22.05.2014 Views

Say who everyone is as you go along - Faculty of Philosophy ...

Say who everyone is as you go along - Faculty of Philosophy ...

Say who everyone is as you go along - Faculty of Philosophy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8<br />

might be induced by shocks to rational thought such <strong>as</strong> exposure to irresolvable<br />

puzzles called koans (in the Rinzai school <strong>of</strong> Zen) or by sitting motionless for long<br />

periods (in Soto Zen). Every person <strong>is</strong> already enlightened so it would be a<br />

m<strong>is</strong>understanding <strong>of</strong> Enlightenment to construe it <strong>as</strong> a future state to be attained.<br />

Enlightenment <strong>is</strong> realized by detachment from desire and habitual means to end<br />

thinking, and their eventual cessation. Th<strong>is</strong> cannot be done by will power, only <strong>as</strong> a<br />

consequence <strong>of</strong> meditation or other Zen Buddh<strong>is</strong>t practices. Trying to be<br />

Enlightened, <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> construing Enlightenment <strong>as</strong> future, are obstacles to<br />

Enlightenment, that <strong>is</strong>, being at one with one’s true Enlightened state. Once the<br />

present h<strong>as</strong> been pol<strong>is</strong>hed clean like a mirror by meditation, Enlightenment <strong>is</strong><br />

d<strong>is</strong>closed <strong>as</strong> already all here now. Although Zen <strong>is</strong> intensely practical, experiential<br />

and non-lingu<strong>is</strong>tic, and the medium <strong>of</strong> philosophy <strong>is</strong> language, in its ins<strong>is</strong>tence on the<br />

ineffable Zen h<strong>as</strong> an affinity with the later Aquin<strong>as</strong> and the early Wittgenstein <strong>who</strong><br />

each thought philosophy reaches a certain limit in what cannot be said.<br />

Zen w<strong>as</strong> founded in China by Bodhidharma, <strong>who</strong> brought the doctrines <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Lanka-Vatara Sutra from India the late 5th century. The genes<strong>is</strong> <strong>of</strong> Zen arguably lies<br />

in the fusion <strong>of</strong> Bodhidharma’s Buddh<strong>is</strong>m with Chinese Tao. Bodhidharma w<strong>as</strong><br />

succeeded <strong>as</strong> m<strong>as</strong>ter by Hui-k'o (487—593). The Zen emph<strong>as</strong><strong>is</strong> on practice rather<br />

than doctrine <strong>is</strong> well shown by Hui-neng (638—713), the sixth patriarch <strong>of</strong> Chinese<br />

Zen, <strong>who</strong> w<strong>as</strong> both enlightened and illiterate. Ma-tsu, Nan-chuan, Huang-po, Lin-chi,<br />

and Chao-chou were m<strong>as</strong>ters during the <strong>go</strong>lden age <strong>of</strong> Zen in the 8th and 9th<br />

centuries. Scripture and doctrine were regarded <strong>as</strong> unimportant, or even <strong>as</strong><br />

hinderances, to the realization <strong>of</strong> one’s Enlightenment. Instead, there w<strong>as</strong> an<br />

emph<strong>as</strong><strong>is</strong> on self-d<strong>is</strong>cipline, oral instruction and testing dialogue. Sometimes a monk<br />

might be suddenly hit with a cane, for example if their alert meditation shaded <strong>of</strong>f<br />

into doziness.<br />

There w<strong>as</strong> severe persecution <strong>of</strong> Buddh<strong>is</strong>m in China in 845. However, Zen not<br />

only survived due to its <strong>is</strong>olation in mountain mon<strong>as</strong>teries, but w<strong>as</strong> left <strong>as</strong> the most<br />

practiced form <strong>of</strong> Buddh<strong>is</strong>m in China. As a result <strong>of</strong> the persecution, Zen divided into<br />

two principal schools: Lin-chi and Ts'ao-tung. These were brought to Japan in the<br />

14 th century where they were known <strong>as</strong> Rinzai Zen and Soto Zen respectively.<br />

In Soto Zen there <strong>is</strong> an emph<strong>as</strong><strong>is</strong> on just sitting. As early <strong>as</strong> Bodhidharma there<br />

had been the practice <strong>of</strong> looking at the wall. (The present author remembers long<br />

periods sitting looking at a whitew<strong>as</strong>hed wall in the 1970’s. I, and others, <strong>as</strong>ked<br />

‘Why are we looking at the wall?’ Our monk would only ever reply ‘Look at the<br />

wall!’) Just sitting <strong>is</strong> the kind <strong>of</strong> meditation known <strong>as</strong> zazen. That there <strong>is</strong> no point, or<br />

no overtly stated point, to zazen allows a me<strong>as</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> deconditioning, a falling away<br />

<strong>of</strong> the repetitive ordinary mind. It would not be completely wrong to say zazen<br />

therefore h<strong>as</strong> a point after all: deconditioning, detachment, Enlightenment, but th<strong>is</strong><br />

could be m<strong>is</strong>leading. If zazen <strong>is</strong> done with th<strong>is</strong> (or anything) <strong>as</strong> a <strong>go</strong>al in mind,<br />

paradoxically, ‘the <strong>go</strong>al’ cannot be ‘reached’. Indeed, <strong>as</strong> we have seen,<br />

Enlightenment <strong>is</strong> not a <strong>go</strong>al in the sense <strong>of</strong> a future state. The gate <strong>is</strong> a gateless gate.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!