09.05.2014 Views

nureg/cr-6700 - Oak Ridge National Laboratory

nureg/cr-6700 - Oak Ridge National Laboratory

nureg/cr-6700 - Oak Ridge National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 6<br />

Summary<br />

6 SUMMARY<br />

This report has presented the importance rankings of the various actinides, fission products, and activation<br />

products that are important to <strong>cr</strong>iticality safety, decay-heat analysis, and cask-shielding analysis. The work<br />

is largely an extension of previous ranking studies (Ref. 9) to assess higher fuel enrichment and burnup<br />

regimes, and has focused on the changes in nuclide importance with in<strong>cr</strong>easing burnup, rather than cooling<br />

time, in the respective analysis areas. In addition, the present study has restricted the decay times to between<br />

2 and 100 years, the regime relevant to spent fuel transport and interim storage.<br />

Table 13 and Table 14 present summaries of the actinides, fission products, and activation products that have<br />

importance rankings greater than 0.1% in any of the application areas. Nuclides having a relative importance<br />

greater than 10% of the total are designated as high ranking (H), those between 1% and 10% are medium<br />

ranking (M), and those less than 1% are low ranking (L). These designations are provided for a reference<br />

low-burnup fuel having 3-wt % 235 U and 20-GWd/t and high-burnup fuel having 5-wt % 235 U and<br />

70-GWd/t to give a quick indication of large changes in rank with in<strong>cr</strong>easing burnup. A reference cooling<br />

time of 20 years was used in generating these rankings. Thus, the tables do not include some of the shortlived<br />

radionuclides important in decay heat and shielding analyses and do not indicate large changes in<br />

nuclide ranking which do not result in a change in the ranking group (i.e., groups are very broad). These<br />

tables should therefore only be used as an approximate guide to nuclide importance for longer cooling times<br />

(about 20 years).<br />

One of the most significant changes in the spent fuel characteristics associated with high burnup, relative to<br />

conventional-burnup fuel, is the dramatic in<strong>cr</strong>ease in the 244 Cm concentration in extended-burnup fuel, which<br />

has an important impact for both decay-heat rates and shielding applications. For decay heating the<br />

contribution of 244 Cm in<strong>cr</strong>eases from typically about 1% of the total at low-to-moderate burnup and cooling<br />

times less than 50 years, to over 10% of the total at high burnup. A large in<strong>cr</strong>ease in the importance of<br />

238 Pu to decay heat is also observed for high-burnup fuel, and it can contribute from 10% to about 30% of the<br />

total decay heat for high-burnup fuel. The effect of the in<strong>cr</strong>eased 244 Cm inventory is also responsible for the<br />

large in<strong>cr</strong>ease in the neutron source term (spontaneous fission) at high burnup relative to the gamma rays.<br />

The analysis of a steel transport cask indicates that the contribution from 244 Cm can in<strong>cr</strong>ease from 3% at<br />

20 GWd/t to over 60% of the total dose rate at 60 GWd/t after 20-years cooling. Consequently, existing<br />

validation data for low- and moderate-burnup fuel may not be representative of extended burnup fuel since it<br />

may not accurately represent the contribution from 244 Cm and other potentially important radionuclides.<br />

Any calculational uncertainties or biases based on validation studies for lower-burnup fuel need to be<br />

reviewed with respect to the changes in the underlying fuel compositions with enrichment and burnup that<br />

contribute to the response.<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!