You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Take</strong> <strong>Avanti</strong> <strong><strong>Fi</strong>ve</strong><br />
1<br />
By Keijo Tanskanen<br />
<strong>Avanti</strong> V and ebony look! Two solid terminals on the back side!<br />
– That is enough!<br />
Foreword<br />
I have always respected Audio Physic’s way to plan and build speakers and I<br />
have had the great pleasure of owning both the Virgo III and <strong>Avanti</strong> III which I<br />
really liked a lot. This brand of speakers has easily met my expectations and<br />
preferences, and even more importantly, AP speakers have been really worth<br />
the money.<br />
Of course there has been room for slight criticism, too. For example, the Caldera<br />
was very sensitive to the size of listening room and it´s arrangements, some<br />
models like <strong>Avanti</strong> III and Virgo III have had a slight lack of warmth or tonality<br />
when compared to other top speakers, and Scorpio never reached the resolution<br />
and accuracy of the Virgo III and <strong>Avanti</strong> III etc. Anyway, the entirety is what<br />
matters, and Audio Physic has really realized that.<br />
<strong>Avanti</strong> III was updated several times during its production, and the latest versions<br />
were clearly better than the first ones. This may be one reason why it has been<br />
renamed <strong>Avanti</strong> V now and not <strong>Avanti</strong> IV. Anyway, the construction has been<br />
changed so much that it alone will give a reason to jump to the model V.<br />
So, I think I really have some background for the <strong>Avanti</strong> V review!
2<br />
Design<br />
<strong>Avanti</strong> V has a completely new cabinet design, new elements and crossovers. It<br />
also features a more rigid enclosure, sophisticated structure and resonance<br />
dampening. The beautiful look is luckily the same as before!<br />
For more information, please follow the link:<br />
http://www.audiophysic.de/avanti/index_e.html.<br />
Placing the speakers<br />
Audio Physic speakers have always liked a wide placing. <strong>Avanti</strong> V is not an<br />
exception. I also tried an ordinary triangle-formed placing and it worked perfectly<br />
too.<br />
The listening room was 45 square meters with partial acoustic treatment. This<br />
time it was impossible to place the speakers closer than 2,25 meters to the rear<br />
wall (there were too much other heavy stuff to move), but fortunately it was<br />
possible to change the place of the listening chair. The speakers were placed<br />
1,6m from the sidewalls and the distance between the speakers was 3,6meters.<br />
After some very first listening, I decided to move the chair a bit forward, because<br />
the bass was too dominant near the wall. The best balance was then achieved<br />
and the chair took a place 3,9 meters from the speakers.<br />
The speaker pair we used was burned in some tens of hours.<br />
Listening session<br />
The AP family sound was immediately noticed from the very first moments of the<br />
session. It was a relief to hear that the strengths of the previous models were still<br />
present. But now there was something else as well!<br />
Some Jazz first! Diana Krall’s voice (Love Scenes, IMP 12342) was clearly<br />
warmer, the bass was more impressive (and I would bet it goes a bit lower than<br />
<strong>Avanti</strong> III’s did) and the treble was even more realistic than before. Diana’s piano<br />
was delicious and it’s hammer hits were easily available for my ears, but some<br />
other speakers were able to produce even more realistic hammer hits. When I<br />
tried George Duke’s After Hours (WB 947073), the previous results were verified,<br />
and exceptionally clean treble really made the triangles sing!<br />
Where the <strong>Avanti</strong> V really shines is on Live recordings. Frank Marino’s Live (Axe<br />
Killer 3065028) and Helborg, Lane and Sipe’s Temporal Analogues of Paradise<br />
(Bardo 136) are perfectly mastered, excellent and brutal Live records. When I<br />
played those with <strong>Avanti</strong> V I was sure about one thing: <strong>Avanti</strong> V is right up at the<br />
top when talking about soundstaging and transparency.
The feeling was so “live” during the session that all the memories from the<br />
Marino’s real concerts returned to my mind. In those areas <strong>Avanti</strong> V is<br />
comparable to any speaker at any price class I’ve heard.<br />
The speed and control abilities of the <strong>Avanti</strong> V do not quite reach the level of the<br />
best speakers I’ve heard (there is the Kronos on the AP’s line too!). But, I<br />
believe, this can be noticed only when one has experience of a certain kind of<br />
dynamic monsters like Wilsons. Despite being easy recognition, these slight<br />
flaws never disturbed me seriously.<br />
Then it was time to try some classical music. I have always praised Reference<br />
Records´ production. My favourite cd for tests is RR Respighi (RR-95CD). It has<br />
tremendous dynamics, a sound without compromises with great music. <strong>Avanti</strong> V<br />
did it very well. Again, transparency and soundstaging took my thoughts away.<br />
When it was time to attack, <strong>Avanti</strong> V did a fine job. The explosive big drums were<br />
natural but they didn’t quite achieve the last bit of the dynamics, which for<br />
example I think Wilsons, some Acapella models and Avantgardes do better.<br />
Anyway the lower register was impressive when one takes into account the size<br />
of the speaker.<br />
I did not find anything bad to say about the balance of the <strong>Avanti</strong> V, but in this<br />
issue one must be careful in setup and of course bigger rooms are naturally<br />
better. In my session the midrange and treble were absolutely clear and in very<br />
good balance. The last record was YL’s Uusi Joulu (<strong>Fi</strong>nlandia Records 3984-<br />
29710-2) which has some nice choral music. The space of the church was so<br />
evident and the singers were so natural. I noticed some very slight roundness in<br />
male voices but female ones were crystal clear. The session was at its end and I<br />
was convinced about the abilities of the <strong>Avanti</strong> V.<br />
Sound<br />
Balance: Neutral (the predecessor was neutral too, but now it is even improved).<br />
Resolution: Excellent overall resolution. Some slight roundness may exist on the<br />
lower register.<br />
Transparency: Marvellous! Really lifelike and beautiful presentation.<br />
Treble: Now the treble is among the best I’ve heard so far from ”traditional”<br />
tweeters! Even though the <strong>Avanti</strong> III already had exceptionally clean and<br />
shimmering treble, it is now even better and more realistic.<br />
Midrange: No bad words at all. <strong>Avanti</strong> V is more balanced in the midrange than<br />
it’s predecessor. I’ve heard a bit more realistic piano and male vocals from some<br />
other top speakers.<br />
Bass: The bass of the <strong>Avanti</strong> V goes very low. During the session I never felt any<br />
need for subwoofers. The quality of bass is very good although I’ve heard more<br />
impressive presentations before.<br />
3
Dynamics: Excellent, but did not quite achieve the level of the best speakers.<br />
Control of the dynamical blows has been remarkably improved.<br />
Spatial information: It is hard to describe how well this relatively small speaker<br />
does in this area! It is just very near the best speakers. The vertical dimensions<br />
of soundstaging are now larger than what the predecessor had.<br />
Summary<br />
Audio Physic has done a careful job. Now the highly valued <strong>Avanti</strong> III has an<br />
excellent successor, which it really deserved. As David Brubeck’s classic song<br />
says; ”<strong>Take</strong> <strong><strong>Fi</strong>ve</strong>” for listening. It is really worth of trying, but be careful, you need<br />
to have at least 20 square meters of listening space and hopefully not too many<br />
stonewalls which may deteriorate the frequency balance. Naturally one can have<br />
a better speaker but for that one needs much more money! Very highly<br />
recommended.<br />
Technical Details<br />
• Floor standing 3 ½ way bass reflex speaker<br />
• The Hyper-Holographic Cone Tweeter (50 kHz -3 dB frequency response)<br />
• Dual 5,9” mid-range drivers with Active Cone Damping (ACD)<br />
• Double push-push bass configuration with four 7” woofers per speaker<br />
• Height: 1110 mm; Width: 240 mm; Depth: 420 mm<br />
• Weight < 40 kg<br />
• Power rating: 250 W<br />
• Frequency response: 28 Hz - 50 kHz (-3 dB)<br />
• Sensitivity: 89 dB<br />
• Price: 10 950€ (ebony 12 800€) in <strong>Fi</strong>nland<br />
Used equipment<br />
• CD player: Burmester 001<br />
• Stereo AMP: Burmester 911<br />
• Interconnects and Speaker cables: Transparent Reference<br />
• Power <strong>Fi</strong>lter: Burmester 948, Power cables from Transparent<br />
4