21.05.2014 Views

Master thesis - UBC Physics & Astronomy

Master thesis - UBC Physics & Astronomy

Master thesis - UBC Physics & Astronomy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 M. Alexandersen : <strong>Master</strong> <strong>thesis</strong><br />

Fourier analysis successfully. The periodicity should repeat at least 10<br />

times over the data. If the dynamical image is binned with 10 time bins,<br />

that will, for good data as for GRB070524, leave just 50-150 counts per<br />

time interval. A large part of these are then in the background, and not<br />

in the actual expanding halo. So not very many counts are available for<br />

each peak.<br />

Furthermore, the halo fades as it expands. This would also be a problem<br />

for the Fourier analysis method, as the periodicity is not really periodic<br />

then.<br />

Last, but not least, the Swift data is full of holes. The size of the<br />

holes vary, but for most observation, more than half of every ∼ 5400 s<br />

orbit of the Swift satellite is unobservable, because the Earth blocks the<br />

view. These holes destroys the periodicity of the one dimensional data<br />

strip in that there are holes where there should have been a peak. One<br />

cannot simply ignore and leave out the time interval where there is no<br />

observation, because then there will not be a constant increase in θ 2 from<br />

one bin to the next 3 . The only way to get around this problem would be<br />

to use time intervals so large that there are always counts in every time<br />

interval. The Swift orbital period, 5400 s, would be good. This, however,<br />

limits the usefulness, as very few Swift GRB observations stretch much<br />

more than 3-5 orbits, and even good haloes as GRB050724 are faded<br />

significantly by then.<br />

Fig. 16 demonstrates well why even good Swift data, as GRB050724, is<br />

not suited for this method. The fading of the peaks is very large, and by<br />

the 5th time interval the peak cannot be seen. If the data in Fig. 16 was<br />

to be split to produce 10 peaks, most of the peaks would be vanishingly<br />

faint. Depending on where the intervals are put, and their size, some of<br />

the intervals would be empty or nearly empty, because of the unobserved<br />

periods.<br />

So, in the end, there are many reasons why this method cannot be<br />

used on Swift data. XMM data, such as the observation of GRB031203<br />

that revealed two expanding rings, have a much higher count rate, and<br />

3 Imagine the dynamical image in Fig. 23 without the holes. The expanding<br />

ring would not be a straight line. In the same way, the one dimensional data<br />

would not be periodic.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!