22.05.2014 Views

Case Study TapeTV

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“5 German Startups hit hard by Google“<br />

Video Not Found: Tape.TV Tries to Buy Top<br />

Search Positions<br />

Sitewide Widget Links and Expensive Integrations Don’t Pay Off<br />

It’s a tough market for a video site. Search for any song or video and the first results are almost<br />

always from YouTube. How is a startup supposed to compete with that? By paying for top position,<br />

apparently. Tape.tv’s CEO tried to get top<br />

positioning by throwing money at API<br />

integrations, paid links, link networks, and<br />

more. They saw fast gains, but they quickly<br />

fizzled into nothing.<br />

Guntram Bechtold uses the CEO’s own words<br />

to guide his detailed exploration into why<br />

tape.tv lost so much search visibility. This is<br />

the fourth case study in the “5 German<br />

Startups hit hard by Google” series by<br />

Guntram Bechtold to achieve Certified LRT<br />

Xpert status.<br />

We look forward to your feedback and always<br />

appreciate you sharing the work of our<br />

Certified LRT Professionals.<br />

- Enjoy & Learn!<br />

Christoph C. Cemper<br />

A <strong>Case</strong> <strong>Study</strong> by Certified LRT Xpert, Guntram Bechtold<br />

May 9, 2014


Table of Contents<br />

Sitewide Widget Links and Expensive Integrations Don’t Pay Off ........................................................ 0<br />

<strong>Case</strong> <strong>Study</strong> Setup .................................................................................................................................. 2<br />

1. Search Visibility Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 2<br />

2.Backlink Profile Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 2<br />

3. Regular Detox for all Backlinks .................................................................................................................. 2<br />

Search Visibility .................................................................................................................................... 3<br />

Link Audit ............................................................................................................................................. 14<br />

Was anchor text overdone? ............................................................................................................................... 15<br />

Did the websites have more CEMPER Power than CEMPER Trust? .................................................. 19<br />

Did the site have too many sitewide links? .................................................................................................. 23<br />

Did they have paid links? .................................................................................................................................... 29<br />

Are sneaky redirects involved? ........................................................................................................................ 33<br />

Is unnatural link growth involved? ................................................................................................................. 33<br />

Are link networks involved? .............................................................................................................................. 35<br />

Trigami .................................................................................................................................................................. 35<br />

Press Portals ........................................................................................................................................................ 37<br />

Agof.de ................................................................................................................................................................... 38<br />

Is there unnatural country distribution? ...................................................................................................... 43<br />

Is there an unnatural deep link ratio? ........................................................................................................... 45<br />

Is there an unnatural link status ratio? ......................................................................................................... 46<br />

Did the websites have a high Link DTOX Risk? .......................................................................................... 54<br />

Competitive Detox Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 60<br />

My Answers to the Interview Questions: ..................................................................................................... 65<br />

Results Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 65<br />

Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................ 66<br />

Author Bio: ............................................................................................................................................................... 68<br />

Page 1


<strong>Case</strong> <strong>Study</strong> Setup<br />

1. Search Visibility Analysis<br />

Analysis of the analytical drops<br />

2.Backlink Profile Analysis<br />

1. Anchor Text Analysis<br />

2. Power & Trust Balance Analysis<br />

3. Sitewide Links Analysis<br />

4. Paid Links Analysis<br />

5. Power*Trust Ratio Analysis<br />

6. Redirect Analysis<br />

7. Link Growth Analysis<br />

8. Link Network Analysis<br />

9. Country Ratio Analysis<br />

10. Deep Link Ratio Analysis<br />

11. Link Status Ratio Analysis<br />

12. Link Detox Risk Analysis<br />

13. Competitive Link Detox Risk Analysis against competition<br />

3. Regular Detox for all Backlinks<br />

Review of Backlinks<br />

Page 2


Search Visibility<br />

Looking at the recent charts, we see Google has hit tape.tv hard. Founded in July of 2008,<br />

tape.tv is a Berlin-based Internet music TV station. Its viewers can watch current programs and<br />

specific music clips. According to information on their site, the station currently has around<br />

45,000 music videos and 3.9 million unique users a month, with an average visit duration of 25<br />

minutes. Tape.tv has a business model that is driven by marketing collaborations and new<br />

forms of video advertising called "Entertainment Advertising." Managing directors are Conrad<br />

Fritzsch and Stephanie Renner.<br />

Looking at the Sistrix visibility chart we see a strong drop in search visibility from 22.321 to<br />

16.66 SI points within a couple of days. From the middle of February to early April, the domain<br />

only lost around 6 SI points.<br />

Before starting the analysis, I did some research. Here is a useful article on online marketing,<br />

SEO and plans from 2010 (Google Translated Version) http://goo.gl/BlW96r.<br />

Keep these quotes in mind:<br />

Strategic cooperation partners, which include for example Bild.de, Bravo<br />

and stern.de include, ensure further growth jumps.<br />

Lars Dittrich, 2010<br />

During the coming months Fritsch wants to enhance tape.tv especially in<br />

terms of SEO.<br />

Lars Dittrich, 2010<br />

Questions arising from that interview are:<br />

1. What and how does a CEO consider that SEO works?<br />

2. What was done to perform growth jumps?<br />

Page 3


Page 4


One of the very first observations in the video portal segment was that Google is constantly<br />

pushing its own products. That is most likely why, for most Money keyword phrases, YouTube<br />

results top the SERPs. See for yourself.<br />

Page 5


Page 6


Page 7


Page 8


Page 9


Page 10


Page 11


Page 12


Page 13


Link Audit<br />

Top 10 keywords<br />

1. gimme more<br />

2. pork and beans<br />

3. back street boys i want it that way<br />

4. walking on air<br />

5. oasis dont look back in anger<br />

6. round round<br />

7. sillyboy<br />

8. the climb<br />

9. deamons<br />

Top competitors in the niche of tape.tv<br />

1. youtube.de<br />

2. myvideo.de<br />

3. clipfish.de<br />

4. lastfm.de<br />

5. laut.de<br />

6. dailymotion.com<br />

7. eventim.de<br />

8. golyr.de<br />

9. lyricsfreak.com<br />

Page 14


Was anchor text overdone?<br />

Yes and no.<br />

They did not use the typical Money keyword-stuffed anchor texts we know from stores, yet<br />

they employed many typical phrases that are Money keywords for their segment. A typical<br />

keyword set includes “Hakkuna Mattata, Xavier Naidoo, Nirvana, Video killed the Radio Star”.<br />

However, from more than 1,200 anchor texts, there are no overused anchor texts. The most<br />

frequently used anchor text is “Whitney Houston tv” that was used 0.5% times.<br />

Looking deeper into the anchor texts of tape.tv we see that many, many anchor texts are used a<br />

few times but they are hard Money keywords.<br />

Page 15


.<br />

http://arenaa.linkarena.com/tags/xavier%20naidoo%20bei%20tape.tv<br />

Page 16


Page 17


Page 18


Did the websites have more CEMPER Power than CEMPER Trust?<br />

No, CEMPER Power and CEMPER Trust are equal. In this specific segment, very high Trust is<br />

common as we see in the table below. Sites like laut.de, a German music portal, and<br />

dailymotion.com have more Trust than Power.<br />

When breaking down the specific Power and Trust graphs per link source, we see a strange<br />

pattern: many links are coming from specific sources that have similar Power and Trust.<br />

The high number of Power*Trust 4 and 5 links is coming from many sitewide links from<br />

various partners. See the next analysis question.<br />

Page 19


Power hit its peak at 2 and 3 because many partner-sites had power of 2 and 3.<br />

Looking at Trust, this effect is even more visible. Many sites have a Trust of 2, giving a<br />

heterogeneous mix of link power.<br />

Page 20


Page 21


The result of CEMPER Power*Trust verifies this observation by showing that tape.tv is<br />

standing out of the market segment. Too many similar pages are sending way too many links<br />

from their footer and sidebars.<br />

Page 22


Did the site have too many sitewide links?<br />

Yes, their partnerships generated many sitewide links, and they had section-wide links. In the<br />

case of bild.de, the links do not span the whole domain, but they are in a full news section of the<br />

bild.de boulevard and stars section. That’s still a lot of links. Some examples include:<br />

MeinRap.de<br />

It is linking from every single post to tape.tv using a sidebar widget. That totals 58,590 links.<br />

http://meinrap.de/2014/03/20/sentence-karl-lagerfeld-audio/<br />

Page 23


Page 24


Stereopol.de<br />

The blog of stereopol.de is sending 4,500 sitewide widget links from its sidebar.<br />

http://stereopol.de/?p=8728<br />

Page 25


MeineStadt.de<br />

It is part of one of Germany’s biggest online agglomerates. It sends thousands of links using this<br />

sidebar widget.<br />

http://veranstaltungen.meinestadt.de/muenchen/musicals-shows/variete<br />

Page 26


Wihel.de<br />

It is sending thousands of sidebar links. Yes, this generates a network. We’re going to see Vice<br />

again soon.<br />

http://www.wihel.de/kategorien/da-hammer-wieder-was-gelernt/page/10<br />

Page 27


Zoomlab.de<br />

Sidebar links were pretty common. Zoomlab.de sends a couple thousand links.<br />

http://www.zoomlab.de/tag/notizbuch/<br />

Page 28


Did they have paid links?<br />

Yes. You want examples?<br />

Taz.de sold links in their blogs. Why are they sold? Honestly, it is unlikely that a user would add<br />

links to the subscription-termination-letter he sends to the editorial team of a newspaper. See<br />

for yourself:<br />

http://blogs.taz.de/hausblog/2012/07/16/aus-und-vorbei-warum-ich-mein-taz-abo-kundige/<br />

Bild.de sold some links in their People Section.<br />

Page 29


http://www.bild.de/unterhaltung/musik/heino/rockerkrieg-wegen-rammstein-und-denaerzten-28233530.bild.html<br />

Page 30


Page 31


Did wihel.de, the guys that send tape.tv thousands of sidebar links, also have paid posts on<br />

their site? Yes, they have links that originate from wihel.de and go to tape.tv that are<br />

categorized in a section called “sponsored posts.”<br />

Page 32


Are sneaky redirects involved?<br />

No, there were no serious redirects. There was some cheap profile marketing, but that’s not the<br />

biggest problem spotted.<br />

Is unnatural link growth involved?<br />

No, there is a falling or neutral trend in Linkbuilding. Compared to Dailymotion and Eventim<br />

there was less activity visible.<br />

Page 33


When first running the CLV Report we included “DailyMotion.com”. The First result appeared<br />

to be valid, yet when looking into the details, dailymotion diluted the whole comparison, since<br />

they pick up many more links than a german-only site like tape.tv order my video.de. This gets<br />

visible by the fact that only dailymotion is visible in this report and no other site got significant<br />

visibility.<br />

This fact required us to rerun the report again. The result was significantly more readable and<br />

gave relevant insight: When looking at Competitive Link Velocity Report, we see that<br />

myvideo.de and lastfm.de are, relative to Tape.tv, picking up more links. It appears that they<br />

are offering more ways to share and integrate their content into the web in useful ways.<br />

Page 34


Are link networks involved?<br />

Trigami<br />

Yes, there were several link networks involved with tape.tv. Some were intended to do<br />

marketing, others less so.<br />

ID Network Name Network<br />

Network Type Status<br />

Structure<br />

1 Trigami: Social<br />

PR<br />

Agency to<br />

Bloggers<br />

Obvious Stopped in<br />

2011<br />

2 Press Portals Syndication PR Sender Ongoing<br />

System<br />

3 AGOF internal PR By Chance Link Widget Ongoing<br />

4 Vice and Indy-<br />

Media<br />

Cooperations Informal Ongoing<br />

Page 35


Yes, several link networks were involved. One was the trigami network. Trigami used to be an<br />

online marketing platform that allows paying for marketing services like guest blogging.<br />

http://www.eisy.eu/short-trigami-reviews-von-google-blockiert/<br />

http://bit.ly/QtOX1k<br />

Page 36


Press Portals<br />

Yes, they released News on cheap press portals<br />

http://www.internetmarketing.or.at/kostenlose-presseportale/<br />

The network is not hard to reveal, just click on “Presseportale”.<br />

Page 37


Google has in Mid 2013 clearly defined that optimized anchor text from press releases are a<br />

violation of their terms & conditions. This was even clearly echo’ed and explained by Search<br />

Engine land a couple days later.<br />

Agof.de<br />

Yes, one of the most interesting network-producing pages is the German Internet tracking<br />

organization, the German Internet Statistics Authority (AGOF). Using their PR messages and<br />

marketing widgets, they produced a network for their top members. One example is the<br />

homepage widget that connects all members with a direct link. The AGOF is linking to top<br />

players from their website.<br />

Page 38


Page 39


http://agof.de/studienteilnehmer-internet/<br />

Page 40


Page 41


The Vice and Indy Media Network<br />

Tape.tv, populis and others are mentioned regularly by webmasters as media partners. That’s<br />

great from a branding perspective, yet it also produces a link network: many webmasters are<br />

sending thousands of footer or sidebar widgets to all the same players. Here is a typical<br />

example.<br />

http://blog.atomlabor.de/2012/09/supercut-die-noes-in-star-wars-1-video.html<br />

Page 42


Is there unnatural country distribution?<br />

No, the country was normal since many blogs are hosted on wordpress.com, tumblr.com and<br />

blogspot.com. The IP distribution was normal as well.<br />

Page 43


Page 44


Is there an unnatural deep link ratio?<br />

No. Though it looks like a high deep link ratio, it appears to be pretty normal.<br />

Page 45


Is there an unnatural link status ratio?<br />

Yes, the sites have many broken links.<br />

URL schemes of iframe videos were changed and are broken. The user gets to a nice and cuddly<br />

penguin animation, yet the real content is missing. This technical flaw is a real issue since many<br />

high quality pages are linking to these URLs.<br />

Many links have also been recently removed.<br />

Page 46


Page 47


One of the most painful findings was that integration with bild.de.<br />

Germany’s bild.de online newspaper is one of the hottest pieces of online real estate on the<br />

web. Working with bild.de requires either awesome personal connections or a ton of money.<br />

I’m not sure which one tape.tv had, but they had a great integration with bild.de. For a whole<br />

section, their videos were automatically pulled from an api, allowing them to send practically<br />

anything into the bild.de website using an iframe. That’s the good side of the story.<br />

The bad side is that the integration still exists, but it’s broken. At least the image link is still<br />

there.<br />

Page 48


http://www.bild.de/dsds/2012/dsds/mensch-dieter-bohlen-hast-du-einen-schweren-job-<br />

27302118.bild.html<br />

Some of the URLs that are linking include:<br />

Page 49


Page 50


Page 51


http://www.charts.de/song.asp?artist=Avicii&title=Wake%20Me%20Up!&country=de<br />

Page 52


Page 53


Did the websites have a high Link DTOX Risk?<br />

Page 54


Page 55


Page 56


When clicking some links, I found real malware on these domains.<br />

Page 57


Bintr.de – Das Presseportal Das Trading Portal<br />

Bad link neighborhood “Bintra.de,” used to be a binary trade portal – one of the lowest quality<br />

SEO sites. You can imagine how these links look.<br />

Page 58


Firewall alerts<br />

Several links are also generating firewall alerts.<br />

Page 59


Competitive Detox Analysis<br />

In the Detox Check, we see that all their competitors have a very similar detox value of around<br />

220. There isn’t a big spread here.<br />

Page 60


When looking more into details, we see that tape.tv uses more Money keywords the other sites.<br />

Page 61


This most likely correlates with the increased amount of suspicious links.<br />

Page 62


Two rules stand out: Susp31 and Susp20.<br />

Susp31 means that the anchor text placement looks suspicious.<br />

Susp20 means that a high risk score has been detected for this link. There is a high likelihood<br />

that this domain is toxic.<br />

See all detox rules here: http://www.linkdetox.com/faq/.<br />

Page 63


These rules produce increased numbers of moderate and deadly links.<br />

Page 64


My Answers to the Interview Questions:<br />

1. What does a CEO think SEO means, and how does that person consider what SEO<br />

works?<br />

In this case we saw what SEO means: throwing money at media to get integrations and links.<br />

And it works if, with partnerships, a webmaster gets exclusive, valuable and permanently<br />

available website integrations.<br />

2. What was done to perform growth jumps?<br />

There was very well done partner management. Bloggers were invited to cooperate. It was a<br />

nice user experience and result. Yet, this did not deliver long-term high growth.<br />

The integrations gave high growth, but that lasted only for a short time. In the end, it was a<br />

quick-win and quick-loss strategy.<br />

Results Analysis<br />

ID Task Result<br />

1. Anchor Text Analysis Yes, overdone<br />

2. Power & Trust Balance Analysis No, okay<br />

3. Sitewide Links Analysis Yes, too many SW links<br />

4. Paid Links Analysis Yes, paid links<br />

5. Power*Trust Ratio Analysis Yes<br />

6. Redirect Analysis No, okay<br />

7. Link Growth Analysis No, okay<br />

8. Link Network Analysis Yes, link networks<br />

9. Country Ratio Analysis No, okay<br />

10. Deep Link Ratio Analysis No, okay<br />

11. Link Status Ratio Analysis No, this was standard<br />

12. Link Detox Risk Analysis Yes, high risk<br />

13. Competitive Link Detox Risk Analysis against competition No, CDTOX is normal<br />

Page 65


Conclusion<br />

Tape.tv had many, many Money keyword anchors for their site. They rarely re-used the same<br />

anchor, yet a significant amount of all links were Money-driven.<br />

The second issue was that they employed cheap press portals and that they had expensive<br />

press coverage or paid links in expensive environments.<br />

They had widget embeds, yet several of them were broken. That’s not a good trust signal. It was<br />

also a negative seeing malware sites and refactored binary trading sites in the networks.<br />

These conclusions are validated in the CDTOX where the high number of Money keywords and<br />

the strange position of links on the page are sending warning signals.<br />

Page 66


This case study was written by Guntram Bechtold, StarsMedia IT Management KG, and<br />

proud user of Link Research Tools and Link Detox.<br />

A word from Christoph C. Cemper<br />

This analysis is part of a series conducted and written by our new<br />

Certified LRT Xpert, Guntram Bechtold.<br />

Guntram demonstrated his expertise in doing a deep dive on why<br />

tape.tv rose and fell in SERPs. It’s one of five studies he’s doing for<br />

his Xpert certification.<br />

He did a great job investigating the possible causes and isolating the<br />

penalized tactics in his case study. Therefore, I’m very happy to<br />

certify Guntram Bechtold as the latest Certified LRT Xpert by<br />

approving and publishing his research on our site.<br />

Our goal is to provide our user community and clients with quality service and knowledge. Our<br />

Certified LRT Professionals and Xperts are key to achieving this goal.<br />

I look forward to Guntram’s future work, and I personally recommend working with him whenever<br />

you get the opportunity.<br />

Page 67


Author Bio:<br />

Guntram Bechtold<br />

Associate at StarsMedia IT Management (StarsMedia.com)<br />

Guntram founded StarsMedia.com in 2011, a SaaS and Project-Management Company. He<br />

gained a lot of experience as the Project Manager for Yumpu.com, i-Magazine’s self-service<br />

publishing platform with readers from 180 countries worldwide. StarsMedia specializes in<br />

Online Marketing Consulting for established online players and Startups. Guntram is a certified<br />

Scrum Master, LRT Certified Professional and graduate Industrial Designer, living in Dornbirn,<br />

Austria.<br />

Google+: https://plus.google.com/114563253174342074125?rel=author<br />

Twitter: http://twitter.com/guntrambechtold<br />

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Bechtold.Guntram<br />

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/guntrambechtold<br />

Page 68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!