ASAB 29-3 Thomas Rohner Michael Lazopoulos - Pestalozzi ...
ASAB 29-3 Thomas Rohner Michael Lazopoulos - Pestalozzi ...
ASAB 29-3 Thomas Rohner Michael Lazopoulos - Pestalozzi ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
T. ROHNER & M. LAZOPOULOS, RESPONDENT’S REFUSAL TO PAY ITS SHARE OF THE<br />
ADVANCE ON COSTS<br />
Date<br />
Rules<br />
Case (form of<br />
the decision)<br />
02.09.1996 ICC Rules ICC Case 7289<br />
10.09.1999 ICC Rules<br />
undated<br />
[2000]<br />
ICC Rules<br />
27.03.2001 ICC Rules<br />
17.06.2002 ICC Rules<br />
ICC Case 10169<br />
(order no. 1)<br />
ICC Case 10526<br />
(partial award)<br />
ICC Case 10671,<br />
(partial award)<br />
ICC Case 11330<br />
(partial award)<br />
Source<br />
Revue de<br />
l’arbitrage<br />
(4/2002), at 1004<br />
unpublished<br />
Journal du Droit<br />
International<br />
(2001), at 1182<br />
ASA Bull.<br />
(2001), at 288<br />
MATTHEW<br />
SECOMB, Awards<br />
and Orders<br />
Dealing with the<br />
Advance on<br />
Costs in ICC<br />
Arbitration, ICC<br />
ICArb. Bull. 1<br />
(2003), at 63<br />
Summary<br />
Parties have a contractual<br />
obligation to pay their<br />
shares of the advance on<br />
costs. Request for<br />
reimbursement granted.<br />
Request for<br />
reimbursement granted in<br />
form of an order to avoid<br />
the formality of an ICC<br />
award. Claimant can apply<br />
for an interim award if<br />
respondent fails to comply<br />
with the order.<br />
Payment of advance on<br />
costs is a contractual<br />
obligation between the<br />
parties. Request to order<br />
respondent to pay its share<br />
of advance on costs is<br />
neither an interim nor a<br />
provisional measure, but a<br />
final decision.<br />
Payment of advance on<br />
costs is a contractual<br />
obligation between<br />
parties. Request for<br />
reimbursement granted.<br />
Payment of advance on<br />
costs is a contractual<br />
obligation between<br />
parties. Respondent<br />
exceptionally excused<br />
from paying its share<br />
because claimant<br />
conducted certain<br />
corporate restructuring to<br />
the extent that it will be<br />
insolvent in the event that<br />
it loses the case. Request<br />
dismissed.<br />
<strong>29</strong> ASA BULLETIN 3/2011 (SEPTEMBER) 571