12.05.2014 Views

Project Report – Fiji 2010 - Pacific Health Voices

Project Report – Fiji 2010 - Pacific Health Voices

Project Report – Fiji 2010 - Pacific Health Voices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 4: Selected <strong>Health</strong> Facility Sites by Division – VAW Study, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

<strong>Health</strong> Facility Divisions Total<br />

Northern Western Central and Eastern Facility No.<br />

National &<br />

Labasa Lautoka Hospital Colonial War Memorial 4<br />

Divisional<br />

Hospital<br />

Hospital, St. Giles Hospital<br />

hospitals<br />

Sub-divisional Savusavu; Nadi Hosp; Ba Mission; Levuka Hospital; 6<br />

hospitals<br />

Taveuni Tavua Hospital,<br />

<strong>Health</strong> centres Seaqaqa HC Korolevu HC, Nausori HC,<br />

4<br />

(HC)<br />

Valelevu HC<br />

Nursing stations Dogotuki NS Naqalimare NS - 2<br />

(NS)<br />

Total 5 6 5 16<br />

Source: Fieldwork, Aug-Sept, <strong>2010</strong><br />

The type of data collected for this part of the study involved tallying the total number of<br />

individual cases presented at each of the facilities. For each of the sites, tallies were recorded<br />

for each patient’s age, ethnicity, marital status, urban or rural residence, occupation,<br />

complaints presented at the health facility, the types of abuse and injury presented, the<br />

outcome for the patient, whether the case was reported to the police or not and, the<br />

identification of the perpetrator of the injury. These variables were chosen because they were<br />

the common information required of each patient at the facilities.<br />

The information was collected from various handwritten physical records kept at each of the<br />

facilities and were manually counted for this study. It is important to note at the outset that the<br />

quality and accuracy of the data gathered for this study largely depended on the recording<br />

methods adopted by the health facilities. While there were instances where all of the variables<br />

were recorded for each case, there were many more where the information about each patient<br />

(including the types of injuries and abuses suffered) was sketchy and brief therefore not<br />

providing much needed information.<br />

Furthermore, there was also the issue and possibility of repeat cases presented at the health<br />

facilities. Where FWCC has meticulously noted the number of repeat cases presented to their<br />

organization over the years (Table 2), there is no such indication appearing in the health facility<br />

records to facilitate accuracy in record keeping and importantly, to effect sound treatment and<br />

care for a VAW patient. Therefore there is likelihood that there had been double, triple or more<br />

counting for a single patient in this study because the study did not record the names of VAW<br />

patients.<br />

The importance of accurate record and data keeping must not be underestimated. There is a<br />

need to maintain timely and accurate records at the health facilities to effect wholesome<br />

treatment and to assist in behavior change interventions for health care workers, violence and<br />

gender-based NGOs, government and the general public.<br />

28 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!