Safe as Houses: Reducing Residential Burglary

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Victims / Targets Lifestyle data identified distinct groups with high rates: • Skilled older families, terraces (Urban Prosperity) • Home owning family are<strong>as</strong> (Comfortably Off) • Older families prosperous suburbs (Wealthy Achievers) • Suburban private renting professionals (Wealthy Achievers)
Victims / Targets • Working families, parents at work and kids at school • Professionals, commute to the city • Higher incomes
Page 1 and 2: Reducing Residential Burglary: Enfi
Page 3 and 4: London Borough of Enfield Tenure Ow
Page 5 and 6: Burglary Levels 2003‐2008 • Dom
Page 7 and 8: • Political and community concern
Page 9 and 10: • Estimated cost of one burglary
Page 11 and 12: Analysis
Page 13 and 14: Overview • High incidence of near
Page 15 and 16: Location Low density suburban dwell
Page 17 and 18: Location Near-Repeats / Space-Time
Page 19: Location LISA Analysis Hot Routes D
Page 23 and 24: Offenders? • 9% detection rate in
Page 25 and 26: • Exploit strongest intelligence
Page 27: Safe as Houses Funding - £231k, of
Page 30 and 31: Increased effort - harden targets
Page 32 and 33: Increased effort - deflect offender
Page 34 and 35: Reduced rewards - stolen property o
Page 36 and 37: Educate and inform residents
Page 38 and 39: Recording info • Environmental Vi
Page 40 and 41: Performance headlines end of first
Page 42 and 43: Performance figures (varied periods
Page 45 and 46: Resident feedback alleygates • 73
Page 47: • Intervention area = 2.5% of the

Safe as Houses: Reducing Residential Burglary

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?