22.05.2014 Views

9 Ways to Check the Quality of a Link

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9 <strong>Ways</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Check</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Link</strong><br />

Learn how <strong>to</strong> check your website's link pr<strong>of</strong>ile in only 9 steps<br />

So many Google Updates and websites losing visibility on search engine results have made most<br />

SEOs question <strong>the</strong>mselves, “what still works <strong>to</strong> improve a website’s ranking”. On Page and content<br />

marketing are a trend, but <strong>the</strong>y are not<br />

enough. As long as Matt Cutts says backlinks<br />

are relevant <strong>to</strong> ranking, you’ll have <strong>to</strong> keep<br />

building links. But only high quality links can<br />

boost rankings and that’s why you have <strong>to</strong><br />

constantly check who is linking <strong>to</strong> your<br />

website.<br />

In his third LRT case study, Rick Lomas<br />

presents 9 very practical ways <strong>to</strong> check <strong>the</strong><br />

quality <strong>of</strong> your backlinks including detailed<br />

how-<strong>to</strong>s on using <strong>the</strong> <strong>Link</strong>ResearchTools for<br />

your link check.<br />

We look forward <strong>to</strong> your feedback and<br />

always appreciate you sharing <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong><br />

our Certified LRT Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals.<br />

Enjoy & Learn<br />

Chris<strong>to</strong>ph C. Cemper<br />

A Case Study by Certified LRT Pr<strong>of</strong>essional, Rick Lomas<br />

May 15, 2014


Table <strong>of</strong> contents<br />

H1 Headline .................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

Are Back <strong>Link</strong>s still relevant <strong>to</strong> search results? ............................................................................................ 2<br />

<strong>Check</strong>ing <strong>Link</strong>s using <strong>Link</strong> Research Tools ..................................................................................................... 3<br />

The <strong>Link</strong> Research Tools Metrics ........................................................................................................................ 4<br />

Basic SEO stats ....................................................................................................................................................... 4<br />

Ranking Keyword Metrics ................................................................................................................................. 4<br />

Onpage-<strong>Link</strong>ing Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 4<br />

Google Indexing, Ranking and Legacy <strong>Link</strong> Metrics ................................................................................ 4<br />

<strong>Link</strong> Source Country & City............................................................................................................................... 5<br />

Domain Registration Details ............................................................................................................................ 5<br />

Authority Backlinks ............................................................................................................................................. 5<br />

<strong>Link</strong> Velocity and <strong>Link</strong> Velocity Trends ....................................................................................................... 6<br />

Where <strong>to</strong> find all <strong>the</strong>se metrics in <strong>Link</strong> Research Tools ............................................................................ 6<br />

Choosing Metrics in BLP .................................................................................................................................... 7<br />

Choosing Metrics in CLA .................................................................................................................................... 7<br />

Choosing Metrics in CKA ................................................................................................................................. 12<br />

Using <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x <strong>to</strong> check <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> backlinks .................................................................................. 13<br />

1 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a page that is blacklisted or banned? .............................................................................. 15<br />

2 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a page that is dangerous? ..................................................................................................... 15<br />

3 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a page <strong>of</strong> a weak domain? .................................................................................................... 16<br />

3.1 Your link is on a very weak page that has no external links...................................................... 16<br />

3.2 Your link is on a very weak domain .................................................................................................... 17<br />

3.3 The link is on a young domain .............................................................................................................. 18<br />

3.4 The link is on an old, but weak domain ............................................................................................. 19<br />

4 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a domain with a penalty? ..................................................................................................... 20<br />

4.1 The domain is not indexed in Google ................................................................................................. 20<br />

4.2 Your link is on a domain which is very weak because <strong>of</strong> a penalty ........................................ 21<br />

4.3 The link is on a page that doesn’t rank for its own title .............................................................. 21<br />

4.4 The link is on a page with no Google PageRank ............................................................................. 21<br />

4.5 The link is on a page that has been banned from Google ........................................................... 22<br />

Page 1


5 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a domain associated with a bad neighbourhood? ...................................................... 22<br />

5.1 Domain’s Theme is listed as suspicious (Hacking, Suspicious or Pornography) or high<br />

risk ........................................................................................................................................................................... 22<br />

6 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a spammy direc<strong>to</strong>ry? ............................................................................................................. 23<br />

6.1 <strong>Link</strong> Direc<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>Link</strong>s.................................................................................................................................. 24<br />

6.2 Article Direc<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>Link</strong>s ............................................................................................................................. 24<br />

6.3 <strong>Link</strong>s coming from typical link voting direc<strong>to</strong>ries ........................................................................ 25<br />

7 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a page with a massive amount <strong>of</strong> outgoing links? ...................................................... 25<br />

8 Is <strong>the</strong> link anchor text unnatural or suspicious? .................................................................................... 26<br />

8.1 Is <strong>the</strong> link highly unnatural? ................................................................................................................. 26<br />

8.2 Sitewide Footer <strong>Link</strong>s ............................................................................................................................... 27<br />

8.3 Hidden image links .................................................................................................................................... 28<br />

8.4 Are you overdoing <strong>the</strong> Money Keyword anchor text? ................................................................. 29<br />

8.5 Are you overdoing <strong>the</strong> Compound Keyword anchor text? ......................................................... 29<br />

8.6 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a spammy forum?............................................................................................................ 29<br />

9 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a domain that is part <strong>of</strong> a link network? ........................................................................ 29<br />

9.1 Does it have <strong>the</strong> same IP or Class C IP as some <strong>of</strong> your o<strong>the</strong>r links? ...................................... 29<br />

9.2 Do you have links that come from domains with <strong>the</strong> same domain name registrant? ... 30<br />

9.3 Do you have links that come from domains with <strong>the</strong> same domain name server? .......... 30<br />

9.4 Does <strong>the</strong> source domain have a negative <strong>Link</strong> Velocity? ............................................................ 30<br />

9.5 Does <strong>the</strong> source domain have <strong>the</strong> same Google Analytics code as o<strong>the</strong>r linking domains?<br />

.................................................................................................................................................................................. 31<br />

9.6 Does <strong>the</strong> source domain have <strong>the</strong> same Google Adsense code as o<strong>the</strong>r linking domains?<br />

.................................................................................................................................................................................. 31<br />

9.7 Does <strong>the</strong> source domain have <strong>the</strong> same Website Footprints as o<strong>the</strong>r linking domains?<br />

.................................................................................................................................................................................. 31<br />

Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................ 31<br />

Author Bio: ............................................................................................................................................................... 33<br />

Page 2


Are Back <strong>Link</strong>s still relevant <strong>to</strong> search results?<br />

The whole <strong>of</strong> this article is about backlinks. Some say social media is more important now,<br />

some say that OnPage SEO and content is more important than backlinks. I believe this <strong>to</strong> be<br />

100% untrue. Here’s what Matt Cutts, head <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Google Spam Team has <strong>to</strong> say about<br />

backlinks:<br />

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCY30WhI2og<br />

<strong>Check</strong>ing <strong>Link</strong>s using <strong>Link</strong> Research Tools<br />

The most important thing about any link is not <strong>the</strong> actual type <strong>of</strong> link it is, but <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

page it is on. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> domain that <strong>the</strong> page is on <strong>to</strong>o. It makes sense that<br />

if <strong>the</strong> domain or <strong>the</strong> page is shady in any way, it would not be a good idea <strong>to</strong> have your link on<br />

<strong>the</strong>re. For this reason, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> time we will be considering <strong>the</strong> source page <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> link and<br />

<strong>the</strong> domain that it belongs <strong>to</strong>.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> sake <strong>of</strong> determining <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> a backlink I have grouped <strong>the</strong> various qualities <strong>of</strong> a<br />

back link in<strong>to</strong> 9 categories that you need <strong>to</strong> check. These are:<br />

1 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a page that is blacklisted or banned?<br />

2 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a page that is dangerous?<br />

3 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a page <strong>of</strong> a weak domain?<br />

4 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a domain with a penalty?<br />

5 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a domain associated with a bad neighbourhood?<br />

6 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a spammy direc<strong>to</strong>ry?<br />

7 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a page with a massive amount <strong>of</strong> outgoing links?<br />

8 Is <strong>the</strong> link anchor text unnatural or suspicious?<br />

9 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a domain that is part <strong>of</strong> a link network?<br />

1-7 can be assessed by considering an individual link, 8 and 9 need <strong>to</strong> be assessed by<br />

considering your existing links <strong>to</strong>o.<br />

To put <strong>the</strong> things that you need <strong>to</strong> check in<strong>to</strong> nine categories was quite <strong>to</strong>ugh, so within each<br />

section <strong>the</strong>re are sometimes a few different scenarios that you need <strong>to</strong> be aware <strong>of</strong>.<br />

The one <strong>to</strong>ol that can be easily used <strong>to</strong> check all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se points very easily is <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x, which<br />

although it requires some human input, can give accurate results very quickly. O<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Link</strong><br />

Research Tools can also be used as we will see later, but <strong>the</strong> one thing <strong>the</strong>y all have in common<br />

is <strong>the</strong> <strong>Link</strong> Research Metrics that <strong>the</strong>y all use. For this reason it makes sense <strong>to</strong> look at <strong>the</strong>se<br />

first. If you are not currently a <strong>Link</strong> Research Tools user, <strong>the</strong> next section will not mean much <strong>to</strong><br />

you, so you may like <strong>to</strong> skip <strong>the</strong> next section.<br />

Page 3


The <strong>Link</strong> Research Tools Metrics<br />

The days <strong>of</strong> saying things like, "I only put my links on sites with PR>3" or "I only build links on<br />

Authority sites like Wordpress.com, Blogspot.com and EzineArticles.com" have well and truly<br />

gone. We now have <strong>to</strong> look at many different metrics for each link and in some circumstances<br />

multiple links simultaneously. If this sounds <strong>to</strong>o complicated, it is because it is! Fortunately<br />

<strong>Link</strong> Research Tools make sense <strong>of</strong> this for us as we will see later. You can find detailed<br />

information about all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> LRT Metrics on this page, but for now lets have a quick run through<br />

<strong>the</strong>m:<br />

Basic SEO stats<br />

Basic SEO stats are <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> links <strong>to</strong> page and domain, linking root domains, <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>pic or<br />

<strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> site, technical site type (i.e. blog/CMS etc) and <strong>the</strong> CEMPER Power and CEMPER<br />

Trust metrics.<br />

Metrics: BL, BLdom, DomPop, Theme, SiteType, Power, Trust, Power*Trust<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore <strong>the</strong> Power and Trust can also be measured for <strong>the</strong> domain or <strong>to</strong>pdomain<br />

Metrics: Power*Trust dom, Power*Trust <strong>to</strong>pdom, Power-<strong>to</strong>pdom, Power-dom, Trustdom,<br />

Trust-<strong>to</strong>pdom<br />

Ranking Keyword Metrics<br />

The <strong>Link</strong> Research Tools use SEMrush <strong>to</strong> provide information about rankings for pages and<br />

domains. KwPage reports <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> keywords a page ranks for, while KwDomain reports<br />

all rankings for a whole domain as known by SEMrush.<br />

Metrics: KwPage, KwDomain<br />

<strong>Link</strong> Ratio Metrics<br />

The <strong>Link</strong> Ratio Metrics are new metrics used <strong>to</strong> evaluate SWR (site wide ratios) and DLR (deep<br />

link ratios) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> a link.<br />

Metrics: SWR, SWR-page, SWR-<strong>to</strong>pdom, DLR, DLR-<strong>to</strong>pdom<br />

Onpage-<strong>Link</strong>ing Analysis<br />

The parameters <strong>of</strong> this package look at <strong>the</strong> links <strong>of</strong> a page and tell you how many links <strong>of</strong> each<br />

kind a page has. Detailed information can be found here<br />

http://www.linkresearch<strong>to</strong>ols.com/helptext/<br />

Metrics: MetaRobots, IntL, ExtL, IntLNF, ExtLNF<br />

Google Indexing, Ranking and Legacy <strong>Link</strong> Metrics<br />

Google PageRank and Majestic ACrank are old legacy link metrics that can't be relied on<br />

anymore. However sometimes PR can be used for finding out more about a page where a link<br />

is. For example if a domain is 10 years old but has no Pagerank, would you want your link<br />

<strong>the</strong>re?<br />

Metrics: PR<br />

A very useful metric that we do use is <strong>the</strong> Google Indexation. If a page isn't indexed by Google,<br />

Page 4


is it good <strong>to</strong> have a link <strong>the</strong>re?<br />

Metrics: G!idx<br />

The Title Rank Metric is one I love <strong>to</strong> use when explaining <strong>to</strong> a client who doesn't believe a link<br />

<strong>the</strong>y built on an 'authority site' eight years ago is no good now. When I show <strong>the</strong>m that <strong>the</strong> page<br />

on which <strong>the</strong>y have a link doesn't rank on <strong>the</strong> first ten pages <strong>of</strong> Google for its own title, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

generally agree that <strong>the</strong> page has been penalised. The TitleRank metric describes how far up a<br />

linking page ranks in Google for its page title. If it ranks on a very high page number or does not<br />

rank at all, it's probably penalised.<br />

Metrics: Title-home, TitleRank-home<br />

<strong>Link</strong> Source Country & City<br />

This metric tells you in which country and city this domain is hosted. If you are looking for<br />

links for a local business this may be important <strong>to</strong> you. But also if you are looking at many links<br />

and <strong>the</strong>y are all coming from irrelevant countries, this may raise a flag due <strong>to</strong> a suspected link<br />

network.<br />

Metrics: CNTRY, CITY<br />

Domain Registration Details<br />

For some SEOs information about <strong>the</strong> domain registration can be useful. The domain creation<br />

date is said <strong>to</strong> affect trust. Older dates are better. Identifying <strong>the</strong> IP address can help spot link<br />

networks.<br />

Metrics: DCD, REG, IP<br />

Domain Expiry & Registrar details can also be helpful. Anybody dumb enough <strong>to</strong> set up a link<br />

network with domains having similar or identical registrar details is asking for trouble. On <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> domain expiry date is useful <strong>to</strong> see. Domains that don't expire for a long time<br />

are believed <strong>to</strong> have a positive impact on <strong>the</strong> trust <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> site.<br />

Metrics: DED, DNR, DNS<br />

Authority Backlinks<br />

Backlinks from universities and governmental agencies are usually more trusted and can be<br />

good places <strong>to</strong> have your links.<br />

Metrics: DomPopGOV, DomPopEDU, BLedu, BLgov<br />

<strong>Link</strong> Research Tools has some unique metrics that it uses with some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> old Moz.com<br />

authority indica<strong>to</strong>rs. These are used <strong>to</strong> show <strong>the</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> a domain or page having<br />

ranking authority in Google.<br />

Metrics: Trust, Trust-dom, Trust-<strong>to</strong>pdom, MozAuthPage, MozAuthDom<br />

The power <strong>of</strong> Dmoz and Wikipedia has been known for a long time, with <strong>Link</strong> Research Tools<br />

we have easy access <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> backlinks from dmoz.org as well as backlinks from each<br />

country's version <strong>of</strong> Wikipedia.<br />

Social Votes<br />

If you believe in <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> social media <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>re is a plethora <strong>of</strong> metrics covering<br />

Page 5


Pinterest, Retweets, Facebook Likes, Shares and Comments, Google+, Reddit and StumbleUpon.<br />

Metrics: RTs, FB!Votes, G+1,Reddit, StumbleUpon, FB!Likes, FB!Shares,<br />

FB!Comments,Pinterest<br />

<strong>Link</strong> Velocity and <strong>Link</strong> Velocity Trends<br />

<strong>Link</strong> Research Tools has <strong>the</strong>se new metrics <strong>to</strong> help us understand how <strong>the</strong> link growth <strong>of</strong><br />

source domains works. This becomes very important when you need <strong>to</strong> identify sites that have<br />

been forgotten about or have possibly been penalised.<br />

Metrics: LVT, LV4m, LV6m, LV12m, LV24m<br />

Where <strong>to</strong> find all <strong>the</strong>se metrics in <strong>Link</strong> Research Tools<br />

The main <strong>to</strong>ols we will use for checking links are <strong>the</strong> Back <strong>Link</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>iler (BLP), <strong>the</strong> Competitive<br />

Landscape Analyzer (CLA) and <strong>the</strong> Competitive Keyword Analyzer (CKA). These are very useful<br />

for quickly spotting links that are on pages that look good or bad. The King <strong>of</strong> all link health<br />

classification is <strong>the</strong> <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x (DTOX) <strong>to</strong>ol, which is amazing. So why don’t we use <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x<br />

all <strong>the</strong> time instead <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong>ols? The answer is that <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x runs comparatively slowly<br />

and also uses <strong>the</strong> <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x credits up ra<strong>the</strong>r quickly. You can never have enough <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x<br />

credits!<br />

With <strong>the</strong> BLP, CLA and CKA you can choose which metrics you want <strong>to</strong> see:<br />

Page 6


Choosing Metrics in BLP<br />

The key here is <strong>to</strong> select <strong>the</strong> metrics you are going <strong>to</strong> need, o<strong>the</strong>rwise it will slow <strong>the</strong><br />

processing speed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> report down. There is no extra credit cost in selecting lots <strong>of</strong> metrics if<br />

that is what you wish <strong>to</strong> do.<br />

Choosing Metrics in CLA<br />

The Competitive Landscape Analyzer is used <strong>to</strong> look at <strong>the</strong> metrics <strong>of</strong> your own backlinks as<br />

well as your competitions back links. The great thing about <strong>the</strong> CLA is that it uses <strong>the</strong> metrics<br />

that involve ratios between o<strong>the</strong>r links, so you can quickly identify Deep <strong>Link</strong> Ratios and<br />

Sitewide Ratios.<br />

If you use CLA in its default configuration, <strong>the</strong> Quick Analysis, <strong>the</strong>re is a basic set <strong>of</strong> metrics that<br />

are selected:<br />

Page 7


But if you want <strong>to</strong> see more data <strong>the</strong>n you can select a Detailed Analysis:<br />

Page 8


This opens up a stunning array <strong>of</strong> extra metrics that you can select:<br />

All <strong>the</strong> more advanced metrics are also available:<br />

Page 9


Is that enough data for you? How about <strong>the</strong> social fac<strong>to</strong>rs and <strong>the</strong> authority metrics <strong>to</strong>o:<br />

Page 10


The CLA is a very comprehensive <strong>to</strong>ol. It is worth noting that selecting a lot <strong>of</strong> metrics will slow<br />

<strong>the</strong> report down and also cost you a few credits <strong>to</strong>o.<br />

Page 11


Choosing Metrics in CKA<br />

The Competitive Keyword Analyzer is designed <strong>to</strong> help you identify keywords that promise<br />

high rankings with minimal effort. This is done by comparing different SEO metrics for <strong>the</strong><br />

current <strong>to</strong>p 10 sites for multiple keywords. It is a good opportunity <strong>to</strong> spot links that can be<br />

used <strong>to</strong> your advantage. There is a very reasonable set <strong>of</strong> metrics that can be selected<br />

optionally:<br />

Page 12


Using <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x <strong>to</strong> check <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> backlinks<br />

On <strong>the</strong> surface <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x is an easy <strong>to</strong> use application that helps you determine <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong><br />

links. Beneath <strong>the</strong> surface, <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x is an incredibly complex and clever piece <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

that makes sense <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> above metrics and uses <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> trigger various rules. The rules are<br />

used <strong>to</strong> determine if a link is healthy, suspicious or <strong>to</strong>xic. It really is <strong>the</strong> easiest way <strong>to</strong> perform<br />

a link audit on any website.<br />

<strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x can be run in 3 different modes, 'Classic', 'What if?' and 'Review'.<br />

Classic mode is where it examines all your existing links and compares <strong>the</strong>m with each o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

This is <strong>the</strong> most common use <strong>of</strong> <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x and you can use it like this <strong>to</strong> find Toxic, Suspicious<br />

and Healthy links <strong>to</strong> your own site, or even your competi<strong>to</strong>rs' sites.<br />

'What If?' mode is where you can upload your own lists <strong>of</strong> links that you believe you might be<br />

able <strong>to</strong> get and <strong>the</strong>n see how <strong>the</strong>y will fit in with your existing links.<br />

'Review mode' is where you can load in your own list <strong>of</strong> backlinks that you may be able <strong>to</strong> get,<br />

but <strong>the</strong>y will not be compared with your existing links.<br />

The metrics used in <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x are all preselected <strong>to</strong> make <strong>the</strong> running <strong>of</strong> this <strong>to</strong>ol as easy as<br />

possible:<br />

Page 13


So now we know what <strong>to</strong>ols we can use and what metrics are going <strong>to</strong> be useful , we can look at<br />

nine different ways <strong>to</strong> check a links quality.<br />

Page 14


1 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a page that is blacklisted or banned?<br />

For various reasons domains can become blacklisted. When <strong>the</strong>y do, <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>of</strong>ten listed at<br />

somewhere like <strong>the</strong> Spamhaus Domain Blocklist (spamhaus.org). Having a link on a blacklisted<br />

domain is not good.<br />

1.1 How <strong>to</strong> test for blacklisted or banned domains<br />

Unfortunately <strong>the</strong>re is no central place online where you can check a domain is blacklisted or<br />

banned. However, you can run <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x in <strong>the</strong> 'classic', 'what if' or 'review' mode <strong>to</strong> find out.<br />

If <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x finds that your link is on a domain which is blacklisted it will trigger <strong>the</strong> SUSP21<br />

Rule. <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x checks a lot <strong>of</strong> blacklists <strong>to</strong> see if <strong>the</strong> domain is listed, if it’s on a blacklist <strong>the</strong><br />

link is bad.<br />

Luckily sites that trigger <strong>the</strong> SUSP21 rule are rare, in fact in my fairly extensive <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x<br />

experience so far, I have not seen one.<br />

2 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a page that is dangerous?<br />

Without realising it, your links maybe on a domain that is listed as dangerous. This means that<br />

<strong>the</strong> domain's <strong>the</strong>me is listed as dangerous with possible malware, malicious activity or a virus<br />

which is classified as a bad neighbourhood. As you would expect <strong>the</strong>se are terrible links <strong>to</strong><br />

have, with no exceptions.<br />

Here’s an example <strong>of</strong> such a link on http://betpedia.ru/William_hill that was linking <strong>to</strong><br />

williamhill.com:<br />

2.1 How <strong>to</strong> test for dangerous domains<br />

Sometimes your browser may warn you about a dangerous domain, but <strong>of</strong>ten it won't.<br />

Fortunately you can use <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x in <strong>the</strong> 'classic', 'what if' or 'review' modes <strong>to</strong> test for<br />

Page 15


dangerous domains. Dangerous domains will trigger <strong>the</strong> TOX2 rule in <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x. The TOX2<br />

rule is actually triggered by a mixture <strong>of</strong> things, but it will always mean that <strong>the</strong> domain is<br />

dangerous.<br />

You can easily filter for any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rules in <strong>the</strong> data table <strong>of</strong> <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x like this:<br />

3 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a page <strong>of</strong> a weak domain?<br />

Having your link on a domain that is weak is not a good place for it <strong>to</strong> be. Here are some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

scenarios you might come across:<br />

3.1 Your link is on a very weak page that has no external links<br />

An example <strong>of</strong> this would be a forum or a page created by some au<strong>to</strong>mated spamming activity.<br />

Sometimes it might look like a normal page, but is just weak, like this one on<br />

http://dev.freebetsplus.co.uk/component/content/article/86-william-hill/291-william-hillpoker<br />

linking <strong>to</strong> williamhill.com:<br />

Page 16


3.1.1 How <strong>to</strong> test using a BLP report<br />

With a BLP report you can filter like this:<br />

CEMPER Power*Trust = 0<br />

CEMPER Power*Trust Domain < 5<br />

3.1.2 How <strong>to</strong> test using a <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x report<br />

The SUSP1 rule will be triggered. The SUSP1 rule means that it is a link coming from a page on<br />

a very weak domain, for example: a link from a page without external links (which is <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>the</strong><br />

case with a forum) or a link resulting from some au<strong>to</strong>mated spamming activity or a link on a<br />

page <strong>of</strong> a link direc<strong>to</strong>ry.<br />

3.2 Your link is on a very weak domain<br />

The reasons a domain may be weak could be that it is new or very weak or because it has a<br />

penalty. Here is an example on http://3ww.caingram.com/Travel_croatia.htm which is linking<br />

Page 17


<strong>to</strong> http://www.navis-yacht-charter.com/<br />

3.2.1 How <strong>to</strong> test using a BLP report<br />

With a BLP report you can filter like this:<br />

CEMPER Power*Trust Domain = 0<br />

3.2.2 How <strong>to</strong> test using a <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x report<br />

In a <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x report <strong>the</strong> SUSP2 rule will be triggered. The SUSP2 rule means that it is a link<br />

coming from a very weak domain that is probably new or has been penalized by Google. A page<br />

that has been penalized by Google is going <strong>to</strong> be a bad place <strong>to</strong> have your link. In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> a<br />

SUSP2 it is a possibility, we will look at more definite examples later.<br />

3.3 The link is on a young domain<br />

If <strong>the</strong> link is on a young domain, it may not be a bad thing as <strong>the</strong> site might grow and become<br />

more powerful. However if it does not, it could become a problem later.<br />

Here’s an example <strong>of</strong> such a link on http://abchemtech.com/shopping/au<strong>to</strong>motive/?p=5 which<br />

is linking <strong>to</strong> http://www.prioritycollisionchesapeake.com/<br />

Page 18


If you have read my case study about WilliamHill.com from April 2014 you might notice<br />

something about <strong>the</strong> example above. It is ano<strong>the</strong>r s<strong>to</strong>ry, but if you recognise something familiar<br />

it would be great if you left a comment below <br />

3.3.1 How <strong>to</strong> test using a <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x report<br />

Such a link will trigger <strong>the</strong> SUSP18 rule. The SUSP18 rule means that it’s a link from a page that<br />

is coming from a young domain (less than 6 months old) that has a low CEMPER Power*Trust<br />

Domain below 3.<br />

3.4 The link is on an old, but weak domain<br />

This is a domain that has been around for a long time and has never really been used or visited.<br />

Such a domain will have no Google PageRank and a link on it will be worthless.<br />

3.4.1 How <strong>to</strong> test using a <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x report<br />

In <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x <strong>the</strong> SUSP19 rule will be triggered indicating that this is an old domain with no<br />

homepage PageRank.<br />

Page 19


4 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a domain with a penalty?<br />

As you would imagine, if Google has penalised a domain and your link is on that page, it is not<br />

going <strong>to</strong> value your link at all. Even worse, a link on a penalised domain is now one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most<br />

harmful links you can have.<br />

I have recently removed a manual spam action penalty from a site <strong>of</strong> mine that was hit by<br />

Penguin 1.0 in April 2012. The site got penalised because I built links <strong>to</strong> it for years, which<br />

worked fine until Penguin came along. Here is an example <strong>of</strong> a link on<br />

http://kilmarnockmo<strong>to</strong>rhomehire.yolasite.com/ which links <strong>to</strong><br />

http://www.mo<strong>to</strong>rhomesdirect.co.uk/mo<strong>to</strong>rhome-hire.html. This link that once worked is now<br />

highly Toxic. (btw this link could not be removed so it has been disavowed)<br />

are some ways <strong>of</strong> telling if <strong>the</strong> domain is penalised:<br />

Here<br />

4.1 The domain is not indexed in Google<br />

The TOX1 rule means that <strong>the</strong> link is on a page that is not indexed by Google and this could<br />

mean that Google has decided <strong>to</strong> give <strong>the</strong> domain a penalty. But it is worth keeping in mind that<br />

a non-indexed link could also mean that it is on a new domain that nobody has linked <strong>to</strong> yet or<br />

it has a problem in <strong>the</strong> robots.txt or meta robots tag. It is worth checking <strong>the</strong>se things before<br />

Page 20


you condemn <strong>the</strong> link completely. Having said that, a domain that is not indexed in Google will<br />

have no SEO benefit, so removing it is <strong>the</strong> better option if you are unsure. The example I gave<br />

above was a TOX1 link.<br />

4.2 Your link is on a domain which is very weak because <strong>of</strong> a penalty<br />

As we discussed above, a domain that has CEMPER Power*Trust Domain = 0 could be a new<br />

domain, a weak domain, but could also mean that it has a penalty.<br />

4.3 The link is on a page that doesn’t rank for its own title<br />

If a page isn’t ranking for its own title in <strong>the</strong> first 30 pages <strong>of</strong> Google <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>re is something<br />

seriously wrong with it. This almost certainly means that it has a penalty. The exception <strong>to</strong> this<br />

might be if <strong>the</strong> page has a very common generic title like 'Partners' or 'Home' which will have a<br />

hard time ranking for <strong>the</strong>se terms.<br />

4.3.1 How <strong>to</strong> check with <strong>the</strong> Back <strong>Link</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>iler ( BLP)<br />

If you run a BLP Report you will need <strong>to</strong> enable <strong>the</strong> extra metric TitleRank, <strong>the</strong>n you can sort<br />

<strong>the</strong> report <strong>to</strong> display:<br />

Page has CEMPER TitleRank 30+,<br />

CEMPER Power*Trust Domain < 5 and<br />

CEMPER Power*Trust < 5<br />

4.3.1 How <strong>to</strong> check with <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x<br />

The report by <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x will trigger a SUSP4 rule which means that <strong>the</strong> page <strong>the</strong> link comes<br />

from does not rank for <strong>the</strong> title <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> page which is usually a sign that this page or domain is<br />

being penalized. SUSP4 is surprisingly common in a <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x report, especially where <strong>the</strong>re<br />

has been a lot <strong>of</strong> au<strong>to</strong>mated link building.<br />

4.4 The link is on a page with no Google PageRank<br />

Google PageRank is becoming more inaccurate and unreliable and most SEO experts no<br />

longer regard it as a metric <strong>the</strong>y can trust. However it is unusual <strong>to</strong> see any established web<br />

site with no Google PageRank at all. If a site has no Google PageRank but has some weak<br />

links <strong>to</strong> it that is even more suspicious.<br />

4.4.1 How <strong>to</strong> check with BLP<br />

When you run a BLP you can select Legacy <strong>Link</strong> Metrics in <strong>the</strong> extra metrics section. The<br />

Legacy <strong>Link</strong> Metrics will show you ACrank and PR. <strong>Link</strong> Research Tools say, "Google<br />

PageRank and Majestic ACrank are legacy link metrics we don't recommend you <strong>to</strong> base your<br />

decisions on for a variety <strong>of</strong> reasons. These metrics are replaced now by <strong>the</strong> new 'Power'<br />

metric, which is more accurate, more up <strong>to</strong> date and more consistent. In conjunction with <strong>the</strong><br />

'Trust' metric <strong>the</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> links is a lot better than any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se legacy metrics."<br />

Page 21


So filter by<br />

PR = n/a <strong>to</strong> n/a<br />

4.4.2 How <strong>to</strong> check with <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x<br />

A Page that has no PageRank but does have at least some weak links will trigger <strong>the</strong> SUSP14<br />

rule in <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x. The SUSP14 means that this link has no Google PageRank. This could be a<br />

sign Google has penalized this site from <strong>the</strong> search engines. Google PageRank is becoming more<br />

inaccurate and unreliable for most SEO purposes, but it does have some uses like this for<br />

determining if a site has a penalty or not.<br />

4.5 The link is on a page that has been banned from Google<br />

A site that is banned from Google is never going <strong>to</strong> be a good link. <strong>Link</strong> de<strong>to</strong>x can easily identify<br />

<strong>the</strong>se by look for a site that no longer has any rankings in Google, but has a CEMPER<br />

Power*Trust >0.<br />

A link like this will trigger <strong>the</strong> SUSP27 rule.<br />

5 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a domain associated with a bad neighbourhood?<br />

This makes a lot <strong>of</strong> sense. If for example you have a web site about good parenting, you<br />

wouldn't want links from porn and gambling sites would you? It is all a matter <strong>of</strong> being aware<br />

<strong>of</strong> your neighbourhood and who you appear <strong>to</strong> be associated with.<br />

5.1 Domain’s Theme is listed as suspicious (Hacking, Suspicious or Pornography) or high risk<br />

Most webmasters aren't looking for links from hacking or porn sites, but if you run a porn site,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n maybe you would. This is where <strong>the</strong> classifying <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> your site is very important<br />

in <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x.<br />

Even after classifying WilliamHill.com as a site about gambling, this link was flagged as being<br />

on a suspicious domain. This is on a Polish URL, http://rimuwonox.pev.pl/bet-on-horses-livevideo.php<br />

linking <strong>to</strong> http://sports.williamhill.com/bet/en-gb/realtime<br />

Page 22


It doesn’t look like a good link for sure, a site about accommodation in Madrid (Spain) doesn’t<br />

really need <strong>to</strong> have links <strong>to</strong> a British sports betting site. <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x is very good at detecting<br />

suspicious <strong>the</strong>mes.<br />

5.1.1 <strong>Check</strong>ing for suspicious <strong>the</strong>mes with <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x<br />

<strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x will show <strong>the</strong> SUSP5 rule being triggered which means that <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> domain<br />

has been listed as Hacking, Suspicious or Pornography. For most webmasters, links from <strong>the</strong>se<br />

type <strong>of</strong> websites are not what <strong>the</strong>y want.<br />

5.1.2 <strong>Check</strong>ing for a high risk score associated with <strong>the</strong> URL<br />

If <strong>the</strong> SUSP20 rule is triggered it means that a high risk score has been detected for this link<br />

and it is recommended that you review <strong>the</strong>se links carefully, <strong>the</strong> higher <strong>the</strong> risk score <strong>the</strong><br />

higher <strong>the</strong> probability that you should get rid <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se links.<br />

6 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a spammy direc<strong>to</strong>ry?<br />

Despite everything SEOs were <strong>to</strong>ld until 2012, direc<strong>to</strong>ry links are now mostly worthless.<br />

Anybody who tells you that a money anchor text link in <strong>the</strong> resource box <strong>of</strong> an EzineArticle is a<br />

white hat link is wrong. But it is not just article direc<strong>to</strong>ries.<br />

Page 23


6.1 <strong>Link</strong> Direc<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>Link</strong>s<br />

For many years SEOs would fill link direc<strong>to</strong>ries with <strong>the</strong>ir links. Quite <strong>of</strong>ten it wouldn't be just<br />

one link <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> home page, but multiple pages within <strong>the</strong> same link direc<strong>to</strong>ry. In <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x <strong>the</strong><br />

SUSP15 rule means that <strong>the</strong>se links are coming from typical web link direc<strong>to</strong>ries. These<br />

direc<strong>to</strong>ries have obvious footprints. The only purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se direc<strong>to</strong>ries was <strong>to</strong> artificially<br />

inflate link popularities and/or sell links. Although this used <strong>to</strong> work for SEOs it cannot be<br />

recommended <strong>the</strong>se days.<br />

Here is an example <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Link</strong> Direc<strong>to</strong>ry link. Yes I will hold my hands up and admit it is one <strong>of</strong><br />

mine again! This is http://www.free-link-direc<strong>to</strong>ry.info/detail/link-81908.htm linking <strong>to</strong><br />

http://www.mo<strong>to</strong>rhomesdirect.co.uk/mo<strong>to</strong>rhome-hire/mo<strong>to</strong>rhome-hire-7/. Looking at this<br />

sort <strong>of</strong> link in 2014 it is hard <strong>to</strong> believe that links like this ever had any value, but <strong>the</strong>y did!<br />

6.2 Article Direc<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>Link</strong>s<br />

The SUSP16 means <strong>the</strong>se links are coming from typical article direc<strong>to</strong>ries which were <strong>the</strong><br />

successor <strong>of</strong> link direc<strong>to</strong>ries and <strong>of</strong>ten also au<strong>to</strong>matically filled with useless articles just <strong>to</strong> get a<br />

link from as many domains as possible. Often <strong>the</strong>se article direc<strong>to</strong>ry pages were fur<strong>the</strong>rmore<br />

linked with spam links <strong>to</strong> increase <strong>the</strong>ir inbound links and thus make those o<strong>the</strong>rwise useless<br />

pages more helpful. While this was usual practice for years for many SEOs it cannot be<br />

recommended <strong>the</strong>se days. Here’s an example <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> mine, this is<br />

http://www.amazines.com/Travel_and_Tourism/article_detail.cfm/1759418?articleid=17594<br />

Page 24


18 linking <strong>to</strong> http://www.mo<strong>to</strong>rhomesdirect.co.uk/<br />

6.3 <strong>Link</strong>s coming from typical link voting direc<strong>to</strong>ries<br />

The SUSP26 rule means that it’s a link coming from link voting direc<strong>to</strong>ries and is a common<br />

way <strong>to</strong> inflate link popularities and/or sell links which is not recommended anymore. I couldn’t<br />

resist sharing this example that I built years ago, but would be insane <strong>to</strong> use now. This is<br />

http://www.my<strong>to</strong>plist.gen.tr/s<strong>to</strong>ry.php?id=28083 linking <strong>to</strong><br />

http://www.mo<strong>to</strong>rhomesdirect.co.uk/location/north-east-england/ with <strong>the</strong> anchor text ‘Fast<br />

Tips for Learning German’ – what on Earth was I thinking!<br />

7 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a page with a massive amount <strong>of</strong> outgoing links?<br />

The SUSP17 rule means that this page has more than 1,000 outgoing links. This could be a sign<br />

for a spammy blog or direc<strong>to</strong>ry. Please ensure that you review <strong>the</strong>se links carefully.<br />

Here is an example <strong>of</strong> such a page, this is http://www.gyygle.com/detail.html which links <strong>to</strong><br />

1,486 URLs. You can see this number by enabling <strong>the</strong> ExtL Metric.<br />

Page 25


8 Is <strong>the</strong> link anchor text unnatural or suspicious?<br />

I think we can all spot ridiculous unnatural anchor text now, but sometimes it really isn’t quite<br />

as obvious as you may think. Unnatural and suspicious link anchor text may also be flagged as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> not just one link, but multiple links when <strong>the</strong>y are considered collectively. Sitewide<br />

links are no longer a good thing and unnatural deep link ratios can stand out <strong>to</strong>o. Again, by far<br />

<strong>the</strong> best <strong>to</strong>ol for this is <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x which uses calculations <strong>of</strong> metrics, its own cross referencing<br />

with databases and its own secret algorithm.<br />

8.1 Is <strong>the</strong> link highly unnatural?<br />

Highly unnatural? What's that? If you are using <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x <strong>to</strong> check your links you may see <strong>the</strong><br />

TOX3 rule has been triggered for some links. This means that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x Genesis<br />

algorithm classified this link as very unnatural. <strong>Link</strong> Research Tools recommend removing<br />

links like <strong>the</strong>se or disavowing <strong>the</strong>m using <strong>the</strong> Google Disavow Tool. Sometimes I have a<br />

problem convincing clients that a TOX3 link is bad, especially when it looks legitimate. The<br />

truth is that I have submitted reconsideration requests <strong>to</strong> try and clear manual spam actions,<br />

only <strong>to</strong> find that Google come back with sample links that still violate <strong>the</strong>ir guidelines. More<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten than not <strong>the</strong>se are TOX3 links. Here is an example on<br />

http://aaa.ukdirec<strong>to</strong>rylist.co.uk/9510/iPhonefixed.html which is linking <strong>to</strong><br />

http://www.iphonefixed.co.uk/<br />

Page 26


8.2 Sitewide Footer <strong>Link</strong>s<br />

Sitewide links in <strong>the</strong> footer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> page will trigger <strong>the</strong> SUSP11 rule in <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x. Today it is<br />

not likely that somebody will <strong>of</strong>fer or try <strong>to</strong> sell you a sitewide link, but if <strong>the</strong>y do it really isn't<br />

worth it. Big brands might be able <strong>to</strong> get away with it, but for <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> us it is probably more<br />

<strong>of</strong> risk than a benefit.<br />

Here’s an image used by WilliamHill.com on a domain from Belarus<br />

http://www.pokerist.by/payment-systems/ linking <strong>to</strong> http://poker.williamhill.com/ru/ -<br />

because this image is sitewide and in <strong>the</strong> footer, it is not a good place for a link <strong>to</strong> be. There are<br />

1,653 instances <strong>of</strong> this here.<br />

Page 27


8.3 Hidden image links<br />

Hidden images will trigger <strong>the</strong> SUSP25 rule in <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x. A hidden image link is usually a sign<br />

<strong>of</strong> bad linking tactics. The example below is actually a poor link on<br />

http://kansaionsen.blogspot.fr/2011/07/sen<strong>to</strong>-in-china-facing-same-problems-as.html linking<br />

<strong>to</strong> http://www.retailmenot.com/view/ascentive.com which is about discount coupons for<br />

computer s<strong>of</strong>tware. It is a dreadful link, but <strong>the</strong> hidden image is just a missing avatar on <strong>the</strong><br />

comment. Never<strong>the</strong>less if you read this<br />

https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66353?hl=en from <strong>the</strong> Google Webmaster<br />

guidlines you will read "Hiding text or links in your content <strong>to</strong> manipulate Google’s search<br />

rankings can be seen as deceptive and is a violation <strong>of</strong> Google’s Webmaster Guidelines."<br />

Page 28


8.4 Are you overdoing <strong>the</strong> Money Keyword anchor text?<br />

This is where you need <strong>to</strong> consider <strong>the</strong> link pr<strong>of</strong>ile as a whole. With <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x <strong>the</strong> SUSP28<br />

rule will be triggered if <strong>the</strong> money keyword’s anchor text is found in more than 5% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> link<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile. In <strong>the</strong>se 'Post Penguin' times most <strong>of</strong> us are now aware that a low percentage <strong>of</strong> anchor<br />

text money links is <strong>the</strong> way <strong>to</strong> go, but some old school SEOs will still want <strong>to</strong> overdo <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Don't!<br />

8.5 Are you overdoing <strong>the</strong> Compound Keyword anchor text?<br />

Just like <strong>the</strong> Money Keyphrase anchor text you want <strong>to</strong> make sure that you are not overdoing<br />

your Compound Keyword anchor text. Compound Keywords are phrases like "iPhone screen<br />

replacement by iPhonefixed.co.uk" If you have more than 5% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se in your link pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>the</strong><br />

SUSP29 rule will be triggered in <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x.<br />

8.6 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a spammy forum?<br />

Spamming <strong>to</strong>ols that we all used pre-Penguin like SENukeX and XRumer traditionally spammed<br />

lots <strong>of</strong> forums. These are now well known <strong>to</strong> our favourite search engine, so if you have links<br />

from <strong>the</strong>se forums you need <strong>to</strong> be careful. <strong>Link</strong>s with anchor text classified as Brand, Money or<br />

Compound coming from <strong>the</strong>se sort <strong>of</strong> forums will trigger <strong>the</strong> SUSP30 rule in <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x.<br />

Generally links like this are <strong>to</strong> be avoided.<br />

9 Is <strong>the</strong> link on a domain that is part <strong>of</strong> a link network?<br />

<strong>Link</strong> networks have been around for years now and many services did very well over <strong>the</strong> years,<br />

such as <strong>Link</strong>vana and BuildMyrank. <strong>Link</strong>vana and BuildMyRank were considered <strong>to</strong> be<br />

completely white hat, legitimate services until Penguin. Google has taken no prisoners with<br />

<strong>the</strong>se link networks and destroyed each one in turn. Google continues <strong>to</strong> do so and this has<br />

forced <strong>the</strong> link networks more underground, like <strong>the</strong> elusive Russian SAPE network and ones<br />

that crop up from time <strong>to</strong> time in <strong>the</strong> Warrior Forum. Blackhat SEOs will continue <strong>to</strong> use <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

own link networks and Google will get more clever and eventually penalise <strong>the</strong> networks. If<br />

you decide <strong>to</strong> use <strong>the</strong>se sort <strong>of</strong> services, you have <strong>to</strong> be responsible for your own actions and<br />

manage <strong>the</strong> risk. You must treat every day you get traffic as if it is your last one, it could all be<br />

gone <strong>to</strong>morrow.<br />

It is possible that you could have used some bad SEO companies in <strong>the</strong> past who put your links<br />

on <strong>the</strong>ir own private link networks without you knowing. If this is <strong>the</strong> case <strong>the</strong>re are a few<br />

things you can easily check.<br />

9.1 Does it have <strong>the</strong> same IP or Class C IP as some <strong>of</strong> your o<strong>the</strong>r links?<br />

I know we have all been tempted by <strong>the</strong> 'shiny objects' in places like <strong>the</strong> Warrior Forum. Offers<br />

promising undetectable, high PR, Penguin Friendly links that are going <strong>to</strong> skyrocket your site <strong>to</strong><br />

#1 in Google are sometimes hard <strong>to</strong> resist! Cheap private networks don't even bo<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong> spread<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir hosting around different IPs properly.<br />

Page 29


IP addresses have a format that has an IP address which is made <strong>of</strong> 4 numbers separated by<br />

dots as in aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd, each number ranges from 0 <strong>to</strong> 255. This is <strong>the</strong> IPv4 format. If <strong>the</strong><br />

'ccc' block <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> IP address appears <strong>to</strong>o <strong>of</strong>ten in a link pr<strong>of</strong>ile this could raise a flag.<br />

The SUSP7 rule is triggered if multiple links have <strong>the</strong> same IP address, which could mean that it<br />

is a link coming from a possible spammy link network.<br />

The SUSP8 rule means that it has detected links coming from <strong>the</strong> same C-Class IP address as<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r linking domains.<br />

<strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x will trigger <strong>the</strong> SUSP3 rule for links that are:<br />

on a page which has more than 10 backlinks from 1 Class-C,<br />

has a CEMPER Power*Trust Domain < 5 and<br />

has a CEMPER Power*Trust < 5<br />

9.2 Do you have links that come from domains with <strong>the</strong> same domain name registrant?<br />

You would think it unlikely that somebody would use <strong>the</strong>ir own name as <strong>the</strong> registrant on<br />

multiple domains in a private link network, but it does happen. In my case study from April<br />

2014 I uncovered some link networks from India that were linking <strong>to</strong> WilliamHill.com. These<br />

were ridiculously easy <strong>to</strong> spot as all <strong>the</strong> domains were registered by <strong>the</strong> same individual.<br />

In <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x, <strong>the</strong> SUSP6 rule may be triggered <strong>to</strong> alert you <strong>to</strong> a possible link network. SUSP6<br />

means that <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x has detected links coming from <strong>the</strong> same domain name registrant as<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r linking domains. This normally means that <strong>the</strong> links are possibly from a link network.<br />

You should always be aware <strong>of</strong> your neighbourhood.<br />

9.3 Do you have links that come from domains with <strong>the</strong> same domain name server?<br />

The SUSP9 rule means that it has detected links coming from <strong>the</strong> same DNS (Domain Name<br />

Server) as o<strong>the</strong>r linking domains. It is possible that you just happen <strong>to</strong> have a lot <strong>of</strong> links from a<br />

sites that use a large shared hosting company like HostGa<strong>to</strong>r, where <strong>the</strong>y have generic Name<br />

Server values for large numbers <strong>of</strong> sites. It is probably more than likely that some <strong>of</strong> your links<br />

are coming from very simple link networks that share <strong>the</strong> same DNS.<br />

9.4 Does <strong>the</strong> source domain have a negative <strong>Link</strong> Velocity?<br />

If you have a link on a page from a domain which has a <strong>Link</strong> Velocity Trend < -70% this is<br />

probably part <strong>of</strong> an expired domain link network or a domain that <strong>the</strong> public has lost interest<br />

in. Ei<strong>the</strong>rway this is going <strong>to</strong> be a very suspicious link.<br />

A negative <strong>Link</strong> Velocity like this is easy <strong>to</strong> spot with <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x. The SUSP10 rule will be<br />

triggered meaning that <strong>the</strong> domain has a <strong>Link</strong> Velocity trend dropping by 70%. <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x does<br />

this in a ra<strong>the</strong>r ingenious way by analysing <strong>the</strong> link growth <strong>of</strong> every domain and if <strong>the</strong> link<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> last 4 months is significantly smaller than it was in <strong>the</strong> last 12 and 24 months, <strong>the</strong><br />

SUSP10 will come in<strong>to</strong> play. This is usually a sign that <strong>the</strong> domain has been abandoned by <strong>the</strong><br />

Page 30


current owner. This has been a common occourance since Penguin has became part <strong>of</strong> our SEO<br />

lives.<br />

9.5 Does <strong>the</strong> source domain have <strong>the</strong> same Google Analytics code as o<strong>the</strong>r linking domains?<br />

The SUSP12 rule in <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x means that <strong>the</strong> domain name has <strong>the</strong> same Google Analytics<br />

code as o<strong>the</strong>r linking domains. If multiple domains have <strong>the</strong> same Google IDs <strong>the</strong>n it is a strong<br />

signal <strong>of</strong> a possible link network. A legitimate, but debatable, use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same GA code over and<br />

over could be derive from somewhere like a web design agency. A web design agency could<br />

feasibly have lots <strong>of</strong> clients that <strong>the</strong>y like <strong>to</strong> manage with <strong>the</strong> same GA account. The question<br />

you might ask <strong>the</strong>n is “why are <strong>the</strong>y all linking back <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> same place?”. Usually web design<br />

agencies that do this are <strong>the</strong> same ones who put ‘Cheap Web Design by Terrible SEO Company’<br />

in <strong>the</strong>ir client’s sitewide footers.<br />

9.6 Does <strong>the</strong> source domain have <strong>the</strong> same Google Adsense code as o<strong>the</strong>r linking domains?<br />

I haven’t seen this for a long time, but around 2006 I became interested in a company based in<br />

Texas called webhostforseo.com which was founded by Todd Spears. Todd is extremely<br />

knowledgeable about webservers, server security and blackhat linking techniques. I was<br />

stunned when I heard somebody talk about Adsense on one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> un<strong>of</strong>ficial training videos<br />

about building your own blog network. It wasn’t Todd, but <strong>the</strong>y went though buying domains<br />

with Privacy, using different Class C IPs and posting unique content on <strong>the</strong> blog network. Not<br />

bad so far, I thought and <strong>the</strong>n he said “So if you have all <strong>the</strong>se blogs you may as well monetize<br />

<strong>the</strong>m with Adsense”. I knew <strong>the</strong>n that was sheer insanity! “Hey Google I’ve just built a blog<br />

network with 50 blogs that all belong <strong>to</strong> me!”<br />

Most people running private link networks, s<strong>to</strong>pped using Adsense when it s<strong>to</strong>pped making<br />

cents and s<strong>to</strong>pped making sense!<br />

In <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x <strong>the</strong> SUSP13 rule means that <strong>the</strong> domain name has <strong>the</strong> same Google Adsense<br />

Publisher ID as o<strong>the</strong>r linking domains. If multiple domains have <strong>the</strong> same Google IDs <strong>the</strong>n it is a<br />

strong signal <strong>of</strong> a possible link network.<br />

9.7 Does <strong>the</strong> source domain have <strong>the</strong> same Website Footprints as o<strong>the</strong>r linking domains?<br />

This is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>p secret areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x, which makes it <strong>the</strong> only <strong>to</strong>ol that can be relied<br />

upon <strong>to</strong> work out if <strong>the</strong>re are <strong>to</strong>o many similar footprints in your linking domains. <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x<br />

will trigger <strong>the</strong> SUSP22, SUSP23 and <strong>the</strong> SUSP24 rules meaning that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x Genesis<br />

footprint detection found this domain <strong>to</strong> be closely related <strong>to</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r domains that link <strong>to</strong> you.<br />

This is <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>the</strong> case when <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> your links come from similar sources like<br />

Wordpress, Wikis or a certain kind <strong>of</strong> CMS.<br />

Conclusion<br />

If you have managed <strong>to</strong> read through all <strong>of</strong> this, congratulations! <strong>Check</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> a link<br />

is not easy at all. We have seen that <strong>the</strong>re are a multitude <strong>of</strong> fac<strong>to</strong>rs that can affect <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong><br />

Page 31


a link. To make things more complicated, sometimes you can’t consider one link on its own, but<br />

you must consider <strong>the</strong> impact this link will have when you are taking <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> your links in<strong>to</strong><br />

account.<br />

The one <strong>to</strong>ol that shines is <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x as this is an incredibly powerful <strong>to</strong>ol that does all <strong>the</strong><br />

hard work for you. Even better is <strong>the</strong> fact that you can use it <strong>to</strong> check links you already have as<br />

well as links that you think you might be able <strong>to</strong> get, before you even go <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> trouble <strong>of</strong><br />

getting <strong>the</strong>m. Getting high quality links has never been easy and it is getting harder, but <strong>Link</strong><br />

De<strong>to</strong>x can really help.<br />

If you have a great site that gets lots <strong>of</strong> links naturally because people love your content, you<br />

might have a different problem. If you are acquiring links that you have no control over you<br />

need <strong>to</strong> have a regular <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x schedule <strong>to</strong> make sure you are not inadvertently putting<br />

your site at risk.<br />

If you have not used <strong>Link</strong> Research Tools yet, especially <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x, I think you know what you<br />

need <strong>to</strong> do next.<br />

This case study was written by Rick Lomas, Owner at Indexicon, and proud user <strong>of</strong> <strong>Link</strong><br />

Research Tools and <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x.<br />

A word from Chris<strong>to</strong>ph C. Cemper<br />

This analysis was conducted and written by Certified LRT Pr<strong>of</strong>essional, Rick Lomas, who has taken<br />

<strong>the</strong> next step <strong>to</strong> become a Certified <strong>Link</strong> Research Tools Xpert.<br />

Rick demonstrated his expertise in creating a complete guide with helpful tips for a link quality<br />

check using <strong>the</strong> <strong>Link</strong>ResearchTools and <strong>Link</strong> De<strong>to</strong>x. He is only one case study away from getting his<br />

Xpert certification. Therefore, I’m very happy <strong>to</strong> share his research with you and encourage him on<br />

his way <strong>to</strong> becoming an LRT Xpert.<br />

Our goal is <strong>to</strong> provide our user community and clients with quality<br />

service and knowledge. Our Certified LRT Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals and Xperts<br />

are key <strong>to</strong> achieving this goal.<br />

I look forward <strong>to</strong> Author Name’s future work, and I personally<br />

recommend working with him whenever you get <strong>the</strong> opportunity.<br />

Page 32


Author Bio:<br />

Rick Lomas<br />

Owner at Indexicon<br />

Rick built his first website in 1997 when <strong>the</strong> main search engine was Altavista and <strong>the</strong> word<br />

Google didn’t exist. Since <strong>the</strong>n he has learnt SEO from <strong>the</strong> ground up and has lived through<br />

every update Google has thrown at us. Rick now has a great deal <strong>of</strong> knowledge about healthy<br />

link maintenance and link risk assessment. In <strong>the</strong>se days <strong>of</strong> manual and algorithmic Google<br />

Penguin penalties it is more important than ever <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r your backlink pr<strong>of</strong>ile very<br />

carefully, this is where his expertise is invaluable. Rick is from <strong>the</strong> UK, but has lived in <strong>the</strong><br />

French Alps since 2001. Rick is available for SEO Audits, Google Penalty Removal and Back <strong>Link</strong><br />

Health Moni<strong>to</strong>ring.<br />

<strong>Link</strong>edin: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/ricklomas<br />

Google+: https://plus.google.com/+RickLomas<br />

Twitter: https://twitter.com/ricklomas<br />

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ricklomas<br />

Page 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!