSPEND PENETRATION INTO T' "ClIMINAL ':.IS-<br />

TICE SYSTEM. THE MATERIALS FRESENTELt ',,':' _.:FINI·<br />

TIVE BIBLIOGRAPHY PERTAIN TO JUVENILt. TRAINING<br />

SCHOOLS, PRERELEASE CF.NTERS, HALr'"WAY HOUSES,<br />

WORK·RELEASE PROGRAMS, RESTITUTION, WEEKEND SEN·<br />

TENCING, COMMUNITY SERVICE ORDERS, GROU? AND<br />

FOSTER HOMES, AND PROBATION AND PAROLE. BAIL AND<br />

F,JELEASE ON RECOGNIZANCE ARE INCLUDED WHEN THEY<br />

ARE USED AS A MEANS FO::' AVOIDING INCARCEF:ATION.<br />

THE CIT~TIONS ARE ANNOTATEUAND PRESENTED IN AL·<br />

PHABETICAL ORDER BY TITLE. PUBLICATION OATES RANGE<br />

PRIMARILY FROM 1972 TO 1978. THE INTRODUCTION SUM·<br />

MARIZES THE :-tISTORICAL SEARCH FOR SUITABLE ALTER·<br />

NATIVES TO INSTITUTIONALIZATION. AUTHOR AND SUBJECT<br />

INDEXES ARE APPENDED AND INFORMATION ABOUT SALES<br />

SOURCES AND MICROFICHE AVAILABILITY IS PROVIDED.<br />

8ponIoriI1g Agencv: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 833 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

AVailability: GPO Slotk Order No. 027·000'()o820-8: NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM. NCJRS.<br />

3. ANTICORRUPTION 8TRA11l0Y FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.<br />

Iy T. FLETCHER, P. GORDON, and S. HE~LL SRI IN·<br />

TERNATIONAL, 333 RAVENSWOOD AVENUE~ MF.NLO PARK CA<br />

94025.67 p. 1970. HCJ·fil524<br />

THIS REPORT DESCRIBES A COUNTERCORRUPTION STRAT·<br />

EGY THAT CAN~~ IMPLEMENTED BY CITY ADMINISTRATORS<br />

TO MONITOR THE:'p,ERF'ORMANCE OF EMPLOYEES AND TO<br />

INCREASE UNDERSr~'~DING OF WHAT CONSTITUTES COR·<br />

RUPTION AND HOW TO>~VOID IT. THE PROGRAM SUGGEST·<br />

ED HERE IS BASED ol"htH.~FO~LOWING HYPOTHESES: (1)<br />

THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF'AN OPPORTUNITY FOR CORRUP·<br />

TION IS INVERSELV PROPORtiONAL TO ITS VISIBILITY: (2)<br />

THE ATTAACTIVENESS·OF AN Or?ORTUNITY FOR CORRUp·<br />

" ..<br />

\\"<br />

, "~"\<br />

,<br />

"<br />

, .,<br />

.<br />

,.<br />

"<br />

(


"<br />

ARSON<br />

PUBLICATIONS<br />

OF THE NIJ<br />

CATALOG<br />

,<br />

TION IS LIKELY TO DROP AS MORE dFFICIALS BECOME AC.<br />

TUALLY OR POTENTIALLY INVOLVEDj AND (3) THE OPPORTU.<br />

NITY FOR AN OFFICIAL TO ENGAGE IN A CORRUPT ACT WILL<br />

BE INCREASED BY STRUCTURES THAT INCREASE AUTON.<br />

OMY, PROVIDE VAGUE DECISION RULES, OR POSE MINIMAL<br />

RISKS (LIMITED DETECTION CAPABILITIES OR LIGHT SANC.<br />

TION POLICIES). THE APPROACH PROPOSED USES MANAGE.<br />

MENT CONTROL, AUDIT PROCEDURES, TRAINING, AND IN.<br />

VESTIGATION, WITH A MANAGEMENT TEAM TO SEE THAT<br />

ALL THESE FUNCTIONS WORK TOGETHER AND WORK PROP.<br />

ERLY. THE COMBINATION IS CALLED AIMS, FOR<br />

ACCOI,INTAI3!LlTY.INTEGRITY.MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. THE<br />

PROPOSEDSYSrEM CAN BE USED FOR ALL OF THOSE IN<br />

THE PUBLIC EMPLOY, BUT IS AIMED PARTICULARLY AT<br />

THOSE IN STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (WHETHER<br />

ELECTED, APPOINTED, OR HIRED) AND WHETHER THEY<br />

WISH "0 ADOPT 'THE PROGRAM FROM THE TOP OF THE OR.<br />

GANIZATION OR AT MIDLEVEL THE PURPOSE OF THE<br />

SYSTEM IS TO ENSURE ACCOUNTABILITY (RESPONSIBILITY<br />

FOR CONDUCT AND OBLIGATIONS) AND INTEGRITY (TRUST.<br />

WORTHINESS AND PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY). THE ETHICAL<br />

BASIS FOR THE HANDBOOK IS PRESENTED, ALONG WITH<br />

INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO INSTALL AN AIMS SYSTEM, HOW<br />

TO ESTABLISH MANAGEMENT CONTROL, AN AUDIT CON.<br />

TROL, TRAINING, AND AN INVESTIGATIVE ARM. POTENTIAL<br />

OBSTACLES ARE IDENTIFIED At'::J SUGGESTIONS ARE GIVEN<br />

ON HOW TO DEAL WITH THEM. AN APPENDIX PROVIDES A<br />

CHART OF THE RANGE OF CONCERNS ENCOMPASSED BY<br />

'ETHICS AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE.' REFERENCES ARE IN.<br />

CLUDED.<br />

~ Acency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA.<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JIJ.§JICE, 833 INDIANA AVENuE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

, '"AVIiIiab!I!ty: GPO Siock Order No. 027.()()()~j NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

4. ARSOH-A 8lLECTED 81BUOORAAAY. J. T. DUNCAN, M.<br />

CAPLAN, and M. KRAVITZ, Eda. NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUS­<br />

TICE REFERENCE SERVICE, BOX 6000, ROCKVILLE MD 20850.<br />

69 p. 1979. NCJ.5I3GCI<br />

ARSON-THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE PROBLEM,<br />

PROACTIVE MEASURES AND CONTROLS TO PREVENT<br />

ARSON, AND ReACTJVE MEASURES AND CONTROLS ON<br />

ARsoN CRIMES-IS THE ',zOOUS OF THIS BIBLlOGAAPHY<br />

WITH ABSTRACTS. ARSON, ',THE WILLFUL ANC, MALICIOUS<br />

BURNING OF PROPERTY, HAS INCREASED DRAMATICALLY IN<br />

RECENT YEARS. DATA PUBLISHED FOR THE YEARS<br />

1965·1975 REFLECT AN INCREASE IN INCENDIARY BUILDING<br />

FIRES OF 326 PERCENT. ARSON IS A DIFFICULT CRIME TO<br />

COMBAT. AN INVESTIGATION M'UST BE CONDUCTED EVEN<br />

BEFORE THE FACT CAN BE ESTABLISHED THAT ARSON WAS<br />

COMMITTED. ARSON CASES ARE CHARACTERIZED BY THE<br />

,LACK OF WITNESSES AND THE DEVASTATION OF THE CRIME<br />

SCENE AND VALUABLE EVIDENCE. MOTIVES FOR ~RSON<br />

ARE VARIED--oFTEN'REVENGE, SPITE, JEALOUSY, INTIMIDA.<br />

TION, AND CRIME CONCEALMENT-BUT MORE AND MORE,<br />

ARSON IS BEING COMMITTED BY PROFESSIONAL CRIMINALS<br />

FOR PROFIT. THE COST (S1.4 BILLION IN 1975) IS BORNE PRI.<br />

MARILY BY INSURANCE COMPANIES, BUT INDIRECTLY BY<br />

THE PUBLIC THAOUGH INCREASED INOURANCE RATES AND<br />

""XES. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS COMBATING ARSON<br />

WITH A VARIETY OF ACTIONS, ONE OF THE MOST NOTABLE<br />

BEING THE ADOITION OF ARSON TO THE SEVEN SERIOUS<br />

OFFENSES REPORTED IN THE FBI UNIFORM CF,lIME RE.<br />

PORTS IN,DEX. THIS BIBLIOGRAPHY FOCUSES ON ARSON<br />

AND PROVIDES LAW ENFORCEMENT PROFESSIONALS WITH<br />

A ,RESOURCE THAT HIGHLIGHTS THE METHODS USED TO<br />

PREVENT AND INVESTIGATE ARSON. THE 89 CITATIONS ARE<br />

,DIVIDED INTO THREE SECTIONS: (1) THE IMPACT OF ARSON<br />

.. AND STUDIES OF THE CHARACTERISTICS AND PSYC'HOLOGI.<br />

CAL PROFILES OF ARSONISTS; (2) ATTEMPTS TO PREVENT<br />

AND CONTROL ,f.RSON THROUGH SUCH STRATEGIES AS<br />

SPECIAL TASK FORCES, PATTERN ANALYSIS, AND INTER.<br />

AGENCY COOPERATION: AND (3) STUDIES OF ARSON INVES.<br />

TIGATIVE PROCEDURES AND FIRE SCENE ANALYSIS. ALL<br />

THE DOCUMENTS ARE SELECTED FROM THE NATIONAL<br />

CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE DATA BASE WITH<br />

PUBLICATION DATES BETWEEN 1975 AND 1979. INFORMA.<br />

TION ABOUT SALES SOURCES AND MICROFICHE AVAILABIL.<br />

ITY IS PROVIDED.<br />

Sponeortng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA.<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGl'ON, DC 20531.<br />

Av.lI.Ib<strong>II</strong>Ity: GPO Stock Order No. 027.()()().()(l822 ....: . NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM. NCJRS.<br />

'<br />

5. 8AWSTIC RES<strong>II</strong>TAHCE OF POLICE DOOY ARMOR-HILECJ<br />

(NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CAIMI.<br />

NAL JUSTICE) STANDARD. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE<br />

I.EAA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND<br />

CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON,<br />

DC 20531. 17 p. 1978. NCJ.474H<br />

THIS LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT STANDARD, AP.<br />

PROVED AND ISSUED ,BY THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW<br />

ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CONSISTS OF PER.<br />

FORMANCE AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS AS WELL AS A DE.<br />

SCRIPTION OF TI:STING METHODS. POLICE BODY ARMOR<br />

WHICH CAN MEET THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN THE<br />

DOCUMENT Is CONSIDERED TO BE OF SUPERIOR QUALITY<br />

AND SUITED TO THE NEEDS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGEN.<br />

CIES. PURCHASERS CAN USE THE TEST METHODS DE.<br />

SCRIBED IN THIS STANDARD TO DETERMINE FIRSTHAND<br />

WHETHER A PARTICULAR EQUIPMENT ITEM MEETS THE RE.<br />

QUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARD, OR THEY MAY HAVE THE<br />

TEST CONDUCTED ON THEIR BEHALF BY A QUALIFIED TEST.<br />

ING LABORATORY. THE DOCUMENT IS OF A TECHNICAL<br />

NATURE, AND ITS SPECIAL FOCUS IS AS Ii PROCUREMENT<br />

AID. THUS, IT IS OF LIMITED USE TO THOSE WHO SEEK GEN.<br />

ERAL GUIDANCE CONCERNING BOOV ARMOR. THE CLASSIFI.<br />

CATION OF BODY ARMOR ACCORDING TO THE DEGREE OF<br />

PROTECTION OFFERED IS EXPLAINED, AND .TECHNICAL<br />

TERMS USED IN THE DOCUMENT ARE DEFINED. GENERAL<br />

REQUIREMENTS Few! TEST SAMPLES, WORKMANSHIP, LA.<br />

BELING, ETC., ARE OUTLINED, AND SPECIFIC TEST METHODS<br />

.AND PROCEDURES FOR THE VARIOUS CLASSIFICATIONS OF<br />

BODY ARMOR ARE PRESENTED. DIAGRAMS AND TABLES<br />

ARE PROVIDED TO ILLUSTRATE AND SUMMARIZE THE MATE.<br />

RIAL PRESENTED.<br />

lupp/ement.l Notn: LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS PRO.<br />

GRAM SUPERSEDES NILECJ.STD.o101.00.<br />

Avlillllblllty: GPO Stock Order No. 027.()()().()(l729.6: NCJRS,<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

I. BATON ROUGE (LA)-STOP f,t,APE Cfllill CENTER. By D.<br />

WHITCOMB, D. A. DAY, and L R. 8TUDEN. ABT ASSO­<br />

CIATES, INC, 55 WHEELER STREET, CAMBRIDGEMA 02138.<br />

90 p. 1Ino. NCJ.I04.<br />

AN AID FOR IMPROVING RAPE ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS,<br />

THIS MANUAL DESCRIBES THE SERVICES AND ACHIEVE.<br />

MENTS OF THE STOP RAPE CRISIS CENTER (SRCC) IN<br />

BATON ROUGE, LA., EST~BLISHED IN 1975 WITH A GRANT<br />

FROM LEM. TO LINK CRIMINAL JUSTICE GOALS (INCREASE<br />

THE REPORTING OF RAPE AND THE NUMBER OF ARRESTS<br />

AND CONVICTIONS) WITH VICTIM SUPPORT GOALS (INVOLVE<br />

THE COMMUNITY IN PROGRAM SERVICES AND REDUCE VIC.<br />

TIMS' TRAUMA), THE BATON ROUGE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S<br />

OFFICE CREATED THE SROC AS ONE OF 10 SPECIAL SERVo<br />

ICE PROGRAMS. THIS AFFILIATION GREATLY ENHANCES THE<br />

CENTER'S CREDIBILITY ,IN DEALING WITH OTHER CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE PERSONNEL, COMMUNITY AGENCIES, THE PUBLIC,<br />

AND POTENTIAL AND ACTUAL RAPE VICTIMS. IN ADDITION,<br />

THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S ACTIVE SPONSORSHIP OF THE<br />

RAPE PROGRAM HAS GUARANTEED THAT RAPE CASES WILL<br />

"<br />

RECEIVE PRIORITY ATTENTION FROM PROSECUTORS, AND<br />

IT HAS ENHANCED COORDINATION AMONG PARTICIPATING<br />

AGENCIES. ONE OF THE SRGe'S MOST IMPRE~IVE<br />

ACHIEVEMENTS IS ITS CAPABILITY 0F GIVING FREE EMER·<br />

GENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT TO RAPE VICTIMS. TWO HOS­<br />

PITALS SUPPLY PRIVATE TREATMENT ROOMS FOR RAPE<br />

VICTIMS, AND TwELVE PHYS,ICIANS VOLUNTEER THEIR TIME<br />

TO GIVE TREATMENT. IN ADDITION, PUBLIC SUPPORT<br />

COMES IN THE FORM OF SERVICES FURNISHED BY 60<br />

WOMEN VOLUNTEERS AND FREE PUBLIC SERVICE AN·<br />

NOUNCEMENTS ON RADIO AND LOCAL TELEVISION. THE<br />

SRCC APPROflCH TO RAPE CRISIS ASSISTANCE IS DETAILED<br />

IN THIS REPORT WHICH FOCUSES ON THE 24·HOUR HOT·<br />

LINE, THE SPECIAL PROCEDURES USED BY tAW ENFORCE·<br />

MENT TI-IE SERVICES OF A TRAINED ESCORT COUNSELOR, ..<br />

AND PIJ'J'SICIAN'S USE OF A RAPE EVIDENCE KIT. PROJECT<br />

COSTS AND LEelSLATIVE ISSUES ARE DISCUSSED, AS ARE<br />

PROJf'CT SUCCESSES. RESULTS OF A CUENT SURVEY<br />

POINT TO A HIGH RATE OF SATISFACTION-86 PERCENT<br />

RATED SRCC'S SERVICES 'EXCELLENT' AND 14 PERCENT DE·<br />

SCRIBED THEM AS 'GOOD.' THE ARREST RATE FOR REPORT·<br />

ED RAPES CLIMBED FROM 38 TO 69 PERCENT, AND THE<br />

CONVICTION RATE JUMPED FROM 3 TO 88 PERCENT. TABU·<br />

LAR DATA ARE PROVIDED, AND SEVERAL CENTER PLANNING<br />

AND OPERATING DOCUMENTS WHICH MAY BE OF USE IN<br />

PLANNING AND OPERATING A SIMILAR PROJECT ARE AP·<br />

PENDED.<br />

~ NotH: AN EXEMPLARY PROJECT.<br />

SponIOI'Ing Agency' US DEPARTMENT OR.;JUSTICE LEAA NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE 'OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Availability: GPO Stock Order No. 027.000-00868·2: NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

7 BODY.WoRN FM (FREQUENCY MODULATIOM) TRANSMIT·<br />

• TERS By R H JONES, L F. SAULSDERY, and J. L WORK·<br />

MAN' US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NATIONAL INSTI·<br />

TUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 633<br />

INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531. 26 p.<br />

1978 ~7371<br />

A STANDARD IS PRESENTED ESTABLISHING PERFORMANCE<br />

REQUIREMENTS AND METHODS .OF TESTING ADEQUACY OF<br />

BODY·WORN FREQUENCY·MODULATED (FM) TRANSMITTERS,<br />

OF THREE WATTS OR LESS, USED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT<br />

AGENCIES. INFORMATION PERTAINS TO THREE CLASSIFICA·<br />

TIONS OF FM TRANSMITTERSj THOSE OPERATING IN THE<br />

0400 TO 512 MHZ BAND, IN THE 150 TO 174 MHZ BAND, AND<br />

IN THE 25 TO 50 MHZ BAND. DEFINITIONS OF TERMS USED<br />

IN THE EQUIPMENT STANDARDS ARE PRESENTED. REQUIRE·<br />

MENTS FOR THE FOLLOWING ARE GIVEN: TRANSMITTER<br />

PERFOAMANC::::, TRANSMITTER, BATTERY, RADIO FREQUEN·<br />

CY CARRIER CHARACTERISTICS, OUTPUT POWER, FREQUEN·<br />

CY STABILITY, AMPLITUDE MODULATION, (AM) HUM AND<br />

NOISt:: LEVEL TRANSMITTER EFFICIENCY, AUDIOFRE.<br />

QUENcY RESPDNSE, :FREQUENCY DEVIATION, MODULATION<br />

LIMITING, E"ECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY CHARACTER·<br />

ISTICS RAPIATED SPURIOUS EMISSIONS, SIDEBAND SPEC·<br />

TRUM 'ANO BATTERY SERVICE LIFE. TEST CONDITIONS ARE<br />

SPECIFIED AND METHODS FOR TESTING EACH OF THE<br />

ABOVE REQUIREMENTS ARE DELINEATED. ,.APPENDIXES IN·<br />

ClIJOE REFERENCES, MINIMUM PERFORMANCE REQUIRE·<br />

MENTS FOR THE THREE CLASSIFICATIONS OF TRANSMIT·<br />

TERS, AND DIAGRAMS FOR A NUMBER OF TEST MEASURE·<br />

MENTS.<br />

SUpplemenbl! NotH: LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS PRO·<br />

GRAM.<br />

Av.llllblllty: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

CARGO SECURITY FIELD TEST PROGRAM-TASK CLa-<br />

I. 8EOUT RE..aRT, DECEMBER Jlt,-EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS,<br />

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. AEROSPACE CORPORATION,<br />

955 L'ENFANT PLAZA, SW, WASHINGTON',pc 20024. 27 p.<br />

1978. NCJ·S3731<br />

TO AID INDUSTRY IN REDUCING CARGO THEFT LOSSES, A<br />

TRUCK ANTIHIJACKING PROJECT WAS INITIATED IN 1973.<br />

THIS REPORT COVERS THE FINAL FIELD TEST OF A SECU·<br />

RITY SYSTEM FOR A TOTAL OF 40 TRUCK·YEARS OF qPER.<br />

ATION. THE ANTIHIJACKING PROJECT WAS S~NSORED BY<br />

THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCeMENT AND<br />

CRIMINAL JUSTICE. THE INITIAL PHASES OF THE PROJECT<br />

IDENTIFIED THE MOST VULNERABLE POINTS OF CARGO<br />

SHIPPING AND DEMONSTRATED THE FEASIBILITY OF AN<br />

AUTOMATIC VEHICLE MONITORING SYSTEM BASED ON AM<br />

(AMPLITUDE MODUW'ION) BROADCAST SIGNALS. THIS<br />

FIELD TEST INVOLVED 40 TRUCK RPUTES BELONGING TO 2<br />

COMMERCIAL TRUCKING COMPANIES IN THE LOS ANGELES,<br />

CALIF AREA WITH CONTROL DATA SUPPLIED BY 2 ADDI·<br />

TIONAL COOPERATING FIRMS. TOTAL AOUTE·MILES FOR<br />

BOTH TEST AND CONTAOL GROUPS WF.RE ABOUT 400<br />

SQUARE MILES. THIS REPORT DESCRIBES THE FIELD TRIAL<br />

METHODOLOGY AND GIVES A NONTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION<br />

OF THE AUTOMATIC TRUCK MONITORING SYSTE~. DURING<br />

THE EARLY PHASES OF THE TEST THE SYSTEM ENCOUN·<br />

TERED COMMUNICATIONS INTERFERENCE WITH OTHER<br />

LOCAL USERS, RESULTING IN A DECISION TO CEASE TEST·<br />

ING. HOWEVER, THE FIELD TRIAL DID PROV~ THE FEASIBIL·<br />

ITY OF A WIDE·AREA MONITORING SYSTEM CAPABLE OF<br />

BEING SHARED BY MULTIPLE USERS WITHOUT COMPRO·<br />

MISE OF INDIVIDUAL DATA INTEGRITY. DESIGN MODIFICA·<br />

TIONS TO ELIMINATE THE INTERFERENCE PROBLEM ARE<br />

IDENTIFIED. FURTHER TESTING IS URGED. AN APPENDIX<br />

CONTAINS DOCUMENTATION AND A LIST OF HARDWARE<br />

PRODUCED FOR THE PROJECT.<br />

SponIOring Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT "',NO CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASH!NGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Av.lIab<strong>II</strong>Ity: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

CATALOG OF RCIJRITY EQUIPMENT. By J. V. FECHTER<br />

I. _net E. M. ROBERTSON. US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE<br />

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS LAW ENFORCEMENT<br />

STANDARDS LASORA'CORY, WASHINGTON DC 20234. 53 p.<br />

1978 NCJ·5U74<br />

THE' SECURITY EQUIPMENT CATALOG PUBLlSH~D BY THE<br />

LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS LABORATORY FOR NILECJ<br />

ACQUAINTS THE GENERAL PUBLIC WITH THE TYPES OF<br />

EQUIPMENT THAT' ARE AVi LABLE TO PROTECT RESI·<br />

DENCES AND BUSINESSES. THE CATALOG IS CONCERNED<br />

PRIMARILV WITH SECURITY EQUIPMENT FOR PREVENTING<br />

CRIMES OF OPPORTUNITY: I.E .. TARGET HARDENING, THE<br />

EQUIPMENT IS CLASSIFIED INTO.,;OUR FUNCTIONA~ AREAS:<br />

PHYSICAL SECURITY, ACCESS CONTROL, ALARM S ISTEMS,<br />

AND BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY EQUIPMENT. WITHIN EACH<br />

AREA ITEMS ARE IDENTIFIED AND DESCRIBED IN TERMS OF<br />

THEIR COST RANGE, USUAL APPLICATIONS, AND CON·<br />

STRUCTION. DISTRIBUTORS OF THE ITEMS ARE LISTED AL·<br />

PHABETICALLY BY PRODUCT AT THE END OF EACH SEC·<br />

TION. ADDRESSES AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS OF DISTRIBU·<br />

TORS ARE PROVIDED AT THE END OF THE CATALOG. EXAM·<br />

PLES OF EQUIPMENT IN EACH OF THE FOUR FUNCTIONAL<br />

AREAS FOLLOW: (1) PHYSICAL SECURITY··SWINGING ,DOOR<br />

LOCKS SUCH AS BARRICADE BOLTS OR STRAIGHT BOLTS<br />

AND DEAD BOLT LOCKS, SLIDING GLASS DOOR AND<br />

WINDOW LOCKS INCLUDING BAR AND CHANNEL LOCKS, AND<br />

GLASS PROTECTION ITEMS SUCH AS IMPACT·RESISTANT<br />

GLAZING AND SCREENS: (2) ACCESS CONTROL··CARD<br />

READER LOCKING MECHANISMS, GUARD BOOTHS, AND IN·<br />

TERCOMS: (3) ALARM SYSTEMS •• PHOTO~LECTRIC CON·<br />

TROLS AND DETECTORS FOR SENSORY POINT AND AREA<br />

PROTECTION INFRARED MOTION DETECTORS FOR VOLUME<br />

PROTECTION: AND BELLS, BUZZERS, HORNS, AND SIRENSj<br />

,AND (4) BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY EQUIPMENT··CARGO<br />

SEALS AND THEFT-TRACKING SYSTEMS, CHECK·WRITER<br />

AND CIJMMY CAMERA~, AND OPTICAL SURVEILLANCE SYS·<br />

2<br />

3<br />

<strong>II</strong><br />

,<br />

'"""<br />

• '" I,<br />

."<br />

<<br />

/<br />

I


f', t I'<br />

,<br />

,'f,~~f<br />

), ..<br />

CIVIL<br />

PUBLICATIONS<br />

,<br />

TEMS. A Sua/ECT INDEX AND A USERS' GUIDE TO THE<br />

CATALOG ARE INCLUDED.<br />

luppllmen"'" HolM: LIMITED NUMBER OF COPIES AVAILA.<br />

.BLE FROM NBS.<br />

~ ~US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE lEM NA.<br />

TIONAl INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND C'RIMINAl<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON,DC 20531.<br />

Avt'Sblltr: GPO Stock Order NOI. 003.()(l3'()197().4: SP<br />

480-35: US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL<br />

BUREAU OF STANDARDS LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS<br />

LABORATORY, WASHINGTON DC 20234.<br />

10. CIVIL "RVICE SYSTEMS-THEIR IMPACT ON POLICE AD­<br />

MINISTRATION. By O. W. ORE<strong>II</strong>INGER, J ... SLOVAk, lind<br />

J. J. MOLKUP. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SERVICE, 1n6<br />

. MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE. NW, WASIiINGTON DC 20036.<br />

238 p. 1979. NCJ.51H4<br />

PosiTIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF CIVil SERVICE REGU.<br />

LATIONS ON URBAN POLICE SYSTEMS IS THE FOCUS OF<br />

THIS RESEARCH PROJECT CONDUCTED r"OVER APPROXI.<br />

MATElY A 2·YEAR PERIOD BF.GINNING IN NOVEMBER 1976.<br />

DATA FROM THE STUDY WERE COLLECTED FROM 42<br />

RANDOMlY·SELEcteD AMERICAN CITIES, RANGING IN SIZE<br />

FROM 50.000 TO 750,000 PERSONS. IN EACH STUDY SITE,<br />

CURRENT CIVil SERVICE LAWS AND PoLICE UNION CON.<br />

TRACTS WERE COLLECTED, INTERVIEWS WERE CONDUCTED<br />

WITH THE MOST KNOWLEDGEABLE MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS<br />

AND ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVES, AND POLICE DE.<br />

PARTMENTS PROVIDED INFORMATION ON PROGRAMS AND<br />

POLICIES 'N A POLICE DEPARTMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE.<br />

SUPPLEMEllTAl DATA WERE PROVIDED BY THE POLICE<br />

FOUNDATION, THE NATIONAL PLANNING ASSOCIATION, AND<br />

THE FBI. THE ABSENCE OF AN OVERAll CIVil SERVICE<br />

SYSTEM WHICH GOVERNS POLICE PERSONNEL AFFAI~S IN<br />

AMERICA IS NOTED. CIVIl. SERVICE COMMISSIONS DIFFER<br />

FROM CITY TO CIT~ IN THE ROLES THEY PLAY IN POLICE<br />

PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION AND, AS A RESULT, IN THE<br />

IMPACTS THEY HAVE ON lOCAL OFFICIALS, ON POLICE DE.<br />

PARTMENTAl PROGRAMS AND PRACTICES. AND ON THE<br />

GENERAL QUALITY OF LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT."WHllE<br />

SOME COMMISSIONS POSE SIGNIFICANT CONSTRAINTS ON<br />

THE ABILITIES OF LOCAL OFFICIALS TO PROMOTE INNOVA.<br />

TIVE POLICE PROGRAMS, OTHERS WORK TO-fRDMOTE DE.<br />

PART.MENTAl INNOVATION .AND MORE EFFICIEN'f':C."!!~Al<br />

APPREHENSION PROCEDURES. THE ,STUDY EXAMINES'\~<br />

NUMBER OF ISSUES, AMONG THEM lHE STATUTORY SUP,I<br />

PORTS FOR lOCAL CIVil SERVICE COMMISSIONS AND TH~<br />

IMPACT OF COMMUNITY POLITICS AND POLICE UNIONISM ON<br />

lOCAL POLICE PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION. PROPOSALS<br />

FOR CIVil SERVICE REFORMS IN THE URBAN POLICE CoN.<br />

TEXT SHOULD BE TAilORED TO LOCAL CIRCUMSTANCES<br />

AND TO MEANINGFUL VARIATIONI;; IN CIVil SERVICE ROLES.<br />

NUMEROUS CHARTS. FOOTNOTES, A BIBLIOGRAPHY, AND<br />

DIAGRAMS ILLUSTRATE THE TEXT. APPENDIXES INCLUDE<br />

CONTENT ANALYSIS CHECKl.ISTS FOR POLICE BARGAINING<br />

CONTRACTS AND PERSONNEL SYSTEMS, A POuce QUES.<br />

TIONNAIRE, AN INTERVIEW SCHEDULE, AND A lEm:R TO<br />

URBAN EXECUTIVES.<br />

~ Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA.<br />

TIONAl INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Avllleblllty: GPO Slock Order No. 027.()()().()()857.7: NOJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

11. COLI.OOUIUM ON THE CORRELATES ell: CRIME AND ,\...<br />

DETERMINANTS OF CRIMINAL IEHAVIOfI-MOcEEDfNG.';:<br />

L omN, Ed. MITRE CORPORATION, POBOX 208, BE[); .<br />

FORO MA 01730. 191 p. 1978. NCJ.U414<br />

THIS ANTHOLOGY OF PAPERS BY CRIMINAL JUSTICE EX.<br />

PERTS, SOCIOLOGISTS, AND PSYCHoLOGISTS CONCERNING<br />

CAIMINAl BEHAVIOR DETERMINANTS CONSIDERS PSYCHO.<br />

PHYSIOLOGICAL FACTORS, DRUG AND ALCOHol USE, AND<br />

BIOSOCIAl INFLUENCES. THE FIRST GROUP OF PAPERS DISeUSSES<br />

STUDIES WHICH INDICAl'E AN APPARENT SMALL<br />

GENETIC CONTRIBUTION TO THE ETIOLOGY OF CRIMINAL<br />

BEHAVIOR AND A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NERVOUS SYS­<br />

TEMS IN CRIMINALS AND NONCRIMINALS THAT COULD HELP<br />

PREDICT DEVIANT BEHAVIOR, THE NE!:D FOR STRINGENTLY<br />

DEFINING THE PERSONALITY TYPE 'PSYCHOPATH' FOR DE.<br />

SCRIBING PERSONS WHO HAVE COMMON BIOLOGICAL<br />

TRAITS SUCH A..'] A SLOWER<br />

SKIN.CQt4DUCTANCE.RESPONSE RECOVERY, AND A GENER.<br />

Al MODEL OF AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR CONSISTING OF SPE.<br />

CIAl NEURAL MECHANISMS WHICH CAN RESULT IN AGGRES.<br />

SIVE BEHAVIOR WHEN FIRED IN THE PRESENCe OF A RELe.<br />

VANT TARGET. A TWo.DIMENSIONAl CLASSIFICATION OF<br />

CRIMINALS IS ALSO PRF.SENTED: IT IS BASED ON A DYSCON.<br />

TROl SCALE AND ELECTROCARDIOGRAM ABNORMALITIES<br />

PRODUCING EPILEPTOIDS, HYSTEROIDS, INADEQUATE PSY.<br />

CHOPATHS, AND PURE PSYCHOPATHS. PAPERS ON DRUG<br />

ANn ALCOHOL CONSIDER THE PROCESS OF DRUG USE AND<br />

CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR AS <strong>II</strong> MEANS OF SELF.EXPRESSION,<br />

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DRUG AND ALCOHOL USE<br />

AND DELINQUENT BEHAVIOR AS THESE FACTORS RELATE<br />

TO LOW EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT, AND DEVIANT BEHAV.<br />

lOR AMONG VETERANS AND ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION. THE<br />

FINAL SECTION FOCUSES ON BIOSOCIAl DETERMINANTS. A<br />

DISCUSSION ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL EF.<br />

FECTS OF PRISON ENVIRONMENTS CONSIDERS PHYSIO.<br />

LOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL EFFECTS OF THE PRISON ENVI.<br />

RONMENT AND CROWDING ON BLOOD PRESSURE OF ANI.<br />

MALS AND HUMANS. RESEARCH ON CONFLICT-MOTIVATED<br />

CRIME IN FAMILIES IS REVIEWED, AND THE EFFECTS OF<br />

SENSORY DEPRIVATION ON ANIMAL AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR<br />

ARE OUTLINED TO SUPPORT A THEORY OF<br />

ISOLATION.AGGRESSION. TABULAR DATA AND TOPIC DIS­<br />

CUSSION ARE PROVIDED.<br />

8p0ns0r' .... AgImcy: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE lEAA NA.<br />

TIONAl INS'rITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Aveltsblllty: MITRE CORPORATION WASHINGTON OPER.<br />

ATIONS. 1820 DOLLEY MADISON BOULEVARD, MCLEAN VA<br />

22101 Stock Order No. M78-81: NCJRS MICROFICHE PRO.<br />

GRAM.<br />

12. COMMERCIAL SECURITY TESTD£<strong>II</strong>ON. US DEPARTMENT<br />

OF JUSTICE LEM NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCE.<br />

MENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW,<br />

WASHINGTON, DC 20531. 37 p. 1979. NCJ.H015<br />

A DESCRIPTION OF THE COMMERCIAL SECURITY PROGRAM<br />

SPONSORED BY THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW EN.<br />

FORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE (NllECJ) IS PRESENT.<br />

ED. THE BASIS FOR THE FIELD TEST IS A TEST DESIGN, A<br />

DOCUMENT WITH DETAilED SPECIFICATION OF SELECTED<br />

PROGRAM ELEMENTS. THE GOAL OF EACH FIELD TEST IS<br />

TO DETERMINE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A PARTICULAR<br />

PROGRAM STRATEGY]! IN VARIOUS SETTINGS AND TO<br />

ASSESS ITS TRANSFERABILITY TO OTHER JURISDICTIONS.<br />

THE COMMERCIAL SECURITY PROGRAM IS DESIGNED TO<br />

REDUCE 'THE VULNERABiliTY OF SMALL COMMERCIAL ES.<br />

TABLISHMENTS TO BURGLARY, ROBBERY, AND LARCENY<br />

THROUGH<br />

THE COOPERATION OF BUSiNESSMEN AND<br />

POLICE IN THE CONDUCT OF CRIME PREVENTION SURVEYS<br />

AND SUBSEQUENT IMPLEMENTATION OF SURVEY RECOM.<br />

MENDATIONS. THE PROGRAM WILL BE TESTED IN THREE<br />

CITIES HAVING POPULATIONS OVER 250,000 AND EVALU',T.<br />

EO BY NILECJ. BOTH THE PROCESS OF IMPLEMENT~TION<br />

AND ITS OUTCOMES WILL BE EVALUATED. THE FIELD TEST<br />

HAS TWO OBJECTIVES: (i) TO ASSESS THE IMPACT OF THIS<br />

CRIME PREVENTION Pf'lOGRAM ON COMMERCIAL CRIME<br />

AND ITS ASSOCIATED EFFECTS, AND (2) .,.0 DETERMINE IF<br />

THE PROGRA~1 MERITS WIDESPREAD REPLICATION IN<br />

OTHEA JUR'S~:'P'TONS. THE REPORT DISCUSSES THE COST<br />

OF THE NIJ<br />

OF COMMERCIAL C~'~E AND EXAMINES THE TYPES OF<br />

CRIME THAT ARE coMMITTED AGAINST COMMERCIAL ES­<br />

TABLISHMENTS CRIME PRI:VENTION STRATEGIES ARE COM.<br />

PARED. THE PURPOSES A~4Q OBJECTIVES OF THE CRIME<br />

COMMERCIAL SECURITY TEST'AflE THEN OUTLINED, AND ITS<br />

PROGRAMMATIC PARTS ARE E)(~~INED. THESE PROGRAM<br />

COMPONENTS ARE COMMUNITY IfSV.t:?lVEMENT STRUCTURE<br />

AND BUSINESS AND POLICE COOPERATION. SUBCOMPON.<br />

ENTS OF THE PROGRAM INCLUDE ADMlNI~JRATION BY A<br />

CITYWIDE AGENCY AND CRIME PREVENTION, ,~U,~VEYS.<br />

SURVEY INSTRUMENTS, TARGET AREA SATURATfCNhl'~D '" ,...<br />

SURVEY COMPLIANCE ARE EXAMINED IN THIS REGA D.<br />

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION IS DISCUSSED AS IS TESTING<br />

OF THE PROGRAM WHICH Will INVOLVE A COMPARISON OF<br />

CRIME RATES AND OTHER MEASURES OVER TIME IN COM·<br />

MERCIAl AREAS WHICH HAVE BEEN THNEa~~Sw~c~U~~~~<br />

SATURATION EFFORTS WITH THOSE I "<br />

NOT IT IS STATED THAT THE EVALUATION OF THE COMME~.<br />

CIAL SECURITY FIELD TEST PROGRAM IS THE ,RESPONSIBll •<br />

TY OF NllECJ AND WILL BE CONDUCTED UNDER A GRANT<br />

OR COOPERATIVE AGRIEEMENT. TABULAR DATA, AN APPEN·<br />

DIX AND A SElECTEtD BIBLIOGRAPHY ARE INCLUDED.<br />

=B:: ~sog~~~~~MENT OF JUSTICE lEM ~ti.<br />

1~~~~ci'E~:~IJ~JI~~~ A~~U~~r~~~r:G:~Z, ~1~531.<br />

Avlllllblllty: NCJAS MICROFICHEj~ROGRAM.<br />

13. COMMUNIC::E~ ~~M~~I8:' NA~~A~B~eru t':;<br />

~~AZg~~~S LAW ENFORCE~NT STANDARDS LABORA·<br />

TORY, WASHINGTON DC 20234. 38 p. ~55S35<br />

THIS 'LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT GUIDE DeVElOPE~<br />

LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS LABORATORY I<br />

~~ST~~ED TO INFORM AND AID AGENC'ES IN SELECTING<br />

COMMUNICATIONS SUBSYSTEMS. MAJOR INNOVATIONS IN<br />

SYSTEMS ARE AFFECTING LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTROL,<br />

COMMAND AND COMMUNICATION, OPERATIONS AND COM·<br />

PUTER AND DIGITAL EQUIPMENT ARE BECOMN~Gp:~~~~~<br />

FOR INCREASED COMMUNITY SERVICE A<br />

SAFETY THIS MANUAL DESCRIBES THE ADVANTAGES AND<br />

DISADVANTAGES OF COMPUTER·AIDED DISPATCH CENTERS,<br />

COMPUTER.CQNTROLlED COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND<br />

INFORMATION FilES, PUBLlc.c~1 liNG AND EMERGENCY<br />

MEDIOAl SERVICC SYSTEMS, DIGI: l SYSTEMS, AUTOMATIC<br />

VEHICULAR lOCATION SYSTEMS, VOICE PRIVACY SYSTEMS,<br />

REPEATER AND VOTING RECEIVER SYST~S, SCA~N~~~:::;<br />

CEIVER SYSTEMS, AND PUBLIC TRANSP'OR~~~WER COM.<br />

CHANNELS THE PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS<br />

MUNICATIONS SUBSYSTEMS ,ARE IDENTIFIED. AND DE·<br />

SCRIBED. THESE INCLUDE TRANSCEIVERS, ANTENNAS AND<br />

BINERS CONTROL CONSGlES, POWER SOURCES,<br />

~NDARD AND TELEPHONE INTERFACES, LlGH~~: p~~.<br />

~~~~'~~T~E~;l E~DM~~~A~~~~~~V~R~ REQUIRED<br />

TI: EFFECTIVELY AtlY OF THESE COMMUNICATION<br />

~eB~~~~MS AND NEW PUBLIC BUilDINGS AND FACiliTIES<br />

SHOULD 'SE' PLANNED WITH ADEQUATE CONDUITS TO<br />

ALLOW FUTURE DEPLOYMENT OF COMMUN~~AT~0:6~T~V;T<br />

TEMS. COST ~~~~EE~:~~::N~I~P~~'ST OF BUYERS'<br />

~~Iri:~N ';~LUDED fOR GENERAL ELECTRONIC PROD •.<br />

UCTS AND TELECOMMU<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>CATIONS SYSTEMS.<br />

NA<br />

... Agency' US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE lEM •<br />

E1t!~ll~J,~~~A~~U~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~I~~:t<br />

'<br />

US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONA<br />

~~=F STANDARDS LAW ENFORCEMENT STA:AR~S<br />

NBS-SP·480·12:<br />

LABORATORY, WAGSPOHINGST\OOCNk og:r:r'2~o<br />

•<br />

NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

S~~~~~2~'2.g:<br />

COMMUNITY<br />

14. COMMuNITY ~ARifiTRAT:Nc :":t::;::N~~':.':.~'::<br />

=''r'~:iJf.',~c, 61 WHEELER $TREeT, C=:~<br />

MA 02138. 93 p. 1979. . , N ANNE<br />

THE COMMUNiTY ARBITRATION PROJECT, (CAP) I<br />

ARUNDEL COUNTY, MO., A VOLUNTARY DIVERSION PRO·<br />

GRAM FOR JUVENilES, IS DESCRIBED, WITH EMPHASIS O~<br />

~,~M~~~~~1~l~:" ~;T~AC::;:~~~~~ T~5 ~~~C~<br />

THE 'BURDEN ON THE COURTS CREATED BY UNMAN~GEA·<br />

BLE CASElOADS AND TO ASSIGN JUVENILES TO TAS;<br />

THAT PROVIDE MEANINGFUL SERVICES. ESSENTIAL E •<br />

MENTS OF THE CAp INCLUDE PROMPT CASE PROCESSING<br />

ITHIN 7 WORKING DAYS), 11 smlNG SUGGESTIVE OF A<br />

~URTROOM FCRTHE ARBITRATION HEARING, INVOL.VE·<br />

MENi OF VICTIMS IN THE HEARING, ASSURANCE OF DUE<br />

PROCESS use OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES TO PROVIDE A<br />

POSiTIVE WORK EXPERIENCE, AND CONSTRUCTIVE DISPOSI·<br />

TION (I.E., RESTITUTION, COUNSELING, AND SPECIAL EDUCA·<br />

TION PROGRAMS). OF THE 1,137 YOUTHS WHQ WERE AS­<br />

SIGNED THROUGH CAP TO COMMUNITY SERVICE OR AN·<br />

OTHER ALTERNATIVE IN THE PROJECT'S FIRST 2 YEARS OF<br />

OPERATION 85 PERCENT SUC;CESSFUllY COMPLETED<br />

THEIR AssiGNMENTS WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED 9O-CAY<br />

PERIOD OF MOST IMPORTANCE, CAP CLIENTS DEMON·<br />

STRATED SIGNIFICANilY lOWER RATES OF REPEA~~<br />

f'ENSES THAN COMPARABLE YOUTH WHO WERE<br />

ESSED TRADITIONALLY, ACCORDIN,~ TO A COMPARISON<br />

STUDY OF THESE TWO GROUPS COUNTY YOUTHS PRQC.<br />

ESSED' BV CAP IN 1975 HAD A 4.6 PERCENT LOWER RECIDI·<br />

VISM RATE AND 37 PERCENT FEWER REARRESTS PER<br />

CLIENT WITHIN 1 YEAR AFTERINTAKE/ARBITRATION. MORE·<br />

. . ONLY 8 PERCENT OF ARBITRATED;CASES WE~E<br />

~~~~ED OVER FOR PROSECUTION, FREEING THE STATE S<br />

ORNEV'S OFFICE FRoM CONCENTRATING ON MINOA JU·<br />

C~ILE OFFENSES AS WELL AS SAVING THE POLICE MUCH<br />

TIME AND PAPERWORK INVOLVED IN CHARGING AN OF·<br />

FENDER AND TESTIFYING IN COURT. COSTS OF CAP :~<br />

SOLELY FOR SALARIES: 90 PERCENT OF<br />

ALMO~~UDGET IN 3 YEARS OF FeDERAL FUNDING WAS FOR<br />

~~~~'3AL~RIES OF 7 STAFF MEMBERS. AN ANNE ARUNDEL<br />

COUNTY JUVENilE CITATION FORM AND NOTICE AND<br />

ADVICE OF RIGHTS (FOR ARBITRATION HEARINGS) ARE AP·<br />

. PENDED. FOOTNOTES, FLOW CHARTS. PHOTOGRAPHS, AND<br />

TABULAR DATA ARE PR.OVIDED.<br />

.................. NotMl AN EXEMPLARY PROJECT.<br />

...,....... ....... ")S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE<br />

~MM~TeSTING AND DISSEMINATION, 633 INDI·<br />

ANA AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC 20531.<br />

•<br />

AvAlleblllty: GPO Stock Order No. 027-()()()~5·3, NCJfl;S<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

I:::<br />

. CONCERN POUCE USE OF DEADLV FORCE.<br />

15. CO:-:::ER and M. KRAVIlZ, Eda. NATIONAL CRIMINA!.<br />

~USiICE REFERENCE SERVICE, BOX 6000, ROCK~i7:~<br />

20850 111 p. 1979.<br />

PAPERS GIVEN AT THE NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF BLACK<br />

LAW ENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVES (NOBLE) WORKSHOP ON<br />

POLICE USE OF DEADLY FORCE AflE PRESENTED, AS WElLl<br />

AS STATEMENTS BY JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS AND<br />

RATURE REVIeW. THE WORKSHOP, SPONSORED BY<br />

~H~IT~MUNITY RELATIONS SERVICE OF THE DEPART.<br />

MENT OF JUSTICE,BEGINS WITH A DESCRIPTION OF NOBLE<br />

AND WITH PRESENTA1:IONS OF 11 RESOLUTIONS CONCERN·<br />

ING THE RESTRICTIO(;( A~" CON. TROl OF POLICE AG;~CY<br />

POLICY ON THE USE di: o£'ADLY FORCE. THE PAP~F!S, ..,OM<br />

. THE NOBLE CONFEA~NC,ti' DISCIJSSeD .THE ISSUE FROM<br />

SEVERAl PERSPECTiveS. THE NATIONAL DIRECTOR OF THE<br />

N TIONA"r. CONFERENCE OF BLACK LAWYERS MAINTAINS<br />

T~AT POLICE LAWLESSNESS IS WIDESPREAD AND FALLS<br />

PARTICULARLY ON BLACK CITIZENS {THIS INCLUDES BEAT·<br />

, ,<br />

.\<br />

5<br />

;<br />

fl.<br />

'. "<br />

I


1-<br />

,<br />

D'UBLICATIONS<br />

OFTHENIJ<br />

CORRUPTION<br />

INGS. ILLEGAL SEARCHES. HARASSMENT. AND MURDER ON<br />

. THE. STREET); HE PROPOSESSTP.ATEGIES FOR INVOLVING<br />

CITIZENS IN POLICE DISCIPLINARY AND REVIEW BOARD<br />

MECHANISMS, A CLERGYMA~<br />

DISCUSSES HOW FEAR OF<br />

~IME IN THE WHITE .COMMUNITY IN THE U.S. CREATES<br />

WHITE SUPpPRT FOR MINIMAL REGULATION OF POLICE USE<br />

OF DEADJ.Y FORCE AND INcREASES THE EXISTING STRAINS<br />

IN BLACK·WHITE REtATiONS. A POLICE CHIEF FROM WASH.<br />

INGTON STATE LINKS POlice POLICY ON DEADI.Y FORCE TO<br />

OLD ENGLISH CQMMON LAW. RECOMMENDS REVISION OF<br />

SUCH POLICIES. '!NO CALLS FOR A CHANGE IN POLICE AU.<br />

THORITARIAN ATirITUDES. BEGINNIN:3 WITH TOP MANAGE.<br />

MENT. TWO ADDITIONAL PAPERS ADDRESS THE NEED FOR<br />

~"'~' UNAMBIGUOUS POLICE POLICY WHICH SETS SPECIF.<br />

IC MINIMUM LIMITS ON THE USE OF DEADLY FORCE A FINA'<br />

PAPER REVIEWS STUDI/SS CONDUCTeD IN THE 1970'S WHICH<br />

REFUTE THE BELIEF THAT LAW ENFORCEMENT .IS AN EX.<br />

TREMELYPERILOUS OCCUPATION AND SHoW THAT BLACKS<br />

.. ARE MORE LIKELY THAN WHITES TO BE KILLED BY POLICE<br />

THE CONCERNS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ARE<br />

HIGHLIGHTED IN STATEMENTS BY THE ASSISTANT ATTOR.<br />

NEY GEN.ERAL AND TWO OTHER OFFICIALS \y'HO DISCUSS<br />

DEADLY fQRCE AND CITE RESEARCH PRIORITI.rdS. THE FINAL<br />

SECTION ISA LITERATURE REVIEW BY POLICE FOUNDATION<br />

STAFF THAT SUMMARIZES 15 MAJOR RESEARCH STUDIES<br />

THE STUDIES C~UR THAT BLACKS AND HISPANICS ARE<br />

FATAL VICTI~~ OJ, POLICE SHqOTINGS IN EXCESS OF THEIR<br />

PROPORTION OF l'HE P.~LATION. THE STUDIES FOUND<br />

T/:IAT LEGAL ACTION IS USUALLV NOT TAKEN AGAINST<br />

POLICE IN SHOOTlt4G INCIDENTS AND RESTRICTIVE POll.<br />

CIES ACCOMPANIED BY SmONG ENFORCEMENT ARE EF.<br />

FECTlVE IN REDUClNG THE NUMBER OF POLlCt; SHOOTINGS<br />

REFERENCES' AND AN .ANNOTATED BIEILIOGRAPHV ON<br />

POLICE USE OF DEADLY FORCE ARE PROVIDED. .<br />

~1ICHtng ~ US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA.<br />

J~.'=~~NC:=A~~U~%v~=~:6W ~'~~~L<br />

AV'<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>ItI.tr- G~~. Slock Order No. 027 -000.00e07.'. •<br />

1 •• fO~~:~~u:-. :ll' WHITCO<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>.<br />

INC. 65 WHEELER STREET. CAMBRIDGE MA 0'fSOO138 IA7TE9 S.<br />

1979. . . NCHoJ'<br />

THE CONNECTICUT ECONOMIC CRIME UNIT (ECU,. ONE c::<br />

TWO OON8U,MER FRAUD-ORIEN'rED PROJECTS GRANTED<br />

exeMPLARV STATUS BY LEM. IS Df;SCRIBED IN DETAIL. THE<br />

~NVCU CONSISTS OF THREE PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS. FIVE<br />

ESTIGATORS. AND SUPPORT STAFF WHO WORk OUT OF<br />

rHE CHIEF STATE'S ATTORNEY'S OFFIce. THE UN!T'S OB.<br />

. JECTIVES Af,'E TO INVESTIGATE AND PROSECUTE CONSUM.<br />

ER FRAUD CASEs AND TO PROMOTE AWARENESS OF ECO.<br />

NOMIC CRIME AMONG THE PUBLIC AND AMONG LAW EN<br />

FORCEMENT AND REGULATORY AGENCY PERSONNEL THE<br />

UNIT'S PREVENTION COMPONENTS INCLUDE AN INTER.<br />

AGENCY ECONOMIC. CRIME COUNCIL. NEWSPAPER ADVER.<br />

TlSING r.tONITORING. CONSUMER ALERTS AND LECTURE<br />

SERVICES. DURING ITS FIRST 3 YEARS OF oPeRATION THE<br />

ECU RECEIVED 32.316 INQUIRIES AND CONDUCTED 78e IN<br />

VESTIGATIONS. ARRESTS WERE MADE IN EVERY COUNTY IN<br />

THE STATE. THE 117 INDKm.tENTS BROUGHT DURING THE<br />

3'YEAR PERIOD RESULTED IN 84 GUILTY PLEAS AND ONLY:2<br />

ACQUITTALS. THE ECU'S TOTAL OPERATING COST WAS<br />

1474,n8. THE UNIT RETURNED 1723.810 IN RESTITUTION TO<br />

VICTIMS OF ECONOMIC CRIMES AND 120.832 TO THE STATE<br />

IN FINES. THE REPORT PROVIDES A DETA<strong>II</strong>.£O DEsr"RIP'fION<br />

OF THE ECl,I'S DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANIZATION (iNcLUD.<br />

ING PROBLEMS AND PRIORITIES,. OPERATIONS (CASE RE.<br />

FERRAI."SCREENING. INVESTIGATION. DATA MANAGEMENT)<br />

PREVENTION STRAtEGIES. PUBLIC RELATIONS AND TRAIN:<br />

<strong>II</strong>«i PRoGRAMS. RESULTS, AND OPERATING COSTS<br />

THROUGHOUT THE.REPORT.ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED BY<br />

8<br />

THOSE PLANNING SIMILAR PROJECTS ArtE HIGHLIGHTED<br />

APPENDED MATERIALS INCLUDE SAMPLE COPIES OF ECU<br />

FORMS. AN OUTLINE OF CONSUMER FRAUD LAW ENFORCE.<br />

MENT STRATEGIES. SUGGESTED DATA ELEMENTS FOR MAN.<br />

AGEMENT AND EVALUATION INFORMATION.GATHERING<br />

AND A SAMPLE COSTING PLAN.<br />

•<br />

SUppIemonbi/ NoI..: AN EXEMPLARY PROJECT.<br />

~ Aeenc:r- US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA.<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE. 833 INDIANA AVENUrf,NW. WASHINGTON. DC 20531.<br />

AY<strong>II</strong>f<strong>II</strong>b<strong>II</strong>Ity: GPO Slock Order No. 027-000-00830.5' NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM. NCJRS.<br />

•<br />

17. COI.tIUMER FRAUD-AN EMPIRICAL PERlHCTlVE-SU<strong>II</strong>­<br />

MARY. Ir J. 0. ICHURRT. R. Eo KRUO lind A M ItO<strong>II</strong><br />

NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER 11 'BEAcoN STREET<br />

BOSTON MA 02108;, AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RE:<br />

~EARCH. 1055 THOMAS JEFFERSON STREET. NW. WASHING.<br />

ON DC 20007. 78 p.1970. HCJ.52171<br />

THE OBJECTIVES OF A CONSUMER FRAUD STUDY ,\RE SUM.<br />

MARIZED. ALONG WITH THE RESULTING GOVERNMENT IN.<br />

TERVENTION STRATEGIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR<br />

THEIR IMPLEMENTA'tlON. THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE<br />

lEM·SPONSORED CONSUMER FRAUD .PROJECT CONSISTED<br />

OF THREE PHASES. THE PURPOSE OF tHE FIRST PHASE<br />

WAS TO DESCRIBE THE NATURE. SCOPE, AND CHARACTf.r..<br />

ISTICS OF CONSUMER FRAUD AND THE LAWS AND REGULA.<br />

TIONS INTENDED FOR ITS CONTROL. THE PURPOSE OF'i THE<br />

SECOND PHASE WAS TO EXPAND ON 'iHE FIRST BY COL.<br />

LE~.!'NG A LARGi:R AND MORE FOCUSED SET OF CONSUM.'<br />

ER1'RAUO EVENTS AND BY EXAMINING THE EFFECTIVENESS<br />

OF EXISTING CONTROL MECHANISMS IN ORDER TO DETER.<br />

MINE THE REQUIREMENTS OF NEW OR MODIFIED PREVEN.<br />

TION AND CONTROL SCHEMES.' THE PRODUCT OF THE<br />

THIRD PHASE WOULD THeN BE A sEr OF RECOMMENDED<br />

~PPR()ACHES OR STRATEGIES TO PROTECT CONSUMERS<br />

FROM FRAUD. IN THE COURSE OF THE FIRST TWO PHASES<br />

CASE HISTORIES OF CONsUMER FRAUD EVENTS WERE COL:<br />

.LECTED. AND I.;UANTITATIVE PROFILES OF VARIOUS PAT.<br />

TERNS OF CONSUMER FRAUD WERE DEVELOPED. WORKING<br />

FROM THESE DATA. SOME 18 APPROACHES TO COMBATING<br />

CONSUMER FRAUD WERE PRt;>POSEiJ AND ORGANIZED INTO<br />

THE FOLLOWING SIX GROUPS: (1) (! PAYMENt<br />

PLA~&NING-INVOLVING THE RESTRUCTURING OF PAYMENT·<br />

PROCEDURES TO ALLOW CONSUMEflS MORE fLEXIBILITY IN<br />

THE . FACE OF POSSIBLE FRAUD; (2,.:cPOSTAALE<br />

ALTERNATIVE8-OPTIONS GIVING CONSUMERS THE OProR.<br />

TUNITY TO EXERCISE AUTOMATIC CANCELLATION RIGHTS'<br />

:~ ~PLAINT MEOIATION··GOVERNMENT AID IN NEGOTIAT~<br />

CONSUMER SATISFACTION: (4, PRIVATE<br />

REMEDIES-OPTIONS ALLOWING CONSUMERS TO INITIATE<br />

AGAINST FRAUDULENT MERCHANTS WITH.<br />

P~ooeEDlNGS<br />

CUT INVOLVING A THIRD PARTY; (S, COVERAGE' FOR CON.<br />

SUMERLOSS-PRO"'DING RESTITUTION TO VICTIMS OF<br />

CONSUMER FRAUD BY REQVIRING BONDING, INSURANCE<br />

AND PREFERENTIAL TREAT~e~ FOR CONSUMERS DURING<br />

BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS' AND<br />

SIMPLIFICATION .. REQUlRINq A 'BALANCE J~ INF~~!i~:<br />

BETWEEN THE MERCHANT ANO THr: CONSUMER IN ALL<br />

TRANSACTIONS WHI=RE PRINT MEDIA ARE INVOLVED REO<br />

OMMENDATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION WERE THEN DeVEL:<br />

~:~g~;D A~~£ DISCUSSED WITH REGARD TO PRIORITY<br />

SUGGESTED ACTIONS BY THE PRIVATE<br />

SECTOR AND AT THE FEDERAL. STATE. LOC~L. AND LEM<br />

,> LEVELS. TABULAR DATA AND THREE APPENDIXES ARE AT·<br />

::;- ~jI TAcH ED. ""<br />

19oMOr',n; Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LAW EN·<br />

FORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRAT,ION CRIMINAL CON·<br />

SPIRAClES DIVISION. 833 INDIANA AVe(.JUE. NW. WASHING·<br />

TON. DC 20531.<br />

Ava<strong>II</strong>Ib<strong>II</strong>Ity: GPO Siock Order No. 027~24·1; AMERI·<br />

, CAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH. 10E5 7'HoMAS JEFFERSON<br />

STREET. NW, WASHINGTON DC 20001 Slock Order No.<br />

AIR·58000-111711-: NCJRS M~OFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

1.. COIHtt!CTIONAL CUCATION PftOGftAill FOf<strong>II</strong>N<strong>II</strong>ATU NA·<br />

TIONAL IVAl.UATIc)N I'<strong>II</strong>aGIWI-PHAIE 1 1tIPOfn'.<br />

<strong>II</strong>. -u.. E. COHMD. T. WRY. J. G. .LUTZ, P. V. MILLER. C.<br />

lIMON, lind A. E.ITAkELOH. LEHIGH UNIVERSITY. 131 p.<br />

1979. .. . . NC ...... ,71<br />

,QUESTIoNNAIRES AND SITE VISITS WERE USED TO EVALU·<br />

ATE 183 CORRECTIONAL· EDUCATION PROGRAMS. THE<br />

SURVEY COVERED" FUNDING. ADMINISTRATION. RE·<br />

SOURCES. MATERIALS. PROGRAM DESIGN AND EVALUA·<br />

TION. AND RELATION TO WORK PROGRAMS. THE SURVEY.<br />

CONDUCTED IN 1977. COVERED A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE<br />

OF STATE CORREcr,ONAL INSTITUTIONS WITH MORE' THAN<br />

100 INMATES IN 48 STATES (ALASKA AND HAWA<strong>II</strong> WERE EX·<br />

CLUDED). ON THE BASIS OF DATA COLLECTED. CONCLU·<br />

SIONS ARE PRESeNTED AND REcoMMENDATIONS ARE<br />

MADE 'FOR EACH AREA STUDIED. A SPECIAL STUDY ON ;t:HE<br />

EFFECT OF THE NATURE OF THE INSTITUTION ON'7'HE<br />

INMATE EDUCATION PROGRAM FOUND THAtlN SOME INSTI·<br />

tUTIONS THE cONFLICT BETWEEN CUSToDIAL AND TREAT·<br />

MENT FUNCTIONS IS SUFFICIENT TO NEGATIVELY INFLU·<br />

ENCE, THE WORK OF THE CORRECTIONS EDUCATOR. THE<br />

IMPORTANCe OF EDUCATION TO REHABILITATION MUST BE<br />

EMPHASIZED BY THE PRISON ADMINISTRATOR AND FULL<br />

cooPERATION SHOULD BE SECURED FROM ALL EMPLOY·<br />

EES. THERELATiON.,C)HIP HETWEEN WORK AND EDUCATION·<br />

AL PROGRAMS NEEDS TO BE ClARIFIED AND E)(ISTING CON·<br />

FLICTS RESOlVED. ON THE WHOLE. THE GENERAL STATE<br />

OF EDUCATION IN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS HAS 1M·<br />

PROVED. A/,..AJOR PROBLEM IS LACK OF FUNDING. WHICH<br />

IS REFLECTED IN THE QI,lALlTY OF ADMINISTRATION. LACK<br />

OF RE~RCES. AND INABILITY TO OFFER MEANINGFUL<br />

PROGRAMS ON A CONTINUING BASIS. S,INCE FUNDING IS<br />

OFTEN FROM FEDERAL SOURCES OR VARIOUS 'SOFT'<br />

SOURCES. CONTINl,IlTY ,OF OPERATION IS A PROBLEM. THE<br />

PRESSURE OF CONSTANTLY REAPPLYING FOR GRANT<br />

MONEY DIVERTS TIME AND ;RESOURCES FROM THE MAIN<br />

PURPOSE OF THE INMATE EDUCATION PROGRAMS. A.<br />

SEI;t.'~S OF 20 PROB~EMS IS IDENTIFIED; RECOMMENDAr<br />

lIONS ARE OFFERED FOR EACH. IT IS CONCLUDED THAT<br />

THE AVERAGE PRiSONEn SPENDS 3 YEARS IN A CORREC­<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTION AND THAT PROGRAMS SHOULD USE<br />

THESE" YEARS EFFECTIVELY TO GIVE. THE INMATE THE<br />

SKILLS NECESSARY FOR SURVIVAL IN SOCIETY. AT PA~S­<br />

ENT. 40 PERCENT OF THE INMATES ATTEND SOME FORM OF<br />

EOUCATIONAL PROGRMt. AND THE SURVEYED INSTITU·<br />

TlCN$ SPEND 8.7 PERCENT OF THEIR BUDGET ON EDUCA·<br />

TION. EVALUATION OF PROGRAM RESULTS IS LIMITED. THIS<br />

AREA ~EEDS TO BE IMPROVED. SURVEV DATA ARE PRE·<br />

SENTED IN CHART. GRAf'I17 AND TABULAR FORM. THE CHAR·<br />

AOTERISTICSOF THE 183 INSTITUTIONS AND METHODOLO·<br />

GY ARE DETAILED. A BIBLIOGRAPHY AND ActfART SHOW·<br />

ING INMATE FLOW THROIJGH A GENERALIZEDEDUQATION<br />

PROGRAM ARE APPENDED. SURVEY QUESTIONS ARE NOT<br />

INCLUDED.<br />

"", ........ HolM: SERIES A.NUMBER 22.<br />

IptonHrtnIJ AfInOY: US DEPARTMENT of JUSTICE LEM NA·<br />

TioNAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL,<br />

JUstICE, 833 INDlAN~ AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

AYln • .,.: GPO StOck Order No. 02NIOO.()()7I1H; NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM.'<br />

Ir<br />

7<br />

11. coRriUPTfON IN LAND UR AND IlUILDING REGULATION, V<br />

1 .". tNT!GllATiD REJIO<strong>II</strong>IT OFCONC/..U<strong>II</strong>OtW;, ~ J. A.<br />

GMDIHEft,T. R. LYMAN, lind S. A. WALDHORN. SRI INTER·<br />

NATIONAl, 333 RAVENSWOOD AVENUE. MENLO PARK CA<br />

9-4025. 120 p. 1979. NCJ.47143<br />

TO PROVIDE A DETAILED UNDERSTANDING OF LOCAL GOV·<br />

ERNMENT CORRUPTION IN LAND USE AND BUILDING REGU·<br />

LATIONS. A 2·YEAR STUDY WAS CONDUCTED WITH LITERA·<br />

TURE SEARCHES, ANALYZED CASES. AND STUDIES COMMIS­<br />

SIONED BV EXPERTS IN THE FIELD. THIS VOLUME. THE<br />

FIRST IN A SIX·VOLUME SERIES. INTEGRATES THE FINDINGS<br />

AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE .c:~URVEY. IT PRESENTS A~<br />

OVERVIEW .OF THE PROBLEM. DEF!I'iES C')RRUPTION. AND.<br />

PROVIDES AN ESTIMATE'OF ITS EXTENT. IT CONCLUDES<br />

THAT THE PROBLEM IS WlOESPR·OO AND THAT THE PRES.<br />

ENCE OR ABSE~,OF cORRUPTION IS. IN PART. A REFLEC­<br />

TION OF THE W~YS iN WHICH A COMMUNITY REsPONDS TO<br />

COARUPTIONAS IT OCCURS. A BASIC INTRODUCTION TO<br />

THE LAND USE AND BUILDING REGULATION SYSTEM IS PRE·<br />

~NTEI;). AND DESCRIPTIONS ARE ~PROVIDED OF TME MECH·<br />

ANISMS FeR PLANNING, ZONING. AND Et~FORCING BUILDING<br />

AND HOUSING CODES. AN ANALYSIS IS ATTEMPTED OF HOW<br />

AND WHY (X)RRUPTION OCCI,JRS. WITH ATTENTION TO THE<br />

OPPORTUNITIES .AND INCENTIVES FOR CORRUPTION. THESE<br />

INCENTIVES ARE EXAMINED FROM THE STANDPOINT OF<br />

BOTH THE ZONING OR LAND USE APPLICANT AND THE OFFI·<br />

CIAL IN CONTROL OF THE REGULATORY PROCESS. POSSI·<br />

BLE REMEDIES FOR CORRUPTIoN ARE ALSO PRESENTED.<br />

BASIC PRINCIPLES WHICH CAN HELP IDENTIFY POTENTIAL<br />

CORRUPTION PROBLEMS AND FORMULATE STRATEGY TO<br />

CONTROL THEM ARE OFFERED. THE ROLES OF REGULA.<br />

TOA"'~EFORM. IMPROVED MANAGEMEtfT SYSTEMS. LEGIS.<br />

LATION. AND CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT INFIGHTING CORRUP·<br />

TloN ARE ALSO EXAMINED. EACH CHAPTER CONTAINS AN<br />

EXTENSIVE LIST OF REFERENCES. TABULAR INFORMATION<br />

IS PRESENTED. INcLUDING CITIZENS' ESTIMATES OF THE<br />

EXTENT OF BRIBERY AND OTHER ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES<br />

(BASED ON DATA COLLEerED AS PART OF THE URBAt


i<br />

CRIME<br />

PUBLICATIONS.<br />

OF THE NIJ<br />

CRITICAL<br />

, (i<br />

.,<br />

'.<br />

, i<br />

;.<br />

•<br />

, ~j<br />

OFFICIALS ANQ CITIZI;NS IN EACH"COMMUNITY. THE AC.<br />

COUNTS ARE IllUSTRATIVE RATHER THAN DEFINITIVE. THE<br />

CITIES WEREo SELECTED BECAVSE THEY IllUSTRATED<br />

PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES, AND BECAUSE OF THE<br />

AVAILABILITY AND ACCESSIBILITY OF INFORMATION ON THE<br />

CORRUPTION·INTEGRITY ISSUE. CITIES WITH SIMILAR PROB.<br />

lEMSARE LIKELY TO BE FOUND THROUGHOUT THE UNITED<br />

STATES: EVERV ATIEMPT WAS MA;)E TO COVER THE SAME<br />

PERIOD OF TIME. 1976 TO 1977, FOR EACH COMMUNITY,<br />

AND TO UNDERS,'AND ;iHECONDITIONS AS THEY EXISTED<br />

DURING THI; PERIOD OF STUDY AND DURING THE YEARS 1M.<br />

MEDIATELY PRECEDING IT. THE FIRST CASE STUDIES DEAL<br />

WITH CORRUPTI()N':'IN INSPECTION PROGRAMS: IN NEW<br />

YORK CiTY, CORRUPTION INVOLVED HOUSING AND DEMOLI.<br />

TION INSPECTORS; IN CINCINNATI, OHIO, INSPECTORS RE.<br />

VIEWING FEDERALLY FINANCED REHABILITATION I>RO.<br />

GR~~S vtgl'iE TAKING PAYOfFS FROM CONTRACTORS; IN<br />

BRqwl\MI) COUNTY, FLA., THE CORRUPTION WAS AMONG<br />

INSPECTO~S SUPERVISING HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS; IN<br />

OKLAHOMA CITY. CORRUPTION IN THE LICENSING OF ELEC­<br />

TRICAL INSPECTORS AND, THEIR SUBSEQUENT' DEALINGS<br />

WITH BUILDERS WAS UNCOVERED. THE 'NEXT FOUR CASES<br />

FOCUS ON LAND USE DECISIONS: THE AWARDING OF<br />

ZONING VARIANCES IN EAST PROVIDENCE, R.I., USE PER.<br />

MITS IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIF., AND ZONING APPLICA.<br />

TIONS IN SANTA' CLARA, CALIF., AND HOFFMAN ESTATES,<br />

,ILL CORRUPTION AND REFORM ARE STUDIED IN FAIRFAX<br />

COUNTY, VA. THE FINAL C?ASE STUDY, ARLlN~TON HEIGHTS,<br />

ILL, DIFFERS FROM THE OTHERS,9ECAUSE THE COMMUNI.<br />

TY DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY OF THE CoRRUPTION THAT<br />

WAS COMMON IN NEIGHBORING TOWNS; THE FOCUS OF<br />

THE CASE STUpy IS ON WHY THIS PATrERNOFINTEGR'ITY<br />

DEVELOPED AS.lT DID. FOR RELATED INFORMATION; SEE<br />

NCJ-47s.43. ;<br />

8p0ne0rtng;Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA.<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF 'LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 205a1.<br />

AV8<strong>II</strong>ab<strong>II</strong>Ity: GPO Stock Order No. 027.()()Q.(J()833-O; ~CJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PRqGRAM. '"<br />

21. CRIME AND Dl8RIJf'1'ION IN SCHOOLS-A SELECTED lIB­<br />

I.IOORAPHY. R. RUBEL, R. N. BRENNER, C: JONES, .nd M.<br />

KRAVITZ, EcIa. NATIONAL CRIMI,NAL ~USnCE REFERENCE<br />

SERVICE, BOX 6OOO,ROCKVILI,E MD 20850. 102 p. 1979,<br />

NCJ·58&11<br />

'C'<br />

OITING MATERIAls COMPilED FROM ACADEMIC, PROFES.<br />

SIONAL, AND GOVERNMENT SOURCES, THIS BIBLIOGRAPHY /<br />

WITH ABSTRACTS COVEnS LITERATURE AVAILABLE WITHIN<br />

THE ,NCJRS DATA BA~ ON THE PROBLEM OF<br />

SCHool·BASED CRIME AND DISRUPTION. PUBLISHED BE.<br />

"tWEEN 1969 AND 1978, THE ARTICLES, REPORTS, AND<br />

OTHER MATERIALS A8E ARRANGED ALPHABETICAllY BY<br />

AUTHOR OR TITLE UNDER FOUR TOPIC HEADINGS. THE<br />

FIRST SECTION PROVID.ESo~~ OVERVIEW OF THE 'NATURE<br />

AND EXTENT OF tHE' PROBLEM AND INCLUDES STUDIES<br />

AND CONGRESSIQN~L REP,oRTS DESCRI~ING THE COST OF<br />

SCHOOL CAlMES-PRIMARilY ARSON AND VANDAlISM •• BOTH<br />

'iN FISCAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL TERMS. THE NEXT SECTION<br />

FOCUSE~cPN, THE STUDENTS THeMSELVES, MISBEHAVIOR,<br />

AND THE ROLE QF TRADITIONAL DISCIPLINE. THE CAUSES<br />

ANDMANIFEljITATIONS OF STUDENT MISBEHAVIOR ARE EX.<br />

A~I~ED; AI.QNG WITH THE EFFECT OF CORpORAL PUNISH.<br />

MENT AND SUSPr;N~1ON AND THE ISSUE OF STUDENTS'<br />

F\IGHT~ •. DISCUSSIONS OF MULTIPLE SCHOol,BASED PRO­<br />

GRMfS :FOLLo.W, ~PLlNGC!JRRICUlUM CHANGES,<br />

TEACHING METHOQS, STUDENT·BASED DISCIPLINE, ALTER.<br />

NATIVJ: SCHOOLS, PROGRAMS FOR HANDLING KNOWN OF.<br />

FI:,NDEF.tS;AN9 OTHER. STRATEGIES ~HOOlSHAVE DEVEl.<br />

, OPED TO REDiJcE CRIME AND DISRUPTION. THE REMAINING<br />

$ELECTION ~lS WITH THE' PHYSiCAL SeCURITY OF<br />

~L Bl,Il!-DIN~S; THE USE, 9f PO~ICE AND SECURITY<br />

o<br />

GUARDS ·IS DESCRIBED, TOGETHER WITH A VAf,lIETY OF<br />

ANTI·INTRUDER DEVICES AND SYSTEMS. APPENDED MATE.<br />

RIALS INCLUDE A LIST OF DOCUMENT SOURCI;:S, THE AD.<br />

DRESSES OF RESOURCE AGENCIES, AND AN EXECUTIVE<br />

SUMMARY OF A REPORT TO COf,jGRESS OF SCHOOL VIO.<br />

lENCE AND SAFETY. "<br />

SponlOllng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA.<br />

TIONAl INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUST/CE. 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON; DC 20531.<br />

Av .... b<strong>II</strong>Ity: GPO. Stock Order No. 027·000·00862·3. NCJRS.<br />

23. CRIMINAL JUSTICE PERIODICALS-A SELECTED <strong>II</strong>BUOQ.<br />

RAPHY. 8. S. LAPERLA, D. M. HORTON, 8nd M.KRAVITZ<br />

Ede. NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE:<br />

BOX 6000, ROCKVILLE MD 20850. 69 p. 1979.<br />

, NC./·57188<br />

THIS ANNOTATED, SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SERIAL<br />

PUBLICATIONS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE IS INTENDED FOR L1.<br />

BRARIANS AS WELL AS CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACADEMICIANS,<br />

STUDENTS, AND PRACTITIONERS. THE BIBLIOGRAPHY IDEN.<br />

TIFIES ~'l':3 SERIAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE PUBliCATIONS THAT<br />

HAVE BEiENJ1ECEIVED BY THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br />

REFEF\!;;Nt.\lil SERVICE AND ARE THE MOST DIRECTLY AC.<br />

CE~IBLE'AND USEFUL TO CONSUMERS OF CRIMINAL JUS.<br />

TICE INFORMATION. THE SELECTIONS ARE ORGANIZED INTO<br />

. EIGHT THEMATIC AREAS: CORRECTIONS AND PENOLOGY,<br />

COURTS, CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, CRIMINAL LAW, CRIMI.<br />

NOlOGY, FORENSICS, JUVENILE JUSTICE, AND LAW EN.<br />

FORCEMENT. TITLES ARE ENTERED A~PHABETICAll Y<br />

WITHIN SUBJECT CATEGORIES. IN ADDITION TO THE ANNO.<br />

TATION DESCRIBING THE GENERAL THRUST, CONTENT, AND'<br />

INTENDED AUDIENCE OF EACH PUBLICATION, THE FOllOW.<br />

ING INFORMATION IS SUPPLIED: THE INTERNATIONAL<br />

STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER, THE FREQUENCY OF PUBLICA.<br />

Q<br />

TION, THE FOUNDING .DATEAND F.,ORMER TIT~ IF APPLlCA·<br />

BLE THE PRICE THE SUBSCRIPTION ADDRESS, THE TITLES.<br />

OF iNDEXING ~D ABSTRACTING SERVICES IN WHICH THE<br />

ARTICLES FROM EACH SERIAL PUBLICATION CAN BE FOUND,<br />

AND THE SPoNsoRING AGENCY. LAW JOURNALS FOR THE<br />

MOST PART, ARE EXCLUDED. SUBJECT AND TITLE INDEXES,<br />

AND INDEXES TO SPONSOR AND FOREIGN PUBLlCA7I0NS<br />

ARE PROVIDED. .. .<br />

Iponeor' ..,. Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA· •<br />

TiONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW. WASHINGTON, DC 20531~<br />

Ava<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>b<strong>II</strong>itr. GPO Stock Order No. 027..()()()..()()815-1; NCJRS'~,><br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM. NPJRS.,.<br />

Z.. CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING. FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.<br />

By n. C •. CUSHMANInd .I. M. WYNNE JR; AST ASSOCIATES,<br />

INC, 55 WHEELER STREET, CAMBRIDGE .MA 02138. 122 p.<br />

1879. ~7<br />

STATE-OF.THE.ART INFORMATION AND GUIDELINES. ON<br />

CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING. AT THE LOCAL LEVEL ARE<br />

PRESENTED IN A REPORT DIRECTED TO LOCAL GOVERN·<br />

MENT OFFICIALS. BASED ON A REVIEW OF FlESEARCH AND !<br />

PROGRAM LITERATURE AND ON VISlrS TO .SIX PLANNING<br />

JURISDICTIONS, THE REPORT PROVIDES, lOCAL OFFICIALS<br />

WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFORMATION ON THE OBJECTIVES,<br />

STRATEGIES, AND TECHNIQUES OF lOCAL CRIMINAL JUs.<br />

TICE PLANNING AT THREE LEVELS: CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br />

AGENCY PLANNING, CITY OR COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br />

PLANNING AND COMPREHENSIVE INTERAGENCY AND 1M·<br />

TERGOVERNMENTAL PLANNING FOR THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br />

SYSTEM AS A WHOLE. THE IMPORTANCE OF PLANNING IS<br />

DISCUSSED, AND TH~ LOCAL PLANNING CONTEXT IS DE·<br />

SCRIBED. A BRIEF HISTORY QF THE DEVELOPMEN!, OF<br />

PLANNING CONCEPTS AND THE EVOLUTION QF lOCAL<br />

CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING IS PROVIDED. THE TYPES OF<br />

ACTIVITIES LOCAL PLANNING UNIT~ ARE UNDERTAKING AS<br />

THEY MOVE AWAY FROM FEDERAL GRANT MANAGEMENT<br />

TOWARD AN EMPH~SIS ON TOTAL FlESOURCE PLANNING<br />

ARE NOTED. OTHER ASPECTS COVERED ARE GOALS, OB·<br />

JECTIVES AND ACTIVITIES OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLAN·<br />

NINGPROcESS; RELATIONSHIPS AMONG POLICY PLANNING,<br />

PROGRAM PLANNING, AND OPERATIONAL.PLANNlf'lG; AND A<br />

STEP.BY.STEP PLANNING PROCESS WITH REFERENCE TO<br />

EXAMPLES FROM LOCAL JURISDICTIONS IN WHICH 'AD·<br />

VANCED PLANNING PRACTICES .ARE EMPLOYED. AlTERNA·<br />

TIVE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES FOR lOCAL PLANNING<br />

ARE DESCRIBED AND ASSESSED. THI; ROl.ES OF THE SUo<br />

PERVISORY BOARD AND PLANNING STAFF AND THE P.ELA·<br />

TIONSHIPS OF THESE ENTITIES TO EACH OTHER AND TO<br />

OTHER PLANNING STRUCTURES ARE CONSIDERED .. GUIDE·<br />

LINES FOR ESTABLISHING AND OPERATING A LOCAL PLAN·<br />

NING UNIT, INCLUDING iNITIAL PLANNING PRIORITIES, ARE<br />

OFFERED. PROCEDURES, CRITERIA, AND MEASURES, FOR<br />

EVALUATING THE. PLANNING PROCESS ARE OUTLINED.<br />

Supplemenlal Not ..: PROGRAM MODEL.<br />

IpoMorIng Agency· US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE lEAA NA·<br />

TloNAl INSTITUTE' OFt.AW ENFOROEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Anl/lllllitty: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

22. CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND THE ELDERLY-A SELECTED BIB­<br />

UOORAPHY. O. BOSTON, R. NITZBERG, 8nd M. KRAVITZ,<br />

Edt. NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERllICE,<br />

BOX 8000, ROCKVillE MD 20850. ,:,101 p. 1979. ,... ,',<br />

NCJ·55187<br />

THIS ANNo.TATED BIBLIOGRAPHY CITES MATERIALS INCLUD.<br />

ED IN THE NCJRS COllECTION ON ELDERLY VULNERABILITY<br />

TO CRIME AND THE ROLE OF ELDERLY PERSONS AS ACTIVE<br />

PARTICIPANTS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. PUB.<br />

L1SHED BETWEEN 1971 AND 1978, THE CITATIONS ARE AR.<br />

RANGED ALPHABETICALLY BY AUTHOR, TITLE, OR JOURNAL<br />

SOURCE WIT.HIN SEVEN SECTIONS, EACH DEALING WITH A<br />

SELECTED ASPECT OF SENIOR CITIZEN INTERACTION WITH<br />

CRIME OR THE CRIMINAL ~USTICE COMMUNITY. THE FIRST<br />

" SECTION PROVIDES AN OVERVIEW OF THE VULNERABILITY<br />

OF OLDER. PEOPLE TO CRIME AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS AND<br />

DESCRIBES THE GENERAL NATURE OF CRIMES AGAINST<br />

THE ELDERLY. THE FOllOWING SECTION DEALS WITH THE<br />

IMPACT OF CRIME ON THE ELDERLY, INCLUDING STUDIES<br />

ON FEAR OF CRIME AND THE RESULTANT PSYCHOLOGICAL<br />

DAMAGE AND CHANGES IN THE LIVING PATIERNS OF MANY<br />

SENIOR ADULTS, SUBSEQUENT SECTIONS cOVER THE rAT.<br />

TERNS AND RATES OF CRIME AGAINST THE ELDERLY, THE<br />

PROBLEM OF CONSUMER FRAUD SCHEMES AIMED AT<br />

SENIOR CITIZENS, VICTIM ASSISTANCE AND RESTITUTION<br />

PROGRAMS PROVIDING ELDERLY CRIME VICTIMS WITH EMO.<br />

TION~L AND FINANCI~L ~tQ, COMMUNITY PROGRAMS DE.<br />

SIGNED TO FULFill CRIME PREVENTION AND OTHER SOCIAL<br />

SERVICE NEEDS, AND THE CHANGING IMAGE OF SENIOR<br />

CITIZENS IN TERMS OF THEIR ROLE IN THE CRIMINAL JUs.<br />

TICE SYSTEM. INFORMATiON o.N HOW TO OBTAIN CITED<br />

DOCUMENTS IS PROVIDED, ALONG WITH LISTS OF SOURCES<br />

AND RESOURCE AGENCIES.<br />

SponIO<strong>II</strong>ng A~: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA.<br />

TIONAl INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE,.833 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Avllll8blttty: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM. NCJRS.<br />

25 CRITICAL·I88UES IN ADULT PROBATION-INTERNATIONAL<br />

• ASSEISMENT OF THE USE OF ADULT PROBATION. ~y P.<br />

C FRIDAY OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PROGRAM FOR THE<br />

sTuDY OF' CRIME AND DELINQUENCY, 1314 KINNE~~.~~~P~<br />

COlUMBUSOH 43212 •.. 11~p. .1e79,'-"'·_·'"",,·"IVIr­<br />

THIS REVIEW OF ~OULT PROBATION MATERIAL FROM 150<br />

DOCUMENTS FROM VARIOUS COUNTRIES DESCRIBES PRO·<br />

BATION AND SUSPENDE:O SENTENCING SYSTEMS, AND<br />

THEIR USE AND EFFECTIVENESS. PROBATION, INITIAllY<br />

USED IN AMERICA, NOW EXISTS IN 25 COUNTRIES. ITS OB·<br />

JECTIVES ARE ,to HE!,P AND TREAT AS WELL AS CONTROL<br />

OFFENDERS, A DUAL )\ND SOMETIMES CONFLICTING eUR·<br />

poSE. WHICH CAN POSE PROBLEMS FOR OFFICERS. PROBA·<br />

TION SERVICES, AND STRUCTURES VARY FROM A FUllY<br />

PROFESSIONAL STATE OJ;Ij3ANIZATION (E.G., ~REAT BRITAIN<br />

ANO~!NDIA). TO· A CENTRAI,IZED BUT MIXEDJ SYSTEM EM·<br />

PLOYING1 BOTH PROFESSIONALS AND VOL.. _ NTEEAS . (E.G.,<br />

JAPAN 4\"10 ~WEDEN). A THIRD STRUCTURE INVOLVES A JU·<br />

DIC!~Mll'TEE (E.G., BELGIUM AND" FRANCE) WHERE A<br />

CLEAR DIVISION OF LABoR EXISTS BETWE.EN THE JUDGE,<br />

CONTROL AGENTS, SOCIAL ASlj<strong>II</strong>STANTS, AND VOLUNTEERS.<br />

SOME COUNTRIES USE A SYSTEM OF DEFERRED OR SUS·<br />

PENDED SENTENCING (E.G., FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF WEST<br />

GERMANY, 'SOVIET ~J.jION,.AI'!D AUSTRIAt~HICH ENABLES<br />

THE SENTENCING DECISION TO BE POSTPONED PENDING<br />

SOME CHANGE OR ACTION ON THE DEFENDANT'S PART.<br />

USUAllY SOME RESTRICTION OR CONDITIONS ARE IN·<br />

VOlVED. THIS DOCUMENT peSCRlliES THE VARIOUS AP·<br />

PROACHES TO PROBAtiON, THE ATTITUDES TOWARD PRO·<br />

BATION, THE THRUST OF PROBATION. PROGRAMS IN THE<br />

VARIOUS.coUNTRIES, EFFI;CTIVENE$S OF THE USE OF PRO·<br />

BATioN .AND SPECIAL AND INNOV,ATIVE MOPES IN PROBA·<br />

'TION IT ALSO' EXAMINES LEGAL" AND HISTORICAL CON·<br />

TExtS OF USE OF PUSPENDED SENTE;NCE PROVISIONS,<br />

VARIATIONS IN ELlGI~!L1TY CRITERIA FOR SUSPENDED SEN~<br />

TENCES, AND THEIR EFFECTIVENESS AND USE. PROBATION<br />

SERVICES APPEAR TO. BE MOVING TOWARD t.tORE<br />

CLIENT -CENTERED ACTIVITY ON AN INTERNATIONAL LEVEL,<br />

AND THE USE OF PROBATION AND ITS APPROACH TEND TO<br />

PARALLEL SOCIAL AND eCONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. W~EN<br />

PROBATION FAilS. IT IS GENERALLY DUE TO POOR SOCIAL<br />

SKILLS, LACK OF EDUCATION OR VOCATIONAL TRAINING,<br />

AND OTHER SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEPRIVATIONS OF<br />

BOTH STAFF AND OFFENDERS. REFERENCES ARE PRO·<br />

VIDEO.' '0.. ;<br />

8ponIOI'Ing Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE lEAA NA·<br />

TIONAl INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 833 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Av8ll8blllty: GPO Stock Order No. 027.ooo.()()84~-O; .NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM. ,<br />

21 CRITICAL ISSUES IN ADULT PROBATION-ISSUES IN PRc)'<br />

• IATtON MANAGEMENT. ByE. W. CARLSON. OHIO STAT!?<br />

UNIVERSITY PROGRAM,FOR THE STUDY OF CRIME AND uG!'<br />

L1NQUENCY, 1314 KINNEAR ROAD,COlUMBUS OH 43212.<br />

502 p. 1979. NCJ·571187<br />

THIS LITERATURE REVIEW EXAMINES ISSUES IN PROBATION<br />

'MANAGEMENT INCLUDING TECHNIQUES IN PROBATION AND<br />

ADMINISTRATION, APPRO~CHES AND EMPHASES, AND THE<br />

EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF VARIOUS TECH·<br />

NIQUES. SEVERAL MAJOR ISSUES IN . PROBATION WERE<br />

IDENTIFIED IN THE .ReVIEW. 5qME MAIN CONCERNS IN MAN·<br />

AGEMENT ARE THE ISSUES OF CENTRALIZATION OR DECEN·<br />

TRALIZATION OF ADMINISTRATION (CENTRALIZED,<br />

STATE.ADMINISTERED AGENCIES ARE FREE OF lOCAL POll·<br />

TICS AND CAN DELIVER MORE UNIFORM AND EVENLY DIVID·<br />

ED SERVICES AND ,RESOURCES, BUT DECENTRALIZED<br />

'. AGENCIES CAN SOLICIT MORE COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION);<br />

,_ ........ THE PROPER ROLE OF PROBATION OFFICERS (PUNITIVE, OR<br />

PASSIVE)' AND THE PROVISION OF PROBATION SERVICES,<br />

PARTICULARLY CASEWORK WHICH FOCUSES ON SERVICE<br />

PROVISION, AND BROKERAGE WHICH EMPHASIZES ASSESS·<br />

ING CLIENT NEEDS AND LINKING AVAILABLE COMMUNITY<br />

SERVICES WITH THOSE NEEDS. THE USE OF BOTH PARA·<br />

PROFESSIONALS AND VOLUNTEERS IS A CENTRAL CON·.<br />

·--Ct:ANRES~8~H INDICATES TH~T USE OF THE ~ORMERI~<br />

" EFFECTIVE PARTiGU~RtY"iNeASESJN~Q~~IN.~. ~~ (~ISK<br />

CLIENTS AND THAT USE OF THE LATTER CAN'tlc",U~Tl!'t.,._<br />

LARGE CoST' SAVINGS. CASE lOAD MANAGEMENl' ISSUES<br />

ARE ALSO CRITICAL, BUT INSUFFICIENT RESEI,I;lCH MAKES<br />

IT DIFFICULT TO ASSESS THE EFFECTIVEN~SS OF; VARIOUS<br />

ASSIGNMENT TECHNIQUES,lEVElS OF ~SUPERVISION, AND<br />

GENERALIZED VERSUS SPECIALIZED CASE lOADS. FURTHER·<br />

MORE, THE LITERATURE REVIEWflEVeAlS THAT (1) MOST<br />

\ ,.<br />

!<br />

/'<br />

!<br />

, . . ~


.c~~.<br />

. .<br />

< - ~,,~,<br />

" '<br />

~~ ____ ._~,.,_,<br />

o<br />

., ,<br />

,I<br />

t<br />

t')<br />

I<br />

,1<br />

1<br />

CRITICAL<br />

PUBLICATION$<br />

',0; FUTURE RESEA~CH EFFORTS. THiS FIRST OF NINE, VOL· ORSKEEPING ACTIVITIES OF MoST LOCAL· AGENCIES ARE<br />

.it,:; VMES PROVIDES AN OVERView OF THE SUBJECT-OF ADULT" NOT AO(PUATE FORAN EVALUATION SYSTE¥: (8) STAFFING<br />

.' .I'j'" PROBATION, WITH ATTENTION '11'0 THE CoNcePTUAL PROB· PRc;>BLEMS; LACK ,OF PRODUCTION COMMIT~ENT, AND DIS.<br />

/i" LEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE .QFTE~ CONFLICTING DEFINI· INTERESTED M~NAGE~EI'fT CAN RESULTI~ SYSTEM FAIL.<br />

y/" TIONS OF PROBATION, THE LEGAL AND STATUTORY DEVEL· VRE (~S IN THE PENNSYLVANIA MEP); AN~ (9) ESTABLISH.<br />

.\ ,/./ ' OPMENT OF PROBATION, ITS ~AJOR OBJECTIVES AND MENTOF A COMMITT~EOF LOCAL CRIM<strong>II</strong>)/ALJUSTJQEI3t;~~<br />

1/:~' TASKS, AND ITS EFFECTIVENE~. SOME OF THE CRITICAL ,R,E,SI;f'f("J!ve.S;.~TDc.F-OLlOW"THE STUDY CAN 'BE HELPFUL<br />

. #.,,(;<br />

..:J.;J ' AREAS ADDRESSED 'NCLUDE T/iELQCUSOF-PAOBATION'c-,-' (AS-PROV~NIN T!;IE AbAMEDA STUDY); F,bRFINDIN~S AND<br />

/; ; ADMINISJ;~£JPN;_~THE'ROlES-cOF PROBATION QFFICERS, , RE~.MENDATIONS SEE NcJ·55682. , ./ /~ ~ .'<br />

r .CASf;LOAQ MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES, STRATEGIES FOR "', ...... Age<strong>II</strong>Cy: US DEPARTMENT OF ~JUSTICE LAW EN.<br />

;v' L TH~PROVt~IOOOF SERYI~S, THE USE .OF PARAPROFES,.-i '. ,FORCEMENTMS!STANCE·ADli.1ll1/iSTRATlON.<br />

J S'9NALSAND V()LU!)ITI;EAS,EDUCATIQNAND TRAININ~FOR 'AY~ GPo .. Stock Order No. 02MOO-Q0797·0; NCJRS<br />

J<br />

~OBATIQN OfFICERS, Tt~E STI)QIES IN P~OBATION; .MAN· MICROFICHE'P.BOGRAM. /<br />

; ,~~ENT INFORMATION SYST,EMS, ~TANA~YSES, AND _.' 'DEVe'OPING BENTE" Nel' .... GUlDE"UNEs-a<br />

;:,1,'1; .......... LSTANDARDS FOR PROBATION. ALSO f.xAMINEDARE .... 15.. ...... ..<br />

_ ISSUES IN THE PI3ODUCTtON A~jD IMPACT OFPRESEtiiTENCE ~<strong>II</strong>ANUAL By A. .. • ."GEL<strong>II</strong>AH, J." M.<br />

"NVt:STIGATIONRE~TS, ISSUES IN.VO. LVED.,,,IN'iHE p. ROVI: ··CALPIN. us DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE "'".',,,.. AP<br />

- - OPM~NT, TESTING AND<br />

,~,SION OF .PROBATION TREATMENT, INNOVATIONS IN PROBA·<br />

AV. ENUE, WM ... S,!,!ING.TQN .. ,DC<br />

~rION STRUCTURE ANQ PROGRAMMING, TRENDS IN INTER.' ~ = .<br />

NATIONAL PROBATIONAPP[ICABi.e' TO THE U,SI, AND THE<br />

. -, ~ STATF. OF .RESEAR9HINAQULT' PROaATION, .. PARTICUL,ARLY ifiiS IS 'A WORKING ~~~~~Ts~~~~~:~1 TO ASSI$T<br />

" THOSE POLiCYMAKElRSf; FOR DEVELOPING A<br />

ITS STAENG~'ANQQl;FICla;:NCIE~. REfEReNCE SOURCE<br />

SENTENCING ' CQOIN(,1 MANUAL<br />

NOTE$ ARFyPROVlDED.FOR IN.DIVIDUAL CHAPTERS. A BIB· '<br />

IMPLEMENTA·<br />

LloGA~Y I~ INCl.!JDEQ. FoFf THE OTHER VOLllMES' OF,<br />

THI$~ALUATION,~E 57667·57674. . '. , ,.<br />

THE '<br />

DESCRIBED ARE<br />

DEVELOP!=D DURING PILOT PROJECTS<br />

/8poi'Iiof1ntl.AgIncy:,U~tDEPAATMENTQF JUSTICE LEAA NA·<br />

liHI'CA(30,!ILL, NEWARK, N.J., PHOENIX,<br />

TIONAL ,INsTIlUrE OF LAW ENFOf:lCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

, JU$TICE.633 INDIANA AveNUE NW;WASliINGTON,DC 20531.<br />

PA. VARiOUS ASPECT$ OF G!JlDE'-<br />

A~GPO' .Stock ordtr No; 027~1;' Nc.lRS<br />

. . ARE PISCUSSED,INCLUbiNG DETER.<br />

M~Pf'ICHEPROGFJMt; • '. .<br />

. THE It-IFQRMA1;ION ~E FI»R .SENTENCINGPECI.<br />

Q. ,;DE8C.iPJlo,utO~ASIE .. .,m OF THE<strong>II</strong>OCEL c" ..... u,'~.,<br />

~ ~ ~C1'I. .., D. M. ICE<strong>II</strong>P,~. D.'''~<strong>II</strong>.IoC''{1<br />

J.W~ANLON, ,: G. NA~y,.MId C. ~R. "u RB~IN~<strong>II</strong>\1·<br />

,~!~WTE,·21()() IiA $'fREET, .NW; ~WASHINGT9N "",,'_ •• '.'<br />

"''''''~''P''' ,iiJ79,c, . " '<br />

•. ,EIGHT:Ri:scRIPhvj: REPORT~ ~RE,·D gl:!l:lI:MrC~'<br />

I!I£J'~P'MOQELEYALl,ItlTION '..' SUPPORTED<br />

BY· NIl:~GI ~F!ArlrS~T,?,STAn;MNSAMPLE: USING STATISTICAl ANALYSIS TO:; "<br />

s.POr FL,AW$IN THe Ql;SIGN, QJ:VELOPING. ~L to DE.<br />

TER~I~E WHICH 9.QMBINATICN OF, F~CTQRS BEST P6E•<br />

~D!CT$ SENTENCING OlITCOMES, VALlQATIONOF THE<br />

SAMPLE, PRESENTING THE GUIDE!.INES SYSTEM TO THE JU·,"<br />

DlCIAfjy"AND, JMP,LEJ.,tENTIN9' THE: SYSTEM. ,,' THE /:IUMAN<br />

FACTORS MITIGATING AGAINST CHA~GEARE'\LSOE~M.<br />

"<br />

-, .,;.<br />

"DIRraCTORJ,<br />

J/<br />

'INED. AN· OFFENSE iNF.6RMA. TION ..' cARD<br />

,ABLE, AND; ILLUSTRATIVE MASTER LIST ITEMS ARE INCLUD."/ ATION APPROACH~S. PROGRAM OBJECTIV~", WERE TO EN<br />

ED •. THE BULK OF THE VOLUME, CONSISTS OF. APPENDE[V COURAGE STATE AND LOCAL P~~NNING' AGENCIES TO G~t<br />

MATERIAL. EXAMPLES, OF' A COHsJRUff!ON SAf,;!ptEERATE AND USE EV~LUATION, INFORMATION AND T ST<br />

CODING!' MANUAL; ACONS]RUCJI9N ~PLE q'AlING WAYS'IN Wt;!JCH EFFECTIVj: USE .. 9F EVALUATION INF,ORMA:<br />

SHEET, AND ERROR STATE~ENTS Ai;lE PROVIDED~,Qi=FENSE TION CAN HELP." THESE AGENCIeS TO ACHIEVE THEIR OB<br />

~ " RANKI~G' INSTRUCTIQf'AS'FOR JUDG ...• ES ARE I.~LUDED. ' AS.<br />

JEC. TIVeS •. THIS ~APER .REPO. R.I. :S'ON LESSON~ L. ~RNED<br />

ARc/ExAMPLES OF INSTRUCTIONAL BOOKLETS FOR THE;FROM THE MEP S, WAYS.:r0 MEASURE ~EP SUCCESS"<br />

CALCULATlbNOFGUIDELINE SENTENCESAHESE INCLUDE MEJHODS FqR BUILDING "N EVALUATION C~~B<strong>II</strong>JTY, ANt;>'<br />

" '~~BboKLETS FOR GENERAL CRIMES AS,,\f4ELLAS;8QOJ(~§ PR9BI,EMS,.T0 BE',If-XPt;CTEQ IN IMPLEM;;NTINGAND OI?~R.<br />

FOR,VIOLENT CRIMES, PROPERTYCRlMES;.ANO DRUG OF· . , AllNG EVALUATIQt!/,SYSTEMS, IT WA~,DETERMINEP THAT<br />

~FENSr:S; ~L TeSTIN~ ~~tEf,lIAIs; INCi.UI)ING"!~ gaM." ' ,EVALUATION SYSTEMS (1) CANNOT ~E EXPECT':'p TO HAVE<br />

"PUTER Pf\OGRAM ANDSUPPLEMENTA,LINSTRUQ!JO.NS, ARE<br />

Ii. MEASURABLE .IMPA,CT ON THEj;!ERFQI:'IMA~CI: OF STArE<br />

.. i .. A. ~MPLE VARI·, ",;:»-'PLANNING AGENCIE~TO DEVELOP AND 1M. P~M~NrEVALU:<br />

ALSO APPENDED, AS IS ~ .. eXAMPLE OF A HANDBOOK FOR<br />

COMPUTER 'I~PLEMENTAilON:PF GUI9ELlNE DATA. ESTI·<br />

PVlt;lNI~G AG,~NCIES AND RWrO~L PLANNING Ut;I'TS,<br />

StNCE THESE "GENCIES, pO ,tro T .- HAVE PRIM~RY~8BJEe-<br />

MATED DEVElOPME.NTjt'lD MAINTENA~oCOSTS ARE PRE· TIVES THAT ARE\BOTH VE~IFIABLE ~D REA~IS~'C~.,(2) AR~ .<br />

SENTED SELEC-..eo.REFERENCES ARE PROVIDED. ALSO SEE NOT .LIKELY TO BE U~rUL TO THE PLANNIN§.AGENCl'<br />

NCJ-4739s;F6fI PARTICIPANT'S HANDBOOK FoR WORKSHOP .<br />

~TAFF UNL,ESS THE A~ENCY ,IS BEU·tG DIRECTElt "TOWARD<br />

ON seNTENCING GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT. '~E MISSION.RELAJ~D O~ECTIVE, AND (3) CAN INCREASE "<br />

~ ntaI Note8: SENTENCING GUloELiNES-STRUCTUR· THEIR CHARQES 9F"iJ!J;)VIDING I,ISEfUL INFORM ATI0 t4 BY<br />

, ,/'~'Ai. DISCREJ~. .'. '., .'. SERVING ,USERliS'EX,ISTlfiG INFORMAtiON NEEO~ AND. AL·<br />

'.~// ' . M NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM<br />

A~. ".' '. ... . - !..0WING USER,s'iO CONTRQL THE STUDY. EVALUATION SY8-<br />

,-',TEM'$ OF VAL.UE TO POTENTIAL. USERS CAN BESET UP<br />

DEVELOPING SENTEHCIHG OUIDEUNES..;,TRAINER'S H~~/// . ONLYIF;rAE'USER IS JNVOLVEDIN EVALUATION ACTiVITY.<br />

30. <strong>II</strong>OOK •..'.,..... KREll, J.C. CALPIN, A. M. GE~IJ",., R ,GIVENJf;iEOPPQRTUNIT't"; PLANNING AGENCIES W,lLL Sf'!<br />

.u.c:iW1l, .. £. DORWOR'I'H, end O. A. SPAID. ,.>UNWERSITY<br />

UP "flVALlIATION SYSTEMS. WHICH DIFFER IN PRODUC1,<br />

RESEAf\CH CORPORATION, 5530 WI!?99NI3IN/ AVENUE, O9$T, AND OPERATIONS, ANOfTHESE SYST.EMS W,I.LL NOT<br />

WA,SjiiNGTQt.I pc. 182 p. 19n., /// . ,. '1tC.-.. 54147 .' AlE SUCCESSFUL 'IN LOCAL ,GRi~<strong>II</strong>I/AL JUSTICE .AGENCIES.<br />

:PA.'trOF LEM'S E)(ECUTIV!:~TAAiNINGPROGRAM I~ .AD: y"PERSONS SETTING UP EVAtUATION SYSTEMS CAN EXPECT<br />

NANCED CRIMINAL Jysric:( PA~CTICES, THIS 'T~INER'S J.::"f' '1." STAFF TURNOVER CAUSING DELAYS AND DISRUPTIONS,<br />

/'MANUAL OUTLI~eS'A WQRKSHOP DESIGN~I) TO. PROVIDE ",,7 RELUCTANCE FROM PROJE~T ,PERSONNEL T~ RELINQUISH<br />

Y JUDG.. ES. AN .. D/OTH.ER OFF. . ICIALS INF.ORM ... A.1'1ON .. ~911...:..I,J§I.!'i~! • DATA, AND PRO. B. LE. M. s-", ..!ffl'.;11' ClVItSERVICE RULES, COM·<br />

/ SENTENCING GUiDeLINES, STRESSING THE~ USE '~~.'.,.~ PUTER PROCE~J~~;"A~D'poNTRACTING. SI,JCCESS OF'THE<br />

.' TI:NcING GUIDELINES AS AIDS IN MA!


c'<br />

o<br />

PUBLICATION$ ,<br />

OF THE NN<br />

. ,",<br />

EVALU~TION<br />

1!,' 0# .~<br />

. Ii<br />

'n<br />

j ---,<br />

• ,. A i .- ':J. ~ . .', (? '! '.<br />

, ED BY GOVERNMI;:NT AGi:~,ICIES AND "BY NONPROFIT AND SET OF SIMULTANEOUS" EQUATIONS, AND THE POLITICAL<br />

jI SOCIAL, SE~YICE QRGANI?ATIONS ARE, INCLUDE;O. EACH ,ARRANGEMENT$ T!;IAT LEAD TO AGGRESSlttE PATROL<br />

,LI~lTI~GIDENT!FIES THE ORGANllATION, 'PROGRAM TITLE STRATEGIES ARE 0 S S "<br />

ADDRESSAN,D, TE;~EP,',HONE' NUM"B'-ER, SPONSORING' '" ";,'" I CUS ED. SEVERP.VPRE,YlOt}S STUDIES<br />

,; ,,' ,,' , THAT HAVE DEALT WITH POLICE EFFECTS ON CAIME;HAVE<br />

AGE~Cy, PROGRAM GO?,tLSANDOBJECTIVES, SERVICES, BEEN CRIT)PIZED FOR VARIOUS REASONS INCLUDING THE '<br />

FiES9U.R~"~~, .. ~~D· ~U~~'CATlqN$ F9R THE PROFESSIONAL ~EASU~f-g USED AND THE E~:rIMATfON PROCEDURES EM .. 'I, ~'<br />

AND'FOR T.HE.GENERA,l. PUBLIC. THE ENTRIES ARE CUR· PLOY~D. DATA PRESENTED IN THIS STUDY ARE CONSIST.<br />

RENT ,AS OF APflIL·MAY ~978. ACCOMPANYING THE DIREC- N ~<br />

TORY ARE .AN It.jTROD_JJCTOlfyC ARTICLE ON THE CONCEPT<br />

E. T' WITH THE VIEW THAT POLICE PATROL STRATEGIES<br />

, a:' ," ,HAvE AN EFFECT ON THE RATE OF ROBBERIES COMMrITED,<br />

"OFCOM~~I ,ltVt~PAE¥ENTION;AN,PVERVIEW OF THE ,/'THAT THIS EFfECT IS A CAUSAL ONE AND NOT THE RESULT<br />

• LEAA ~g"... " M\lli!:TY CI1IME PREVE,NTION (INCLUDING /' OF A SPURIOUS STATISTICAL CORREi:.ATION AND THAT THE<br />

¢P A J!SI1J~GPF ReLEV~!ll' LEAA GRANTS); A LIST OF ORGANV'''' EXISTENCE OF A '<br />

f:'? " ZATIONS'THAI P"t,-lPROVIDE'INFORMATION, TECHNICAL, AS-<br />

'GIVEN PATROL STRATEGY is AFFECTED BY<br />

" SISTANce, FUN91NGj AND TRAINING MATERIALS; A gLOSsA. BUREAUCRATlg DECISIOt.jS AS WELL AS BY LEVELS OF RE~<br />

RY; Afll? AN~ANNOrATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF COMMUNITY SOURC£,S;THE MEASURES OF POLICE RESOURCES (PATROL<br />

CRIME PREVENTION C " ciUNITS ON THE STREET) ANO PPLiCE ,AClIVITY ON THE<br />

TION: ......':, ' M~TERIALl:! FR~M TH~,~GJRS COLLE


~j<br />

(<br />

"<br />

'"<br />

,'.<br />

,. .....<br />

()<br />

,<br />

EXEilPLARY<br />

PUBLICATIONS<br />

OF THE NIJ<br />

FORCIBLE<br />

I<br />

I<br />

/<br />

-'c'<br />

.~ ~.<br />

I~JP .•<br />

()<br />

J<br />

",,1<br />

, ,<br />

1<br />

'1<br />

i I<br />

!~<br />

.,<br />

I<br />

HAVE BEEN DETAINED TIll THE DISPOSITION Of THEIR<br />

CASES. PROGRAM STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SUPER.<br />

VISED RElEASE OF OFFENDERS WERE IMPLEMENTED<br />

flI.E.NLY FOR ECONOMICALLY ADVANTAGED AND DlSAOVAN.<br />

TAGr:D PERSONS AT AlL THREE SITES. FURTHER FINDINGS<br />

AND RECOMMENDATIONS ARE PRESENTED. .<br />

Spo .. eo( ... A1*ICr! US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA.<br />

~ INSTITUTE,.Of LAW ENFORCEMENT AND ~IMINAL<br />

JUSTK:E; e33 INW.NA AVENUE nw. WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Aw ....,. NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

31. EX£WLARy PAO.IECTS-A PAOGfWI OF THE NATIONAL<br />

INS11TUTE OF LAW ENFOfICbIEJrr AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br />

US DEPARTMENT OF Jl.lSTJCE OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT'<br />

~~ t!ID DISSEMINATION. 633 INDIANA AVENUE, WASH:<br />

un """ 20531. 33 p. 1978. NCJ.53H2<br />

REVIEWS ARE PP,oVlDED OF 2S LOCAl. INITIATIVES SELECT.<br />

ED FOR THE EXEMPLARY PROJECTS PROGRAM OF LEM'S<br />

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF I.AW ENFORCEMENT AND ~IMINAL<br />

JUSTICE. THE E~...::"'1.AAY PROJECTS PROGRAM IS A SYS­<br />

TEMA11C METHOD OF IDEN11FY!~ OUTSTANDING ~IMINAL<br />

Jl.lSTJCE PROGRAMS 1HROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY. VERIFY.<br />

I~ THEIR ACHIEVEMENTS, AND PUBLICIZING THEM WIDELY<br />

IN ORDER TO FrNCOURAGE THE WIDESPFIEAD USE OF AD­<br />

VANCED CRIM<strong>II</strong>\IAL JUSTICE PRACTICES. THE 29 PROJECI'S<br />

CITED ANO DlSCUsseo DEAl WITH COMMUNITY INVOLVE.<br />

MENT~ I.A.' ENFORCEMENT. PROseCUTION, ADJUDICATION<br />

AND DEFENSE. CORRECTIONS. JlMi:NILE DIVERSION AND<br />

TREATMENT, AND ALTERNATIVE SERVICE DEUVERY. THEY<br />

INCWDE A RAPE PREVENTION CENTER IN LOUISIANA, COM.<br />

MUNiTY CRIME PREVENTION AND HIDDEN CAMERA PRC).<br />

JECT~\ IN WASHINGTON STATE. A RAPElSEXUAL ASSAULT<br />

CARE CENTER AND A COMMUNITY·BASED CORRECTIONS<br />

PROGRAM IN IOWA. A VOLUNTEER PRoe.~TION COUNSELING<br />

PROGRAM AND A RURAL LEGAL INFORMATION CENTER IN<br />

NEBRASKA. STREET CRIME\ AND MAJOR OFFENSE UNITS IN<br />

NEW YORK CITY, CONSOUDATED POUCE RADIO DISPATCH<br />

SERVICES AND A ONE DAY/ONE TRIAL JURY SYSTEM IN<br />

MICHIGAN ARE INClUDED. A POUCE LEGAL UAlSON IN<br />

TEXAS. AND ECONOMIC CRIME PROSECUTION UNIT IN CON.<br />

NECTICUT. THE PROSECUTOR MANAGEMENT INFORMATION<br />

SYSTEM (PROMIS) AND PUBUC DEFENDER SERVICES IN THE<br />

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ARE DE5Cr<strong>II</strong>BED. AN ADMINISTRA.<br />

TIVE ADJUDICATION BUREAU FOR TRAFFIC OFFENSES IN<br />

NEW YORK STATE. WORK RELEASE AND JUVENILE ARBITRA.<br />

TION PROJECTS IN MARYLAND, PAROLE, OFFICER AIDE AND<br />

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROGRAMS IN OHIO<br />

FRAUD PROSECUTION IN CAUFORNlA, MENTAL PENNSYLVA:<br />

NIA. AND JUVENILE DIVERSION. TREATMENT. EDUCATION.<br />

AND CORRECTIONS PROGRAMS IN CAUFORNIA, COLORADO<br />

MISSOURI, AND PENNSYLVANIA ARE GIVEN. BRIEF OUTLINES<br />

OF EACH PROGRAM ARE PROVIDt:D. ALONG WITH PHOTO.<br />

GRAPHS AND TABULAR DATA.<br />

A\I8<strong>II</strong>atM<strong>II</strong>ty: NCJRS MI~OFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

40. FEOEIW. LAW ON CONSU<strong>II</strong>EA DECEPTION-AM AGENCY<br />

BY AGEHCY ANALYSIS. By G. J. ZWEIBE1.. AMERICAN IN.<br />

STITUTES FOR RESEARCH. 1055 THOMAS JEFFERSON<br />

STREET,IN/, WASHINGTON DC 20007; NATIONAL CON.<br />

SUMER L~W CENTER, 11 BEACON STREET, BOSTON MA<br />

02106. 21.l1 p. 1979. NCJ.5I132<br />

CONSUMER' DECEPTION STATUTES AND REGULATIONS AD.<br />

MINISTERED BY FEDERAL GOVERNM~NT AGENCIES ARE<br />

ANALYZED ''''~ THIS REPORT. IT IS A REFERENCE TOOL AND<br />

PROVIDES Of:TAILED CITATIONS TO THE AUTHORITY RE:.<br />

SPONSIBLE FOR EACH LAW. THIRTY FEDERAL AGENCIES<br />

ARE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT; AN ADDITIONAL CHAPTER<br />

CONTAINS MiSCeLLANEOUS FEDERAL PROHIBITIONS NOT<br />

ASSOCIATED WITH PARTICULAR AGENCIES AND THE APPEN.<br />

DIX SUMMARIZES THE CONSUMER PROTECTION RESPONSI.<br />

BI~lTIES OF AN ADDmONAL NINE FEDERAL AGENCIES. THE<br />

MATERIAL IS ORGANIZED BY AGENCY, AND STATUTES EN.<br />

FC'-lCED BY MORE THAN ONE AGENCY ARE<br />

CROSS·REFERENCED TO THE AGENCY MOST ASSOCIATED<br />

WITH THE SPECIFIC LAW OR LISTED UNDER EACH AGENCY.<br />

EACH CHAP,TER INCLUDES A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE<br />

AGENCY (E.G" DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, CIVIL AERc)'<br />

NAUTICS BOARD, CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMIS­<br />

SION, DEPARTMENTS OF DEFENSE, ENERGY, AND HOUSING<br />

AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AND THE NATIONAL CREDIT<br />

UNION ADMINISTRATION), THE YEAR IT COMMENCED OPER.<br />

ATION, AND A SUMMARY OF PROHIBITED TRADE PRACTICES<br />

AND AVAILABLE REMEDIES ASSOCIATED WITH THAT<br />

AGENCY. A DETAILED LISTING OF ALL DECEPTIVE TRADE<br />

PRACTICES PROHIBITED BY EACH AGENCY'S ENABUNG LeG.<br />

ISLATION, REGULATIONS, OR OTHER SOURCES OF LEGAL<br />

AUTHORITY ARE ALSO PRESENTED, REMEDIES ARE CATE­<br />

GORIZED AS ADMINISTRATIVE, CIVIL. CRIMINAL, PRIVATE<br />

AND OTHER. THE INDEX IS ARRANGED ALPHABETICALLY BY<br />

SUBJECT AREA, ALLOWING ACCESS TO SPECIFIC SECTIONS<br />

OF INDIVIDUAL AGENCY CHAPTERS. FOOTNOTES ARE PRO­<br />

VIDED. (AUTHOR ABSTRo'\CT MODIFIED)<br />

SponlOrlng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA.<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 6.'13 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

AYI'<strong>II</strong>b1l1ty: GPO Stock Order No, 027..()()().()()825-9· NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

'<br />

41. FEMALE OFFENDER-A SELECTED BIBUOGRAPHY D M<br />

HORTON Ind M. KRAVITZ, Ed.. NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUS:<br />

TICE REFERENCE SERI!ICE, BOX 6000. ROCKVILLE MD 20850.<br />

58 p. 1979. NCJ.55e37<br />

THIS BIBLIOGRAPHY REPRESENTING SELECTED LITERATURE<br />

ON . ADULT FEMALE OFFENDERS EMBRACES THREE<br />

THEMES-IDEOLOGY, IMPLICATIONS, LEGAL AND PROCEDUA.<br />

AL MATIERS, AND MANAGEMENT AND DISCHARGE OF<br />

FEMALE INMATES. THE L1TERATUAE WAS INCLUDED ON THE<br />

BASIS OF IMPORTANCE OF THE CONCEPT TREATED, GENER.<br />

AL CLARITY OF PRESENTATION, QUALITY OF RESEARCH<br />

AND DOCUMENTATION, AND AVAILABILITY. FOCUSING ON<br />

LITERATURE FR?M 1965 TO 1978, THE BIBLIOGRAPHY WITH<br />

ABSTRACTS TREATS SUCH ISSUES AS THE HISTORICAL DE.<br />

VELOPMENT OF FEMALE·SPECIFIC CRIMINOLOGY CURRENT<br />

STATISTICAL RESEARCH ON THE NATURE, EXTENT, AND ETI.<br />

OLOGY OF FEMALE CRIMINALITY, THE EFFECTS OF SOCIAL<br />

FORCES AND ATiiTUDINAL CHANGES ON WOMEN IN SOCI •<br />

ETY. SEX·BASED TREATMENT AND PROCESSING DIFFEREN.<br />

TIATIONS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AND THEIR<br />

QUESTIONED CONSTITUTIONALITY IN LIGHT OF THE 14TH<br />

AMENDMENT, DEVELOPING PRISON LAW, TH~ PROPOSED<br />

EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT. SEX DISCRIMINATION PRAC.<br />

TICES IN THE AREAS OF ARREST, BAIL COURT DEFENSE.<br />

SENTENCING, PROBATION, PAROLE, AND WORK RELEASE<br />

OPPORTUNITIES, CITATIONS ALSO REPRESENT SUBJECTS<br />

SUCH AS THE MANAGEMENT AND DISCIPLINE OF FEMALE<br />

OFFENDERS, THE CONCEPT OF FEMALE PRISONIZATION<br />

THE UNIQUE CONDITIONS AND PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED<br />

WITH INC~RCERATED WOMEN, THE INMATE CULTURE AND<br />

SOCIAL SIRUCTURE OF SEXUALLY SEGREGATED AS WELL<br />

AS COED, PRISON ENVIRONMENTS,AND THE EDUCATIONAL<br />

AND VOCATIONAL TRAINING CURRICULUMS AVAILABLE TO<br />

FEMALE INMATES, THE ENTRIES ARE ARRANGED ALPHA.<br />

BETICALLY BY AUTHOR, AND THE LITERATURE IS SELECTED<br />

FROM THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERV<br />

ICE DATA BASE.<br />

•<br />

SponlOrlng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA<br />

I~~~~E.'~~J'r~~~N~A~~u~NJ~,~~~~~1:~~ ~I~~:,~<br />

Avlllllblllty: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM,<br />

42. :~gsR': R::~-A MANUAL FOR FILING AND TRIAL PROS-<br />

~toV~i~~~~~~~TT~~' :~6UJ~~T~CE ~~u~lcg~!~~:<br />

, SEATTLE WA 98105. 75 p. 1978.<br />

NCJ.43521<br />

TESTS AND WITNESSES NECESSARY FOR RAPE CHARGES<br />

TO BE FILED, PRE·TRIAL PREPARATION, PLEA BARGAINING<br />

STANDARDS, JURY SELECTION, TRIAL STRATEGY, SENTENC·<br />

ING. AND COUNSELING FOR THE VICTIM ARE EXAMINED IN<br />

DETAIL. INTERVIEWS WITH 40 EXPERIENCED PROSECUTORS<br />

INDICATED THAT EVEN IN MAJOR CITIES AN AVERAGE OF<br />

ONLY 4.5 RAPE CASES PER PROSECUTOR ACTUALLY PRO·<br />

CEEDS TO TRIAL, WHILE 2,5 RESULT iN A CONVICTION.<br />

SINCE THE HANDLING OF RAPE CASES IS OFTEN AN UNFA­<br />

MILIAR TASK, THIS MANUAL HAS BEEN DESIGNED AS A REF·<br />

ERENCE WORK. IT DISCUSSES THE HISTORICAL PREJUDICES<br />

PROSECUTORS, JUDGES, AND JURIES HAVE HAD TOWARD<br />

RAPE VICTIMS. ALTHOUGH THE VICTIM IS OFTEN THOUGHT<br />

TO BE CONTRIBUTORY TO THE OFFENSE, A STUDY OF RE·<br />

PORTS FROM FIVE MAJOR POLICE DEPARTMENTS FOUND<br />

THAT SUBSTANTIAL THREATS AGAINST THE VICTIM'S LIFE<br />

WERE MADE IN 60 PERCENT' OF CASES AND STRONG·ARM<br />

FORCE WAS USED IN 75 peRCENT. MOST ATTACKS TOOK<br />

PLACE IN THE VICTIM'S HOME OR ON THE STREET. MEDICAL<br />

TESTS WHICH SHOULD BE CONDUCTED IMMEO:ATEL Y<br />

AFTER REPORT OF THE ATTACK, MEDICAL TESTS WHICH<br />

SHOULD BE CONDUCTED AT INTERVALS OF TIME AFTER THE<br />

ATTACK, AND QUESTIONS WHICH SHOULD BE ASKED AT THE<br />

TIME ARE DETAILED. FORENSIC EVIDENCE WHICH SHOULD<br />

BE GATHERED IS DISCUSSED. THE PROCESS OF PLEA BAR·<br />

GAINING AND 'rHE POPULAR CONCEPT OF THE 'DEGREE OF<br />

SERIOUSNESS' OF RAPE ARE CONSIDERED TO AID THE<br />

PROSECUTOR WHO MUST DETERMINE HIS CHANCES OF<br />

WINNING THE CASE. BECAUSE OF POPULAR PREJUDICES,<br />

THE RAPE CASE MUST BE ESPECIALI.Y WELL PREPARED.<br />

EVIDENCE, WITNESSES, AND TRIAL 'TACTICS ARE DIS·<br />

CUSSED. METHODS OF DISCOVERING POSSIBLE JUROR BIAS<br />

ARE DETAILED. INCLUDED ARE CHECKLISTS, SAMPLE<br />

FORMS FOR MEDICAL AND FORENSIC EXAMINATIONS, BIB·<br />

.. LIOGRAPHIES, AND A DESCRIPTION OF RAPE VICilM SERVo<br />

ICES IN VARIOUS CITIES.<br />

Sponaortng AlJItncy: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531,<br />

Avllllblllty: GPO Stock Order No. 027.()()().()()618·3: NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

43. FORCIBLE HAPE-A MANUAL FOR PAmOL OFFICERS­<br />

POLICE VOLUME 2. By F. J. ALBI. BATIELLE MEMORIAL<br />

LAW AND JUSTiCE STUDY CENTER, 4000 NE 41ST STREET,<br />

SEATTLE WA 98105. 52 p, 1978, NCJ043522<br />

SINCE THE INITIAL POLICE CONTACT IS THE MOST IMPOR·<br />

TANT SOURCE OF EVIDENCE IN A RAPE CASE, THIS MANUAL<br />

HAS BEEN DEVELOPED TO , 10 POLICE OFFICERS WITH IN·<br />

TERVIEWS, EVIDENCE GATHt., '<strong>II</strong>/G, AND SUSPECT APPRE·<br />

HENSION. MOST OF THE, EVIDENCE NECESSARY FOR SUC·<br />

CESSFUL PROSECUTION OF A RAPE CASE IS AVAILABLE<br />

ONLY AT TIME OF PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION: THIS PUTS<br />

A SPECIAL BURDEN ON THE PATROL OFFICER RESPONDING<br />

TO THE CALL. THE MOST IMPORTANT SOURCE OF INFORMA·<br />

TION WILL BE THE INTERVIEW WITH THE VICTIM. TECH·<br />

NIQUES FOR EVALUATING THE RELIABILITY OF THE TESTI·<br />

MONY, PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS PECULIAR TO RAPE IN·<br />

VESTIGATIONS, AND METHOOS FOR ESTABLISHING RAP·<br />

PORT ,4,RE DISCUSSED. SPEOIAL TECHNIQUES ARE GIVEN<br />

FOR INTERVIEWING TW:: ELDERLY, ADOLESCENTS, AND<br />

CHILDREN BECAUSE NEARLY HALF OF ALL VICTIMS ARE<br />

UNDER AGE 20, LEGAL PROBLEMS ARISE WITH MEDICAL EX·<br />

AMINATIONS OF VICTIMS AND NOTIFICATION OF PARENTS,<br />

ESPECIALLY PARENTS OF ADOLESCENTS, FOR VERY YOUNG<br />

CHILDREN, IT IS OFTEN WISE TO l,JSE Sf'ECIALL Y TRAINED<br />

INTERVIEWERS. RAPE CRISIS CENTERS AND HOSPITALS CAN<br />

ALSO HELP WITH INTERVIEWING BY FILLING IN MISSING BITS<br />

OF EVIDENCE, CLOSE COOPERATION BElWEEN POLICE AND<br />

SUCH AGENCIES IS URGED. SEARCH TECHNIQUES AND<br />

METHODS OF GENERATING A POOL OF SUSPECTS ARE DIS·<br />

CUSSED, INCLUDING THE USE OF HELICOPTERS, RADIO. AND<br />

TRACKING DOGS. RAPE BRINGS SPECIAL POLICE PROB·<br />

LEMS. BECAUSE NEWS MEDIA ARE USUALL V VERY INTER·<br />

ESTED IN RAPE CASES, POLICIES HAVE TO BE DEVELOPED<br />

FOR DEALING WITH REPORTERS. IN ADDITION, MANY COM·<br />

MUNITY GROUPS WANT POLICE SPEAKERS ON THE SUB·<br />

JECT. RAPE CASES ALSO REQUIRE UNUSUALLY CLOSE c0-<br />

OPERATION WITH THE PROSECUTING ATIORNEY. THE<br />

PATROL OFFICER SHOULD NOT ONLY FOLLOW ESTAB·<br />

LlSHED GUIDELINES, HE ALSO SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED TO<br />

SUGGEST WAYS TO IMPROVE HANDLING OF RAPE CASES,<br />

SponeorIng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE. 833 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Avllllblllty: GPO Stock Order No. 027·000·00619·1: NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

44. FORCIBLE RAPE-AN ANALYSIS OF LEGAL ISSUES. By C.<br />

E. U;~D. J. A. REICH. Irod D. CHAPPELL. BATTELLE<br />

MEMORIAl.IAW AND JUSTICE STUDY CENTER. 4000 NE 4iST<br />

STREET, SEATILE WA 98105, 106 p. 1978.<br />

NCJ.43520<br />

PAST ATTITUDES TOWARDS RAPE. CURRENT LAWS, MOVE·<br />

MENTS TOWARD REFORM, AND PROBLEMS OF ENFORCE·<br />

MENT OF RAPE LAW ARE SUMMARIZED. A STATE·BY·STATE<br />

TABLE GIVES CURRENT PROPOSED AND PASSED LEGISLA·<br />

TION. TRADITIONALLY RAPE HAS BEEN DEFINED AS 'CARNAL<br />

KNOWLEDGE OF A WOMAN BY FO~CE AND AGAINST HER<br />

WILL.' THE TEST OF FORCE HAS BEEN CRUCIAL TO THE<br />

CASE ANO CONSENT HAS BEEN DEDUCED FROM THE CIR·<br />

CUMSTANCES. HISTORICALLY. VICTIMS WERE ASSUMED TO<br />

BE CONSENTING PARTIES TO THE RAPE UNLESS CRIMINAL<br />

CIRCUMSTANCES COULD BE PROVED BEYOND DOUBT. IN<br />

ADDITION, VICTIMS WERE OFTEN SUBJECT TO QUESTIONS<br />

ABOUT PAS- SEXUAL BEHAVIOR AND EMBARRASSED BY<br />

POLICE AND IXlURT HANDLING OF THE CASE. CURRENT<br />

REFORM EFFORTS HAVE ATTEMPTED A REDEFINITION OF<br />

RAPE TO CONSIDER TYPES OF RESISTANCE, DEGREES OF<br />

RAPE, ANDFLE),;lBLE PENALTY STRUCTURES DEPENDING<br />

UPON CIRCUMSTANCES, AND TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE<br />

SPECIAL ISSUES OF CHILD SEXUAL MOLESTATION, RAPE<br />

WITKIN MARRIAGE, AND RAPE IN WHICH A MALE IS THE<br />

VICTI~4. REFORM GROUPS HAVE FOUND JURIES UNWILLING<br />

TO,CONVICT FOR RAPE IN SITUATIONS RESEMBLING SEDUC·<br />

TION BECAUSE PENALTY STRUCTURES ARE CURRENTLY<br />

TOO SEVERE. PRIVACY FOR RAPE VICTIMS, VICTIM ADVO·<br />

CATE PROGRAMS, VICTIM SERVICE PROGRAMS, AND RAPE<br />

PREVENTION AND SELF·DEFENSE PROGRAMS ARE DIS·<br />

CUSSED, THE MICHIGAN AND WASHINGTON STATE LAWS<br />

ARE DISCUSSED AS PATIERNS OF SUCCESSFUL CHANGE.<br />

A~'PEND1XES GIVE: A TABLE SUMMARIZING LEGISLATION IN<br />

EACH STATE, A NARRATIVE SUMMARY OF STATE LEGISLA·<br />

TION, '(H~ MODEL PENAL CODE, THE MICHIGAN, MINNESO·<br />

TA, WASHINGTON, AND WISCONSIN STATE STATUTES, A SE·<br />

LECTED BIBliOGRAPHY, AND SEVERAL SAMPLE DEFINITIONS<br />

OF RAPE,<br />

SponlOl'lng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON. DC 20531.<br />

Av .... b<strong>II</strong>Ity: GPO Stock Order No. 027·000·00627·2: NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

45. FORCIBLE RAPE-FINAl. PROJECT REPORT.. By D. D.<br />

SCHRAM. BATIELLE MEMORIAL LAW AND JUSTICE STUDY<br />

CENTER, 4000 NE 41ST STREET, SEATILE WA 98105. 93 p.<br />

1978, NCJ·435:!4<br />

FINDINGS ARE GIVEN OF A 2·YEAR PROJECT WHICH SUR·<br />

VEYED A NATIONWIDE SAMPLE OF POLICE AND PROSECUT·<br />

ING AGENCIES, INTERVIEWED RAPE VICTIMS, ANI) GATH·<br />

ERED STATISTICS. THIS PROJECT FOUND THAT RAPE. IS THE<br />

MOST UNDERREPORTED CRIME IN THE UNITED STATES.<br />

ONLY A FRACTION OF THr: RAPES COMMITTED ARE RE·<br />

'.<br />

,<br />

14<br />

15<br />

' ....<br />

,"I


,<br />

FO~CIBLE<br />

PUBLICATIONS<br />

OF THE NIJ<br />

HEALTH<br />

. ',lit<br />

"<br />

i<br />

I<br />

.<br />

PORTED, MOSTLY BECAUSE THE VICTIM FEARS THE TREAT.<br />

MENT SHE WILL RECEIVE FROM THE POLICE AND PROSECU.<br />

TORS. OF REPORTED CRIMES, ONLY 5 PERCENT LEAD TO<br />

APPREHENSION OF A SUSPECT AND LESS THAN 3 PERCENT<br />

TO A CONVICTION. RAPISTS ARE LARGELY INDISTINGUISH.<br />

ABLE FROM THE REST OF THE POPULATION. THE VICTIM IS<br />

GENERALLY AGE 20 OR YOUNGER: THE RAPIST AGE 30 OR<br />

YOUNGER. MOST ATTACKS, INVOLVE STRANGERS OR<br />

SLIGHT ACQUAINTANCES. MOST RAPES TAKE PLACE IN THE<br />

VICTIM'S HOME OR ON THE STREET. SEVERE FORCE IS<br />

USED IN 60 PERCENT OF ATTACKS: 'STRONG·ARM' FORCE IN<br />

75 PERCENT. MOST INJURIES ARE MINOR, BUT THE PSYCHO.<br />

LOGICAL AFTEREFFECTS ARE MAJOR. (RAPE.HOMICIDES<br />

WERE SPECIFICALI. Y EXCLUDED FROM THIS S'rUDY.) THE<br />

STUDY FOUND THAT THE AVERAGE POLICE OFFICER IS<br />

GIVEN LITTLE TRAINING IN THE SPECIAL PROBLEMS OF<br />

RAPE INVESTIGATION, YET THE INITIAL CONTACT IS THE<br />

MOST IMPORTANT SOURCE OF EVIDENCE, FOR PROSECU.<br />

TION. TRAINING FOR POLICE AND INVESTIGATORS IS SUG.<br />

G~SiED. ;.. SERiES OF TRAiNING MANUALS IS BEING ISSUED<br />

AS PARi OF THIS PROJECT. APPENDIXES PRESENT TABLES<br />

ANALYZING DATA FROM POLl~~E REPORTS IN SEATTLE,<br />

WASH., DETROIT, MICH., KANSAS CITY, MO., NEW ORLEANS,<br />

LA., AND PHOENIX, ARIZ. GIVEN ARE NUMBER OF VICTIMS,<br />

AGE, RACE, WITNESSES, LOCATION OF OFFENSE, WEAPONS<br />

USED, TYPES OF RESISTANCE, INJURIES SUSTAINED. AND<br />

AN ANALYSIS OF FOLLOWUP INVESTIGATION.<br />

Sponlorlng AgInCy: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA.<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

An<strong>II</strong>Ib<strong>II</strong>Ity: GPO Stock Order No. 027'()()()-00625-6: NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROORAM.<br />

4fi. i=OMCilLE RAPE-POLICE ADMINISTRATIVE AND POLICY<br />

ISSUES-POLICE VOLUME.e. By C. ULIERO. BATTELLE<br />

MEMORIAL LAW AND JUSTICE STUDY CENTER, "000 NE "1ST<br />

STREET, SEATTLE WA 98105. 43 p. 1978. NCJ


HEALTH<br />

PUIJLlCATIONS<br />

--<br />

,<br />

i<br />

, -<br />

-., I<br />

i .... ~.'.<br />

I<br />

I<br />

~<br />

I<br />

!<br />

~<br />

1<br />

f<br />

I<br />

SIVE FOOTNOTED REFERENCES AND SMALLER BIBLIOGRA­<br />

PHIES.<br />

SUpplerMntal Nots.: NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE EXECU.<br />

TIVE TRAINING PROGRAM.<br />

~ Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE<br />

OF DEVELOPMENT, TESTiNG AND DISSEMINATION, 633 INDI.<br />

ANA AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC 20531.<br />

Avlllleblllty: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGR.~M.<br />

61. HEALTH CARE IN CORAECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS-PARTICI.<br />

PANT'S HANDBOOk. Iy N. I. OLUCkSTEAN, M. NEUSE, J.<br />

HARNEss, R. PACKAAD, lind C. PATMOH. UNIVERSITY RE.<br />

SEARCH CORPORATION, 5530 WISCONSIN AVENUE, WASH.<br />

INGTON DC. 130 p. 1977. HCJ.473t13<br />

THIS HANDBOOK TRACES SESSION·BY.SESSION A WORK. '<br />

SHOP FOR THE TOP 60 STATE AND LOCAL POLICYMAKERS<br />

RESPONSI.~LE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTA.<br />

TION OF Hi:ALTH CARE STANDARDS FOR CORRECTIONAL IN.<br />

STITUTIONS. THE WORKSHOP CONSISTS OF 10 SESSIONS<br />

CONDUCTED OVER A a.DAY .PERIOD. THE FIRST THREE SES­<br />

SIONS DEA~ WITH AN OVERVIEW OF WORKSHOP GOALS, A<br />

NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HEALTH CARE DELIVERY IN COR.<br />

RECTIONS. AN EXA~AINATION OF HEALTH CARE DELIVERY<br />

SYSTEMS WITHIN CORRECTIONAL SETTINGS, AND A DISCUS.<br />

SION OF THE USE AND ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH CARE<br />

STANDARDS REGARDING THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH<br />

SERVICES DELIVERY WITHIN "HE CORRECTIONAL SETTING.<br />

BOTH HEALTH CARE SERVICE AND SERVICES RESOURCE<br />

CHECKLISTS ARE PROVIDED. AS ARE TWO CASE STUDIES<br />

OF STANDARDS FOR HEALTH EDUCATION. THE NEXT FOUR<br />

SESSIONS DISCUSS SUPPORT SERVICES NEEDED FOR EF.<br />

FECTIVE HEALTH CARE SERVICE, MANAGEMENT OF HEALTH<br />

CARE DELIVERY IN CORRECTIONS. AND IMPLEMENTING<br />

CHANGE WITHIN THE ENVIRONMENT OF CORRECTIONAL IN.<br />

STITUTIONS. A REVIEW IS ALSO PROVIDED OF THE HEALTH<br />

CARE DELIVERY SYSTEM RELATIVE TO CHANGES AND OP.<br />

TIONS IN SERVICE DELIVERY AND MANAGEMENT. THE FINAL<br />

THREE SESSIONS ARE DEVOTED TO IDENTIFYING AND IN.<br />

FLUENCING EXTERNAL. AGENCIES AND ATTITUDES WHICH<br />

AFFECT HEALTH CARE DELIVERY, DEVELOPING ACTION<br />

PLANS FOR EFFECTING CHANGE WITHIN SPECIFIC HEALTH<br />

CARE DELIVERY SYSTEMS, AND DISCUSSING FUTURE TRAIN.<br />

ING POSSIBILITIES. WORKSHEETS, OBSERVER FORMS, SAM.<br />

PLES OF CORRESPONDENCE, AND OTHER SUPPORTING MA.<br />

TERIALS ARE PROVIDED FOR EACH SESSION. APPENDIXES<br />

PROVIDE WORKSHOP LOGISTICS, A BIBLIOGRAPHY. AND A<br />

GLOSSARY OF TERMS OFTEN ENCOUNTERED IN DISCUS­<br />

SIONS OF HEALTH CARE SERVICE DELIVERY WITHIN COR.<br />

RECTIONAL SETTINGS.<br />

Ic.IppIemenI8l NotM: EXECUTIVE TRAINING p,ROGRAM IN AD-<br />

VANCED CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRACTICES. • ~<br />

8poMortng AIency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTiCE OFFICE<br />

OF DEVELOPMENT, TESTING AND DISSEMINATION, 633 INDI.<br />

ANA AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC 20531.<br />

Avllllblllty: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

, 62. HEALTH CARE IN CORRECTIONAL IHiTITUTIOH8-TRAIN­<br />

EA'8 HAH~. IV N. I. GLUCkmRN, M. NEUSE, J.<br />

HARNESS, R. PACkARD, lind C. PATMOH. UNIVERSITY RE.<br />

SEARCH CORPORATION, 5530 WISCONSIN AVENUE, WASH.<br />

INGTON DC. 218 p. 1977. .HCJ.54f41<br />

THIS TRAINER'S MANUAL TRACES SESSION·BY.SESSION A<br />

WORKSHOP FOR ST".lE AND LOCAL POLICYMAKERS RE.<br />

SPONSIBLE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION<br />

OF HEALTH CARE STANDARDS FOR CORRECTIONAL INSTI.<br />

TUTIONS. PARr OF lEM'S EXECUTIVE TRAlr~ING PROGRAM<br />

IN ADVANcED CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRACTICES, THE MANUAL<br />

OUTLINES THE INSTRUCTOR'S ROLE IN A WORKSHOP CON.<br />

SISTING OF 10 SESSIONS OV!:A A 3·DAY peRIOD. THE<br />

GOALS OF EACH SESSION ARE OUTLINED, ALONG WITH RA.<br />

TIONALE, INSTRUCTIONAL METHOD, AND MATERIALS/lOG IS.<br />

TICS PRIMARY TO THE SESSION'S SELECTED TOPIC. THE<br />

18<br />

FIRST THREE SESSIONS DEAL WITH AN OVERVIEW OF THE<br />

WORKSHOP GOALS, A NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HEALTH<br />

CARE DELlVEA'1J IN CORRECTIONS, AN EXAMINATION OF<br />

HEALTH CARE DELIVERY SYSTEMS WITHIN CORRECTIONAL<br />

SET<strong>II</strong>NGS, AND A DISCUSSION OF THE USE AND ASSESS.<br />

MENT OF HEALTH CARE STANDARDS !N TERMS OF THEIR<br />

IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH SERVICE. THE REMAINI~JG .SES­<br />

SIONS COVER SUPPORT SEAVICES NEEDED FOR EFFECTIVE<br />

HEALTH CARE DEliVeRY, IMPLICATIONS OF USING STAND.<br />

ARDS FOR PERSONNEL, MANAGING HEALTH CARE DELIV.<br />

ERY IN CORRECTIONS, IMPLEMENTING CHANGE IN CORREC­<br />

TiONAL INSTITUTIONS, CONTROLLING EXTERNAL INFLU.<br />

ENCES,.AND DEVELOPING ACTION PLA.~S FOR INSTITUTING<br />

CHANGES WITHIN THE CORRECTIONAL SETTING. SAMPLE<br />

FORMS ARE INCLUDED. AN EXERCISE IN DEVELOPING A<br />

COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AMOI~G PRISON PERSoNNEL<br />

AND DECISION MAKERS IS APPENDED. SEE ALSO NCJ 47392<br />

AND 47393,<br />

'<br />

8uppilmenUi Hotea: FROM THE EXECUTIVE TRAINING PRO.<br />

GRAM IN ADVANCED CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRACTICES.<br />

Sponaorl,'1<strong>II</strong> Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE<br />

OF DEVELOPMENT, TESTING AND DISSEMINATION, 633 INDI.<br />

ANA AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC 20531.<br />

Ava!llblllty: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

63. HIGH SPEED PATROL CAA TIRES-A GUIDE. BV A. C.<br />

LEWIS end Eo LEWIS JA. US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE<br />

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS LAW ENFORCEMENT<br />

STANDARDS LABORATORY, WASHINGTON DC 20234: 42 p.<br />

1979. ~5t72t<br />

THIS GUIDE PROVIDES TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR SE.<br />

lECTING TIRES TO SUIT THE NEEDS OF HIGH SPEED POLICE<br />

PURSUIT CARS, AND FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE TIRES FOR<br />

MAXIMUM SAFETY, TIRE LIFE, AND PERFORMANCE. THE<br />

COMPARATIVE DATA ON TIRE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION,<br />

AND MAINTENANCE PRI:SENTED WERE COLLECTED FROM<br />

TESTS DONE TO EVALUATE COMPARATIVE TRACTION AND<br />

PERFORMANCE OF VARIOUS BRANDS AND SIZES OF HIGH<br />

SPEED PURSUIT TIRES. BASED ON INFORMATION COllECT.<br />

ED FROM A SURVEY OF POLICE DEPARTMENTS THROUGH.<br />

OUT THE COUNTRY BY THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION<br />

OF CHIEFS OF POLICE. USES FOR H!GH SPEED PURSUIT<br />

TIRES ARE DISCUSSED; I.E., TYPES OF ROADS DRIVEN, PUR.<br />

SUIT DRIVING, TIRE MAINTENANCE, HAZARD EXPOSURE,<br />

TYPES OF TIRES USED, TIRE MILEAGE, SNOW TIRE USAGE,<br />

ANt) ASPECTS OF RADIALS VERSUS SNOW TIRES. TECHNI.<br />

CAL FACTORS EXAMINED INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION, TIRE<br />

MARKINGS, TIRE MATERIALS, USE OF CHAINS, AND THE<br />

GASoLINE MIlEAGE OF CERTAIN TIRES. COST FACTORS,<br />

PRINCIPLES OF SELECTION, AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA<br />

ARE DETAILED. OPERATIONAL ASPECTS SUCH AS INSTAlLA.<br />

TION, BREAKING IN THE TIRES, ROAD CONDITIONS, INFLA.<br />

TION CHECKS, ROTATION, REPAIRS, AND SERVICING ARE<br />

COVERED AS ESSENTIAL TO OPTIMAL TIRE SELECTION AND<br />

USE. {lIAGRAMS, GRAPHS, TABLES, AND PHOTOGRAPHS AC­<br />

COMPANY THE TEXT. THE FEDERAL QUALIFIED PRODUCTS<br />

lIST, A CHART FOR TIRE INTIERCHANGEABILlTY AND lOAD<br />

AND INFLATION DATA, AND A TIRE MIXING GUIDE ARE Ap.<br />

PENDED.<br />

IUppllmen'" HolM: A LIMITED NUMBER OF COPIES ARE<br />

AVAILABLE FROM NBS.<br />

~ Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE lEM NA.<br />

TIONAl INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531-<br />

AV<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>bi<strong>II</strong>ty: GPO Stock Order No. 003-OO3.()2073.7· US DE.<br />

PARTMENT OF· COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STAND.<br />

ARDS LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS LABORATORY<br />

WASHINGTON DC 20234 Stock Order No. NBS SP 480.33:<br />

NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

'<br />

OF THE NIJ<br />

~, ILLEGAL CORPORATE IEHAVIOR. Iy. M. I. CUNARD, P. C.<br />

YEAGEA, J. IR<strong>II</strong>IETTE, D. PETRAlHEK, 8I1d E. HARRIES,<br />

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY,<br />

MADISON WI 53706. 348 p. 1979. NCJ.57n3<br />

FOCUSING ON SEVERAL HUNDRED MAJOR CORPOrIATIONS,<br />

THis STUDY REPRESENTS THE FIRST LAR,GE·SCAlE, COM·<br />

PREHENSIVE INVESTIGATION OF CORPORATIONS FOR AC­<br />

TIONS THAT VIOLATE THE LAW. ALTHOUGH THE EMPIRICAL<br />

INVESTIGATiON CONCENTRATED ON 582 OF THE LARGEST<br />

PUBl!CLY OWNED CORPORATIONS IN.THE U.S., THE MAJOR<br />

FOCUS WAS ONMANUrACTURING FIRMS WHOSE ANNUAL<br />

SALES (1875, RANGED FROM $300 MILLION TO MORE THAN<br />

$45 BILLION, WITH AN AVERAGE SALES VOLUME OF $1.7 BIL·<br />

liON. THE STUDY DATA COVERED ALL ENFORCEMENT AC­<br />

TIONS OBTAINABLE, ACTIONS INITIATED OR IMPOSED BY 24<br />

FEDERAL AGENCIES DURING 1975 AND 11176. THE DATA<br />

REVEAL A WIDE RANGE OF CORPORATE VIOLATIONS, AS<br />

WEll AS AorlON INITIATED AND IMPOSED BY GOVERNMENT<br />

AGENCIES. PREDICTIONS OF VIOLATIONS ARE ATlCMPTED<br />

THROUGH ANALYSES OFTEN USED TO COMPARE<br />

INDUSTRY·lEVEl AND ECONOMY·LEVEL DATA. THESE DATA<br />

SHOW THAT UNFAVORABLE TRENDS IN SALES, PROFITS,<br />

EARNINGS. AND PRODUCT DIVERSIFICATION AREl ASSOCIAT­<br />

ED WITli VIOLATIONS. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IS PRE·<br />

SENTED OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THOSE CORPORA·<br />

TIONS AGAINST WHICH LIMITED ACTIONS HAVE BEEN INITI·<br />

ATED AND THOSE "GAINST WHICH ACTIONS HAVE BEEN EX·<br />

TENSIVE. TO TEST THE VIEW THAT PRESSURES FROM<br />

PARENT CORPORATIONS TO INCREASE PROFITS CONTRIB·<br />

UTE TO THE GREATER VIOLATIONS BY SUBSIDIARIES, AC­<br />

TIONS AGAINST PARENT CORPORATIONS ARE COMPARED<br />

WITH ACTIONS AGAINST THEIR 101 LARGEST SUBSIDIARIES,<br />

WHOSE 1978 SALES RANGED FROM $300 MILLION TO $7.8<br />

BilLION. AN ANALYSIS IS PROVIDED OF THE METHODOLOG·<br />

ICAL PROBLEMS IN STUDYING CORPORATE CRIME AND THE<br />

INADEQUACY OF FEDERAL STATUTES ON CORPORATE<br />

CRIME. OTHER TOPICS DISCUSSED ARE CORPORATE ORGA·<br />

NI1.ATION AND CORPORATE CRIME, REGULATORY AGENCIES<br />

ANO ,FEDERAL AND STATE RELATIONS IN CONTROLLING<br />

CORpQR~TE CRIME, CORPORATE ANTITRUST AND ILLEGAL<br />

PAYMENTS VIOLATIONS, CORPORATE EXECUTIVES AND<br />

CRIMINAL LIABILITY, AND THE CONTROL OF CORPORATE<br />

CRIME. TABULAR DATA AND REFERENCES ARE PROVIDED.<br />

(AUTHOR ABSTRACT MODIFIED)<br />

SponIorIng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF· LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 iNDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Av8llablllty: GPO Stock Order No. 02NlOO.()()843·7; NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM. NCJRS.<br />

65. IMPACT OF AFFIRMAnVE ACTION AND CIVIl. SERVICE ON<br />

AMERICAN POUCE PEASONNEL SYSTEMS. Iy H. O.<br />

LOCKE. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SERVICE, 1778 MASSA·<br />

CHUSETTS AVENUE, NW, WASHINGTON DC 20038. 19 p.<br />

1979. HCJ·H2116<br />

THE IMPACT OF CIVIL SERVICE AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION<br />

PROGRAMS ON MINORITY EMPLOYMENT IN THE LAW EN·<br />

FORCEMENT SETTING IS ADDRESSED IN THIS MONOGRAPH.<br />

EACH STAGE OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S PROGRAM<br />

TO INSURE EQUALEMPl0YMENT OPPORTUNITY FROM NON·<br />

DISCRIMINATION THROUGH AFFIRMATIVE ACTION HAS BEEN<br />

ACCOMPANIED BY ACRIMONIOUS PUBLIC DEBATE, FOCUS·<br />

ING PARTICULARLY ON AFrJRMATIVE ACTION WHICH IS DE·<br />

SIGNED TO DEVELOP GUIDELINES, TIMETABLES, AND OTHER<br />

MEASURABLE INDICES BY WHICH EMPLOYERS CAN BE HELD<br />

ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR P~OGRESS, OR LACK OF IT, IN<br />

IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL POLICY. THE PRINCIPAL BURDEN<br />

OF FINDING ANSWERS TO THE COMPLEX ISSUES SUR·<br />

ROUNDING MINORITY EMPLOYMENT HAS FALLEN TO THE<br />

COURTS. NUMEROUS JUDICIAL DECISIONS, WITH ENOR·<br />

MOUS IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICE AGENCiES, HAVE BEEN<br />

IMPROVING<br />

TRANSLATED INTO PROCEDURAL REGULATIONS COVERING<br />

THE MEASURES, TECHNIQUES, CRITERIA, AND 'PROCESSES<br />

THAT MAY BE USED FOR EMPLQYMENT DECISIONS AND EM·<br />

PlOYMENT SELECTION. ~VERAL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES<br />

WHICH MAY CREATE PROBLEMS IN THE AREA OF EMPLOY·<br />

MENT DISCRIMINATION ARE INCLUDED. WHETHER DUE TO<br />

ENLIGHTENED POLICE I.EADERSHIP, COMMUNITY PRES­<br />

SURES, POLITICAL CIRCUMSTANCES, CIVil SERVICE INTER·<br />

'JENTION, OR A COMBINATION OF ALL l1iESE FACTORS, THE<br />

RACIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF AMERICAN?OLlCING HAVE<br />

BeGUN TO CHANGE SUBSTANTIALLY OVER THE PAST<br />

DECADE. TEN YEARS AGO, APPROXIMATELY 4 PERCENT OF<br />

THE SWORN POLICE PERSONNEL IN THE NATION WERE<br />

RACIAL MINORITIES: TODAY. THAT FIGURE HAS RISEN TO 10<br />

PERCENT. FINDINGS OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE ADMINISTRA·<br />

TION SHOW THAT ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS<br />

IN CHANGING THE NATURE .AND QUALITY OF POLICING IS<br />

THE COURAGE AND COMMITMENT OF POLICE LEADERSHIP.<br />

TO THE EXTENT THAT INCREASING MINORITY AND FEMALE<br />

PARTICIPATION IN THE RANKS OF SWORN POLICE OFFICERS<br />

IS A CRUCIAL i'ART OF! THIS CHANGE PROCESS; THERE IS<br />

THE ACOED FINDING 1HAT SUCH EFFORTS ARE NOT EN·<br />

HANCED BY A RELIANCE ON THE REGULATORY ROLE OF<br />

CIVIL SERVICE. SEVERAL SUGGESTIONS FOR INSTITUTIONA·<br />

L1ZING THIS CHANGE PROCESS ARE NOTED. REFERENCE<br />

NOTES ARE APPENDED.<br />

IpoMorIng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE lEM NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMI~JAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Avllllblllty: GPO Stock Order No. 027-()()0'()08~.9; NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE FROGRAM.<br />

/ • '<br />

/1<br />

H. IMPROVING THE CRIMIHAL PROCElSlHO.QF M<strong>II</strong>DEMEAH­<br />

ANTI-THE IMPROVED LOWEA COUAT/CASE HAHDUNQ<br />

PROGRAM-kALAMAZOO (kALAMAZOO COUNTY), MICHI­<br />

GAN-NATIONAL EVALUATION FINAL AEPORr. By E.<br />

CHEi.lMSlCY, M. FISCHEL, lind J. 1ASfY. MITRE CORPORA·<br />

TION WASHINGTON OPERATIONS, 1820 DOllEY MADISON<br />

BOULEVARD MCLEAN VA 22101. 112 p; 1978.<br />

, HCJ-4''J'"<br />

THE IMPROVED lOWER COURT CASS HANDLING (lLCCli)<br />

PROGRAM IN KALAMAZOO COUNTY, MICH., WAS EVALUATED<br />

AS PART OF A LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINIS·<br />

TAlmON EFFORT TO IMPROVE THE CASE IPROCESSING OF<br />

MISDEMEANANTS. EIGHT PROGRAM COMPONENTS WERE<br />

DESIGNED TO IMPROVE THE PROCESSING OF MISDEMEAN·<br />

ANT OFFENDERS. FOUR COMPONENTS OFFERED LAW EN·<br />

FORCEMENT AND JUDICIAL PERSONNEL lESS DRASTIC<br />

METHODS FOR HANDLING MISDEMEANANTS: POLICE CITA·<br />

TIONS, COURT SUMMONS, PRETRIAL RELEASE, AND SELECT<br />

OFFENDER PROBATION. THREE 'COMPONENTS WERE DE·<br />

SIGNED TO PROVIDE CONSISTENCY AND EFFICIENCY IN<br />

HANDLING MISDEMEANOR CASES: CASE SCREENING,<br />

PROMIS, AND SHORT FORM PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION<br />

REPORTS. THE EIGHTH COMPONENT KNOWN AS THE MASS<br />

CASE COORDINATOR WAS DESIGNED TO FOSTER COOPERA·<br />

TICN AMONG PROGRAM COMPONENTS AND ACROSS CRIMI·<br />

NAL JUSTICE AGENCIES. THE ILCCH PROGRAM iN KALAMA·<br />

ZOO WAS UNIQUE IN MAINTAINING AN ACTIVE COORDINAT·<br />

ING COUNCil COMPOSED OF REPRESENTATIVES FROM<br />

CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY. A<br />

UNIFORM CITATION FORM WAS DEVELOPED AND ADOPTED<br />

BY ALL POLICE AGENCIES. EFFORTS TO IMPLEMENT COURT<br />

SUMMONS FOR USE IN HANDLING CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS<br />

FAilED. A MISDEMEANOR PRETRIAL RELEASE PROGRAM<br />

WAS DEVELOPED TO EXTEND INTERVIEW/RECOMMENDA·<br />

TION SERVICES AVAILABLE TO FELONS TO MISDEMEAN·<br />

ANTS. SCREENING WAS CONDUCTED BY All. PROSECU·<br />

TIONAl AGENCIES IN THE COUNTY, so THE SCRI;EN!NG<br />

COMPONENT WAS DIRECTED TOWARD PROBLEMS ASSOCI·<br />

ATED WITH THE CONSISTENCY OF SCREENING AND CHARG·<br />

ING PRACTICES. A SEMIAUTOMATED INFOR,MATION SYSTEM<br />

;<br />

. \<br />

18<br />

"<br />

I<br />

. "<br />

.'"<br />

.~<br />

I


IMPROVING<br />

PUBLICATIONS<br />

OF THE NIJ<br />

JAIL<br />

\<br />

., I<br />

..<br />

~,," flit<br />

-.,<br />

WAS IMPLEMENTED THAT POSSESSED MANY FEATURES OF<br />

THEPAOMIS MODEL AND A WORD PROCESSING CAPABILITY.<br />

A COUNTYWIDE SHOAT FORM PRESENTENCE INVESTIGA·<br />

TION REPORT WAS NOT ADOPTED ElY PROBATION AGENCIES<br />

BECAUSE CONSENSUS ON THE NATURE OF THE FORM WAS<br />

NEVER REACHED. THE SELECT OFFENDER PROBATION COM·<br />

PONENT OPERATED AS AN ADJUNCT TO THE EXISTING PRO·<br />

BATION AGENCY IN KALAMAZOO; IT SERVED 33 CLIENTS SE·<br />

LECTED AS HIGH~RISK MISDEMEANANTS ACCORDING TO A<br />

SET OF FORMAL CRITERIA. THE COORDINATING COUNCIL,<br />

MORE THAN ANY PROGRAM COMPONENT, BROUGHT iN·<br />

CREASED VISIBILITY TO MISDEMEANANT PROCESSING AND<br />

DEMONSTRATED THAT AN INTERAGENCY APPROACH TO<br />

CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROBLEMS CAN RESULT IN COORDINAT·<br />

ED SOLUTIONS TO SYSTEM PROBLEMS. A DESCRIPTION OF<br />

THE CRIMINAL JUSTICi': SYSTEM IN KALAMAZOO COUNTY<br />

AND ,A WARRANT REQUEST AND DISPOSITION FORM ARE<br />

APPENDEO. .;, .<br />

AV<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>Ib<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>y: M!TRE CORPORATION WASHINGTON OPER.<br />

ATIONS, 1820 DOLLEY MADISON BOULEVARD, MCLEAN \fA<br />

" 221Q.1 Stock Order No. MTR·7682, VOL 2; NCJRS MICRO·<br />

FICHE PROGRAM.<br />

57. IMPFlOViNG THE CRIMINAL PROCESSING OF MISOEMEAH.<br />

ANTS-THE 'MPROVED LOWER COURT CASE H»IDUNa<br />

PROOMM-LAS VEGAS (CLARK COUNTY), NEVADA-HA.<br />

TtOHAL EVALUATION-fiNAL REPORT. Iy E. CHEUMSKY<br />

&\lid J. SA9FY. MITRE CORPORATION WASHINGTON OPER·<br />

ATIONS, 1820 DOLLEY MADISON .BOULEVARD, MCLEAN VA<br />

22101. 85 p. 1978. NCJ.4I41IS<br />

THE IMPROVED LOWER COURT CASE HANDLING (ILCCH)<br />

PROGRAM IN CLARK COUNTY, NEV., WAS EVALUATED AS<br />

PART OF A LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRA.<br />

TION EFFORT TO IMPROVE THE CASE PROCESSING OF MIS.<br />

DEMEANANTS. THE ILCCH PROGRAM WAS INTENDED TO 1M.<br />

PROVE THE PROCESSING OF MISDEMEANANT OFFENDERS<br />

THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION OF EIGHT<br />

PROGRAM COMPONENTS. FOUR OF THESE COMPONENTS<br />

OFFERED LAW ENFORCEMENT AND JUDICIAL PERSONNEL<br />

LESS DRASTIC METHQDS FOR HANDLING MISDEMEANANTS:<br />

POLICE CITATIONS, COURT SUMMONS, PRETRIAL RELEASE,<br />

AND SELECT OFFENDER PROBATION. THREE COMPONENTS<br />

WERE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE CONSISTENCY AND EFFICIEN.<br />

CY IN HANDLlN(1MISDEMEANOR CASES: CASE SCREENING,<br />

PROMIS, AND SHORT FORM PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION<br />

REPORTS. THE EIGHTH COMPONENT kNOWN AS THE MASS<br />

CASE COORDINATOR WAS DESIGNED TO FOSTER COORDI.<br />

NATION AMONG T~E OTHER PROGRAM COMPONENTS AND<br />

ACROSS CRIMINAL'JUSTICE AGENCIES TO BETTER MANAGE<br />

CASE FLOW. 'A UNIFORM CITATION TICKET WAS DEVISED<br />

FOR USE BY ALL POLICE AGENCIES IN THE COUNTY, AND A<br />

UNIFORM SUMMONS WAS DEVELOPED FOR ALL PROSECU.<br />

TORIAL AGENCIES. PLANS TO DEVELOP FORMAL GUIDE.<br />

LINES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE UNIFORM SUMMONS<br />

FAILED BECAUSE JUDGES DID NOT WANl'TO REDUCE THEIR<br />

DISCRETION IN THE USE OF SUMMONS. A PRETRIAL RE.<br />

LEASE PROGRAM, OPERATED. BY A PRIVATE NONPROFIT OR.<br />

GANIZATION, WAS PART OF THE ILecH PROGRAM FOR 13<br />

MONTHS. PROCEDURAL CHANGES WERE INSTITUTED IN<br />

CASE SCREENING TO GIVE A SCREENING UNIT, RATHER<br />

THAN POLlC!:, RESPONSIBILITY FOR FILING CHARGES IN<br />

MISDEMEANOR CASES. ILCCH PROGRAM FUNDS WERE<br />

USED TO ,CONTINUE THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MANAGE.<br />

MENT INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR THE DISTRICT ATTOR.<br />

NEY'S OFFICE. MISDEMEANANT PftOBATION IS NOT A LEGAL<br />

.OPTION IN NEV1IDA, SO PROBATION AND PRESENTENCE IN.<br />

'~,Si:IGATION COMPONENTS'W~Rr; IMPLEMENTED ~S PART<br />

~ ,OF THE COURT COUNSELlr:!q.PR{)G~. THE ILCCH PRO.<br />

GRAM, IN GENERAL, WAS PLANNED ~ND EVOLVED COMPO.<br />

NENT BY COMPONENT. ANO'rHE MASS CASE COORDINATOR<br />

ROLE NEVER DEVELOPED THE ACTIVE<br />

COORDINATIVE'MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS ENVISIONED BY<br />

20<br />

THE PROGRAM. NO MECHANISMS WERE DEVISED TO ANA·<br />

LVZE MISDEMEANANT PROCESSING PROBLEMS OR TO PRO·<br />

POSE CI.:>oRDINATED SOLUTIONS. THE ILCCH PROGRAM RE·<br />

SULTED IN SOME LOCALIZED IMPROVEMENTS, PRIMARILY<br />

PRETRIAL RELEASE AND COURT COUNSELING ELEMENTS.<br />

PROCEDURAL CHANGES AELAT,ED TO POLICE CITATIONS,<br />

COUR'r SUMMONS, AND CASE SCREENlf,oIG WERE INSTITU·<br />

TIONALIZED, AND A PROMIS SYSTEM NEARED COMPLETION.<br />

THE '':;RIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CLARK COUNTY IS DE·<br />

SCRIBED IN AN APPENDIX.<br />

~ Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LAW EN·<br />

FORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION.<br />

~~lib<strong>II</strong>Ity: MITRE CORPORATION WASHINGTON OPER·<br />

AT10NS, 1820 DOLLEY MADISON BOULEVARD. MCLEAN VA<br />

22101 Stock Order No. MTR·7682, VOL 3i NCJRS MICRO·<br />

FICHE PROGRAM.<br />

sa. ' .. .PROVING THE CRIMINAL PROCESSING OF Il<strong>II</strong>DE<strong>II</strong>EAN­<br />

AIm-THE IMPROVED LOWER COURT CASE HANDLING<br />

PROGRAM-RICHLAND COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA-NA­<br />

TIONAL EVALUATION-FINAL REPORT. Iy E. CHEU<strong>II</strong>IKY,<br />

L OnEH. lind J. IAIFY. MITRE CORPORATION WASHING·<br />

TON OPERATIONS, 1820 DOLLEY MADISON BOULEVARD,<br />

MCLEAN VA 22101. 98 p. 1978. NCJ.414113<br />

THE IMPROVED LOWER COURT CASE HANDLING (ILCCH)<br />

PROGRAM IN RICHLAND COUNTY, S.C., REPRESENTED A<br />

LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION EFFORT<br />

TO IMPROVE THE CASE PROCESSING OF MISDEMEANANTS.<br />

THE ILecH PROGRAM WAS DESIGNED TO IMPROVE THE<br />

PROCESSING OF MISDEMEANANT OFFENDERS THROUGH<br />

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EIGHT COMPONENTS. FOUR OF<br />

THE COMPONENTS OFFERED LAW ENFORCEMENT AND JU.<br />

DICIAL PERSONNEL LESS DRASTIC METHO[)'S FOR HAN.<br />

DLiNG MISDEMEANANTS: POLICE CITATIONS, COURT SUM.<br />

MONS, PRETRIAL RELEASE, AND SELECT OFFENDER PROBA.<br />

TION. THREE COMPONENTS WERE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE<br />

CONSISTENCY AND EFFICIENCY IN HANDLING MISDEMEAN.<br />

OR CASES: CASE SCREENING, PROMIS, AND SHORT FORM<br />

PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORTS. THE EIGHTH COM.<br />

PONENT KNOWN AS THE MASS CASE COORDINATOR WAS<br />

DESIGNED TO FOSTER COOPERATION AMONG PROGRAM<br />

COMPONENTS AND ACROSS CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES.<br />

NEITHER POLICE CITATION NOR COURT SUMMONS ALTER.<br />

NATIVES COULD BE IMPLEMENTED IN THE COUNTY BE.<br />

CAUSE STATE LAW DOES NOT ALLOW THEIR USE. THE PRE.<br />

TRIAL RE~EASE COMPONENT OP.ERATED AS A DISCRETION.<br />

ARY MECHANISM TO EFFECT RELEASE OF DEFENDANTS<br />

BASED ON A SET OF FORMAL AND INFORMAL CRITERIA. THE<br />

CASE SCREENING COMPONENT OPERATED TO IMPROVE<br />

THE TRANSMITTAL OF OFFENSE INFORMATION, AND AP.<br />

PROXIMATELY 33 PERCENT OF ~LL CASES WERE EVENTUAL.<br />

LY DISMISSED VIA SCREENING. PRIOR TO THE ILCCH PRO.<br />

GRAM, NO CASES HAD BEEN DISMISSED. ALTHOUGH THE<br />

ORIGINAL INTENT WAS TO DEVELOP A<br />

CROSS-JURISDICTIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM ALONG THE<br />

LINES OF THE MANUAL PROMIS, THE COUNTY EVENTUALLY<br />

IMPLEMENTED A SIMPLIFIED CARD SYSTEM. JUDGES WERE<br />

NOT PARTICULARLY DISPOSED TOWARD THE USE OF PRE.<br />

SENTENCE INVESTIGATIONS, AND FEW PRESENTENCE IN.<br />

VESTIGATIONS WERE CONDUCTED. THE SELECT OFFENDER<br />

PROBATION COMPONENT WAS TERMINATED AS PART OF<br />

PROGRAM RESTRUCTURING. IT SUPERVISED 63 CLIENTS<br />

BUT SUFFERED BECAUSE IT FAILED TO INFORM JUDGES IN<br />

AN EFFECTIVE MANNER ABOUT THE ILCCH PROGRAM, TO<br />

DEVELOP A PROPOSED VOLUNTEER PROGRAM, AND TO IN.<br />

VOLVE THE LOCAL PROBATION DEPARTMENT. THE ILCCH<br />

PROGAAM IN RICHLAND COUNTY, IN GENERAL, FAILED TO<br />

MOVE BEYOND LIMITED IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATIONS<br />

AND INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF COMPONENTS ."ND DID NOT<br />

DEVELOP INTERAGENCY COORDINATION DUE TO INAD.<br />

EQUATE MANAGEMENT, LACK OF ANALYSIS AND PLANNING<br />

IN THE EARLY STAGES OF THE PROGRAM, AND LACK OF IN.<br />

TEREST BV AGENCIES IN COMPONENT C{)NCEPTS. A' DE·<br />

SCRIPl'lCN OF THE COUNTY'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IS<br />

APPENDED..<br />

.0;';>.<br />

AvllllMlllty: MITRE CORPORATION WASHINGTON OPER· 4~'"<br />

ATIONS 1820 DOLLEY MADISON BOULEVARD, MCLEAN VA<br />

22101 'Stock Order No. MTR·7692. VOL1i NCJRS MICRO·<br />

FICHE PROGRAM.<br />

P. INCARCERATION AND ITS ALTUNATlVElIH 2O'1'H CENTURY<br />

AMERICA:" Iy D. J. ROTHMAN. 80. p. 1979.<br />

NCJ·5H14<br />

THIS REPORT SURVEYS CONCEPTS AND TREATMENT OF<br />

THE DEVIANT IN THE U.S. FROM 187o.11MO. THE ORIGINS OF<br />

THE PROGRESSIVE REFORM MOVEM~NT IN THE CRIMINAL<br />

"USTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH FIELDS ARE ANALYZED.<br />

\iROM 1Il00 TO 1829 REFORMERS DEVOTED UNPRECEDENT·<br />

ED ATTENTION TO ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCeRATION. PRO·<br />

BATION, PAROLE, AND JUVENILE COURT PROCEDURES<br />

GAlt~ED ACCEPTANCE IN CRIMINAL ,IUSTICE, WHILE MENTAL<br />

HEALTH INNOVATIONS INCLUDED {)UTPATIENT CARE, AF·<br />

TERCARE, AND THE DESIGN OF AN ENTIRELY NEW TYPE OF<br />

FACILITY, THE PSYCHOPATHIC HOSPITAL T/:'IE PROGRAM<br />

THAT PROGRESSIVe REFORMERS peSIGNED IN THIS<br />

PERIOD REMAINED THE ESSENTIAL ,PROGRAM OF THE<br />

MIDDLE 1118O'S WHEN FUNOAMENTALr,CHALLENGES TO THE<br />

CONCEPTS OF PROGRESSIVE REFORM BEGAN TO DEVELOP.<br />

THIS REPORT CONTENDS THAT TO UNDERSTAND THESE<br />

CHALLENGES AN UNDERSTANDING OF' THE IDEOLOGICAL<br />

PREMISES OF THE OLDER PROGRA.MOF PROGRESSIVE<br />

REFORM IS .REQUIRED. THE REPORT ALSO FOCUSES ON<br />

THE RESULTS OF THE REFORM .EFFORT AND CONCLUDES<br />

THAT NONE OF THESE PROGRAMS WERE FULFILLED AS<br />

THEIR DESIGNERS HAD PLANNED. THUS, THE HISTORICAL<br />

REOORD IS RELEVANT TO THOSE WHO WOULD INNOVATE IN<br />

THESE FIELDS TODAY. THE LEGACY OF THE 1800'S IN<br />

REGARD TO INCARCERATION ".~,PRISONS AND INSANE ASY·<br />

LUMS IS DISCUSSED FOLLOW~D BY AN ANALYSIS OF THE<br />

ORIGINS AND REALITIES OF P~OB"TION AND PAROLE. THE<br />

PROGREsSIVE PRISON, THE ,CREATION OF THE JUVENILE<br />

COURT AND THE DISPENSING OF JUVENILE JUSTICE ARE<br />

CONSiDeRED, ALONG WITH A DISCUSSION OF THE FUTURE<br />

OF THE MENTAL HYGIENE MOVEMENT. FROM THIS ANALY·<br />

SIS, THAN: LINES OF THOUGHT EMERGE. FIRST, THIS RE·<br />

BEARel: IMPLIES THAT THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS OF<br />

THE l.ONGER APPEAA VALID. TODAY, EFFORTS FOCUS ON<br />

THE OVERT 'ACT', NOT THE 'STATE OF MIND', OF THE OF·<br />

FENDER. SECOND, THIS ANALYSIS SHOWS THAT ALTERNA·<br />

TIVES TO INSTITUTIONS CANNOT COEXIST EASILY WITH IN·<br />

STITUTIONS. A COMMITMENT TO ALTeRNATIVES TO INCAR·<br />

CERATION WILL DEMAND A THOROVGHGOING REVERSAL IN<br />

THE SOCIAL POLICY OF GIVING PRIORITY TO THE INCARCER·<br />

ATION OF OFFENDERS. FINALLY, THE HISTORICAL RECORD<br />

STRONGLY SUGGESTS THE DrFFICUL TY OF ADMINISTERING<br />

A PROGRAM THAT IS BOTH cUSTODIAL AND REHABILlTA·<br />

TIVE. NEVERTHELESS, IT IS coNTENDED THAT THE HISTORI·<br />

(,.AL APPROACH SHOULD HELP TO CREATE A CLIMATE OF IN·<br />

NOVATION IN FINDING NEW RESOLUTIONS TO INCARCER·<br />

ATION. A NOTE ON SOURCES IS APPENDED.<br />

1ponIot'1I Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA·<br />

TiONAlfNSTITUTE • OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE,833 INDIANA AVEN!,IE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

AWl ....., GPO Stock Qrder No. 027.()OO.(10885-8i NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

,<br />

10. INTIfINAnOiw.lUllllARlEI-A COLLECTION OF IEU!CT­<br />

. ED TJIANILATIONI IN LAW ENfORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUIT/CIE, y~ I. NATIONAL CRIMINAL J,USTICC REFER·<br />

ENCE SERVICE BOX 8000, ROCKVILLE MD, 20850.' 171 p.<br />

1879.' , .. NCJ-57117<br />

TERRORISM IS THE THEME OF THIS THI~D VOLUME OF<br />

NCJRS INTERNATIONAL SUMMARIE;S. THE '9,~UMMARIES<br />

WERE SELECTED TO PROVIDE A WIDE RANGEPF INTERNA·<br />

21<br />

TIONAL OPINION AND DISCUSSION ON TERRORISM AND ITS<br />

MANIFESTATIONS. A GRAPHIC, DAY·BY·DAY ACCOUNT OF<br />

THE KIDNAPPING OF GERMAN INDUSTRALiST HANS MARTIN<br />

SCHLEYER AND THE SUBSEtlUENT HIJACKING OF A LUFTH·<br />

ANSA JET IS THE VOLUME'S LEAD ARTiCLE. ADAPTED FROM<br />

A RELEASE OF THE PRESS AND INFORMATION OFFICE OF<br />

THE WEST GERMAN GOVERNMENT, THIS CASE HISTORY RE·<br />

VIEWS THE GERMAN GOVERNMENT'S DELAY STRATEGY IN·<br />

TENDED TO GAIN MORE' TIME TO SEARCH AND .AVOID<br />

GRANTING THE TERRORISTS' DEMANDS. THE SECOND SEC­<br />

TION IS DEVOTED TO SPECIFIC EXAMPLES OF TERRORISM IN<br />

VARIOUS AREAS OF THE WORLD. IN ADDITION TO DISCUS·<br />

SIONS OF THE HISTORY AND EVOLUTION OF TERRORISM IN<br />

LATIN AMERICA AND NORTHERN IRELAND, A DETAILED EX·<br />

AMINATION OF PALESTINIAN TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS IS<br />

PRESENTED THAT FOCUSES ON THEIR ORIGINS, PHILOS·<br />

OPHIES, AND CONNECTIONS WITH OTHER GROUPS. A<br />

STUDY OF THE BACKGROUND AND IDEOLOGY OF WEST<br />

GERMAN TERRORISTS, THE REACTION OF THE GERMAN<br />

PEOPLE, AND GOVERNMENTAL ANTITERRORISM MEASURrES<br />

IS ALSO PROVIDED. THE FEMALE TERRORIST IS CONSID·<br />

ERED IN A PAIR OF WEST GERMAN ESSAYS THAT RELATE<br />

THE BEHAVIOR OF THE FEMALE TERRORIST TO HER WITH·<br />

DRAWAL FROM PRODUCTIVE SOCIETY, EXAMINF- HER LACK<br />

OF EMANCIPATION, AND DISCUSS HER PSYCHOLtJGlCAL DE·<br />

VELOPMENT AND REHABILITATION. THE NEXT GROUP OF<br />

ARTICLES RANGES FROM THEORETICAL STUDIES OF TER·<br />

RORIST DOCTRINE AND PRACTICE TO SPECIFIC COMMEN·<br />

TARIES ON WAYS TO COMBAT TERRORISM AND NEGOTIATE<br />

WITH TEARORISTS TO OBTAIN RELEASE OF HOSTAGES. A<br />

CRIMINOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF TERRORIST BEHAVIOR IS<br />

INCLUDED IN THIS SECTION, ALONG WITH A PERSPEC!'VE<br />

OF TERRORISM FROM AN EAST EUROPEAN COUNTRY, YU·<br />

GOSLAVIA. LEGAL ASPECTS OF TERRORISM AND ANTITER·<br />

RORISM ARE DISCUSSED IN SELECTIONS THAT REVIEW BEL·<br />

GIAN, ITALIAH, AND WEST GERMAN LEGISLAT~ON AND<br />

PENAL CODES DEAl,ING WITH TERRORISTS AND TERRORIST<br />

ACTS. THE SUMMARIES CONCLUDE WITH TWO PAPERS ON<br />

INTERNATIONAL ANTITERRORISM EFFORTS BY THE UNITED<br />

NATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL ANTITERRORIST "GRElE:<br />

MENTS FROM THE 1937 GENEVA CONVENTION TO THE 191'.'<br />

COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTION.<br />

1IpoMor'1I Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA·<br />

TIONALiNSTITUTE'OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

AV......itr. NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM. NCJRS.<br />

Ii JAIL lASED INMATE PROQRAMS-A SELECTED <strong>II</strong>IUOGRA·<br />

• PHY. M. LEVINE lind M. KRAVITZ, Ecia. NATIONAL CRIMI·<br />

NAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE, BOX 6000, ROCKVILLE<br />

MD 20850. 28 p. 1979. HCHC331<br />

THIS ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR CORRECTIONS rER·<br />

SONNEL INCLUDES SECTIONS ON JAIL MANAGEMENT AND<br />

MINIMUM STANDARDS, BROAD-BASED PROGRAM DESIGNS,<br />

AND HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WORK·RELEASE PROGRAMS.<br />

CURRENT AVAILABLE EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT 36 PERCENT<br />

OF ALL INOIVIDUALS INCARCERATED IN THE UNITED STATES<br />

ARE HELD IN LOCAL JAILS. TO EFFECTIVELY TREAT IN·<br />

MATES, THESE JAILs SHOULD HAVE PROGRAMS OF SUFFI·<br />

CIENT LENGTH AND C.ONTINUITY. Al.THOUGH NOT ALL COM·<br />

MUNITIES VIEW THE JAIL AS A P~CE FOR TREATMENT, SEV·<br />

ERAL INNOVATIVE PROGRAM DESIGNS HAVE BEEN DEVEL·<br />

OPED THAT SERVE AS A BRIDGE BETWEEN CONFINEMENT<br />

AND FREEDOM. THiS BIBLIOGRAPHY HAS BEEN COMPILED<br />

TO PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW OF WHAT HAS BEEN ATTEMPTED<br />

AND ACCOMPLISHED IN THE FIELD. CITATIONS ARE AR·<br />

RANGED BY TOPIC AND COVER PRINCIPLES AND STAND·<br />

ARDS FOR EFFECTIVE JAIL OPERATIONS, DESCRIPTIOi"S OF<br />

PROGRAMS WITH MULTITREATMENT ELEMENTS, I'CCOUNTS<br />

OF PROGRAMS DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR FEMALE OF·<br />

FENDERS, ANALYSES OF THE NEED FOR HEALTH AND MEDI·<br />

,<br />

.,


~UROR<br />

PUBUCATIONS<br />

OF THE NIJ<br />

NATIONAL<br />

•<br />

CAL. PROGRAMS, MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR NUTRITION,<br />

SUBSTANCE ABUSE; AND MEDICAL CARE, DESCRIPTIONS OF<br />

ACADEMIC, VOCATIONAl: SKIl:l:, WORK RELEASE, AND JOB<br />

PLACE.MJ:NT PROGRAMS. STATE·OF·THE·ART DOCUMENTS<br />

~,EGARDING AMERICAN JAIL SYSTEMS, AND SUGGESTIONS<br />

FOR CHANGE, INCLUDiNG ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCER.<br />

ATION. ,ALL DOCUME~TS CITED IN THIS BIBLIOGRAPHY HAVE<br />

BEEN SELECTED FROM THE NCJRS DATA BASE. EACH C/TA.<br />

TION INCLUDES AN ABSTRACT; INFORMATION IS INCLUDED<br />

ON OBTAINING THESE DOCUMENTS, AND AN AUTHOR INDEX<br />

IS APPENCE/?<br />

Ii<br />

s,a"... A88fICY: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA.<br />

T/ONAl INSTlrUTE OF LAW ENFORCEM1;NT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JU$TICE, 633 INDIANA AVl;ff;)E NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531-<br />

~V<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>b<strong>II</strong>Ity: GPO. Stock Or~ No. 027.()()O.{)088.C-4. NCJRS.<br />

'2. JUROR RESPONsE TO PRER£CORD£D "'D£OTAP£ TRIAlS.<br />

IJJ E. <strong>II</strong>. RO<strong>II</strong>£RTSoN. US DEPAFlTMENT OF COMMERCE<br />

• NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS LAW ENFORCEMENT<br />

STANDARDS LABORATORY, WASHINGTON DC 20234. 30 p.<br />

1979. NCJ.5t301<br />

AN ANALYSIS IS "ROVIDED OF RESPONSES TO AN ATTITU.<br />

DlNlJ, OUESTIONNAIRE RETURNED BY 278 JURORS WHO<br />

PARTICIPATED IN PRERECORDED VIDEOTAPED (PAVTT) CIvil<br />

TAIALS CONDUCTED IN OHIO IN 1975 AND 1978. OHIO WAS<br />

THE FIRST STATE TO EXTEND THE USE OF VIDEOTAPE<br />

BEYOND THE RECORDING OF DEPOSITIONS. THE FIRST 'OF<br />

.MANY PAVTT'S WAs HELD IN THE SANOUSKY, OHIO, COURT<br />

OF COMMON PLEAS ON NOVEMBER 18, 1971. THE TRIALS TO<br />

WHICH THIS APPROACH WAS APPLIED DIFFERED FROM 00.<br />

DiNARY TRIALS IN TWO MAJOR RESPECTS: (1) THE WIT.<br />

NESSES' TESTIMONY HAD BEEN PRERECORDED FOR TRIAL<br />

PRESENTATION. TO EVALUATE JUROR ACCEPTANCE, A<br />

"·PAGE F~M CONTAINING 24 QUESTIONS (APPENDED) WAS<br />

MAILED TO EACH MEMBER 0.


OF THENIJ<br />

f,f-- ;-~<br />

-~;.-¥/<br />

"EIGHeORHQOP<br />

I,<br />

IC TERM 'PROPERTY CRIMES'; AND (4) SI;VERAL COLLATER· '1. NATIONAL INSTITIJTI: HOST', PROC.JRAM~SHARINQ ADo,<br />

ALLY Ri:LATED TERMS, INCLUDING 'FIRE DETECTION' AND YANCED CRIMINAL JUSTICE ImACTlCE8." PUBLIC 'TECH."<br />

'INCENDIAFI'( DEVICES.' AN EXPLANATION OF HOW TO USE NOLOGY, INC. 1140 CONNECTICUToAVENUE, NW, WASHING.<br />

THE Tt1ESAURUS IS PROVIDED.' TON 0020036. 12p. 1978. • ' HCJ.41031<br />

~..Agency: US DEP~RTMENTOF JUSTICE LEAA NA"'<br />

TlONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT At-ID CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE. 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW. WASHINGTON;'llC 20531.<br />

THE NATIONAl,. INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND<br />

CRIMINAL JUSTICE (NILECJ) HOST PROGRAM IS DeSIGNED<br />

TO FACILITATE TRANSFER OF INf:ORMATION ABOUT,EXEM.<br />

A"~ Nr9JRS ~1,cRbFICHE PROGRAM. ' c' PLARY CRIMINAL JUSTICEcPROJECTS THROUGH ONSrrE oa.<br />

') , SERVATION AND PARTICIPATION. HOST SITES AA~ CHOSEN<br />

fSI. NA~ EVALUATION PR9QRAM-PHASE " POLICE JU. , , O~ THE BASIS OF DEMONSTRATE[.I, EFFECTiVENESS IN RE.<br />

¥ENILE ,UNITS' STUDY-FINAL REPORT. By R. 19)IJCING""C~IM=~OB",>IMPBOVING THE ' ,<br />

RQY~-PlECZENI". US DEPAFlTMENT OF~US'TlCE LEAASYSTEM. COST.EFFECTI~.lENEss.L~AND' ","'''.'~T'''''"<br />

f ,NATIONAL INSTITUTE OHAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL ~ OTHER JURISDICTIONS. TO DATE, ONLY PRI;'I~~~~~~~~'~'"<br />

" ': UUST.,ICE, cf!3~ lNot~NAAVENl!E' NW'WAS'iiINGTON DC 20531 PASSED THE INTENSIVE ScREENING<br />

' '1J:i' DL


,.~ ".."~..,_ ~."",'.~-,,. ~,L'."··<br />

.<br />

",·::;C_="-co<br />

r ,NS<br />

. B,)' THE ARE PROVIDl:O.<br />

8DcNIMi<strong>II</strong>na<br />

OF JUSTI.CE LeM NA.<br />

.<br />

ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

AVENUE NW, WAS~,INGTON, DC 20531.<br />

NCJRS<br />

~~EG:oi=~~~~Order No. 027~-00839·9i<br />

~ .~.<br />

78. POLICE ioDY AR.-oR TESTING AND SU<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>MY OF PER.<br />

FOR<strong>II</strong>ANC£ TESTING DATA.. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCI.<br />

~~~U~ ~~'EFS OF ",POLICE, 11 FIRSTFIELD ROAD, GAITH.<br />

.~ :P..",:;.120760f-l"l 32 p. H)78. ,P-53tIl<br />

" POLI~9(jjjy ~~MOR Is TESTED AT THE EQUIPMENT<br />

CENTER IN GAf1'l1EASBURG, MD., AND RESULTS ARE 'RE.<br />

PORTED BY!,J)iE INTERNATIOt-,'AL ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS<br />

. OF POUCj5 UACP). THIS IS THE FIRST OF MANY CONSUMER<br />

Pfl9D~ REPORTS ON LAW ENFORCEMENT eQUIPMENT ,.,'<br />

ISSUE." A~ A GUIDE FOR .QUALITY. PERFORMANCE AND .'<br />

E~MY. THE CONSUMER GUIDE .IS INTENDE.R'F6e,~, ~~""-­<br />

~..!9E AQMINISTRATORS AND OFFICER~,.wt!O;;AAe>'CON"<br />

, ...,. .... ~P~TING ~IJRCH~E. ~)30DY'·AR..MOR;;AS RETESTING<br />

~', P BUSHED. TESTING 'I~F(JNOED BY, THE NATIONAL INSTI.<br />

:i.~UTE OF LAW .~,NFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL J.USTICE OF<br />

~2~L_~~_--:-JI!li~I~~~~~~I~~~J~·~~~~~~~rn~~<br />

28<br />

>_I-E.M AND IS CONDUCTED AT TI;1E LAW ENFORCEMENT =,<br />

$TANDARDS LABORAT~Y AT THE NATIONAL BUREAU· .oF<br />

ST~NRARDS IN GAITHERSBURG,MD. INFORM~TION AS TO<br />

THE TEST CENTER IT~LF, ITS ADVISORYCO~MlriEE AND<br />

. THE TESTING PROGRAM' ALONG WITH ,A CHART OF T!~E<br />

=RA~ IS/GIVEN IN THIS FJEPORT •.. ITIS EXPLAINED riAT<br />

. "BODY ARMOR WASDEVELOP.ED IN RESPONSE Ta THE<br />

,.,... ALARMING INCREASE IN ASSAULTS, SERIOUS INJURIES' AND ..<br />

g~THS INFLICTED ON LAW ENFOR~"'E~T PERSONNEL ON<br />

TV. MANY.ASSAULTS OCCUR IN FAMILY QUARRF.j,.INTER. .<br />

\<br />

A ,<br />

OF THENIJ<br />

'-><br />

Ii<br />

<strong>II</strong> "<br />

./<br />

{<br />

POLleE<br />

VENTION. JHE I3qQY ARMOR TE,STINGPROJECT BEGAN· IN MOD~S OF OPERATION UNITS, CORRUPTION, OISCRETION !N<br />

1976 WITH THE DEVELOP~ENT OF PERFORMANCE CRITE}!IA DRUG LAW ENFORCEMENT, THE' POLITICS OF DRlI.G LAW<br />

BY ,THE NAT~ONALI3UAEAU OF, STANDAR[)S, AND TESTS ENFORCEM~NT, AND MEASURING THE EFFECTS 'OF ,fN'·<br />

WERE PERFORMED BY· THE H.P: WHITE LABORATORY IN . FOACEMEf4T. TI-!E B!BLlOGRAPI-!Y CITES 2a5 SCHOLAR.!,ti ~F!~~<<br />

.. MARY'-qi"w.l .AND ';fHE DENVER R~SEARCH INSTITUTE IN TIC~S, DISSERTATIONS, GOVER~IMENT STUDIES)ffi~GAZiNE .<br />

. CQLORADOUSING WEAPONS.,SUCH AS 0.38 CALIBER OR ~~j'ICLE~, AND A FEW WORKS OF FICTION" BASEOO~b<br />

, - OTHER SMA!.LER'}NE"PONSOOMMoNLV USED AGAINST ,';STREET REPORTAGE .. THE LITER~TUR~ IS INc" ENGLISH,<br />

.. ",.POl:lCE;€ACFI'"GARMENT, Tj:STED UNDER STRICTLY CON.",-' MAINLY DISCl)SSES THEDF!l,IG~PRQBLEM IN TH~dJ.S., AND'<br />

_~__ ~"O--' TROLLED CONDJ:r.'gN$,~WA$ PlACED O~,A CLAY BLOC~!;:OF" HAS PUBLlCA"t:lQJ;IS p~JEcn~ETWEEN 1969,,1977. WORKS<br />

A ME,ASUAEDCQNSISTENCY AND TEMPERATUf.lIY."AND . ARE ARRANGED~!;?fIAI3ETICALLY BY AUTHOR. (AUTHOR<br />

FIRED UpON FIVE TIMES FROM A PRESCRf~D


, .,<br />

POLICE<br />

PUBLICATIONS<br />

OF THE NIJ<br />

PRE-RELEASE<br />

,',<br />

..<br />

, ,<br />

,.,1<br />

;'1<br />

I<br />

'I<br />

~<br />

.1<br />

·, , j',<br />

J<br />

(<br />

IMPROVE POLICE PATROL CAPABILITIES. UTILITY. SAFETY.<br />

ECONOMY. AND PRODUCTIVITY THROUGH MODIFICATION OF<br />

POLICE CRUISERS. A PROGRAM SUMMARY IS PRESENTED.<br />

INCLUDING DISCUSSIONS OF THE PROTOTYPE DEVELOP­<br />

MENT. FIELD TEST PROGRAMS. VEHICLE CONFIGURATION<br />

IMPROVEMENT STUDIES. TEST SITE SELECTION, AND PRO.<br />

GRAM TERMINATION. THE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION COVERS<br />

MEASURES TAKEN TO IMPROVE ECONOMY, TO PROVIDE<br />

NECESSARY EMERGENCY WARNING AND SAFETY SYSTEMS<br />

AND TO ADD CAPABILITIES FOR IMPROVED PRODUCTIVIlY:<br />

THE DEVELOPMENT, FABRICATION. AND BENCH TEST OF<br />

THE PROTOTYPE IS DETAILED. ALONG WITH THE INTEGRA.<br />

TION OF ALL COMPONENTS AND SUBSYSTEMS INTO THE<br />

PROTOTYPE VEHICLE. THE RESULTING PROTOTYPE VEHICLE<br />

WAS OF COMPACT SIZE AND WAS SUCCESSFULLY RETRO.<br />

FITTED WITH FUEL AND DRIVER AIDS, IMPROVED BRAKES,<br />

UPDATED SEAT AND RESTRAINT SYSTEMS. AND SOPHISTI­<br />

CATED MICROPROCESSOR CONTROLLED DIGITAL COMMUNI.<br />

CATIONS. DISPLAYS. AND DATA SYSTEMS. THE PLANNING<br />

AND SELECTION OF A FIELD TEST CONTRACTOR AND THE<br />

SUBSYSTEM COMPONENTS TO BE TESTED ARE DISCUSSED<br />

AS ARE THE DATA SOURCES AND ANALYSIS. TWENTY VEHI:<br />

CLES WERE SELECTED FOR RETROFITTING. TESTING, AND<br />

EVALUATION IN ACTUAL POLICE OPER,o.TIONS IN NEW OR.<br />

LEANS. LA .• AND DALLAS, TEX. VEHICLE CONFIGJRATION 1M.<br />

PROVEMENT STUDIES CONCERNING THE DESIGN OF- IM­<br />

PROVED BODY CONFIGURATIONS ARE NOTED, FOLLOWED<br />

BY A STUDY OF A VEHICLE LOCATION SYSTEM AND AN AS­<br />

SESSMENT OF DRIVE-TRAIN SYSTEMS FOR DUAL-MODE<br />

PERFORMANCE. A BIBLIOGRAPHY, PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE<br />

PROTOTYPE AND SYSTEM COMPONENTS. AND TABULAR<br />

DISPLAYS ARE PROVIDED. (AUTHOR ABSTRACT MODIFIED)<br />

Spi)nlOrfng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA­<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW. WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

AVlllabillty: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

80. POLICE STRESS-A SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 5<br />

DUNCAN, R. N. BRENNER, Ind Y. KRAVITZ, Ed.. NATIONAL<br />

CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE, BOX 0000, ROCK­<br />

VILLE MD 20850. 96 p. 1979. NCJ.58352<br />

THE 113 DOCUMENTS IN THIS SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />

GIVE AN OVERVIEW OF JOB-RELATED STRESS AMONG<br />

POLICE OFFICERS, EXAMINE THE CAUSAL FACTORS AND<br />

DESCRIBE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES TO REDUCE STRESS.<br />

THE DOCUMENTS DESCRIBE THE TYPES OF STRESS<br />

COMMON IN POLICE WORK, THE EFFECTS OF SUCH STRESS<br />

AND RESEARCH FINDINGS. IN ADDITION TO THE<br />

LIFE-ENDANGERING NATURE OF POLICE WORK, THE TYPES<br />

OF STRESS TREATED IN THE BIBLIOGRAPHY INCLUDE LOW<br />

SELF·ESTEEM, POOR POLICE-COMMUNITY RELATIONS, CON.<br />

FLICT SITUATIONS, SOCIAL ISOLATION, ORGANIZATIONAL<br />

PRACTICES, POOR PAY (WHICH MEANS AN OFFICER MUST<br />

MCONLIGHT), TRAINING AND EQUIPMENT PROBLEMS AND<br />

CIVIL LIABILITY PROBLEMS. THE MANAGEMENT' AP­<br />

PROACHES DESCRIBED INCLUDE MORE EXPLICIT POLICIES<br />

IMPROVED EQUIPMENT AND TRAINING, ENLIGHTENED PER:<br />

SONNEL PRACTICES, PROFESSIONAL AND PEER COUNSEL­<br />

ING, MI,)RE EFFECTIVE DISCIPLINE MEASURES, LESS EMPHA­<br />

SIS ON MILITARY ORGANIZATION, PHYSICAL CONDITIONING<br />

TRAINING, REFINED SELECTION AND EDUCATION PROCE­<br />

DURES. PROGRAMS FOR FAMILIES, AND SPECIFIC TRAINING<br />

IN STRESS MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES. MOST OF THE DQC..<br />

UMENTS WERE PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1972 AND '!)78 AND<br />

AL'. ARE INCLUDED IN THE COLLECTION OF THE h~TIONAL<br />

CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE. EACH CITATION IN­<br />

CLUDES lIN ABSTRACT AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION.<br />

AS A FUATHER AID, AN APPENDIX DESCRIBES 33 TRAINING<br />

FILMS THAT DEPICT STRESSFUL SITUATIONS (MAKING AN<br />

ARREST, HANDLING A DOMESTIC DISPUTE, MEDIATING A<br />

PROBLEM). PROMOTE SUCCESSFUL MANAGEMENT TECH-<br />

NIQUES. AND DISCUSS HUMAN RELATIONS IN GENERAL.<br />

LISTS OF SOURCES FOR BOTH THE DOCUMENTS AND THE<br />

FILMS ARE APPENDED.<br />

SponllOflng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA.<br />

'lIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE. 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON. OC 20531.<br />

AVlllablllty: GPO Stock Order No. 027.000-00842-9: NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM. NCJRS.<br />

81. POLICE UNIONS IN THE CIVIL SERVICE SETTING. :,ty J. H.<br />

BURPO. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SERVICE. 1776 MASSA.<br />

CHUSETTS AVENUE. NW, WASHINGTON OC 20036. 4~ p.<br />

1979. NCJ-511255<br />

FOCUSING ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POLICE<br />

UNIONS AND CIVIL SERVICE SYSTEMS, THIS PAPER EXAM.<br />

INES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE<br />

CIVIL SERVICE SYSTEM. A STUDY BY THE PUBLIC ADMINIS­<br />

TRATIVE SERVICE REVEALED THAT ALTHOUGH A SUBSTAN.<br />

TIAL MINORITY OF POLICE UNIONS AND PUBLIC ADMINIS.<br />

TRATORS FEEL THAT CIVIL SERVICE SYSTEMS INTERFERE<br />

WITH PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION. MOST SUPPORT THE<br />

SYSTEM. <strong>II</strong>NION ATTEMPTS TO ALTER THE SYSTEM SHOULD<br />

REMAIN MINIMAL DUE TO PERCEIVED ADVANTAGES AND<br />

THE LACK OF ANY ALTERNATIVE TO THE CIVIL SERVICE<br />

SYSTEM. CURRENT INCREASING DEMAND FOR PRODUCTIVE<br />

PUBLIC SERVICES POINTS OUT THE NEED TO IMPROVE THE<br />

QUALITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF POLICE SERVICES. NU­<br />

MEROUS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING HIRING AND<br />

PROMOTION PRACTICES AND DISCIPLINARY POLICIES AND<br />

PROCEDURES ARE NOTED. SEVERAL REASONS FOR THE<br />

FAILURE OF CIVIL SERVICE CHANGES ARE OUTLINED.<br />

ALONG WITH A SUGGESTED ALTERNATIVE: UTILIZATION OF<br />

THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING PROCESS FOR MORE PRO­<br />

DUCTIVE METHODS OF HIRING, PROMOTING, AND DISCIPLIN.<br />

ING POLICE OFFICERS. A SUCCESSFUL EXAMPLE OF A COL­<br />

LECTIVE 8A~r.,~INING AGREEMENT IN CORPUS CHRISTI<br />

TEX., IS DISCU~).'lED. AMONG THE CIVIL SERVICE PROVI:<br />

SIONS NEGOTIATED INTO THIS CITY'S POLICE COLLECTIVE<br />

BARGAINING AGREEMENT ARE PROMOTION AND DEMOTION<br />

OF ASSISTANT CHIEFS AND COMMANDERS, PROBATIONARY<br />

PERIODS FOR RECRUITS AND SUPERVISORS, SUSPENSION<br />

OF OFFICERS, REDUCTION IN THE POWER OF THE CIVIL<br />

SERVICE COMMISSION IN DISCIPLINARY CASES POWER OF<br />

ASSISTANT CHIEFS AND COMMANDERS TO RECOMMEND<br />

SUSPENSIONS, AND PROMOTIONS. ADDITIONAL ANALYSES<br />

OF THE CORPUS CHRISTI BARGAINING EXPERIENCE ARE EX.<br />

AMINED. FDOTNOTES ACCOMPANY THE TEXT.<br />

Sponaorlng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA.<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

AVllllblllty: GPO Stock Order No. 027.000.00859.3' NCJRS<br />

MICROFIC~1E PROGRAM.<br />

'<br />

'2. POLICING BY OBJECTIVES-A HANDBOOK FOR IMPROVING<br />

POLICE MANAGEMENT. 9y V. A. LUBANS Ind J M EDGAR<br />

SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 266 Pl:ARL 'STREET<br />

ROOM 418, HARTFORD CT 06103. 26-4 p. 1979. '<br />

NCJ-45511<br />

POLICING BY OB.IECTIVES (PBO) IS A PROCESS OF PLAN.<br />

NING, EXECUTING, AND REVIEWING THE ACTIVITIES OF A<br />

POLICE ORGANIZATION IN RELATION TO SPECIFIC DESIRED<br />

RESULTS. BASED ON A PROCESS DESIGNED PRIMARILY FOR<br />

USE IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, PBO HAS BEEN EXTEN­<br />

SIVELY MODIFIED TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE EXTRAOROI.<br />

NARY MANAGEME'~T PROBLEMS INHERENT IN THE POLICE<br />

ENTERPRISE. THE TYPICAL PROBLEMS WHICH BESET THE<br />

POLICE MANAGER-L1TILE CONTROL OVER THE DEMAND<br />

FOR THE TYPES, TIMING, OR FREQUENCY OF SERVICES: RE.<br />

SUL TS WHICH ARE NOT EASILY MEASURED: BUDGET DECI.<br />

SIONS WHICH ARE OFTEN MADE OUTSIDE THE POLICE<br />

DEPARTMENT--ARE PROBLEMS WITH WHICH A<br />

BUSINESS·ORIENTED SYSTEM OF MANAGEMENT IS INCAPA-<br />

'f<br />

i<br />

,<br />

1,:<br />

BLE OF DEALING. PBO, ON THE OTHER HAND, ACKNOWL­<br />

EDGES THESE AND THE MA~JY OTHER SPECIAL DIFFICUL­<br />

TIES WHICH CHARACTERIZE THE DISTINCTIVE WORLD OF<br />

POLICE MANAGEMENT. TO MAKE THE NUMEROUS MODIFICA­<br />

TIONS OF THE REQUISITE CONCEPTS AND PRACTICES. RE­<br />

SEARCHERS STUDIED THE PRACTICAL EXPERIENCES OF 37<br />

POLICE ORGANIZATIONS NOW USING SOME FORM OF PBO.<br />

THE ADVICE AND OPINIONS OF A PANEL OF ADVISORS<br />

FROM THE POLICE WORLD AND THE BUSINESS AND ACA·<br />

DEMIC SECTORS WERE SOLICITED. THIS INFORMATION WAS<br />

THEN ORGANIZED AND SYNTHESIZED INTO A STEP·BY-STEP<br />

SYSTEM OF MANAGEMENT WHICH IS PRESENTED IN<br />

HOW-TO FORM. THE RESULT IS A GUIDE TO MODERN<br />

POLICE MANAGEMENT WRITTEN EXPRESSLY FOR THE<br />

ACTIVE AND WOUI.D-BE POLICE MANAGER WHICH EMPHA­<br />

SIZES THE PRACTICE OF MANAGEMENT RATHER THAN MAN­<br />

AGEMENT THEORY. EACH STEP IN THE PBO PROCESS IS<br />

PRESENTED. FROM THE DEVELOPMENT OF A DEPARTMENT­<br />

AL MISSION TO THE FINAL ASSESSMENT OF RESULTS.<br />

CHAPTERS EXPLAIN THE BENEFITS OF PBO MANAGEMENT<br />

TO THE INDIVIDUAL MANAGER AND HIS ORGANIZATION:<br />

OUTLINE POSSIBLE APPROACHES TO IMPLEMENTATION: DIS­<br />

CUSS PROBLEMS WHICH MAY ARISE, AND SOME WAYS THEY<br />

CAN BE AVOIDED OR OVERCOMEi AND OFFER SUGGES·<br />

TIONS AS TO HOW THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE<br />

MIGHT BE CHANGED TO MAKE PBO STILL MORE EFFECTIVE.<br />

DESCRIPTIONS OF PBO SYSTEMS IN ACTUAL OPERATION IN<br />

SEVERAL POLICE ORGANIZATIONS HAVE BEEN APPENDED<br />

TO SHOW THE v'ARIOUS WAYS PBO CAN BE EMPLOYED. AN<br />

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY IN ALSO INCLUDED.<br />

Sponaorlng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

AVllllblHty: SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 266<br />

PEARL STREET, ROOM 416, HARTFORD CT 06103.<br />

13. POLICING URBAN MASS TRANSIT SYSTEMS-PHASE 1 SUM·<br />

MARY REPORT. By L SIEGEL, M. MOLOF, W. MaY, J.<br />

STRACK, Ind F. JORDAN JR. MITRE CORPORATION, P 0<br />

BOX 208. BEDFORD MA 01730. 70 p. 1979.<br />

NCJ-t02.4<br />

THIS REPORT ASSESSES WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT CRIME<br />

AND POLICING .RESPONSES ON URBAN MASS TRANSIT SYS­<br />

TEMS. REPORT FINDINGS ARE BASED ON A LITERATURE<br />

SURVEY, SITE VISITS, AND INTERVIEWS. THE ASSESSMENT<br />

CONSISTS OF ANALYZING THE INTERACTIONS AMONG THE<br />

TRANSIT ENVIRONMENT, CRIME AND POLICING OPER­<br />

ATIONS: EXAMINING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF VARIOUS<br />

TRANSIT POLICING STRATEGIES AND SUPPORTIVE ANTI­<br />

CRIME MEASURES: AND SUGGESTING NEW EVALUATIVE AND<br />

EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMS. POLICE TRANSIT SYSTEMS USE<br />

A BROAD RANGE OF STRATEGIES INCLUDING POLICE OPER·<br />

ATIONS (UNIFORMED AND PLAINCLOTHES PATROL, DECOY,<br />

STAKEOUT), ELECTRONIC AND MECHANICAL COMMUNICA­<br />

TION AND SECURITY DEVICES (2-WAY RADIO, TELEPHONES,<br />

CLOSED·CIRCUIT TELEVISION (CClV), SUPPORT ACTIVITIES<br />

(DRIVER EDUCATION, LIAISON WITH SCHOOLS, COURTS, AND<br />

NEIGHBORHOODS), TARGET HARDENING VIA ENVIRONMEN·<br />

TAL AND VEHICULAR REDESIGN (INCREASED LIGHTING, 1M·<br />

PROVED VISIBILITY, .EXACT FARE, AND SCRIP), AND SELEC·<br />

TIVE OPERATING ACTIONS (SKIPPING STOPS, CLOSING STA·<br />

TIONS, ELIMINATING RUNS, REDUCING THE NUMBER OF<br />

CARS IN A TRAIN). MANY SYSTEMS FOR IMPROVING POLICE<br />

EFFECTIVENESS HAVE USED MULTIPLE STRATEGIES IN THE<br />

BELIEF THAT A COMBINATION OF APPROACHES WILL BE<br />

MORE ECONOMICAL. THE BASIC ASSUMPTIONS THAT GUIDE<br />

TR~\NSIT POLICE ANTICRIME ACTIVITIES ARE SIMILAR TO<br />

THOSE IN GENERAL POLICING. BASED ON A REVIEW OF REL·<br />

EVANT LITERATURE, ON A SERIES OF 12 SITE VISITS, AND<br />

CONTINUING DISCUSSIONS WITH TRANSIT POLICE OFFI·<br />

CIALS, THIS STUDY FOUND THAT THE CRIME PROBLEM IN<br />

MASS TRANSIT ESSENTIALLY IS CONCENTRATED IN THE NA­<br />

TION'S LARGE CITIES, THAT CERTAIN TYPES OF TRANSIT<br />

CRIME ARE MORE AMENABLE TO COfl!TROL THAN OTHERS,<br />

AND THAT METHODS OF FARE COLLECTION FREQUENTLY<br />

INFLUENCE THE SELECTION OF POLICING STRATEGIES. EN·<br />

VIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS AGE, POOR<br />

LIGHTING, MULTIPLE EXITS. AND RECESSED AREAS HINDER<br />

SURVEILLANCE. WHEREAS NEW STATIONS ARE DESIGNED<br />

TO INCREASE VISIBILITY AND IMPROVE ACCESS CONTROL.<br />

SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASED PATROLS GENERALLY REDUCE<br />

CRIME. AND STAKEOUT AND DECOY OPERATIONS ARE EF­<br />

FECTIVE. OTHER POLICING ACTIVITIES HAVE NOT BEEN<br />

EVALUATED FORMALLY IN TERMS OF THEIR IMPACT ON<br />

TRANSIT CRIME. THE IMPACT OF VARIOUS POLICING STRAT­<br />

EGIES ON PASSENGER PERCEPTIONS OF SECURITY ALSO<br />

ARE DISCUSSED. FOOTNOTES, CHARTS. AND A BIBLIOGRA­<br />

PHY ARE INCLUDED.<br />

SUpplementil Not .. : SERIES A, NUMBER 23.<br />

Sponaorlng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA­<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

AVlllablllty: GPO. Stock Order No. 027-000-00858·5.<br />

14. PRE·RELEASE CENTER PROGRAM TEST DESIGN. US DE·<br />

PARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW<br />

ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA<br />

AVENUE NW. WASHINGTON, DC 20531. 22 p. 1978.<br />

NCJ-66869<br />

NILECJ IS SPONSORING A FIELD TEST OF PRERELEASE CEN·<br />

TERS AT A LIMITED NUMBER OF SITES. USING THIS PRO·<br />

GRAM TEST DESIGN AS A BASIS. THE TESTS SHOULD<br />

, ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A PROGRAM STRATEGY IN<br />

VARIOUS SETTINGS. THE GOAL OF THE TESTING EFFORT IS<br />

TO IDENTIFY AND TEST A SET OF FOUR PROGRAM COMPO·<br />

NENTS FOR COUNTY-BASED, CORRECTIONAL, PRERELEASE<br />

CENTERS. A MAJOR CONCERN IN THE REPLICABILITY m~<br />

THE COMPONENTS. THE COMPONENTS INCLUDE (1)<br />

COMMUNITY·BASED WORK OR EDUCATION RELEASE IN<br />

WHICH SENTENCED INMATES ARE RELEASED FOR EMPLOY·<br />

MENT AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES OPERATED BY THE<br />

COUNTY AND LOCATED IN A SEPARATE FACILITY OR UNIT:<br />

(2) CLIENT PARTICIPATION, LIMITED TO INMATES WHO HAVE<br />

BEEN SENTENCED TO SERVE TIME IN PRISONS OR JAILS: (3)<br />

COMPREHENSIVE SEHVICES, INCLUDING PROGRAM CON·<br />

TRACTS, TREATMENT SERVICES, AND FINANCIAL PAYMENT<br />

BY INMATES: AND (4) SUPERVISION WITH INCREASED FREE­<br />

DOM BASED ON A GRADUATED RELEASE PROGRAM. PAR­<br />

TICIPANT SUPERVISION, AND WRITTEN RULES AND ADMINIS·<br />

TRATIVE PROCESSES. THE PROGRAM TEST DESIGN IN·<br />

CLUDES f~ANDOM .4SSIGNMENT OF ALL SELECTED ELlG!BLE<br />

CLIENTS TO EXPERIMENTAL AND CONTROL GROUPS. A<br />

COMPARISON GROUP COMPOSED OF IN~4ATES NOT ELIGI·<br />

BLE FOR PROGRAM SERVICES, AND SEPARATE ANALYSES<br />

OF THE PERFORMANCES OF JAIL AND PRISON INMATES.<br />

THESE EVALUATIONS WILL SEEK TO DETERMINE THE PRO·<br />

GRAMS' IMPACT ON PARTICIPATING CLiENTS AND COMMUNI­<br />

TY, WILL ASSESS THE ECONOMIC UTILITY OF THE PRO·<br />

GRAMS TO THE CRIMINAL JUISTICE SYSTEM, AND WILL IDEN·<br />

TIFY THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF MAJOR COMPONENTS. TO<br />

ASSURE THAT THE SELECTED TEST SITES PROVIDE COM·<br />

PREHENSIVE PROGRAMS CONSISTENT WITH THE TEST<br />

DESIGN, EACH SELECTED COUNTY CORRECTIONAL AGENCY<br />

WILL BE REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT OR UPGRADE CERTAIN<br />

PROGRAMMATIC ELEMENTS. EACH PARTICIPATING COUNTY<br />

AGENCY WILL BE PROVIDED FUNDS TO COVER THE DEVEL·<br />

OPMENT OF THEIR CURRENTLY OPERATING PRERELEASE<br />

PROGRAM INTO ONE WHICH INCLUDES ALL THE PROGRAM<br />

TEST DESIGN ELEMENTS. FROM THE GRANT AWARD DATE,<br />

AGENCIES WILL BE EXPECTED TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT<br />

IN 18 MONTHS (3 MONTHS FOR PLANNING AND 12·15<br />

Ji<br />

,"\<br />

. "~<br />

29


__--______ ~~--____________ _~------~~.~c~,~ ----~q,~______ ~ ____________________----~~--~--------.--~--~--------~- -----<br />

r-<br />

--------- ------.--------<br />

, .,<br />

PRETRIAL<br />

PUBLICATIONS<br />

OF THE NIJ<br />

REDUCING<br />

, j}<br />

I,<br />

i<br />

L'<br />

Ii<br />

i<br />

I,<br />

r<br />

f;<br />

MONTHS FOR IMPLEMENTATION). SITE SELECTION CRITERIA<br />

ARE LISTED.<br />

AVlllablllty: GPO. Slock Order No. 027·000·00927·1.<br />

IS. PFiETRIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE-AN EVALUATION<br />

REPORT. By W. It. KERSETTER Ind A. M. HEINZ. UNI·<br />

VERSITY OF CHICAGO CENTER FOR STUDIES IN CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 1111 EAST 60TH STREET, CHICAGO IL 60637. 203<br />

p. 1979. NCJ·56175<br />

DIRECTED AT BOTH CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRACTITIONERS AND<br />

RESEARCHERS, THIS STUDY OUTLINES A DADE COUNTY,<br />

FLA., PROPOSAL TO VOLUNTARILY INVOLVE VICTIMS, DE·<br />

FENDANTS, AND POLICE IN JUDICIAL PLEA NEGOTIATION<br />

CONFERENCES. SUPPORTED BY LEAA, THE STUDY HAD SEV·<br />

ERAL OBJECTIVES: (1) TO DETERMINE WHETHER PRETRIAL<br />

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES WERE A FEASIBLE CASE DIS·<br />

POSITION PROCEDURE IN A MAJOR URBAN AREA FELONY<br />

COURT: (2) TO MAKE A PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION OF<br />

THE PROCEDURE'S IMPACT ON CASE PROCESSING AND DIS·<br />

POSITION: AND (3) TO ASSESS THE IMPACT OF THE CONFER·<br />

ENCE ON THE JUDGES, ATTORNEYS, VICTIMS, DEFENDANTS,<br />

AND POLICE INVOLVED. THE FIELD EXPERIMENT IN DADE<br />

COUNTY PROPOSED THAT ALL PLEA NEGOTIATIONS TAKE<br />

PI.ACE IN FRONT OF A JUDGE AND THAT THE VICTIM, DE·<br />

FENDANT, AND POLICE OFFICER BE INVITED. THE CONFER·<br />

ENCES WERE BRIEF, BUT GENERALLY REACHED .IT LEAST<br />

AN OUTLINE OF A SETTLEMENT. THEY USUALLY INCLUDED<br />

AT LEAST ONE LAY PARTY, ALTHOUGH THE ATTENDANCE<br />

RATES FOR THE VICTIM AND POLICE OFFICER WERE LOW.<br />

THE CHANGE IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE PLEA PROCESS<br />

REDUCED THE TIME INVOLVED IN CLEARING CASES BY LOW·<br />

ERING THE INFORJ.'ATION AND DECISION MAKING COSTS TO<br />

THE JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS. NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGES<br />

IN THE SETTLEMENT RATE OR IN THE IMPOSITION OF CRIMI·<br />

NAL SANCTIONS WERE NOTED. THERE WAS SOME EVI·<br />

DENCE THAT THE POLICE AND, TO SOME EXTENT, THE VIC·<br />

TIMS WHO ATTENDED THE SESSIONS OBTAINED MORE IN·<br />

FORMATION AND HAD MORE POSITIVE ATTITUDES ABOUT<br />

THE WAY THE CASES WERE HANDLED. A BRIEF BACK·<br />

GROUND DISCUSSION AND LITERATURE ARE PROVIDED,<br />

ALONG WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE FULL PRETr:lj~L SET·<br />

TI.EMENT CONFERENCE PROPOSAL AND ITS RATIONALE.<br />

THE ISSUES ADDRESSED IN IMPLEMENTING THE PROPOSAL<br />

ARE DISCUSSED, AS ARE THE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY,<br />

FINDINGS, AND IMPLICATIONS. TABULAR AND GRAPHIC<br />

DATA ARE PROVIDED. THE SAM~LE PROCEDURE AND IN·<br />

STRUMENTS ARE APPENDED.<br />

Spontorlng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

AVllllblllty: GPO Slock Order No. 027·000·00818·6: NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM. NCJRS.<br />

Ie. PRISON GRIEVANCE MECHANISMS-MANUAL. By J. M.<br />

KEATING. CENTER FOR COMMUNITY JUSTICE, 918 18TH<br />

STREET NW, WASHINGTON DC 20006. 89 p. 1977.<br />

NCJ·43402<br />

THIS BASIC REFERENCE WORK PROVIDES AN OVERALL<br />

VIEW OF THE PROCEDURES THAT COMPRISE AN EFFECTIVE<br />

PRISON GRIEVANCE MECHANISM, AS WELL AS PRINCIPLES<br />

AND GUIDELINES FOR DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A<br />

MECHANISM. THE MANUAL DISCUSSES THE NEED FOR<br />

PRISON GRIEVANCE MECHANISMS AND PRINCIPLES OF ES·<br />

TABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE GRIEVANCE MECHANISM<br />

(DESIGN PRINCIPLES, MODEL MECHANISMS BASED ON THE<br />

DESIGN PRINCIPLES, AND iMPLEMENTATION PRINCIPLES),<br />

ALSO PRESENTED ARE BA&Iv REASONS FOR ESTABLISHING<br />

AN EFFECTIVE GRIEVANCE MECHANISM, A RESPONSE TO<br />

PRINCIPAL OBJECTIONS AGAINST THE INTRODUCTION OF<br />

AN EFFECTIVE MECHANISM, AND THE PROCESS OF IMPLE·<br />

MENTING A GRIEVANCE MECHANISM BASED ON DESIGN<br />

PRINCIPLES.<br />

Supplementll Not ..: EXECUTIVE TRAINING PROGRAM IN AD·<br />

VANCED CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRACTICES.<br />

Span,orlng Aglncl ..: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE<br />

OF DEVELOPMENT, TESTING AND DISSEMINATION, 633 INDI·<br />

ANA AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC 20531: UNIVERSITY RE·<br />

SEARCH CORPORATION, 5530 WISCONSIN AVENUE, WASH·<br />

INGTON DC.<br />

AVlnlbUlty: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

17. PRISON GRIEVANCE MECHANISMS-PARTICIPANT'S HAND­<br />

BOOK. By J. M. KEATING. CENYER FOR COMMUNITY<br />

JUSTICE, 918 16TH STREET NW, WASHINGTON DC 20006.<br />

69 p. 1977. NCJ·40306<br />

TRAINING SESSION OFFERS AIDS TO PARTICIPANTS IN THE<br />

RES,)LUTION OF PRISONERS' GRIEVANCES. A NUMBER OF<br />

GUIDES ARE PRESENTED THAT ARE HELPFUL IN ESTABLISH·<br />

ING A GRIEVANCE MECHANISM. SOME OF THESE INVOLVE<br />

WRITIEN RESPONSES, INCLUDING THE REASON FOR THE<br />

DECISION WHICH MUST BE GIVEN FOR All GRIEVANCES.<br />

GRIEVANCES MUST SE ANSWERED WITHIN PRESCRIBED,<br />

REASONABLE TIME LIMITS: SPECIAL PROVISIONS MUST BE<br />

MADE FOR RESPONDING TO EMERGENCIES: AND OUTSIDE<br />

REVIEW OF GRIEVANCES MUST BE AVAILABLE. VARIOUS<br />

LEVELS OF THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE ARE GIVEN, AND<br />

SAMPLE GRIEVANCES ARE INCLUDED.<br />

Supplem.nlll Not .. : NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE EXECU·<br />

TIVE TRAINING PROGRAM.<br />

SponlOring Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE<br />

OF DEVELOPMENT, TESTING AND DISSEMINATION, 633 INDI·<br />

ANA AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC 20531.<br />

AVlnlbUlIy: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

88. PRISON GRIEVANCE MECHANISMS-TRAINER'S HAND­<br />

BOOK. By J. M. KEATING. UNIVERSITY RESEARCH COR·<br />

PORATION, 5530 WISCONSIN AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC.<br />

140 p. 1977. NCJ·S4148<br />

PART OF LEAA'S EXECUTIVE TRAINING PROGRAM IN AD·<br />

VANCED CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRACTICES, THIS TRAINER'S<br />

MANUAL OUTLINES WORKSHOP SESSIONS ON DEVELOPING<br />

AND IMPLEMENTING PRISONER GRIEVANCE MECHANISMS.<br />

THE 10·SESSION, a·DAY WORKSHOP IS DESIGNED TO HELP<br />

PARTICIPANTS GAIN AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE PRINCI·<br />

PLES ESSENTIAL TO CREATING EFFECTIVE PRISON GRIEV·<br />

ANCE MECHANISMS, AN AWARENESS OF THE POTENTIAL<br />

BENEFITS·DIRECT AND INDIRECT··OF EFFECTIVE GRIEVANCE<br />

MECHANISMS, AN AP?RECIATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF<br />

THOROUGH PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION, A GRASP OF<br />

THE TECHNIQUES THAT ARE HELPFUL IN SOLVING PROB·<br />

LEMS OF PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION, AND A KNOWl·<br />

EDGE OF THE RESOURCES AVAILAfJlE NATIONALLY, RE·<br />

GIONALL Y, AND LOCALLY TO CORRECTIONAL SYSTEMS<br />

ABOUT TO IMPLEMENT GRIEVANCE MECHANISMS. FOCUS·<br />

ING SOLELY ON THE TRAINER'S ROLE, THE MANUAL LISTS<br />

THE GOALS OF EACH WORKSHOP SESSION, ALONG WITH<br />

THE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES, INSTRUCTIONAL METH·<br />

ODS, AND MATERIALS/LOGISTICS PRIMARY TO THE SES·<br />

SION'S SELECTED TOPIC. THE MANUAL IS INTENDED AS AN<br />

AID TO SESSION MANAGERS IN GUIDING THE PARTICIPANTS<br />

IN APPROACHING, DISCUSSING, AND DEVELOPING DESIGN,<br />

IMPLEMENTATION, AND EVALUATION PRINCIPLES RELATIVE<br />

TO EFFECTIVE INMATE GRIEVANCE MECHANISMS. SEE ALSO<br />

NCJ 40306 AND 43402.<br />

Suppllmentll Not ..: FROM THE EXECUTIVE TRAINING PRO·<br />

GRAM IN ADVANCED CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRACTICES.<br />

SponlOrlng Agency: US DEPARTMEI~r OF JUSTICE OFFICE<br />

OF DEVELOPMENT, TESTING AND DISSEMINATION, 633 INDI.<br />

ANA AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC 20531.<br />

AVllllbUlly: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

18. PUBLICATIONS OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW EN.<br />

FORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE-A COMPREHENSIVE<br />

BIBLIOGRAPHY 1878 SUPPLEMENT. J. FERRY Ind M. KRA.<br />

VITZ, Edl. NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERENCE<br />

SERVICE, BOX 6000, ROCKVILLE MD 20850. 124 p. 1979.<br />

NCJ·S7N7<br />

THIS ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY REPRESENTS THE FIRST<br />

ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO AN EARLIER, COMPREHENSIVE<br />

BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MATERIALS PUBLISHED BY THE NATION.<br />

Al IN5TITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL JUS.<br />

TICE BETWEEN 1968 AND 1977. CONTAINING CITATIONS FOR<br />

SEVERAL PRE·1978 DOCUMENTS AND ALL DOCUMENTS PU9.<br />

LlSHED FOR DISTRIBUTION THROUGH THE U.S. GOVERN.<br />

MENT PRINTING OFFICE OR THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUS.<br />

TICE REFERENCE SERVICE IN 1978, THIS COMPENDIUM PAO.<br />

VIDES BOTH SUBJECT AND TITLE INDEXES TO ASSIST RE.<br />

SEARCHERS. IN THE FIRST SECTION, 136 CITATIONS ARE<br />

liSTED BY NCJRS DATA BASE NUMBERS··AN IDENTIFYING<br />

CODE ASSIGNED TO EACH DOCUMENT AS.lT 'ENTERS THE<br />

NATIONAL INSTITUTE'S COMPUTER SYSTEM. COMPLETE BIB.<br />

LlOGRAPHIC CITATIONS, AVAILABILITY INFORMATION, AND<br />

ABSTRACTS ARE PROVIDED FOR EACH DOCUMENT. THE<br />

NEXT SECTION CONTAINS LISTINGS OF SEVERAL SPECIAL.<br />

IZED TYPES OF PUBLICATIONS: (1) PRESCRIPTIVE PACKAGES<br />

AND PROGRAM MODELS··COMPILATION OF THE MOST SUC·<br />

CESSFUl APPROACHES TO PARTICULAR CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br />

PROBLEMS: (2) NATIONAL EVALUATION<br />

PROGRAMS-PRACTICAL INFORMATION ON THE EFFECTIVE·<br />

NESS, COST, AND PROBLEMS OF CERTAIN WIDELY tidED<br />

CAIMINAl JUSTICE PROGRAMS: (3) EXEMPLARY<br />

PROJECTS·.QUTSTANDING LOCAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRO·<br />

JECTS SUITABLE FOR ADAPTATION TO OTHER COMMUNI·<br />

TIES: AND (4) SELECTED BIBlIOGRAPHIES··TOPICAl BIBLIOG.<br />

RAPHIES THAT REFLECT CURRENT INTERESTS AND DEVEl·<br />

OPMENTS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE.<br />

THESE CITATIONS ARE liSTED ALPHABETICALLY, ALTHOUGH<br />

NCJRS DATA BASE ACCESS NUMBERS ARE INCLUDED. IN·<br />

FORMATION ON HOW TO OBTAIN THE CITED MATERIALS IS<br />

ALSO PROVIDED.<br />

Spontorlng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE lEAA NA·<br />

TIONAl INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531,<br />

AVllllblllty: GPO. Stock Order No. 027-


- ~~. -, -- ~'~~ -.~, ...... "I'qI:a ... ;' " . .- "'''~'''~'''V " ~<br />

·-.;i*,t~"<br />

,<br />

"<br />

RESTITUTION<br />

PUBLICATIONS<br />

OF THE NIJ<br />

SELECTION<br />

PROJECT CONDUCTED IN AN URBAN RESIDENTiAL NEIGH·<br />

BORHOOD IN HARTFORD, CONN. BEGUN IN 1973, THE HART·<br />

FORD PROJECT SET OUT TO ASSESS THE NATURE OF<br />

CRIME IN THE NORTH ASYLUM HILL' TARGET AREA AND TO<br />

IDENTIFY ITS' CONTRIBUTING FACTORS. THE PREMISE OF<br />

THE: PROJECT WAS THAT THE ANALYSIS OF THE PROBLEM<br />

AND THE PROPOSED SOLUTION SHOULD TAKE INTO AC.<br />

COUNT THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT, THE POLICE AND THE<br />

CITIZENS, AND THAT AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO CRIME<br />

REDUCTION WAS MORE LIKELY TO SUCCEED THAN AN AP.<br />

PROACH THAT OMITTED EITHER THE PHYSICAL DESIGN, THE<br />

POLICE, OR COMMUNITY RESIDENTS. A NUMBER OF FEA.<br />

TURES OF THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT CONTRIBUTED TO<br />

THE BREAKDOWN OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S RESIDENTIAL<br />

CHARACTER. CARS AND PEDESTRIANS PASSING THROUGH<br />

THE AREA DOMINATED THE STREETS AND DEPERSONAL.<br />

IZED THEM. THE STREETS BELONGED MORE TO OUTSIDERS<br />

THAN TO RESIDENTS, CREATING AN IDEAL ENVIRONMENT<br />

FOR POTENTIAL OFFENDERS. TO REDUCE CRIME IN THE<br />

AREA, A THREE·PART PROGRAM, IMPLEMENTED IN 1976, IN.<br />

CLUDED (1) CLOSING AND NARROWED STREETS TO REDUCE<br />

OUTSIDE TRAFFIC AND INCREASE RESIDENTIAL CHARAC.<br />

TER; (2) INSTITUTING A NEIGHBORHOOD POLICE UNIT WITH<br />

STRONG RELATIONSHIPS TO THE RESIDENTS; (3) CREATING<br />

AND ENCOURAGING AREA ORGANIZATIONS TO WORK WITH<br />

POLICE AND TO INITIATE RESIDENTS EFFORTS TO IMPROVE<br />

THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AFTER 1 YEAR OF THE PROGRAM AN<br />

EVALUATION REIiEALED THAT BURGLARY HAD DECREASED<br />

BY 42 PERCENT IN THE TARGET AREA, INSTANCES OF ROB.<br />

BERY (PURSE SNATCHING) WERE REDUCED BY 28 PERCENT,<br />

AND FEAR OF BURGLARY AND ROBBERY HAD DECREASED<br />

AS WELL. ALL OF THE PROGRAM COMPONENTS PLAYED A<br />

ROLE IN REDUCING CRIME, ALTHOUGH INCREASED RESI.<br />

DENT USE OF NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS AND OPEN SPACES<br />

AND INCREASED EFFORTS TO CONTROL NEIGHBORHOOD<br />

ACTIVITY APPEARED TO BE THE MOST SIGNIFICANT REA.<br />

SONS FC'R THE INITIAL SUCCESS OF THE PROGRAM. THE<br />

PHYSICAL CHANGES THAT WERE IMPLEMENTED APPEARED<br />

TO BE ESSENTIAL IN ACHIEVING SUCCESSFUL RESULTS. EX.<br />

TENSIVE STATISTICAL DATA AND REFEAENCE NOTES AC.<br />

COMPANY THE TEXT.<br />

8ponIO<strong>II</strong>ng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA.<br />

TIONAl INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Avlllleblllty: GPO Stock Order No. 027.()()().()()877.1· NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

'<br />

'3. RESTITUTION-A SELECTED BIBUOGRAPHY. A. A. CAIN<br />

end M. KRAVITZ, E'-. NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE REF.<br />

ERENCE SERVICE, BOX 6000, ROCKVILLE MD 20850. 64 p.<br />

1979. NCJ-62011<br />

THIS ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY HAS BEEN COMPILED<br />

FROM THE DATA BASE OF THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br />

REFERENCE SERVICE TO HIGHLIGHT THE GROWING LITERA.<br />

TURE ON RESTITUTION. RESTITUTION IS A SENTENCING AL.<br />

TERNATIVE THAT REQUIRES THE OFFENDER TO MAKE A<br />

MONEY OR SERVICE PAYMENT TO THE VICTIMS OF THE<br />

CRIME OR TO SUaSTITUTE VICTIMS. IN MANY RESTITUTION<br />

PROGRAMS THE OFFENDER IS REQUIRED TO COMPENSATE<br />

THE VICTIM FOR DAMAGE OR LOSS SUFFERED AS A RESULT<br />

OF THE CRIMINAL ACT. PROPONI:NTS OF THESE PROGRAMS<br />

POINT TO THEIR DUAL BENEFITS: OFFENDERS ARE MADE<br />

MORE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR CRIMES, AND THE<br />

LONG·FORGOTTEN VICTIMS RECEIVE SOME ATTENTION AND<br />

BENEFITS FROM THE PERPETRATORS OF CRIMES AGAINST<br />

THEM. WHEN THE OFFENDER IS SENTENCED TO COMMUNI.<br />

TY SERVICE, SOCIETY AS A WHOL':: RECEIVES REPARATIONS<br />

FROM THE OFFENDER. RESTITUTION CAN BE IMPOSED AS<br />

AN ALTERNATIVE SENTENCE OR AS A SUPPLEMENTAL SEN.<br />

TENCE. THE 77 ENTRIES OF THIS ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRA.<br />

PHY ARE GROUPED IN THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS: OVER.<br />

VIEW, RESTITUTION THEORY, AND RESTITUTION PROGRAMS.<br />

ENTRIES ARE DATED FROM 1972 TO 1978 AND INCLUDE<br />

BOOKS, JOURNAL ARTICLES, PROGRAM REPORTS, AND RE.<br />

SEARCH REPORTS. ALL ENTRIES ARE IN ENGLISH; MOST<br />

ORIGINATE IN THE UNITED STATES, AND A FEW COME FROM<br />

CANADA. INFORMATION IS INCLUDED ON HOW TO OBTAIN<br />

THE DOCUMENTS CITED. THE APPENDIXES CONTAIN A LIST<br />

OF SOURCES AND A LIST OF LEAA GRANT FlECIPIENTS.<br />

(AUTHOR ABSTRACT MODIFIED)<br />

SponlOring Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA.<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

AVlllablllly: GPO. Stock Order No. 027·000-00883-6. NCJRS.<br />

114. SCHOOL CRIME-THE PROBLEM AND SOME ATTEMPTED<br />

SOLUTIONS. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NATION.<br />

AL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL JUS­<br />

TICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC .20531.<br />

16 p. 1979. tlCStHOl<br />

ALTHOUGH THE NATIONAL iNSTITUTE OF EDUCATION SAFE<br />

SCHOOLS STUDY PRESENTS SOME ALARMING STATISTICS<br />

ABOUT SCHOOL CRIME, IT ALSO CHALLENGES A NUMBER<br />

OF ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT THE EXTENT OF SUCH CRIME.<br />

OVER 61,000 TEACHERS WERE PHYSICALLY ASSAULTED IN<br />

1976; AN ESTIMATED 282,000 JUNIOR AND SENIOR HIGH<br />

SCHOOL STUDENTS ARE ATTACKED EACH MONTH AND<br />

112,000 ARE ROBBED; SCHOOL VANDALISM COSTS RANGE<br />

FROM $50· TO $6OO·MILLION ANNUALLY. YET RESEARCHERS<br />

HAVE ALSO FOUND THAT MOST ADMINISTRATORS BEl.IEVE<br />

VIOLENCE AND VANDALISM HAVE LEVELED OFF IN THE LAST<br />

5 YEARS, THAT MOST PROBLEMS OF VIOLENCE IN THE<br />

SCHOOLS ARE NOT CAUSED BY OUTSIDERS, THAT THE<br />

FEAR OF CRIME MAY BE MORE DAMAGING THAN ACTUAL<br />

CRIMINAL ACTS, AND THAT THE CRIME PROBLEM CAN BE<br />

REDUCED THROUGH SPECIFIC PROGRAM CHANGES. SUG.<br />

GESTED STRATEGIES INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: THE HARD.<br />

WARE APPROACH WHICH EMPHASIZES BUILDING SECURITV<br />

AND ENLISTS THE HELP OF POLICE IN COMBATING CRIME,<br />

THE PREVENTIVE APPROACH WHICH EMPHASI2ES HIGHLY<br />

VISIBLE SURVEILLANCE PERSONNEL AND HARDWARE, THE<br />

CORRECTIVE VIEW WHICH UNDERLINES ATTENTION TO DIS­<br />

CIPLINARY PROCEDURES AND CURRICULUM, THE INTER.<br />

AGENCY APPROACH THAT DRAWS ON PUBLIC OR PRIVATE<br />

AGENCY PERSONNEL FOR YOUTH SERVICES, AND THE INTE.<br />

GRATIVE APPROACH WHICH TRANSFORMS SCHOOL CON.<br />

FLICT INTO AN OPPORTUNITY FOR STUDY. COMMUNITY<br />

GROUPS INTERESTED IN REDUCING SCHOOL CRIME CAN<br />

CONTACT THE NEW SCHOOL RESOURCE NETWORK,<br />

FUNDED BY THE LEAA OFFICE OF JUVENILE JUSTICE AND<br />

DELINQUENCY PREVENTION, TO PROVIDE TRAINING, TECH.<br />

NICAL ASSISTANCE, AND INFORMATION THROUGH FOUR RE.<br />

GIONAL CENTERS. REFERENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL LISTS<br />

ARE ATTACHED.<br />

AVlllablllly: GPO Stock Order No. 027,()()0.()0860.7· NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM. NCJRS.<br />

'<br />

95. SEAnu: (WA)-FOCUS ON ROBIERY-THE HIDDEN CAM.<br />

ERAS PROJECT-AN EXEMPLARY REPORT. .~ D. WHIT.<br />

CBOMRIDGB'E MABT ASSOCIATE~~, INC, 55 WHEELER STREET, CAM·<br />

A 02138. 77 p •. 1979. NCJ.1l1014<br />

THE POLICE IN SEATTLE, WASH., HAVE TAKEN A NEW AP.<br />

PROACH TO ROBBERY PREVENTION IN HIGH RISK BUSI.<br />

NESSES BY USING CONCEALED CAMERAS THAT ARE ACTI.<br />

VATED WHEN A 'TRIP' Bll,L IS REMOVED FROM THE CASH<br />

REGISTER. '!"HE CAMERAS TAKE CLEAR PICTURES OF THE<br />

ROBBERY.IN.PROGRESS, MAKING SUSPECT IDENTIFICATION<br />

POSSIBLE AND GAINING ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE FOR TRIAL.<br />

THE CONCEPT WAS IMPLEMENTED ACCORDING TO A RIGOR.<br />

OUS EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; IMPLEMENTATION, ORGANIZA.<br />

TION, SITE SELECTION, EQUIPMENT OPERATiONS, POLICE<br />

PROCEDURES, RECORDKEEPING, AND PROJECT COSTS ARE<br />

DOCUMENTED IN THIS REPOAT AS WELL AS THE EXPERI.<br />

MENTAL DESIGN AND PROJECT FINDINGS. BUSINESSES<br />

WITH THE HIDDEN CAMERAS WERE COMPARED TO A CON.<br />

TROL GROUP WITHOUT CAMERAS AT 150 SITES (75 EXPERI.<br />

MENTAL, 75 CONTROL). ONE HUNDRED OFFENSES WERE<br />

REPORTED FROM MID.JUNE 1976 TO APRIL 27,1977, INCLUD.<br />

ING 38 ROBBERIES AT THE EXPERIMENTAL SITES AND 66<br />

ROBBERIES AT CONTROl. SITES. EVALUATION OF THE PROJ·<br />

ECT DEMONSTRATES THAT 66 PERCENT OF EXPERIMENTAL<br />

GROUP CASES WERE CLEARED EITHER BY ARREST OR EX·<br />

CEPTION, COMPARED TO 55 PERCENT OF CONTROL GROUP<br />

CASES, WITH A HIGH DEGREE OF CONTROL CASES BEING<br />

CLEARED USING PICTURES TAKEN AT EXPERIMENTAL SITES.<br />

A DECLINE IN COMMERCIAL ROBBERY FOLLOWING THE<br />

PROJECT ONSET WAS SIGNIFICANTLY COP-RELATED WITH<br />

THE NUMBER OF ROBBERS ARRESTED AND CONVICTED<br />

DURING THE PROJECT PERIOD. PROJECT OBJECTIVES WERE<br />

ACHIEVED WITHOUT INCREASING RISK TO VICTIMS, POLICE,<br />

OR OFFENDERS, AND CONVICTIONS FOR HIDDEN CAMERA<br />

CASES WERE ACHIEVED AT A LOWER C'()ST THAN WERE<br />

CONVICTIONS FOR CONTROL CASES. FURTHERMORE, THE<br />

HIDDEN CAMERAS PROJECT IS RELATIVELY INEXPENSIVE<br />

AND EASY TO OPERATE. HIDDEN CAMERA PROJECTS IN SIX<br />

OTHER CITIES ARE DISCUSSED AS WELL AS HOW TO GO<br />

ABOUT DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING SIMILAR PRO·<br />

JECTS. APPENDIXES CONTAIN SAMPLE DAILY MONITORING<br />

FORMS USED BY CAMERA OFFICERS IN KANSAS CITY, MO.,<br />

SEATTLE'S DATA COLLECTION FORMS, AND A COST ANALY·<br />

SIS OF THE SEATTLE PROJECT.<br />

Spon~ring Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUS •.: LEAANA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMIN~!.<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 205~1.<br />

AVlllabllily: GPO Stock Order No. 027.()()Q'()()799-8j NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

l1li. SECOND NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br />

EVALUATION ABSTRACTS-WASHINGTON, DC, NOVEMBER<br />

20-21, 187.. 51 p. 1978. NCJ·1I3103<br />

THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS PRE·<br />

SENTED AT A 1978 NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON CRIMINAL JUS·<br />

TICE EVALUATION THAT WAS SPONSORED BY THE LEM<br />

AND HELD IN WASHINGTON, D.C. TOPICS OF THE AB·<br />

STRACTS, BY WORKSHOP PANEL, ARE AS FOLLOWS: (1)<br />

DRUG ABUSE (POLICE NARCOTICS CONTROL), (2) SENTENC·<br />

ING (MASSACHUSETTS GUN CONTROL LAW AND SENTENC·<br />

ING LAWS IN PENNSYLVANIA), (3) PRETRIAL SERVICES (DESK<br />

APPEARANCE TICKETS IN NEW YORK CITY, PRETRIAL DIVER·<br />

SION, AND WHETHER PRETRIAL PERFORMANCE IS AFFECT·<br />

ED BY SUPERVISION), (4) RESEARCH METHODOLOGY<br />

(RANDOM TIME QUOTA SELECTION AND BAYESIAN ANALY·<br />

SIS OF CRIME RATES), (5) CAREER CRIMINALS (CAREER OF·<br />

FENDERS AND JUSTICE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND THE<br />

PRISON EXPERIENCE OF CAREER CRIMINALS), (8) CORREC·<br />

TIONS AND REHABILITATION (THE AMERICAN MEDICAL AS·<br />

SOCIATION'S PROGRAM TO IMPROVE HEALTH CARE IN JAILS<br />

AND A POINT SYSTEM FOR TEMPORARY RELEASE SELEC·<br />

TION), (7) ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (COMMERCIAL SECURITY<br />

SURVEYS AND TARGET HARDENING), (8) CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br />

PLANNING (LOCAL PLANNING IN NEW JERSEY), (9) EVALUAT·<br />

ING EVALUATIONS (MANPOWER SERVICE PROGRAMS FOR<br />

ILLINOIS OFFENDERS AND A CASE STUDY IN THE NATIONAL<br />

EVALUATION PROCESS FOR SYNTHESIZINe,:I EVALUATIONS<br />

AND ASSESSING EVALUABILITY), (10) EVALt 'ATING PO,LICE<br />

PRACTICES (BURGLARY INVESTIGATION, A SINGLE FINGER·<br />

PRINT PROJECT, AND AN AUTOMATIC VEHICLE MONITORING<br />

SYSTEM), (11) EVALUATING JUVENILE JUSTICE PROGRAMS<br />

(SERIOUS JUVENILE DELINQUENCY AND SECURE CARE, SUP·<br />

PRESSION EFFECT IN BEFORE·AFTER COMPARISONS, AND<br />

TITLE I PROGRAMS FOR NEGLECTED AND DELINQUENT<br />

YOUTH), (12) CORRECTIONAL FIELD SERVICES (RECIDIVISM<br />

AS A FUNCTION OF PROBATION SUPEAVISION AND EFFECTS<br />

OF FINANCIAL AID AND EMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE ON<br />

EX·PRISONERS), (13) UNIFIED DELINQUENCY INTERVENTION<br />

SERVICES (HOW A REGRESSION ARTIFACT CAN MAKE ANY<br />

DELINQUENCY INTERVENTION PROGRAM LOOK EFFECTIVE),<br />

(14) PLEA BARGAINING, AND (15) POLICE RESEARCH AND<br />

EVALUATION (HIDDEN CAMERA USE IN SEATTLE, WASH.,<br />

AND EFFECTS OF POLICE RESPONSE TIME ON CITIZEN SAT·<br />

ISFACTION). THE ADDRESSES OF PEOPLE WHO PRESENTED<br />

THE PAPERS IS PROVIDED.<br />

SponsorIng ~,;.ncy: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Av.u.b<strong>II</strong>Ity: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

'7. SECURITY AND'rHE SMALL BUSINESS RETAILER, 1tl7l~. fl~<br />

E. CHELIMSKY, F. C. JORDAN JR, 1. S. RUSSELL, Ind J. R.<br />

STRACK. MITRE CORPORATION WASHINGTON OPER·<br />

ATIONS, 1820 DOLLEY MADISON BOULEVARD, MCLEAN VA<br />

22101. 122 p. 1978. Ned·S1a3S<br />

THIS HANDBOOK FOR SMALL BUSINESSES CONSIDERS THE<br />

CRIME THREAT PROBl.EM AND INSTRUCTS OWNERS ON<br />

HOW TO DETERMINE THEIR VULNERABILITY TO CRIME. A<br />

GUIDE TO ECONOMICAL AND RELIABLE EQUIPMENT AND SE·<br />

CURITY PLANNING IS PROVIDED. THE EXTENT AND NATURE<br />

OF LOSS WHICH SMALL BUSINESSES PRESENTLY SUFFER<br />

DUE TO CRIME IS ASSESSED, AND DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS<br />

OF THE NATURE OF THE FOUR CRIMES THAT MOST OFTEN<br />

PLAGUE SMALL BUSINESSES-·ROBBERY, BURGLARY, SHOo<br />

PLiFTING, AND INTERNAL THREAT .. ARE PRESENTED. THIS<br />

HELPS SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS EVALUATE THEIR OWN<br />

VULNERABILITY TO CRIME. THE OPERATING METHODS OF<br />

THE FOUR TYPES OF CRIMINALS ARE DISCUSSED AND A<br />

GUIDE FOR ASSESSING VULNERABILITY IS INCLUDED. THE<br />

CRIMINAL'S POINT OF VIEW IS USED IN DISCUSSING WEAK·<br />

NESSES IN INSTALLATION AND PROCEDURES. A SECTION OF<br />

THE HANDBOOK IS DESIGNED TO AID IN INTERPRETING<br />

FINDINGS AND PRESENTS THE RANGE OF SECURITY TECH·<br />

NIQUES AVAILABLE TO SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS. A CATA·<br />

LOG OF AVAILABLE, LOW.coST SECURITY TECHNIQUES IS<br />

PROVIDED. COVERED ARE PROPERTY LINE PROTECTION,<br />

ENTRY PROTECTION, SPACE PROTECTION, POINT PROTEC·<br />

TION, AND ALARMS. INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING THE HAND·<br />

BOOK PRECEDE THE BODY OF THE TEXT AND APPENDIXES<br />

COr-.,AIN A SHOPLIFTING GUIDE FOR RETAILERS, SECURITY<br />

ORDINANCES FOR OAKLAND, CALIF., A LISTING OF SECU·<br />

RITY CONSULTANTS, AND A DICTIONAt=lY OF<br />

ANTI·INTRUSION DEVICES FOR ARCHITECTS AND BUILDERS.<br />

A FEDERAL CRIME INSURANCE APPLICATION FORM IS ALSO<br />

INCLUDED. (AUTHOR ABSTRACT MODIFIED)<br />

SponaorIng Agency: US DEPAATMENT OF JUSTICE LEAA NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 833 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20631.<br />

Avlllleblllty: MITRE CORPORATION WASHINGTON OPER·<br />

ATIO~jS, 1820 DOLLEY MADISON BOULEVARD, MCLEAN VA<br />

22101 Stock Order No. MTR·7713j GPO Stock Ordor No.<br />

027.()()Q.()()765·1; NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

<strong>II</strong>. SELECTION AND APPLICATION GUIDE TO COMMERCIAL IN·<br />

TRU<strong>II</strong>ON ALARM SYSTEMS. B~ A. H. SHER Ind G. N.<br />

lTENIAKKEN. US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATION·<br />

,AL BUREAU OF STANDARDS LAW ENFORCEMENT STAND·<br />

ARDS LABORATORY, W1.SHINGTON DC 20234. 43 p. 1979.<br />

NCJ-I1272<br />

TO PROVIDE BUSINESSES WITH A BETTER UNDERSTANDING<br />

OF INTRUSION ALARM SYSTEMS AND THEIR POTENTIAL<br />

USE, THIS GUIDE EXAMINES THE TYPES OF PROTECTION AF·<br />

FORDED BY ALARM SYSTEMS AND THE MANNER IN WHICH<br />

THEY OPERATE. IN DECIDING WHETHER TO INSTALL AN IN·<br />

TRUSION ALARM SYSTEM, BUSINESSMEN OR WOMEN<br />

SHOULD BASE THEIR DECISIONS ON ECONOMIC CONSIDER·<br />

ATIONS SUCH AS WHETHER POTENTIAL PROPERTY LOSSES<br />

JUSTIFY THE EXPENSES INVOLVEDj THE POTENTIAL<br />

,<br />

l


2<br />

) ,<br />

,<br />

OF THE NIJ<br />

TEAM<br />

, .<br />

"<br />

..<br />

, ;<br />

SOME<br />

THREAT. OEPENDENT UPON BUSINESS LOCATION. TYPE OF<br />

BUSINESS. ETC.; ALTERNATE SECURITY PROCEDURES.<br />

WHICH MAY ALREADY 'PROVIDE AMPLE PROTECTION; AND<br />

THE POTENTIAL FOR FAl.SI'i ALARMS FROM THE INSTRU·<br />

SION ALARM SYSTEMS. !o SOURCE OF CONCERN FOR MANY<br />

LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. ALL INTRUSION ALARM SYSTEMS<br />

CONSIST OF THREE FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTS OR COMPO­<br />

NENTS: A SENSOR WHICH DETECTS THE ACTION OR PRES­<br />

ENCE OF AN INTRUDER; A CONTROL UNIT TI-I~;r TURNS THE<br />

SYSTEM ON AND OFF. RECEIVES THE SIGN<strong>II</strong>L FROM THE<br />

SENSOR AND PROCESSES AND TRANSMITS THE ACTUAL<br />

ALARM SIGNAL; AND A DEVICE TO SUMMON ASSISTANCE IN<br />

RESPONSE TO THE ALARM. THE SENSOR AND CONTROL<br />

UNIT COMPONENTS CAN BE ASSEMBLED INTO A VARIETY OF<br />

CONFIGURATIONS TO PROVIDE FOUR BASIC TYPES OF PRO·<br />

TECTION: (1) POINT. SPOT. OR OBJECT-USED TO DETECT<br />

THE ACTION OR PRESENCE OF AN INTRUDER AT ONLY A<br />

SINGLE LOCATION; (2) PERIMETER OR LINEAR-USED TO<br />

DETECT THE ACTION OR PRESENCE OF AN INTRUDER AT<br />

ALI. VULNERABLE BUILDING ACCESS POINTS SUCH AS<br />

DOORS. WINDOWS. SKYLIGHTS. ETC.; (3) AREA. SPACE, OR<br />

VOLUME-USED TO DETECT THE PRESENCE OF AN INTRUD·<br />

ER ANYWHERE WITHIN A SELECTED AREA; AND (4)<br />

HOLDUP-ACTIVATED DURING THE DAY BY AN INDIVIDUAL<br />

ON THE SCENE. AND TRANSMITTED TO A REMOTE LOCA·<br />

TION. SUCH AS A POLICE STATION. BECAUSE SELECTING<br />

THE PROPER SENSORS FOR AN INTRUSION ALARM SYSTEM<br />

IS COMPLICATED. THE MOST COMMONLY USED TYPES OF<br />

SENSORS ARE DEscriBED: SWITCH SENSORS; PRESSURE<br />

MAl'S; METALLIC FOIL; WIRE SCREENS; MICROWAVE. ULTRA·<br />

SONIC. AND INFRARED MOTION DETECTORS; INFRARED<br />

PHO'fOELECTRIC SENSORS; SOUND SENSORS; VIBRATION<br />

SENSORS; AND CAPACITANCE SENSORS. OTHER FACTORS<br />

THAT BUSINESSES SHOULD CONSIDER INCLUDE SYSTEM<br />

DESIGN (THE FLOOR PLAN. CONTROL UNITS. TAMPER PRO·<br />

TECTION). INSTALLATION. AND POSTINSTALLATION FAC·<br />

TORS), AND SOUNDING THE ALARM (FOR LOCAL ALARM<br />

SYSTEMS. CENTRAL STATION SYSTEMS. AUTOMATIC TELE·<br />

PHONE DIALERS. AND DIRECT CONNECT SYSTEMS). TABU·<br />

LAR DATA COVER THE APPLICATIONS OF INTRUSION ALARM<br />

SENSORS, COMPARISON OF INTRUSION SENSORS. AND REL·<br />

ATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROTECTION SYSl'EMS. THE<br />

GUIDE IS ILLUSTRATED.<br />

SUpp<strong>II</strong>ImentaI Moln: LIMITED NUMBER OF COPIES AVAILA·<br />

BLE FROM NBS.<br />

SpcInIorIng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE. 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

AV<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>Ib<strong>II</strong>Ity: GPO Stock Order No. 003'()()3'()2098-2; US DE·<br />

PARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STAND·<br />

ARDS lAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS LABORATORY.<br />

WASHINGTON DC 20234 Stock Order No. NBS·480·14;<br />

NCJRS MICROFICHE PRCGRAM.<br />

<strong>II</strong>. SOME'~YCHOPHY<strong>II</strong>CAL TUTS OF THE CONSPICUITIES OF<br />

EIiER(IEfojCY VEHICLE WARNING I.IOHTS. By O. L.<br />

~/ETT. US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL<br />

BUREAU OF STANDARDS LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS<br />

LABORATORY. WASHINGTON DC 20234. 27 p. 1979.<br />

. ,<br />

NCJ.H302<br />

I PART ,OF A PILOT STUDY OF THE ATTENTION·ATTRACTING<br />

POWERS OF SOME COMMERCIAL WARNING LIGHTS FOR<br />

EMERGENCY VEHICLES. THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES RE·<br />

SULTS'FROM CONSPICUITY STUDIES AND PSYCHOPHYSICAL<br />

TESTS. THE' REPORT RESULTS FROM A PROJECT ON EMER·<br />

GENcv VEHICLE LIGHTS. WHICH INCLUDED THE PHYSICAL<br />

MEASUREMENT (PHOTOMETRy) OF THE INTENSITIES OF<br />

SOME LIGHTS. PSYCHOPHYSICAL (PERCEPTUAL) TEST OF<br />

LIGHTS FOR CONSPICUITY. AND SEVERAL REPORTS. THE<br />

MAIN EXPERIMENT USED A NOVEL TECHNIQUE OF CONSPI·<br />

CUITY MATCHING. EACH OBSERVER VIEWED TWO FLASHING<br />

LIGHTS PERIPHERALLY. ONE LOCATED 20 DEGREES TO THE<br />

PUBLICATIONS<br />

LEFT OF THE FIXATION POINT, AND THE OTHER 20 DEGRESS<br />

TO THE RIGHT. ONE OF THE TWO LI!3HTS WAS ALWAYS A<br />

REFERENCE LIGHT WHOSE INTENSITY COULD BE ADJUS'rED<br />

BY THE onsERVER UNTIL THE TWO LIGHTS APPEARED<br />

EQUALLY CONSPICUOUS. ALL THE LIGHTS WERE RANKED<br />

ON A SINGLE SCALE OF CONSPICUiTY. BASED ON THE<br />

ADJUSTABLE.L1GHT INTENSITIES. THERE WAS A GOOD COR·<br />

RELATION BElWEEN THESE RANKS AND THE MEASURED<br />

EFFECTIVE INTENSITIES OF LIGHTS. ANOTHER, VERY BRIEF<br />

PILOT EXPERIMENT RANKED SOME OF THE LIGHTS BY THE<br />

NUMBER OF DEGREES INTO THE LEFT SIDE OF THE VISUAL<br />

FIELD THE FLA$HES COULD BE SEEN. THIS<br />

DISAPPEARANCE.ANGLE ALSO CORRELATED WELL WITH<br />

CONSPICUITY RANK. SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK IN<br />

THIS FIELD ARE PROVIDED, ALONG WITH DISCUSSION OF<br />

SOME OF THE PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN THE PILOT<br />

STUDY. REFERENCES AND TABULAR AND,GRAPHIC DATA<br />

ARE ALSO PROVIDED. THE TEXT OF THE INSTRUCTIONS<br />

PROYIDED OBSERVERS IS INCLUDED IN AN APPENDIX.<br />

SUppfementaI HoIH: LIMITED NUMBER OF COPIES AVAILA.<br />

BLE FROM NBS.<br />

SponIOring Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA·<br />

TiONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE. 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON. DC 20531.<br />

i\yliMtllllty: GPO Stock Order No. 003'()()3'()2085-1; US DE·<br />

PARTMENT OF COMMERCE N<strong>II</strong>TiONAL BUREAU OF STAND­<br />

ARDS LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS LABORATORY,<br />

WASHINGTON DC 20234 Stock Order No. NBS-SP 480·36;<br />

NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

100. SPOUSE ABUSE-A SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY. C. JOHN·<br />

SON, J. FERRY, end <strong>II</strong>. KRAVITZ, Eda. NATIONAL CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE. BOX /3000, ROCKVILLE MD<br />

20850. 67 p. 1978. NCJ.54427<br />

THIS SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY HIGHLIGHTS THE PROBLEM<br />

OF SPOUSE ABUSE AND THE VARIOUS FORMS OF INTER·<br />

VENTION CURRENTLY AVAILABLE. IT CONTAINS 91 ENTRIES<br />

WITH ABSTRACTS. BOOKS, ARTICLES, AND REPORTS PUB·<br />

L1SHED BETWEEN 1975 AND 1978 ARE CITED ALPHABETICAL·<br />

LY BY AUTHOR. THE CITATIONS ARE PRESENTED IN TWO<br />

PARTS: (1) THE NATURE OF THE PROBLEM-DESCRIPTIONS<br />

OF WIFE ABUSE, HUSBAND ABUSE, AND DOMESTIC VIO·<br />

LENCE, ANALYSES OF THE CAUSES, AND SUGGESTIONS<br />

FOR CHANGE; AND (2) INTERVENTION··THE ROLE OF LAW<br />

ENFORCEMENT IN SPOUSE ABUSE CASES AND DOMESTIC<br />

VIOLENCE, OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO BATTERED SPOUSES,<br />

AND EXAMPLES OF REFUGE SHELTERS FOR ABUSED WIVES<br />

AND HUSBANDS. ALL OF THE DOCUMENTS CITED HAVE<br />

BEEN SELECTED FROM THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br />

REFERENCE SERVICE DATA BASE, AND INFORMATION ON<br />

OBTAINING THE DOCUMENTS IS PROVIDED. APPENDIXES IN·<br />

CLUDE A LIST OF INFORMATION SOURCES AND NAMES AND<br />

ADDRESSES OF AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS THAT DEAL<br />

WITH THE SPOUSE ABUSE ISSUE.<br />

SpoMOrIng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

AYiMIb<strong>II</strong>Ity: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM. NCJRS.<br />

101. STRUCTURED PLEA NEOOTIATIONS-TESTDESION. US<br />

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF<br />

LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA<br />

AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531. 45 p. 1979.<br />

NCJ ...... 7<br />

THIS STRUCTURED PLEA NEGOTIATIONS TEST DESIGN IS IN.<br />

TENDED TO INCREASE THE EQUITY, EFFICIENCY, AND THE<br />

EFFECTIVENESS OF PLEA BARGAINING, A PROCESS WHICH<br />

MOST JURISDICTIONS WILL CONTINUE TO USE. A NUMBER<br />

OF SINGLE, LOCAL COURT SYSTEMS OF GENERAL TRIAL JU.<br />

RISDICTION HAVE EXPERIMENTED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT<br />

AND IMPLEMENTATION OF VARIOUS FORMS OF STRUC.<br />

TURED PLEA NEGOTIATIONS. IN ORDER TO ASSESS THE<br />

FEASIBILITY OF THIS CONCEPT, THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE<br />

OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE (NILECJ)<br />

HAS DEVISED <strong>II</strong> TEST DESIGN WHICH WILL INVOLVE SELECT·<br />

ED COURTS WITHIN ONE JURISDICTION IN THREE DIFFER·<br />

ENT'STATES. BOTH PROCESSES OF DEVELOPMENT AND 1M·<br />

PLEMENTATION AS WELL AS THEIR OUTCOMES WILL BE<br />

EVALUATED BY THE INSTITUTE. TEST DESIGN GOALS ARE<br />

TO IMPLEMENT A PLEA NEGOTIATIONS PROCESS THAT IS<br />

EQUITABLE TO ALL PARTIES, SUBJECT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW,<br />

AND COGNIZANT OF ALL PARTIES' NEEDS AND VIEWS, AND<br />

AN EFFICIENT PROCEDURE THAT REDUCES COURT PROC­<br />

ESSING TIME AND DELAYS. A THIRD GOAL IS TO DEVELOP<br />

AN EFFECTIVE PLEA NEGOTIATION SYSTEM WHICH BOTH<br />

VICTIM AND DEFENDANT PERCEIVE AS LEGITIMAT!: AND<br />

FAIR BY INVOLVING BOTH PARTIES IN THE PROCESS. THE<br />

TEST USES AN EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN IN WHICH POTENTIAL<br />

CASES ARE SCREI:NED FOR ELIGIBILITY AND THEN RAN·<br />

DOMLY ASSIGNED TO EXPERIMENTAL (STRUCTURED PLEA<br />

NEGOTIATION CONFERENCE) OR CONTROL CONDITIONS.<br />

THE ANALYTIC FRAMEWORK ADDRESSES BOTH LONG·TERM<br />

TRENDS AND IMMEDIATE PROGRAM EFFECTS. THE SUG·<br />

GESTED MINIMUM NUMBER OF CASES WITHIN THE SMALL·<br />

EST UNIT FOR ANALYSIS IS 100. DATA REQUIREMENTS WILL<br />

INCLUDE SYSTEM· LEVEL, CASE·LEVEL, AND<br />

INDIVIDUAL·LEVEL INFORMATION REGARDING SUCH FAC­<br />

TORS AS CASE IDENTIFIERS, OFFENSf{IN):ORMATION, CASE<br />

STRENGTH, Ar~D INDIVIDU<strong>II</strong>L DATA Ij(.lNcERNING ACTORS'<br />

BACKGFlOUND AND SOCIOECONoMIC CHARACTERISTICS,<br />

ATTITUDES TOWARD THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, AND<br />

MORE. E\


It<br />

TRIAL<br />

PUBLICATIONS<br />

OF THE NIJ<br />

VICTIM/WITNESS<br />

./<br />

CURRENTLY USING TEAM POLICING. SUPPORTING TABULAR<br />

DATA. FooTNOTES,AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY ARE PROVIDED.<br />

SUppllmMtai Motel: PROGRAM DESIGN-A GUIDE TO IMPLE·<br />

MENTATION.<br />

IpoMorIng Aeeftcy: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE<br />

OF DEVELOPMENT, TESTING AND DISSEMINATION, 633 INDI·<br />

ANA AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC 20531.<br />

Avlllllllllty: GPO Stock Order No. 027-()00.()()828·3: NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM. NCJRS.<br />

104. TRIAL COURT MANAGEMENT SERIES-EXECUTIVE SUM·<br />

IlARY. Bv C. S. COOPER. AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, MAS­<br />

SACHUSenS AND NEBRASKA, AVENUES, NW, WASHINGTON<br />

DC 20016. 1« p. 1979. NCJ-52653<br />

SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA ARE PROVIDED FOR<br />

.LEM'S COURT MANAGEMENT PROJECT, LAUNCHED IN 1977<br />

TO PROVIDE TRIAL COURT MANAGERS WITH A FRAMEWORK<br />

FOR FINANCIAl. PERSONNEL, AND RECORDS RESOURCE<br />

AND WORKLOAD MANAGEMENT. OVER .4() TRl,Al' COURTS<br />

WERE STUDIED IN THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT'S 13<br />

MONTHS IN AN EFFORT TO EI~HANCE THE TRIAL COURT<br />

MANAGER'S CAPABILITY FOR DEALING WITH SElECTEO<br />

MANAGEMENT AREAS. SEPARATE VOLUMES ARE PROVIDED<br />

ON FINANCIAl. PERSONNEL, AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT:<br />

EACH INCLUDES A FRAMEWORK OF RELEVANT MANAGE·<br />

MENT PRINCIPLES, FUNCTIONS, AND CONCERNS WHICH<br />

BEAR ON THESE ASPECTS OF TRIAL COURT OPERATIONS<br />

AND THE RANGE OF MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES NECESSARY<br />

TO SUPPORT THEM. A SERIES OF GUIDELINES AND ASSESS·<br />

MENT QUESTIONS ARE PROVIDED IN EACH REPORT TO<br />

ASSIST USERS IN ANALYZING MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES IN<br />

THEIR JURISDICTIONS, IDENTIFYING PROBLEMS, AND DE·<br />

TI:RMINING AREAS FOR IMPROYEMENT. IN ADDITION TO<br />

OUTLINING THE BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY OF THE<br />

STUDY AND THE ORGANIZATION AND USE OF THE MANAGE·<br />

MENT REPORT SERIES, THIS VOLUME INCLUDES SELECTED<br />

COMMENTS BY TRIAL COURT JUDGES AND ADMINISTRATIVE<br />

STAFFS ON THE MANAGEMENT AREAS ADDRESSED BY THE<br />

PROJECT, SURVEYS OF RELEVANT COURT MANAGEMENT<br />

LITERATURE AND MATERIALS PERTAINING TO SPECIFIC<br />

TRIAL COURT MANAGEMENT ISSUES, AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY.<br />

PRINCIPAL SUBJECT AND JURISDICTIONAL<br />

CROS5-REFERENf'A:S ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN AN APPENDED<br />

INDEX TO THE REPORT SERIES. TABULAR DATA ARE IN·<br />

CLUDED. ~E ALSO NCJ 53623-53625.<br />

~ .. <strong>II</strong>I Hot..: PI'~OGRAM MODELS.<br />

1poI1IC<strong>II</strong>' ... Agency: US DEPARTtAr:'NT OF JUSTICE LEM NA·<br />

TIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, s;J3 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

Avdlli.ty. GPO Stock Order NO. 027-()00"()()766.Q: NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

105. TRIAL COURT <strong>II</strong>AHAGE<strong>II</strong>ENT 8I:RIES FINANCIAL MANAGE­<br />

<strong>II</strong>IEHT. By R. TOBIN. AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, MASSA·<br />

CHUsenS AND NEBRASKA, AVENUES, NW, WASHINGTON<br />

DC 20016. 78 p. 1979. NCJ-53I23<br />

THIS VOLUME OF LEM'S TRIAL COURT MANAGEMENT<br />

SERIES PROV<strong>II</strong>JES A FRAMEWORK WITHI~~ WHICH TRIAL<br />

COURT STAFF CAN DETERMINE SPECIAL AREAS OR POINTS<br />

OF FINANCIAL MAMAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY WITHIN THEIR<br />

COURT SYSTEM.' LEM'S COURT MANAGEMENT PROJECT<br />

WAS LAUNCHED IN19n TO PROVIDE TRIAL COURT<br />

MANAGERS-8OTH JUDGES AND STAFF5--WITH A MANAGE·<br />

MENT REPORT SERIES ADOREss/~ CRITICAL AREAS OF<br />

WORKlOAD AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN AN EFFORT<br />

TO EIifiANCE TRIAL COURT MANAGERS' CAPABILITY FOR<br />

DEALING WITH FINANCW.. PER~NEI., AND RECORDS<br />

MANAGEMENT. IN THE FIRST SECTION OF THE FINANCIAL<br />

MAHAGEMENT VOLUME. NINE POSSIBLE<br />

SOURCES OF<br />

FUNDS FOR TRIAL COURT OPERATIONS ARE DISCUSSED,<br />

ALONG WITH ADDITIONAL TYPES OF FUNDS WHICH A COURT<br />

- .~<br />

MIGHT COLLECT. IN ADDITION TO THESE LEGAL ASPECTS<br />

OF A COURT'S FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES,<br />

DIFFERENT TYPES OF INFORMAL 'POWER RELATIONSHIPS'<br />

BETWEEN FEDERAL, STATE, AND lOCAL GOVERNMENTS<br />

ARE DESCRIBED. THE FOLLOWING SECTION OUTLINES THE<br />

ELEMENTS OF A TRIAL COURT FINANCIAL MAf1I~GEMENT<br />

SYSTEM AND PRESENTS A SERIES OF SElF·ASSESSMENT<br />

QUESTIONS DESIGNED TO DETERMINE THE RANGE OF Fl·<br />

NANCIAL MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS BEING PERFORMED<br />

FOR A SPECIFIC TRIAL COURT AND WHETHER SOME ARE<br />

BEING OMITIFIJ OR INCOMPLETELY PERFORMED, WHETHER<br />

SOME BEING PERFORMED BY THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH<br />

SHOULD BE UNDER COURT CONTROL, AND WHETHER SOME<br />

BI::ING PERFORMED BY THE COURT SHOULD BE EXPANDED<br />

OR BETTER CONTROLLED. THE FINAL SECTION TREATS THE<br />

BUDGETING PROCESS SPECIFICALLY, INCLUDING MANY OF<br />

THE MANAGEMENT CONCERNS EXPRESSED BY COURT OFFI·<br />

CIALS RELATING TO THE PRACTICAL PROBLEMS THEY EN·<br />

COUNTER IN THE BUDGETARY PROCESS. AS A FOUNDATION<br />

FOR CONSIDERING THE TRIAL COURT BUDGET PROCESS,<br />

THE GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROCESS ARE<br />

NOTED: THEN THE ORGANIZATIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE<br />

VARIABLES AFFECT!NG THE PROCESS THE MOST ARE DIS­<br />

CUSSED, ".LONG WITH THE PRINCIPAL STAGES BY WHICH A<br />

COURT MANAGES ITS BUDGET. A DESCRIPTION OF THESE<br />

STAGES IS PROVIDED, WITH A DISCUSSION OF SPECIFIC<br />

MANAGEMENT ISSUES WHICH SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AND<br />

MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES SOME COURTS HAVE FOUND<br />

EFFECTIVE. ASSORTED GUIDELINES, PERFORMANCE MEAS­<br />

URES, AND FORMS ARE APPENDED. SEE ALSO NCJ·53624,<br />

53625 AND 52653.<br />

Supplemental Notn: PROGRAM MODELS-TRIAL COURT<br />

MANAGEMENT SERIES.<br />

SponIorIng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LAW EN·<br />

FORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION.<br />

Avlillblllty: GPO. Stock Order No. 027'()()o"()()768-6.<br />

101. TRIAL COURT MANAGEME.IT SERIES PERSONNEL MANAGE­<br />

MENT. By R. TOBIN. AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, MASSA·<br />

CHUsenS AND NEBRASKA, AVENUES, NW, WASHINGTON<br />

DC 20016. 62 p. 1979. NCJ.53I24<br />

THIS VOLUME OF LEM'S TRIAL COURT MANAGEMENT<br />

SERIES OUTLINES PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC PERSONNEL MAN·<br />

AGEMENT WHICH HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED iN THE PUBLIC<br />

SECTOR AND THEN APPLIES THEM TO A TRIAL COURT SET·<br />

TING. LEM'S COURT MANAGEMENT PROJECT WAS<br />

LAUNCHED IN 1977 TO PROVIDE TRIAL COURT<br />

MANAGERS-·BOTH JUDGES AND STAFF5--WITH A MANAGE·<br />

MENT REPORT SERIES ADDRESSING CRITICAL AREAS OF<br />

WORKLOAD AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN AN EFFORT<br />

TO ENHANCE TRIAL COURT MANAGERS' CAPABilITY FOR<br />

DEALING WITH FINANCIAl. PERSONNEL, AND RECORDS<br />

MANAGEMENT. THE VOLUME ON PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT<br />

IS ORGANIZED IN THREE CHAPTERS TO PROVIDE A ~N·<br />

AGEMENT FRAMEWORK WITHIN WHICH BOTH BROAD AND<br />

SPECifiC TRIAL COURi PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ISSUES<br />

CAN BE ANALYZED AND HANDLED. THO: FIRST DISCUSSES<br />

THE SPECIAL FEATURES OF THE YRIAl COURT ENVIRON·<br />

MENT WHICH BEAR ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTE·<br />

NANCE OF A PERSONNEL SYSTEM-THE FOCUS OF ADMINIS­<br />

TRATIVE AUTHORITY AND CONTROl. THE INTERNAL ORGA·<br />

NlZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND THE AUTHORITY TO MANAGE<br />

BASIC ORGANIZATIONAL FUNCTIONS. THESE ISSUES ARE<br />

THEN DISCUSSED WITH REGARD TO THEIR MANAGEMENT<br />

SIGNIFICANCE IN LIGHT OF THE SPECIAL FACTORS AFFECT­<br />

ING THE MANAGEMENT OF TRIAL COURT PERSONNEL THE<br />

FOLLOWING SECTION PROVIDES A SERIES OF ASSESSMENT<br />

QUESTIONS IN ORGANIZATION, STAFFING, EMPLOYEE PER·<br />

FORMANCE, AND EMPLOYEE RELATIONS AND DEALS WITH<br />

SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF SPE'<br />

CIALIZED PERSONNEL PROCEDURES. THE FINAL SECTION I~<br />

DESIGNED TO AID THOSE TRIAL COURTS PLANNING TO DE·<br />

VElOP A COURT PERSONNEL SYSTEM OR TO SUBSTANTIAL·<br />

L Y RESTRUCTURE AN EXISTING SYSTEM. THE SECTION AS·<br />

SUMES THE NEED FOR A RELATIVELY SELF·CONTAINED AND<br />

INDEPENDENT JUDICIAL BRANCH SYSTEM AND PRESENTS A<br />

GENERAL FIVE·PHASE IMPLEMENTATION CHRONOLOGY FOR<br />

ITS DEVELOPMENT. TABULAR DATA ARE INCLUDED. SEE<br />

ALSO NCJ 52653, 53623, AND 53625.<br />

SUpplementlil Notn: PROGRAM MODELS-TRIAL COURT<br />

MANAGEMENT SERIES.<br />

SpoMOrlng Agency: U'S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LEM NA·<br />

TIONAl INSTITUTE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND "CRIMINAL<br />

JUSTICE, 633 INDIANA AVENUE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20531.<br />

AVlllabillty: GPO Stock Order No. 027.()()().()()769·4: NCJRS<br />

MICROFiCHE PROGRAM.<br />

107. TRIAL COURT MANAGEMENT SERIES-RECORDS MANAGE­<br />

MENT. By E. H. SHOAT Ind C. DOOUTTLE. AMERICAN<br />

UNIVERSITY, MASSACHUSenS AND NEBRASKA, AVENUES,<br />

NW, WASHINGTON DC 20016. 92 p. 1979. NCJ·531125<br />

THIS VOLUME OF LEANS TRIAL COURT MANAGEMENT<br />

SERIES DEALS WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A RECORDS<br />

MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CAPABLE OF MEETING THE HIS·<br />

TORICAL AND lEGAL DE~ANDS OF COURT RECORDS AND<br />

INDIVIDUAL CASE FilE MANAGEMENT. lEM'S COURT MAN·<br />

AGEMENT PROJECT WAS LAUNCHED IN 1977 TO PROVIDE<br />

TRIAL COURT MANAGERS-· BOTH JUDGES AND<br />

STAFFS .. WITH A MANAGEMENT REPORT SERIES ADDRESS·<br />

ING CRITICAL AREAS OF WORKLOAD, AND RESOURCE MAN·<br />

AGEMENT IN AN EFFORT TO ENHANCe TRIAL COURT MAN·<br />

AGERS' CAPACITY FOR DEALING WITH FINANCIAL, PERSON·<br />

NEl, AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT. THE FIRl)T SECTION OF<br />

THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT REPORT DISCUSSES THE<br />

OVERALL CONTEXT IN WHICH RECORDS MANAGEMENT IS<br />

PERFORMED AND, PARTICULARLY, THE VARIETY OF MATERI·<br />

ALS WHICH CONSTITUTE A COURT RECORD (I.E., CASE<br />

FILES, MICROFilM, COMPUTER PRINTOUTS, VIDEO DIS·<br />

PLAYS, AND OTHER EXHIBITS). THE NEED TO MANAGE<br />

THESE RECORDS DURING THE COURsE OF THEIR LIFE<br />

CYCLE IS DESCRIBED IN THE FOUR STAGES OF A RECORD'S<br />

LIFESPAN: INTAKE AND INITIATION: MAINTENANCE: ACCESS,<br />

USE, AND DISTRIBUTION: AND DISPOSITION. SOME OF THE<br />

DISTINCTIVE FACTORS WHICH SHOULD BE CQNSIDE"AEO IN'<br />

DEVELOPING A COURT RECORDS PROGRAM ARE DE·<br />

sCRIBED ALONG WITH RECORDS MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES<br />

IN OTHER SECTORS WHICH HAVE RELEVANCE TO COURTS.<br />

THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS DISCUSS THE BASIC RECORDS<br />

MAINTAINED BY A COURT, SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT ACTIVI·<br />

TIES PERTAINING TO THE MAINTENANCE OF CASE FILES,<br />

GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING A COURT'S RECORDS MAN·<br />

AGEMENT PROGRAM, AND PLANNING FOR IMPROVEMENT.<br />

TABULAR DATA ARE PROVIDED. SEE ALSO NCJ 53624, 53623,<br />

AND 52653.<br />

Supplemental Hot .. : PROGRAM MODELs.<br />

SponsorI", Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LAW EN·<br />

FORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION.<br />

Avlllablllty: GPO Stock Order No. 027.()()()·OO767·8: 'NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

101. UNIFORM LAW COMMISSIONERS' MODEL SENTENCING AND<br />

CORRECTIONS ACT. NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMIS·<br />

SIONERS ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS, 1155 EAST 60TH<br />

STREET, CHICAGO Il 60637. 458 p. 1979. NCJ-SHOO<br />

THE 1978 MODEL SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS ACT IS<br />

PRESENTED IN DRAFT FORM AS DEVELOPED BY THE NA·<br />

TIONAl CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS ON UNIFORM<br />

STATE LAWS UNDER THE SPONSORSHIP OF LEM. SEVERAL<br />

MAJOR THEMES DISTINGUISH THE MODEL SENTENCING AND<br />

CORRECTIONS ACT: IT UNIFIES THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF<br />

THE CORRECTIONAL SYSTEM INTO ONE DEPARTMENT OF<br />

CORRECTIONS IN ORDER TO COORDINATE THE DEPLOY·<br />

37<br />

MENT OF SCARCE CORRECTIONAL RESOURCES: IT IMPLE·<br />

MENTS THE lEGISLATIVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR DETERMIN·<br />

ING BASIC CORRECTIONAL PURPOSES AND POLICIES: AND IT<br />

SEEKS TO REDUCE THE UNFAIRNESS AND INEFFECTIVE·<br />

NESS RESULTING FROM SENTENCING DISPARITY. THE ACT<br />

AUTHORIZES APPELLATE REVIEW OF SENTENCES, ABOl·<br />

ISHES PAROLE, AND PROVIDES FOR A WIDE VARIETY OF<br />

INMATE PROGRAMS GIVING OFFENDERS A GREATER VOICE<br />

IN, AND A GREATER INCENTIVE FOR, SELF·IMPROVEMENT.<br />

THE ACT RECOGNIZES THE INTERESTS OF VICTIMS IN THE<br />

SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONAL PROCESS. IT ALSO AP·<br />

PLIES TRADITIONAL MECHANISMS USED TO STRUCTURE<br />

," AN,D LI~:T GOVERNMENTAL DISCRETION TO SENTENCING<br />

AND CORRECTIONS. THE ACT IS DIVIDED INTO SIX ARTICLES,<br />

INCLUDING GENERAL PROVISIONS WHICH CONTAIN DEFINI·<br />

TIONS AND RUlEMAKING PROCEDURES, A SECTION RE·<br />

GARDING ORGANIZ,


G<br />

-~.,~, - ...-'<br />

.::: ..<br />

~' J- ;:;-<br />

~~~~!$:~~~~~~~~::;:;;;;'I ;:~~"~~~ .• ~~. "~~<br />

VICTIM/WITNESS<br />

OF THE HIJ<br />

=.<br />

ZONING<br />

, /.<br />

t<br />

[.<br />

; ,<br />

.<br />

" ..,<br />

..<br />

ECT IN BROOKLYN, N.Y,; PROJECT TURNAROUND IN MIL·<br />

WAUKEE COUNTY, WIS.; THE VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROJECT<br />

IN MULTNOMAH.COUNTY, ORE.; AND THE VICTIM-WITNESS<br />

ADVOCATE PROGRAM IN PIMA COUNTY, ARIZ. THE SERVICES<br />

PROVIDED BY THESE PROGRAMS ARE. DISCUSSED IN<br />

DETAIL. HIGHLIGHTS OF EACH PROGRAM'S EVALUATION<br />

FINDINGS ARE REVIEWED, AND SUGGESTIONS FOR EVALU/(;<br />

TORS WHO MONITOR AND ASSESS VICTIM/WITNESS PRO·<br />

GRAMS ARE OFFERED. A OESCRIPTION OF NEW YORK<br />

CITY'S GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY ESTABLISHeD SOLELY TO<br />

SERVE CRIME VICTIMS IS ALSO PROVIDED, AS ARE CASE<br />

STUDIES OF FOUR PROGRAMS AND A SELECTED BIBLlOG·<br />

RAPHy. .<br />

SponIOrlng Agency: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE<br />

OF DEVEl.OPMENT, TESTING AND DISSEMINATION, 633 INDI·<br />

ANA AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC 20531. .<br />

Av.llabilltY: GPO Stock Order No. 027.000-00831·3; NCJRS<br />

MICROFICHE PROGRAM. "<br />

110. VICTIM/WITNESS SERVICES.,.,PARTICIPAHT'S HANDBOOK<br />

AND MANUAL B~ E. C. VIANO. D. JACQUIN, H. C. JONES.<br />

• M. NEUSE, J. SCHILLER, O. SPAID, .net S. S.STEINBERG.<br />

'UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION, 5530 WISCONSIN<br />

AVENUE, WASHINGTON DC. 301 p. 1977. NCJ-473111<br />

'--:'THEEl.OLE PLAYED IN THE CRIMINAL SYSTEM BY VICTIMI<br />

WITNESS SERVICES, THE IDENTIFICATION OF SERVICE<br />

NEEDS APPROPRIATE TO A PARTICULAR COMMUNITY, AND<br />

SEBVICE IMPLEMENTATION ARE EXAMINED IN THIS WORK·<br />

SHOP HANDBOOK:' IN THE FIRST SESSIONS OF THE WORK·<br />

SHOP, THE PROBLEMS WHICH VICTIMS AND WITNESSES EN·<br />

COUNTER IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM ARE EXAM·<br />

INED. AN OVERVIEW OF VlCTIM/WITNESS PROBLEMS IS "<br />

PROVIDED AND A BACKGROUND PAPER IS PReSENTEDj THE<br />

PAPER CHARACTERIZES THE VICTIM AS THE LOST PARTY<br />

WITHIN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. A FLOW CHART IS<br />

PROVIDED WHICH COMPARES THE CAREFUL CONSIDERA·<br />

'" TION GIVEN THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED, WITH THE.COR·<br />

RESPONDINGLY LITTLE ATTENTION PAID TO THE RIGHTS OF<br />

VICTIMS. ONE SESSION IS DEVOTED TO THE IDENTIFICATION<br />

OF VICTIM/WITNESS PROBLEMS AND SERVICES BY OCCUPA·<br />

TIONAl AFFILIATION: PARTICIPANTS .ARE GIVEN AN OPPOR·<br />

TUNITY TO MEET f;COLLEAGUES IN THEIR OCCUPATIONAL<br />

SPECIALITIES AND TO IDENTIFY OFFENSE·RELATED AND<br />

SYSTEM·RELATED PROBLEMS FACING'THE VICTIM/WITNESS.<br />

THE NEXT SESSIONS DEAL WITH VICTIM/WITNESS SERVo<br />

ICES; AN OVERYIEW AND ACCOMPANYING BACKGROUND<br />

PAPER ARE PROVIDED. 'fW0 CONCURREm-',SEMINARS ARE<br />

OUTLINED; THE FIRST DEALS WITH CRISIS INTERVENTION<br />

MANAGEMENT, AS WELL AS SOCIAL SERVICE ASSISTANCE<br />

AND REFERRAL. A BACKGROUND PAPER ON INTERVENTION<br />

AND DESCRIPTIONS OF VICTIM/WITNESS ,\PROGRAMS ARE<br />

PROVIDED, THE SECOND SEMINAR 'DEALS WITH<br />

COURT·RELATED INFORMATION, WITNESS NOTIFICATION<br />

AND, PROTECTION, PROPERTY RETURN, AND COMPENSA·<br />

TION AND RESTITUTION. BACKGROUND PAPERS ON COM·<br />

PENSATION AND RESTITUTION ARE INCLUDED. THERE ARE<br />

ALSO SESSIONS ON IDENtiFYING PRIORITY NEEDS AND DE·<br />

VELOPING SERi~ICE PLANS, A., BACKGROUND PAPER PRO­<br />

VIDES AN OUT~INE AND NOTES FOR DESIGNING A VICTIM!<br />

'I~\TNESS PROGRAM. THE FINAL SESSIONS ARE DEVOTED<br />

TO STRATEGIEj) FOR IMPLEMENTING CHANGE, THE DEVEL­<br />

OPMENT OF A'COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN, AND FEEDBACK<br />

ON THE ACTION PLAN. SAMPLE INFORMATION SHEETS", DE·<br />

SCRIPTIONS OF SPECIFJP PROGRAMS, AND BUDGET INFOR·<br />

MATION ARE INCLUDED. TABLES IDENTIFY POSSIBLE RE·<br />

SPONSES 70, VICTIM AND WITNESS NEEDS, ADMINISTRATIVE<br />

CONSIDI;RATIONS,I'ERVICE REQUIREMENTS, AND THE AD·<br />

VANTAGESAt.lo DISADVANTAGES OF VARIOUS PROGRAMS.<br />

SEVERAL OF THE ~ACKGAOUN[) PAPERS PROVIDE REFER·<br />

ENCES, AND A GLOSSARY AND A BIBLIOGRAPY ARE AP·<br />

PENDED.<br />

SUppIMIen .. 1 ,.otea: EXECUTIVE TRAINING PROGRAM IN AD-<br />

VANCED CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRACTICES. ~<br />

Sponsorl"".r~; US -DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE<br />

OF DEVELOP~ENT,TESTINGAND DISSEMINATION, ~3 INOI·<br />

ANA AVENUE, WASHINGTON. DC 20531-<br />

Anl'-blUty: NCJRS MICROFICHE PROGRAM.<br />

ttl. VICTIM/WITNESS SERVICES-TRAINER'S HA!fDBOOKi 8~<br />

e. C. VIANO, D. JACQUIN, H. C.JONES, M, NEUse, J. SCHIL­<br />

LER, ~ O. SPAID. UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPOR.A·<br />

.' TION, 553(fWISCONSIN AVENUE, WASHING·rON.DC. l77p.<br />

. 1978. . NCJ.~<br />

IHIS TRAINER'S MANUAL OUTLINES THE CURRICULUM AND<br />

PROGRAM ELEMENTS OF THE LEAA·SPONSORED REGIONAL<br />

TRAINING WORKSHOP ON VICTIM AND WITNESS SEFiVICES.<br />

THIS MATERIAL IS MEANT TO GUIDE THE TRAINER<br />

, THROUGH THE WORKSHOP PRESENTATlo,-.,S AND IN THE<br />

COMPLETION OF TRAINING TASI


,<br />

~;<br />

,I,<br />

PART <strong>II</strong><br />

SPECIALIZED PUBLICATIONS<br />

(I<br />

\~.<br />

;r<br />

fl·<br />

,< •<br />

,<br />

.....<br />

,<br />

"<br />

I<br />

f


,<br />

,;<br />

"<br />

\,<br />

'.<br />

,', ,"<br />

(\<br />

! I<br />

I<br />

,<br />

J<br />

A. PROGRAM MODELS AND PRESCRIPTIVE PACKAGES<br />

Program Models are a synthesis of research and ,evaluation findings,<br />

operational experience, and expert opinion in a criminal justice<br />

topic area. Each report presents a series of programmatic options and<br />

analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of each. The intent is to<br />

provide criminal justice administrators with the capability to make<br />

informed choices in planning, implementing, and improving efforts in a<br />

program area. The Models may also serve as the basis of testing and<br />

demonstration efforts.<br />

A listing of Program Models is presented below in alphabetical<br />

order. For complete bibliographic citation and abstract, refer to the<br />

entry number in Part I of this supplement or to the earlier editions<br />

of ' Publications of the <strong>National</strong> Institute of Law Enforcement and <strong>Criminal</strong><br />

<strong>Justice</strong> as indicated. Following the list of Program Models is a<br />

list of Prescriptive Pac'll;:ages, a publication series of the <strong>National</strong><br />

Institute that was replaced by Program Models.<br />

Title<br />

I<br />

Halfway Houses<br />

Improving Patrol Productivity, Volume 1<br />

Improving Patrol Productivity, Volume 2<br />

Managing <strong>Criminal</strong> Warrants<br />

Neighborhood <strong>Justice</strong> Centers<br />

Prevention, Detection,?~d<br />

Correction of<br />

Corruption in LOCAl Gove~nment<br />

Promising Strategies in Parole and<br />

Probation<br />

Security and the Small Business Retailer<br />

Small Police Agency Consolidation<br />

Trial Court Management Series:<br />

Executive Summary<br />

Financial Management<br />

----- ________ Personnel Management<br />

________ Records Management<br />

NCJ Number<br />

45542<br />

42500<br />

42501<br />

50018<br />

43580<br />

50199<br />

46895<br />

51335<br />

50694<br />

52653<br />

53623<br />

53624<br />

53625<br />

Citation<br />

**<br />

*<br />

*<br />

**<br />

*<br />

**<br />

*<br />

97<br />

**<br />

104<br />

105<br />

106<br />

107<br />

..<br />

~ublications of the <strong>National</strong> Institute of Law Enforcement and<br />

<strong>Criminal</strong> <strong>Justice</strong>: A Comprehensive Bibliography. 1978. (NCJ 49700)<br />

** Publications of the <strong>National</strong> Institute of Law Enforcement and<br />

<strong>Criminal</strong> <strong>Justice</strong>: A Com rehensive Biblio ra h -1979 SU lement.<br />

NCJ 57987<br />

, I<br />

P_i~g pag. blank<br />

_I<br />

43<br />

y<br />

..<br />

"<br />

I


,<br />

l'<br />

(<br />

Title<br />

MBO:<br />

A Corrections Perspective<br />

Mentally Retard 1 Offender and<br />

Corrections<br />

Methadone Treatment Manual<br />

Multi-Agency Narcotics Units Manual<br />

Neighborhood Team Policing<br />

Paralegals: A Resource for Public<br />

Defenders and Corr~ctional <strong>Service</strong>s<br />

Police Burglary Control Programs<br />

Police Crime Analysis Units<br />

Police Robbery Control Manual<br />

Presentence Report Handbook<br />

Prosecutor's Charging Decision<br />

Rackets Bureaus--Investigation and<br />

Prosecution of Organized Crime<br />

Rape and Its Victims<br />

Treatment Program for Sex Offenders<br />

Volunteers in Juvenile <strong>Justice</strong><br />

NCJ Number<br />

18304<br />

39024<br />

11101<br />

34204<br />

10428<br />

15652<br />

25997<br />

11277<br />

17414<br />

41337<br />

35832<br />

41953<br />

29894<br />

42967<br />

35607<br />

Citation<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

**<br />

*<br />

**<br />

*<br />

**<br />

*<br />

Title<br />

Child Abuse Intervention<br />

Crime Scene Search and Physical<br />

Evidence Handbook<br />

PP~SCRIPTIVE<br />

Diversion of the Public Inebriate<br />

From the <strong>Criminal</strong> <strong>Justice</strong> System<br />

Drug Programs in Correctional<br />

Institutions<br />

Evaluative Research in Corrections<br />

Grievance Mechanisms in Correctional<br />

Institutions<br />

Guide to Establishing a Defender<br />

System<br />

Guide to Improved Handling of<br />

Misdemeanant Offenders<br />

Health Care in Correctional Institutions<br />

Improving Police-community Relations<br />

Improving Productivity in the Courts:<br />

A Primer for Court Clerks<br />

Job Placement and Training fQr<br />

Offenders and Ex-offenders<br />

Managing <strong>Criminal</strong> Investigations<br />

PACKAGES<br />

NCJ Number<br />

32333<br />

07984<br />

10946<br />

38509<br />

15132<br />

19594<br />

44091<br />

11964<br />

27342<br />

10340<br />

44167<br />

15652<br />

19486<br />

Citation<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

**<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

**<br />

*<br />

*<br />

,<br />

"<br />

..<br />

44<br />

"<br />

, .' .,-


r<br />

,.'<br />

, r,<br />

','<br />

f<br />

; ,<br />

" ~'~<br />

~.<br />

'.<br />

,1.,-0(<br />

:F<br />

f'<br />

l'<br />

:.<br />

,j.<br />

~;<br />

l'<br />

(<br />

j,<br />

I<br />

t<br />

k<br />

I<br />

r<br />

,<br />

,<br />

,\<br />

~(<br />

I<br />

~<br />

j<br />

i<br />

:8. TEST DESIGNS<br />

. Test Designs are detailed specifications of selected program<br />

strategies intended for carefUl field testing in a limited number of<br />

sites. The goal of each test is to examine the effectiveness of a<br />

particular concept or program strategy in varied settings, as well as<br />

to examine the transferability of the concept, and its suitability for<br />

further demonstration and marke~ing.<br />

A listing of Test Designs is presented below in alphabetical<br />

order. For complete bibliographic ci tat,ion and abstract, refer to the<br />

entry number in Part I of this supp1.ement or to the earlier editions<br />

of Publications of the <strong>National</strong> Inatitute of Law Enforcement and <strong>Criminal</strong><br />

Just.:!.ce.·<br />

Title NCJ Number Citation<br />

Commercial Security<br />

Managing Patrol Operations<br />

Multijurisdictional Sentencing<br />

Guidelines<br />

Pre-Release Center<br />

Structured Plea Negotiations<br />

59015<br />

47032<br />

53479<br />

66869<br />

66847<br />

12<br />

**<br />

65<br />

84<br />

101<br />

C. EXEMPLARY PROJECTS<br />

Each year State and local agencies are invited to submit candidate<br />

projects that have been measurably effective in reducing crime or<br />

improving some aspect of the criminal justice system. For the few<br />

selected each year as Exemplary Projects, descriptive brochures and<br />

instruction manuals are developed--to assist local agencies by<br />

identifying successfUl techniques and detailing how they may be<br />

adapted most effectively.<br />

The Exemplary project program is administered by the Institute's<br />

Office of Development, Testing, and Dissemination. Additional information<br />

about selection procedures may be obtained from:<br />

Director, Model. Program Development Division<br />

Office of Development, Testing, and Dissemination<br />

Natipnal Institute of <strong>Justice</strong><br />

Washington, DC 205..31<br />

A listing of Exemplary projects is presented below in alphabetical<br />

order. For complete bibliographic citations and abstracts of<br />

Exemplary Project reports published in 1979, refer to the Entry Number<br />

in Part I of this volume or to earlier editions of Publications of the<br />

<strong>National</strong> Institute of Law Enforcement and <strong>Criminal</strong> <strong>Justice</strong> as indicated.<br />

Title<br />

Administrative Adjudication of<br />

Traffic Offenses (New York State)<br />

Adolescent Diversion Project, Champaign­<br />

Urbana, Illinois<br />

Central Police Dispatch, Muskegon<br />

County, Michigan<br />

Citizen Dispute Settlement,<br />

Columbus, Ohio<br />

Community Arbitration Project<br />

NCJ Number<br />

Citation<br />

30389 *<br />

38510 *<br />

30393 *<br />

15156 *<br />

61012 14<br />

, .. ,)<br />

""i<br />

k.<br />

~<br />

, I'<br />

1<br />

l ,<br />

r<br />

j:<br />

,.<br />

r<br />

1<br />

I L<br />

1,;<br />

It<br />

l~<br />

tt<br />

itt<br />

11<br />

lA<br />

Ii:<br />

\:!<br />

rl<br />

<strong>II</strong> r<br />

1:'1<br />

1'(<br />

r;,f<br />

U<br />

11<br />

! I<br />

l:{<br />

1.'£<br />

H<br />

1(<br />

\J<br />

t!<br />

I'!<br />

L<br />

\}<br />

<strong>II</strong><br />

~!<br />

I ~<br />

f!<br />

'fl<br />

~<br />

~<br />

fl<br />

,<br />

community-Based Corrections,<br />

Des Moines, Iowa<br />

34542 *<br />

..<br />

* Publications of the <strong>National</strong> Institute of Law Enforcement and<br />

** Cr m nal Just1ce: A comp:ehens ve B7bl10graph~. 1978. NCJ 49700<br />

Publications of the Nat10nal Inst1tute of Law Enforcement and<br />

t~~~i5;;871ustice: A Comprehensive BibliographY-l:979 S~pPlement.<br />

* Publications of the <strong>National</strong> Institute of Law Enforcement and<br />

<strong>Criminal</strong> <strong>Justice</strong>: . A Com rehensive Biblio ra h. 1978. (NCJ 49700)<br />

** Pub11cat1ons 0 the Nat1onal. Inst1tute 0 Law Enforcement and<br />

<strong>Criminal</strong> <strong>Justice</strong>: A Com rehensive Biblio ra h -1979 SU lement .<br />

(NCJ 57 87<br />

,<br />

47<br />

, .. ,"<br />

I


",'~<br />

"to.<br />

r<br />

,<br />

Title<br />

Community crime Prevention program,<br />

Seattle, Washington<br />

Community Response to Rape, polk<br />

County, Iowa<br />

Connecticut Economic Crime Unit<br />

Controlled Confrontation--The Ward<br />

Grievance Procedures of the California<br />

Youth Authority<br />

Focus on Robbery--Hidden Camera<br />

Project<br />

Juvenile Diversion Through Family<br />

Counselir.g, Sacramento, Cali fornia<br />

Legal Information Center, Creighton<br />

University<br />

Legal Liaison Division, Dallas<br />

Police Department<br />

Major Offense Bureau, Bronx County,<br />

New York<br />

NCJ Number<br />

42383<br />

38480<br />

60332<br />

35801<br />

59014<br />

32026<br />

39468<br />

34673<br />

37810<br />

Title NCJ Number citation<br />

Citation<br />

Public Defender <strong>Service</strong>, Washington, D.C. 15080 *<br />

**<br />

stop Rape Crisis Center, Baton Rouge 60498 6<br />

street Crime Unit, New York City 26492 *<br />

* volunteer Probation Counselor Program,<br />

Lincoln, Nebraska<br />

16<br />

30392 *<br />

"<br />

Montgomery County Emergency <strong>Service</strong>,<br />

Norristown, pennsylvania<br />

.{~4950<br />

,I<br />

I<br />

!<br />

,<br />

,~ ;<br />

Montgomery County Work Release/Pre­<br />

Release Program<br />

Neighborhood Youth Resources Center,<br />

Philadelphia<br />

46250<br />

16769<br />

I<br />

,I<br />

• I.<br />

One Day/One Trial, Wayne County,<br />

Michigan<br />

41516<br />

• I<br />

"<br />

'\0., ...<br />

Parole Officer Aide Program, Ohio<br />

Adult Parole Authority<br />

project New Pride, Denver I<br />

Colorado<br />

PROMIS (Prosecutor Management Information<br />

system), Washington, D.C.<br />

prosecution of Economic Crime,<br />

Seattle and San Diego<br />

providence Education Center, st. Louis<br />

35432<br />

42020<br />

43722<br />

31615<br />

15651<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

.8<br />

......


,-<br />

,<br />

D. NATIONAL EVALUATION PROGRAM<br />

Title<br />

NCJ Number<br />

citation<br />

Practical information on costs, benefits l and limitations of<br />

selected criminal justice projects and programs is collected by the<br />

<strong>National</strong> Institute of· <strong>Justice</strong> to assess projects funded by the Law<br />

Enforcement Assistance Administration and share the findings with<br />

St.ate and local officials and planners . Initially, Phase I assessments<br />

concent.rate on specific topic areas and, where appropriate,<br />

these are followed by ·Phase <strong>II</strong> indepth Evaluations. Additional<br />

information on the <strong>National</strong> Evaluation program may be obtained from:<br />

Director<br />

Office of Prog~am Evaluation<br />

<strong>National</strong> Institute of <strong>Justice</strong><br />

U.s. Department of <strong>Justice</strong><br />

Washington, DC 20531<br />

A listing of Summaries of completed <strong>National</strong> Evaluation Program<br />

studies is presented below in alphabetical order. Full reports are<br />

available on loan from NCJRS. For complete bibliographic citations<br />

and abstracts .of <strong>National</strong> Evaluation Reports, refer to the entry<br />

number in Part I of this volume or to earlier editions of Publications<br />

of the Nation~l Institute of Law Enforcement and <strong>Criminal</strong> <strong>Justice</strong> as<br />

indicated.<br />

Phase I Reports<br />

Title<br />

Citizen Crime Reporting Projects<br />

NCJ Number<br />

35828<br />

Citation<br />

*<br />

Early warning Robbery Reduction<br />

Projects--An Assessment of<br />

Performance<br />

Halfway Houses<br />

.,<br />

Intensive Special probation Projects<br />

Juvenile Diversion<br />

Neighborhood Team policing<br />

Operation Identification Projects-­<br />

Assessment of Effectiveness<br />

Pretrial Release Programs<br />

Secure Detentipn of Juveniles and<br />

Alternatives to Its Use<br />

street Lighting projects<br />

policing Urb~n<br />

Mass Transit systems<br />

Traditional prevention Patrol<br />

Treatment Alternatives to Street<br />

Crime (TASC) projects<br />

32498<br />

36383<br />

42407<br />

32847<br />

35296<br />

27305<br />

39022<br />

42640<br />

4'1011<br />

60284<br />

34817<br />

34057<br />

'*<br />

'*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

**<br />

83<br />

*<br />

*<br />

1<br />

t<br />

• I<br />

1<br />

citizen Patrol Projects<br />

com.rnuni ty-Based Al terna ti ves 't.o<br />

Juvenile Incarceration<br />

Correctional Education Programs for<br />

Inmates<br />

36435<br />

35834<br />

48176<br />

-It<br />

*<br />

l~<br />

Phase <strong>II</strong> Report<br />

Treatment Alternatives to Street<br />

Crime<br />

!?193l<br />

**<br />

l.<br />

Court Information syste~s<br />

Cri.me Analysis in support of<br />

Patrol<br />

crime Prevention Securit.y Surveys<br />

41680<br />

42547<br />

34858<br />

*<br />

*<br />

Publications of the <strong>National</strong> Institute of - Law Enforcement and<br />

<strong>Criminal</strong> <strong>Justice</strong>: A comerehensive Bibliograpl~. 1978. (NCJ 49700)<br />

** Publications of the <strong>National</strong> Institute of Law Enforcement and<br />

criminal <strong>Justice</strong>: A Com rehensive Bib1io ra h -1979 su lement.<br />

NCJ 57987<br />

51<br />

....<br />

,


\\,<br />

n •


;~. :-~.<br />

"<br />

. u ....<br />

-----<br />

.,•. rl<br />

Title<br />

NCJ Number<br />

Cit.ation<br />

~-=-..:-.. ,<br />

" \<br />

~ I , "'<br />

.'<br />

. ,<br />

; .:l . ,- q'<br />

¥ •<br />

Publications of the <strong>National</strong> Institute<br />

of Law Enforcement and <strong>Criminal</strong><br />

Ju~tice<br />

Publications of the <strong>National</strong> Institute<br />

of Law Enforcement and <strong>Criminal</strong><br />

~ustice, 1979 Supplement<br />

Public Defender Programs<br />

:Recidivism<br />

Restitution<br />

Speedy Trial<br />

Spouse Abuse<br />

Team Polic::ing<br />

Techniques for Project Evaluation<br />

Terrorism. 2d Edition<br />

'Victim/Witness Assistance<br />

49700<br />

57987 89<br />

49096 **<br />

34360 *<br />

62011 93<br />

48110 .*<br />

54427 100<br />

35887 •<br />

43556 •<br />

39646 •<br />

•<br />

45.nO-5<br />

',., '''::.:<br />

49698 .*<br />

(;<br />

A<br />

AB1}sEOF AUTHORITY 63, 87<br />

A~LTOFFENOEAS 27<br />

AFt 7 1RPTlVE ACTION PROGRAMS<br />

AU~RM SYSTEMS 97, 98<br />

AU'.oHOLIS<strong>II</strong>I CAllIES 11<br />

Ai:TEANAl1VE Pf8PUTE SETTLE"~<br />

'14<br />

AI.,TERNAnVE SCHOOLS 21<br />

ALTERNAnVES 10<br />

INSTITUTIONALIZATION<br />

61,93 <<br />

2, 26, 38, 59,<br />

ANALYSIS 82<br />

MNUAL "EPORTS 71<br />

ANTITRUST OFFENIES 54<br />

ARINTAATION 14<br />

ARIZONA 45,109<br />

ARSON 4,102<br />

ARSONISTS 4<br />

ASSAULT AND BATTERY 94<br />

ATTORNEYS 48 \'<br />

ATTORNEYS GENERAL 16<br />

AI,ISTRIA 25<br />

AUTO<strong>II</strong>An;D VEHICLE MONITORS 13<br />

B<br />

BAU-18TICS 76<br />

BATTERED HUlBANDa 100<br />

,BAMRIED WIVES' 100<br />

BEHAViOl!t UNDER STRESS 60<br />

BELGIUM 25, 60<br />

BIBLIOGRAftHIE8 2, 4, 21, 22, 23. 32, 36,<br />

41,61,74,80,89,93,100<br />

BIQORAPHIES 77<br />

BIOLOGICAL INFLUENCES 11, 36<br />

BLOOD AND BODY FLUID ANALYSIS<br />

BODY ARMOR 5, 78 ' '<br />

42<br />

BUDGETS' 77<br />

BURGLARY 92, 97<br />

IUSlNE~ SECURITY 9,12,95,97,98<br />

c<br />

CAUFORNIA 8, 20, 28, 69, 73, 97, 103<br />

CARGO SECURITY 8<br />

CASE STUDIES 20,109<br />

CASELOAD MANAGEMENT 26<br />

CASELOADS 27<br />

CITIZEN ASSOCIATIONS ,25<br />

CITIZEN CR<strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>E PRECAUTioNs" 22<br />

CITIZEN CRIME TOLERANCE " 90, 91<br />

{\<br />

SUBJECTJND.EX<br />

CIlIZEN GRIEVANCES 90, 91<br />

CIVIL SERVICE 10<br />

COEDUCATlOM.\L COARECTI0N3<br />

FACIUTIES 41<br />

COM<strong>II</strong>UNICATIONS CENTERS 13<br />

eoti<strong>II</strong>UNrrY BASED CORRECTIONS<br />

(ADULT), 38,39,69<br />

COIl<strong>II</strong>UNITY CRIME PREVENTION<br />

~A118 32,35,39,69<br />

CCNlMUNITYINVOLVEMENT 6,92<br />

COMMUNITY SERVICE ORDER 93<br />

COMPUTER AIDED OPERAnONS 13,75<br />

COliPUnAS 75<br />

CONFLiCT OF INTEREST 63<br />

CONNECTICUT 16,92<br />

eONSUIiIER rRAUI;) 16. 17.40<br />

CONSU<strong>II</strong>Q PROTECTION 16,17,40<br />

CORRECTIONAL FACIUTIES<br />

108<br />

50,51,61,<br />

CORREC!lONAL INSTITUTIONS (ADUL"f)<br />

18,59,72<br />

CORRECTIONAL INSTr",'nONS (JUVENILE)<br />

72 i,l<br />

CORRECTIONAL flEAfiONHEL 72<br />

CORRECTIONAL PWINING 86<br />

CORRECTIONAL STAFF TRAINiNG 72<br />

CORRECTIONS 23, 52, 87<br />

CORRECTIONS IlANAGE~IlNT<br />

108<br />

50,51,88,<br />

CORRUPTION OF PUB.UC OFFICIALS<br />

19,20,35.63,112 '<br />

3,<br />

COUNSELING 6<br />

COURSE MATEnlALa 110,111<br />

COURT CASE FL.OWMANAGEMENT<br />

57, 58, 104 .,. .. .<br />

56,<br />

CQURT MANAGEMENT 104,105,108,107<br />

COURT PERsmtNEL 104, 108<br />

COURT RECORDS 104,107<br />

COURT REFORM 101<br />

COURTS 2!3. 66<br />

CftlME CAUSES 11, 36, 60<br />

CRIME CONTROL PRt'4RAMS 17<br />

.' CRIMINAL JUSTICE 1,23,33,98<br />

CRI"I~AL JUSTICE EDUCATION eo ,~<br />

CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFOR<strong>II</strong>IATION<br />

SYSTEMS 33<br />

CRIMINOLOGY 41,90,91<br />

CRISIS INTERVENTION 6<br />

D<br />

DENMARK 25<br />

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 15<br />

DETERMINATE SENTENCES 108<br />

DEVIANCE 11<br />

DIGrrAL COMMUNICATIONS S7<br />

DIRECTORIES 9, 32, 33<br />

DISCIPLINE 21<br />

DISCRIMINATION<br />

DISPATCHING 13,37,39<br />

DIS,TRICT AT!ORNEYS 6<br />

DOMESTIC RELATIONS 60,100<br />

ORUG ABUSE CAUSES 11<br />

ORUG D£TECTION 77<br />

DRUG EFFECTS 77<br />

DRUG LAW ENFQRCEr.ENY 77,78<br />

DRUG LAW ENFORCEME~'r UNITS 77, 78<br />

DRUG LAWS 77<br />

DRUG RELATED CRIMES 77<br />

EC~IC INFLUENCES 54<br />

EDUCATION 18<br />

EFFECTIVENESS 34<br />

EMERGENCY VEHICLE WARNING SYSTEMS<br />

99<br />

EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCf£S<br />

EMPLOYEE THEFT 9?<br />

EMpLOYER ATTITUDES ~<br />

EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE REI,.ATION3<br />

CRIME COSTS ~., , ENCEPHALOGRAPHIC RESIEARCH 36<br />

CRI"'E IN SCHQPLS 94<br />

CRIME LABORATORIES 48<br />

CRIME LABORATORY EQUIPMENT. 48<br />

CRIME PREDICTION 34<br />

CRIME PREVENTION MEASURES 12,16,<br />

34,60,83,63,97<br />

CRIME SCENE SEARCH 43, 48<br />

CRIME SPECIFIC COUNTERMEASURES<br />

18,92<br />

CRIME STATiSTICS 45<br />

CRIMES AGAINST THE ELDERLY 22<br />

CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION 48, 64<br />

CRIMINAL I"VESTIGATION UNITS 39, 64<br />

55<br />

E<br />

EQUAL appQnTU,.1TY EMPLOYMENT 1<br />

EQUAL,PROTECTION Qf THE LAWS 101<br />

EQUIPMENT 9<br />

EQUIPMENT EVALUATION 53<br />

EVAI..UATION<br />

96<br />

7,18,28,31,66,71,83,,84,<br />

EVALUATICH CRITERIA 31<br />

EVALUATION DESIGN 88,84<br />

EVALUATION TECHNIQUES 28,31,68<br />

EVALUATIVE RESEARCH 28,31;77, 101 ~<br />

EVIDENCE 42<br />

EVlDENCiE COLLEC!ION 43,47.95<br />

EXflERT WITNESSES . 48<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

.I<br />

J<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

:1<br />

I '"'-<br />

J<br />

',:<br />

~<br />

I


..<br />

-<br />

USb<br />

FACILITY SE. llTY<br />

F<br />

FACIUTY SECURITY 97<br />

FEAR OF CRIME 22, 90, 91<br />

40<br />

fEDERAL PROGRAUS '49,71<br />

G<br />

i I<br />

H<br />

,;<br />

't " \<br />

FEDERAL AID 71<br />

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 4,0<br />

FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES<br />

FEDERAL REGULATIONS 40<br />

FEDERAL REPUBUC OF GERMANV 25,<br />

60<br />

FEMALE OFFENDERS 41,60,61<br />

FEl1ALES 1<br />

FiNANCIAL MANAGEMENT 51,105<br />

FIRE DEPARTMENTS 102<br />

FLORIDA 20, 28, 85<br />

FORENSIC MEDICINE 48<br />

FRANCE 25<br />

FRAUD 39,49<br />

GEORGIA 73<br />

GOVERNMENTAL PLANNING 24, 28, 31<br />

GRAFT 63<br />

GRANTS OR CONTRACTS 70<br />

GREAT BRITAIN 25<br />

HANDSFREE TELECOMMUNICATIONS<br />

EQUIP 7<br />

HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION 18<br />

HIGHER EDI.!CATION 18<br />

HIJACKING 8<br />

HISTORIES 103<br />

HOTUNES 6<br />

IlUNaIS 20, 28<br />

IMPRISONMENT 59<br />

INDUSTRIAL SECURITY 9, 12<br />

INFORMANTS 77<br />

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION 33<br />

INFORMATION PROCESSING 75<br />

INMATE CLASSIFICATION 108<br />

INMATE DISCIPUr~E 41,108<br />

INMATE GRIEVANC~S 66,87,66,106<br />

INMATE PEER COU~'cUNG 74<br />

INMATE PROGRAMfj 18,41,84,66,108<br />

INMATE SELF.IlOVERNMENT IOU<br />

INMATE STAFf RELATIONS 87<br />

INMATE TRANSFEnS 106<br />

INMATES 59,87<br />

INTERVENTION 100<br />

INTERVIEW AND <strong>II</strong><strong>II</strong>TERROGATION 43, 46<br />

INTRUSION DETECrrORS 98<br />

INVESTIGATIVE POWERS 47<br />

IOWA 69<br />

ITALY 60<br />

J<br />

JAILS 61<br />

JAPAN 25<br />

JOB PRESSURE 80<br />

JUDGES 30<br />

JUDICIAL DECISION COMPUANCE 55<br />

JUDICIAL DECISIONS 30<br />

JUDICIAL DISCRETION 30, 59<br />

JURIES 66<br />

JURY DECISIONMAKING 62<br />

JURY SELECTIO:I 42, 66<br />

JUVENILE COURT PROCEDURES 59<br />

JUVENILE DEUNQUENCY 94<br />

JUVENILE DEUNOUENCY FACTORS 11<br />

JUVENILE DEUNOUENCY PREVENTION<br />

39<br />

JUVENILE DEUNOUENTS 66, 94<br />

JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM 23<br />

JUVENILE OFFENDERS 14<br />

JUVENILES 68<br />

L<br />

LABOR RELATIONS 61<br />

LATIN AMERICA 60<br />

LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMIN<br />

1,48,96,108<br />

LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS<br />

LABORATORY 9,13<br />

LAWFUL USE OF FORCE 15<br />

LAWS AND STATUTES 6, 40, 44, 63<br />

LEAA EXEMPLARY PROGRAMS<br />

69,71,84,89<br />

16, :ili,<br />

LEGAL AID SERVICES 39<br />

UGHTING 99<br />

lITERACY EDUCATION 16<br />

LITERATURE 69,104<br />

UTERATURE REVIEWS 27,90,91<br />

lOCAL GOVERNMENT<br />

112<br />

19,20,24,35,63,<br />

lOUISIANA 6, 45<br />

M<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

87, 104<br />

26, 46, SO, 63, 64, 66, 82,<br />

MANAGEMENT BY OBJEI';TIVES 3, 64, 62<br />

MANAGEM:ENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS<br />

27<br />

MARYLAND 14,84<br />

MASS TRANSIT SECURITY 83<br />

MEDICAL AND DENTAL SERVICES<br />

51,52<br />

50,<br />

MEDICAL RESEARCH 36<br />

MICHIGAN 28, 44. 45. 56<br />

MIDDLE EAST 60<br />

MINNESOTA 44<br />

MINORITY EMPLOYMENT " 55<br />

MINORITY RECRUITMENT 1. 55<br />

MISDE<strong>II</strong>IUNOR 56. 57. 58<br />

MISSISSIPPI 26<br />

MISSOURI 37, 45. 73<br />

MODElLAW 44<br />

MODEL PROGRAMS 29, bS. 69<br />

MODELS 101<br />

MUool.1O 92<br />

MUNICIPAL POUCE 10, 7£1<br />

N<br />

NATIONAL EVALUATION PROGRAM 71,<br />

89. 103<br />

HATl CONF OF COMMSNRS ON STATE<br />

LAW~ 108<br />

HATL CRIM JUST REFERENCE SERVICE<br />

21,38,60,74,93<br />

SUBJECT INDEX<br />

NATL INST OF LAW ENFOR AND CRIM<br />

JUST 65,69,70.71,84,89,101,102<br />

NEEDS ASSESSMENT 105,106,107<br />

NEGOTIATION 61<br />

NEIGHBORHOOD JUSTICE CENTERS 14,<br />

73<br />

NEVADA 57<br />

NEW YORK 20,69,109<br />

NON BEHAVIORAL CORRELATES OF CRIME<br />

11<br />

NORTH CAROLINA 103<br />

NORTHERN IRELAND 60<br />

o<br />

OFFENDERS 93<br />

OFFENSES 94<br />

OHIO 20,62<br />

OKLAHOMA 20, 28<br />

OMBUDSMEN 86<br />

OMNIBUS CRIME CONTROL SAFE STS ACT<br />

1<br />

OREGON 109<br />

f\\IERCROWDiNG 11<br />

p<br />

PARALEGALS 74<br />

PARAPROfESSIONAL PERSONNEL<br />

74<br />

27,<br />

PAROLE 59<br />

PARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENT 3<br />

PENNSYLVANIA 28,69<br />

PENOLOGY 23<br />

PERSONNEL ADMiNISTRATION<br />

104,106<br />

10,81,<br />

PERSONNEL SELECTION 1<br />

PHYSICAL CRIME PREVENTION 92, 97<br />

PLANNING 105,106,107<br />

PLEA NEGOTIATIONS 42,47,8&, 101<br />

POLICE 23, 43, 46, 48, 64, 82<br />

POLICE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAMS<br />

1,55<br />

POLICE AGENCIES 83<br />

POLICE ATTITUDES 15,41<br />

POLICE CARS 53, 79<br />

POLICE COMMAND AND CONTROL 37<br />

POLICE COMMUNITY RELATIONS 92<br />

POLICE EFFECTIVENESS 77<br />

POLICE EQUIPMENT<br />

79<br />

5, 7, 13, 53, 75, 76,<br />

POLICE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 75<br />

POLICE INTERNAL AFFAIRS 15<br />

POLICE INTERNAL INVESTIGATIOf.& 15<br />

POLIC~ INTERNAL ORGANIZATIONS 82<br />

POLICE LEGAL ADVISERS 39<br />

POLICE MANAGEMENT 10,64,78,80,82<br />

POLICE MA~POWER DEPLOYMENT 103<br />

POLICE OCCUPATIONAL STRESS 80<br />

POI.ICE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE<br />

77<br />

POLICE PATROL 34, 37<br />

POLICE PURSUIT DRIVING 53<br />

POLIC;; RESPONSE TIME 37<br />

POLICE SPOUSES 80<br />

POLICE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS<br />

13<br />

POLICE UNIONS 10,81<br />

POLICE USE OF DEADLY FORCE 15<br />

POLrCE WEAPONS USE 15<br />

POl~CE YCUTH UNITS 68<br />

POLICY 15<br />

SUBJECT INDEX<br />

PREDICTION 72<br />

PRERELEASE CENTERS 84<br />

PRERELEASE PROGRAMS 84<br />

PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATIONS 27<br />

PRETRIAL INTERVENTION 38<br />

PRETRIAL PROCEDURES 47, 65<br />

PRETRIAL PROGRAMS 38<br />

PRETRIAL RELEASE 38<br />

PRISONERS RIGHTS 41,50,87<br />

PROACTIVE POLICE UNITS 34<br />

PltOBATI()N 25, 26, 27, 59<br />

PROBATION CONDITIONS 25<br />

PROBATION OR PAROLE AGENCIES<br />

26<br />

25,<br />

PROBATION OR PAROLE OFFICERS<br />

26,27,72<br />

25,<br />

PROBATION OR PAROLE RECORDS 26<br />

PROBATION OR PAROLE SERVICES<br />

26,27<br />

25,<br />

PROCEDURE MANUALS 7, 29, 35, 42, 43,<br />

46,47,64,65,82,66,87,105,106,107<br />

PROGRAM ABUSE 49<br />

PROGRAM ADAPTABILITY 65, 103<br />

PROGRAM COORDINATION 56, 5'1, 58<br />

PROGRAM EVALIJATION<br />

58,68,73,84,103<br />

37, 38, 56, 57,<br />

PROGRAM IMPLElIENTATION 17,73,103<br />

PROGRAM PLANNING 103<br />

PROGRAMS 109,110,111<br />

PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS 47, 48<br />

PROSECUTION 39,47<br />

PROSECUTORIAl DISCRETION 42<br />

PROSECUTORIAl SCREEWNG 42<br />

PRDSECL'TORS MANAGEMENT INFO SYS<br />

39<br />

PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 76<br />

PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH BO<br />

PSYCHOFATHS 11,59<br />

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 3,35,63,112<br />

PUBLIC ATTITUDES 90, 91<br />

PUBLIC DEFENDERS 39<br />

PUBLIC SCHOOLS 94<br />

R<br />

RACIAL DISCRIMINATION 1,15<br />

RAPE 39,42,43,44,45,4~,47<br />

RECORDS MANAGEMENT 104,107<br />

RECRUITrJlENT 72<br />

REFERENCE MATERIALS 2'::, 134<br />

REFORM 19,20,35,44,45,59,112<br />

REGUI.;\TORY AGENC!~S 40<br />

RELEASE ON RECOOItlZANCE 38<br />

REMEDIAL A!DUCATlo.'4 10<br />

REPUBLIC OF INDIA 25<br />

RESEARCH 8,27,71,77<br />

RESEARCH AND DEVELlt)PMENT<br />

71<br />

17,70,<br />

RESEARCH METHODS 71<br />

RESEARCH PROGRAMS 71<br />

RESIDENTIAL SECURITY ~<br />

RESTITUTION 93<br />

RESTITUTION CENTERS 93<br />

RESTITUTION PROGRAMS' 93<br />

REVOLUTIONARY OR TERROR/aT GROUPS<br />

60<br />

RHODE ISLAND 20<br />

RIGHT TO TREATMEN7 50, 51<br />

ROBBERY 95, 97<br />

ROLE PERCEPTION 22<br />

RULES OF EVIDENCE 95<br />

s<br />

SCHOOL DELINQUENCY PROGRAMS 21<br />

SCHOOL SECURITY 21,94<br />

SCHOOL SECURITY OFFICERS 21,94<br />

SCHOOL VANDALISM 21,94<br />

SCHOOLS 21,94<br />

SECURITY 97<br />

SECURITY CODES AND ORDINANCES 12<br />

SECURITY SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS 9<br />

SECURITY SYSTEMS 8,9,12,97<br />

SENIOR ADULTS 22<br />

SENTENCING 29,30,93,108<br />

SENTENCING DISPARITY 65, 108<br />

SENTENCING GUIDELINES 30,108<br />

SERVICES 69<br />

SEX DISCRIMINATION 1,41<br />

SEXUAL ASSAULT 44<br />

SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIMS 6<br />

SHELTERS FOR BATTERED WIVES 100<br />

SHOPLIFTING 97<br />

SOCIAl. CONDITIONS 11<br />

SOUTH CAROUNA 28, 58<br />

SPECIAL PROSECUTORS 16<br />

SPECIFIC~TIONS 7, 53<br />

STANDARDS OR GOALS 5,7, 76, 106<br />

STATE-eY·STATE ANALYSES 44<br />

ST!;iE CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES 18<br />

STATE LAWS 44<br />

STATE OF I!mAEL 60<br />

STATE-oF·THE·ART ReVIEWS 24<br />

STATISTICS 72<br />

STATUTORY RAPE 46<br />

STUDENTS 74<br />

STUDIES<br />

104<br />

11.19,45,49,59,71,72,78,79,<br />

STUDY RELEASE 84<br />

SUMMARIES 78<br />

SUPERVISION 26<br />

SURVEilLANCE EQUIPMENT 39, 95<br />

SURVEYS 49,62, 72, 102<br />

SUSPECT IDENTIFICATION 43<br />

SUSPENDED SENYENCES 25<br />

SWEDEN 25<br />

T<br />

TEAM POLICING 103<br />

TECHNIQUES 104<br />

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 69, 71<br />

TERRORISM 60<br />

TESTING AND MEASUREMENT 5,12,65,<br />

99<br />

TEXAS 69,81<br />

THESAURI 67<br />

TRAFFIC MONITORING EQUIPMENT 13<br />

TRAINING 46<br />

TRAINING MANUALS 3, 30, 52, 63, BB,<br />

111<br />

TREATMENT 61<br />

TRIAL COURTS 5B, 57, 6B<br />

TRIAL PREPARATION 42<br />

TRIAL PROCEDURES 42<br />

v<br />

VEHICLE EQUIPMENT 79<br />

VEHICLE LOCATION MOttlTORS B, 13,37<br />

VEHICLES 79<br />

VICTIM COMPENSATION 22, 93<br />

VICTIM MEDICAL ASSISTANCE 6<br />

VICTIM SERVICES 22,42,43,108,109,<br />

110,111<br />

YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU<br />

VICTIMIZATION 45<br />

VICTIMOLOGY 90, 91<br />

VICTIMS 47, 110, 111<br />

VIDEO TAPED TESTIMONY 62<br />

VIRGINIA 20<br />

VOCATIONAL TRAINING 18<br />

VOLUNTEER PROGRAMS 6<br />

w<br />

WASHINGTON 44, 45, 69, 95<br />

WHITE COLLAR CRIMES 3,19,20,35,39,<br />

40,54,63,112<br />

WItK:ONSIN 44,109<br />

WITNESS ASSISTANCE 109,110,111<br />

WITNESSES 110,111<br />

WOMENS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTI~i;<br />

41<br />

WORK RELEASE 39,61, B4<br />

WORKSHOPS AND SEMINARS 30, 48, 50,<br />

51,52,63,87,88,110,111<br />

y<br />

VOUTH SERVICES BUREAU 69<br />

.<br />

'I<br />

\<br />

,<br />

56<br />

57


POi<br />

.'<br />

~<br />

. ''''<br />

,<br />

J<br />

"<br />

.<br />

r<br />

1 '<br />

AUTHOR INDEX<br />

!<br />

I<br />

I'<br />

..<br />

LJ<br />

\ !<br />

• ,I<br />

A<br />

ALB I, F. J. 43<br />

ALBRIGHT, E. J. 103<br />

ALLEN, H. E. 27<br />

AUSTERN, D. T. 63<br />

B<br />

BALL, J. H. 63<br />

BELL, R. 18<br />

BELLOWS, J. B. 30<br />

BLEW, C. H. 14.109<br />

BOLAND, B. :34<br />

BOSTON, G. 22<br />

BOWERS, R. A. 49<br />

BRANTj.EY, J. R. 2, 36<br />

BRENNER, R. N. 15,21,32,80<br />

BRISSETTE, J. 54<br />

BRYANT, P. A. 66<br />

BURPO, J. H. 61<br />

c<br />

CAIN, A. A. 74, 93<br />

CALPIN, J. C. 29, 30<br />

CALVANO, N. J. 5<br />

CAPLAN,M. 4<br />

CARLSON, E. W. 28, 27<br />

CHAPPELL, D. 44<br />

CHELIMSKY, E. 56, 57. 58, 97<br />

CIZANCKAS, V. I. 63<br />

CLINARD, M. B. 54<br />

COLEMAN, M. 50<br />

COLTON, K. W. 75<br />

CONARD, E. 18<br />

COOK, R. F. 73<br />

COOPER, C. S. 104<br />

CUSHMAN, R. C. 24<br />

o<br />

DAVIS, C. 88<br />

DAY, D. A. 6<br />

DOOLITTLE, C. 107<br />

DORWORTH, B. E. 30<br />

DUBOW, F. 90.91<br />

DUNCAN, J. T. 4, 32<br />

DUNCAN, S. 80<br />

EOOAR, J. M. 62<br />

E<br />

F<br />

FECHTER, J. V. 9<br />

FERRY, J. 89, 100<br />

FISCHEL, M. 56<br />

FISHER, J. 74<br />

FLETCHER, T. 3<br />

FLETCHER,~W. 63<br />

FOWLER, r. J. , JR 92<br />

F:RIDAV, P. C. 25<br />

FRISINA, L 16<br />

G<br />

GAR DINE", J. A. 19,20<br />

GELMAN, ,~. M. 29. 30<br />

GETZELS, J. 112<br />

GLUCKSTIllRN, N. B. 50,51,52<br />

GORDON,P. 3<br />

GREENBERG, I. 64<br />

GREISINGEA, G. W. 10<br />

H<br />

HARNESS, J. 51, 52<br />

HARNESS, J. K. 50<br />

HARRIES, E. 54<br />

HEINl, A. M. 85<br />

HENTZELL, S. 3<br />

HORTON, D. M. 23, 41<br />

HOWETT, G. L 99<br />

J<br />

JACQUIN, D. 110,111<br />

JOHNSON, C. 100<br />

JONF.S,C. 21<br />

JONES, H. C. 110, 111<br />

JONES, R. N. 7<br />

JORDAN, F. , JR 83<br />

JORDAN, F. C. , JR 97<br />

K<br />

KAPLAN, G. 90, 91<br />

KEATING, J. M. 86, 67, 88<br />

KEMP, D. M. 28,31<br />

KERSETTER, W. A. 85<br />

KETTERMAN, T. 33<br />

KRAVITZ, M. 2,4,15,21,22,23,36,41,<br />

81,74,80,89,93,100<br />

KRESS, J. M. 29, 30<br />

KRUG, R. E. 17<br />

L<br />

LAFFEY,T. 18<br />

LANCER, C. 28<br />

LANGE, A. Q. 49<br />

LAPERLA,S.S. 23<br />

LARSON, G. C. 37<br />

LEGRAND, C. E. 44<br />

LEVINE, M. 61<br />

LEWIS, A. C. 53<br />

LEWIS, E. , JR 53<br />

LOCKARD, J. L 32<br />

LOCKE, H. G. 55<br />

l.UBANS, V. A. 82.<br />

LUTZ, J. G. 18<br />

LYMAN, T. R. 19,63<br />

LYMON, T.J~. 20<br />

M<br />

MCCABE, E. 90, 91<br />

MCCALLA, M. E. 92<br />

MANGIONE, T. W. 92<br />

MANIKAS, P. 35<br />

MANNING, P. K. 77, 78<br />

MATHEWS, K. E. , JR 102<br />

MATHLESS, P. 88<br />

MILLER, P. V. 18<br />

MOLKUP, J. J. 10<br />

MOLOF, M. 83<br />

MOUNT, C. H. 66<br />

MOY, W. 83<br />

MUNSTERMAN, G. T. 66<br />

NALLEY, P. G.<br />

NEUSE, M.A.<br />

NITZBERG, R.<br />

OTTEN, L 11,58<br />

PABST, W. n. J. R.<br />

N<br />

26,31<br />

50,51,5~ 110. 111<br />

22<br />

o<br />

p<br />

6A<br />

,<br />

,<br />

Preceding page blank<br />

59<br />

I


.1<br />

am<br />

PACKARD, R.<br />

AUTHOR INDEX<br />

I<br />

, ~<br />

) .<br />

\ Ok<br />

,<br />

PACKARD, Po. 51,52<br />

PACKARD, R. W. 50<br />

PARKS, Eo C. 27<br />

PATMON, C. 50,51,52<br />

PETRASHEK, D. 54<br />

PROTESS, D. 35<br />

R<br />

REDUNOER, L. J. 77, 78<br />

REICH, J. A. 42, 44, 47<br />

ROBER1SON, E. M.<br />

ROEHL, J. A. 73<br />

9, 62<br />

ROSE,A.M. 17<br />

ROSENBLUM, R. 14<br />

ROSENBLUM, R. H. 109<br />

ROTHMAN, D. J. 59<br />

ROVNER.pIECZENIK, R. 68<br />

RUBEL, R. 21<br />

RUSSELL, L. S. 97<br />

s<br />

SASFY, J. 56, 57, 58<br />

SAULSBERY, L. F. 7<br />

SCANLON, J. W. 28, 31<br />

SCHILlER, J. 110,111<br />

SCHRAM, D. D. 45, 48<br />

SCHUBERT, J. G. 17<br />

SCOTT, W. W. ,JR 13<br />

SHEPPARD, D. I. 73<br />

SHER, A. H. 98<br />

SHORT, E. H. 107<br />

BIEGEL, L 83<br />

SIEGEL, L. G. 103<br />

SIMON,C. 18<br />

SIMON, J. W. 37<br />

SLOVAK, J. S. 10<br />

SPAID, O. 110, 111<br />

SPAID, O. A. 30, 63<br />

SPANOENBERG,R.L. 16<br />

STAKELON, A. E. 18<br />

STEINBERG, S. S. 110<br />

STENBAKKEN, O. N. 98<br />

STRACK, J. 83<br />

STRACK, J. R. 97<br />

STUDEN, L. R. a<br />

WHITCOMB, D. 6, 16, 95<br />

W/WA<strong>II</strong>S, J. R. 77, 78<br />

WILSON, J. Q. 34<br />

WORKfAAN, J. L. 7<br />

WYNNE, J. M. , JR 24<br />

y<br />

YEAGER, P. C. 54<br />

z<br />

ZWEIBEL, G. J. 40<br />

THUROW, C •. 112<br />

TOBIN, R. 105,106<br />

ULBERG, C. 46<br />

T<br />

u<br />

v<br />

VIANO, E. C. 110,111<br />

w<br />

WALDHORN, S. A. 19,20<br />

WALlER, J. D. 28,31<br />

WASSERMAN, R. 64<br />

WEBSTER, S. H. 102<br />

"<br />

60<br />

I


"<br />

1<br />

'"<br />

U.S. Department of <strong>Justice</strong><br />

<strong>National</strong> Institute of <strong>Justice</strong><br />

Official Business<br />

Penalty for Private Usc SJOO<br />

Postaae and Fees Paid<br />

U.S. Deparlmenl of Juslice<br />

Jus 436<br />

Third Class<br />

Bulk Rate"<br />

Washington. D.C. 205JI<br />

"<br />

'<br />

,<br />

,<br />

,<br />

.1"<br />

, I<br />

"J<<br />

,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!