Safe as Houses: Reducing Residential Burglary

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Performance headlines end of first financial year • Target of -7.5% in Safe as Houses streets • Achieved a reduction of 106 burglaries, or -46.7% • Non intervention areas saw a reduction of -1.8% • Enfield wide there was a -7.2% reduction
Unintended benefits Crime Type Change in SAH Change Borough Wide Difference (% points) Criminal Damage -6.7% -2.0% 4.7 Damage to Dwelling -6.7% +3.9% 10.6 Motor Vehicle Crime -23.0% -12.5% 10.5 Robbery +29.3% +15.8% 13.5 Violence -1.4% +9.7% 11.5
Page 1 and 2: Reducing Residential Burglary: Enfi
Page 3 and 4: London Borough of Enfield Tenure Ow
Page 5 and 6: Burglary Levels 2003‐2008 • Dom
Page 7 and 8: • Political and community concern
Page 9 and 10: • Estimated cost of one burglary
Page 11 and 12: Analysis
Page 13 and 14: Overview • High incidence of near
Page 15 and 16: Location Low density suburban dwell
Page 17 and 18: Location Near-Repeats / Space-Time
Page 19 and 20: Location LISA Analysis Hot Routes D
Page 21 and 22: Victims / Targets • Working famil
Page 23 and 24: Offenders? • 9% detection rate in
Page 25 and 26: • Exploit strongest intelligence
Page 27: Safe as Houses Funding - £231k, of
Page 30 and 31: Increased effort - harden targets
Page 32 and 33: Increased effort - deflect offender
Page 34 and 35: Reduced rewards - stolen property o
Page 36 and 37: Educate and inform residents
Page 38 and 39: Recording info • Environmental Vi
Page 42 and 43: Performance figures (varied periods
Page 45 and 46: Resident feedback alleygates • 73
Page 47: • Intervention area = 2.5% of the

Safe as Houses: Reducing Residential Burglary

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?