22.05.2014 Views

Say who everyone is as you go along - Faculty of Philosophy ...

Say who everyone is as you go along - Faculty of Philosophy ...

Say who everyone is as you go along - Faculty of Philosophy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6<br />

Th<strong>is</strong> seemed to open the possibility <strong>of</strong> sweeping away the old superstitions <strong>of</strong><br />

theology and metaphysics forever.<br />

It <strong>is</strong> possible to d<strong>is</strong>cern four ph<strong>as</strong>es <strong>of</strong> Nietzsche's life, three sane and one mad:<br />

an anti Socratic ph<strong>as</strong>e, a positiv<strong>is</strong>tic pro-Socratic ph<strong>as</strong>e, a relativ<strong>is</strong>t and pragmat<strong>is</strong>t<br />

Ph<strong>as</strong>e, and the final mad ph<strong>as</strong>e.<br />

The anti-Socratic Ph<strong>as</strong>e l<strong>as</strong>ts from 1869 to 1876. While holding the Chair <strong>of</strong><br />

Philology at the University <strong>of</strong> B<strong>as</strong>el (1864-1879) Nietzsche v<strong>is</strong>ited Richard Wagner<br />

at Lake Lucerne. In The Birth <strong>of</strong> Tragedy from the Spirit <strong>of</strong> Music (1872) Nietzsche<br />

searched for a new non-Chr<strong>is</strong>tian ethics in the Ancient Greeks and subsequently in<br />

Wagner. Nietzsche contr<strong>as</strong>ts Greek culture before and after Socrates with German<br />

culture before and after Wagner. He argues that life <strong>is</strong> essentially tragic and<br />

inexplicable but transmuted by art. The affirmation <strong>of</strong> life through creative genius<br />

transmutes life into an aesthetic phenomenon. Creative genius <strong>is</strong> the <strong>go</strong>al and<br />

justification <strong>of</strong> culture. The Dionysian and the Appollonian were fused in the<br />

tragedies <strong>of</strong> Aeschylus before the advent <strong>of</strong> Socrates effected their bifurcation. If<br />

their fusion could not be reinstated, it <strong>is</strong> a model to be emulated. During th<strong>is</strong> ph<strong>as</strong>e,<br />

Nietzsche w<strong>as</strong> heavily influenced by Schopenhauer. In Untimely Meditations (1873-<br />

6), Nietzsche <strong>is</strong> critical <strong>of</strong> the German theologican David Strauss (1808-1874),<br />

author <strong>of</strong> the controversial Leben Jesu (Life <strong>of</strong> Jesus) (1835) and advocates<br />

Schopenhauer’s philosophy, and Wagner’s opera and operatic theory. In 1870<br />

Nietzsche served <strong>as</strong> a volunteer medical orderly in the Franco-Prussian War.<br />

The positiv<strong>is</strong>tic pro-Socratic ph<strong>as</strong>e l<strong>as</strong>ts from 1876 to 1883. Nietzsche resigned<br />

from the chair at B<strong>as</strong>el in 1879 through ill-health and spent 1879-1889 in<br />

Switzerland, Italy, Germany, devoting h<strong>is</strong> time to writing. The book Human, All-too-<br />

Human (1898-9) <strong>is</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>oundly anti-metaphysical and material<strong>is</strong>t and includes<br />

natural<strong>is</strong>tic explanations <strong>of</strong> morality. For example: that a d<strong>is</strong>tinction <strong>is</strong> drawn<br />

between <strong>go</strong>od and evil <strong>is</strong> a necessary condition for a society. Conscience <strong>is</strong> the<br />

internal<strong>is</strong>ed voice <strong>of</strong> secular, not divine, authority: the father, the mother, the teacher.<br />

Daybreak (1881) <strong>is</strong> a tirade against ‘morality’. There <strong>is</strong> no God, no responsibility and<br />

no morality. Nietzsche undermines our confidence that in acting we have knowledge<br />

<strong>of</strong> the essential nature <strong>of</strong> our actions. Th<strong>is</strong> <strong>is</strong> a 'terrible truth'. (116) Our actions are<br />

never what they appear to be. Nor <strong>is</strong> there any security in the rest <strong>of</strong> knowledge:<br />

Neither the external world nor the internal world <strong>is</strong> <strong>as</strong> it appears. There <strong>is</strong> no escape<br />

from the perspectives <strong>of</strong> own subjectivity. Nietzsche h<strong>as</strong> an ex<strong>is</strong>tential<strong>is</strong>t<br />

appreciation <strong>of</strong> the lived reality <strong>of</strong> one’s own ex<strong>is</strong>tence. He says that around every<br />

being there <strong>is</strong> a circle, which h<strong>as</strong> a mid point unique to that being, but th<strong>is</strong> entails a<br />

qu<strong>as</strong>i-solips<strong>is</strong>m which makes knowledge impossible. Each <strong>of</strong> us <strong>is</strong> constrained by<br />

their senses <strong>as</strong> if in a pr<strong>is</strong>on. When Nietzsche says 'It <strong>is</strong> all <strong>of</strong> it an error' (D 117) he<br />

does not mean we can be even confident <strong>of</strong> th<strong>is</strong>. H<strong>is</strong> sceptic<strong>is</strong>m implies that any<br />

belief we hold could in principle be m<strong>is</strong>taken. Our so called ‘knowledge’ ex<strong>is</strong>ts only<br />

in relation to the kind <strong>of</strong> senses we have:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!