28.05.2014 Views

Peace Support Operations: Lessons Learned? - School of Political ...

Peace Support Operations: Lessons Learned? - School of Political ...

Peace Support Operations: Lessons Learned? - School of Political ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PEACE SUPPORT OPERATIONS: LESSONS LEARNED?<br />

Shannon Tow<br />

Logistics arrangements also present<br />

particular difficulties. Logistics chains<br />

are not only contingent on whether the<br />

needs <strong>of</strong> peacekeeping forces can be<br />

met, but also whether suppliers and<br />

transporters can meet the needs <strong>of</strong><br />

logistics headquarters (Cohen and<br />

Shelton 1999: 4; Breen 2000: 139). In<br />

the case <strong>of</strong> INTERFET, logistics chains<br />

were stretched to maximum (Cotton<br />

2001: 137). These difficulties were<br />

only compounded by expectations <strong>of</strong><br />

many international contingents’ that<br />

Australia, as the lead state, would also<br />

supply the bulk <strong>of</strong> INTERFET troops<br />

(Breen 2000: 140). The PSO doctrine’s<br />

recognition that consent must be<br />

managed, points to the model’s utility<br />

in encouraging a more integrated<br />

organisational structure. However, the<br />

erosion <strong>of</strong> political will over time is<br />

likely to prove a significant obstacle in<br />

actually realising these operational<br />

advantages.<br />

Civil-Military Cooperation<br />

Efforts to generate integrated<br />

peacekeeping missions are further<br />

complicated by the need to coordinate<br />

with humanitarian agencies. Such<br />

efforts have, in past, proven relatively<br />

unsuccessful. In Bosnia, for example,<br />

over 150 NGOs operated in the UN<br />

theater <strong>of</strong> operations. Only forty-one<br />

<strong>of</strong> these agencies, however, regularly<br />

coordinated their operations with<br />

UNPROFOR (Hillen 2000: 172). In<br />

recognising the role <strong>of</strong> these agencies<br />

in managing consent, the PSO doctrine<br />

encourages and codifies greater civilmilitary<br />

coordination. This has been<br />

evidenced by the plethora <strong>of</strong> civilmilitary<br />

coordinating mechanisms that<br />

have emerged in recent years. Among<br />

these include NATO’s strengthened<br />

Civil Military Cooperation (CIMIC)<br />

component and Humanitarian<br />

Coordination Information Centre<br />

(Bellamy 2001: 11).<br />

An absence <strong>of</strong> enduring political will on<br />

the part <strong>of</strong> both military contingents<br />

and NGOs at the operational level,<br />

however, <strong>of</strong>ten undermines such<br />

initiatives and the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the PSO<br />

model. Indeed, both actors continue to<br />

perceive themselves as autonomous<br />

rather than as equal partners <strong>of</strong> a<br />

broader peacekeeping/peacebuilding<br />

force. Several military forces, for<br />

instance, do not attempt or are not<br />

equipped for the capacity-building<br />

activities that the PSO doctrine<br />

envisions. The US army represents a<br />

case in point, preferring to focus on<br />

issues <strong>of</strong> force protection (Bellamy<br />

2001: 10). Michael Pugh has also<br />

suggested that civil-military initiatives<br />

such as NATO’s CIMIC, are designed<br />

by military forces primarily to support<br />

Dialogue 1:1 (2003) 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!