Reporter - Oregon State Bar

86 In re Schenck 5
\ *
--%
B
In Re: 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT '- 3
OF THE STATE OF OREGON
.J
Complaint as to the Conduct of Case No. 89-75
1
RONALD D. SCHENCK, 1 STIPULATION FOR DISCIPLINE 9
-3
1
Accused.
1
"at
$
;ZJ
Ronald D. Schenck (hereinafter the Accused) and the Oregon State Bar
7
(hereinafter the Bar) hereby stipulate to the following matters pursuant to Rule of
.4
Procedure 3.6k).
The Oregon State Bar was created and exists by virtue of the laws of the
State of Oregon and is, and at all times mentioned herein was, authorized to carry
out the provisions of ORS Chapter 9 relating to the discipline of attorneys.
2.
The Accused, Ronald D. Schenck, is, and at all times mentioned herein,
was an attorney at law, duly admitted by the Oregon Supreme Court to the
practice of law in Oregon on May 1, 1979, and has been a member of the
Oregon State Bar since that time.
3.
The Accused enters into this Stipulation for Discipline freely and voluntarily.
4.
On September 22, 1990, the State Professional Responsibility Board (SPRB)
authorized the filing of a formal complaint alleging that the Accused committed
conflict of interest violations contrary to former DR 5-105(A) [current DR 5-
105(C) and (E)] of the Code of Professional Responsibility. A formal complaint
(no. 89-75) was subsequently filed by the Oregon State Bar on February 18,