06.05.2014 Views

Sandbanks Draft Veg Mgmt Plan - Ontario Parks

Sandbanks Draft Veg Mgmt Plan - Ontario Parks

Sandbanks Draft Veg Mgmt Plan - Ontario Parks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE G – Restoration Implementation <strong>Plan</strong><br />

• A tally of all planted individuals should be conducted by species in the following<br />

categories to determine total mortality of the planted material: healthy, mild damage<br />

(some defoliation), medium damage (dead/broken leader), severe damage (only<br />

epicormic branches), and dead.<br />

• Five plots measuring 10m by 10m should be permanently marked and the coordinates<br />

determined by GPS within each restoration site to monitor the growth and survival of all<br />

planted material. Within these plots:<br />

• Four photographs should be taken from the centre point of the plot looking out in<br />

each of the cardinal directions.<br />

• Heights and diameters should be taken of each tree so that they can be tracked over<br />

time.<br />

• Any new “volunteer” trees or shrubs that were not planted (ie: naturally established)<br />

should be noted as such and measured as above.<br />

• Cover estimates should be made for each woody species within the plot as well as a<br />

total percent cover of all woody species for the entire plot, as this provides an<br />

indication of progress towards canopy closure.<br />

• A complete species list for the plot should be created to measure changes in plant<br />

diversity. These data can be analyzed using an appropriate diversity index.<br />

• One 1m by 1m plot should be located in each of the four corners of the larger plot to<br />

measure the percent cover of all herbaceous and graminoid species. Calculate<br />

importance values for each species to note changes over time<br />

• Additional information should be recorded on water levels, wildlife use, damaging agents<br />

(disease, insects, browse, etc.) and signs of disturbance.<br />

Annotated Resources<br />

Barry, W.J., A.S. Garlo, C.A. Wood. 1996. Duplicating the Mound-and-Pool<br />

Microtopography of Forested Wetlands. Restoration and Management Notes<br />

14:1, 14-21.<br />

• provides construction details for pits and mounds method<br />

Bellemare, J., G. Motzkin, and D.R. Foster. 2002. Legacies of the agricultural past in<br />

the forested present: an assessment of historical land-use effects on rich<br />

mesic forests. Journal of Biogeography 29: 1401 – 1420.<br />

• describes effect of historical uses on soil chemistry, even when forest cover is reestablished<br />

– see fewer nutrient-demanding herbs with more recent disturbance<br />

• forest herbs need to re-establish through seed-dispersal – dispersal method can affect reestablishment<br />

success, along with rates of seed production and establishment requirements<br />

• establishment also depends on distance from primary forest and refugia (hedgerows)<br />

• provides good species lists and seed dispersal classification<br />

McLachlin, S.M. and D.R. Bazely. 2001. Recovery patterns of understorey herbs and<br />

their use as indicators of deciduous forest regeneration. Conservation Biology<br />

15: 98-110.<br />

• describes microsite needs of native understorey herbs<br />

Verheyen, K., O. Honnay, G. Motzkin, M. Hermy, and D.R. Foster. 2003. Response of<br />

forest plant species to land-use change: a life-history trait-based approach.<br />

Journal of Ecology 91: 563-577.<br />

• describes how specific life-history traits of different species affect regeneration<br />

<strong>Sandbanks</strong> <strong>Veg</strong>etation Management <strong>Plan</strong> A-29<br />

<strong>Ontario</strong> <strong>Parks</strong>, SE Zone<br />

2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!