28.05.2014 Views

Low-Sulfur Fuel Incentive Program Fact Sheet - The Port of Los ...

Low-Sulfur Fuel Incentive Program Fact Sheet - The Port of Los ...

Low-Sulfur Fuel Incentive Program Fact Sheet - The Port of Los ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Low</strong>-<strong>Sulfur</strong> <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>Incentive</strong> <strong>Program</strong><br />

<strong>Fact</strong> <strong>Sheet</strong><br />

Purpose<br />

To quickly reduce emissions from Ocean-going Vessels, the ports <strong>of</strong> <strong>Los</strong> Angeles and<br />

Long Beach have proposed an incentive program to get vessel operators to switch from<br />

highly polluting bunker fuel to clean, 0.2 percent low-sulfur distillate.<br />

<strong>The</strong> program would:<br />

• Pay eligible shipping lines the difference between the cost <strong>of</strong> bunker fuel and the<br />

more expensive low-sulfur distillate when used in main engines within the terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> the program.<br />

• Encourage the use <strong>of</strong> cleaner fuels among ocean-going vessels prior to the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> lease-based low-sulfur fuel agreements and prior to the start<br />

<strong>of</strong> international treaties, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or California Air<br />

Resources Board regulations requiring low-sulfur fuel use.<br />

• Reduce ocean-going vessels’ emissions <strong>of</strong> sulfur oxides by an estimated 11<br />

percent and diesel particulates by 9 percent in a 12-month period.<br />

• Sunset on June 30, 2009, upon the expected implementation <strong>of</strong> statewide lowsulfur<br />

fuel regulations.<br />

Overview<br />

Ocean-going Vessels are the single largest source <strong>of</strong> goods movement-related air<br />

pollution in Southern California, accounting for about half <strong>of</strong> the port-relation emissions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> high-sulfur content <strong>of</strong> bunker fuel is responsible for much <strong>of</strong> these emissions.<br />

Locally, the ports plan to require the use <strong>of</strong> cleaner fuels among their vessel-operating<br />

partners through lease-based agreements. Statewide, the California Air Resources<br />

Board is planning to phase in sulfur-content restrictions on the main engines <strong>of</strong> oceangoing<br />

vessels starting July 1, 2009, with a limit <strong>of</strong> 0.5 percent, going to 0.1 or 0.2 in<br />

January 2012.


Page -2-<br />

In the interests <strong>of</strong> achieving air quality improvements more rapidly, the <strong>Port</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Los</strong><br />

Angeles and Long Beach are planning to <strong>of</strong>fer the <strong>Low</strong>-<strong>Sulfur</strong> Main Engine <strong>Fuel</strong><br />

<strong>Incentive</strong> <strong>Program</strong>.<br />

For cargo ships that switch over to 0.2 percent low-sulfur fuel in their main engines<br />

within at least 20 nautical miles and up to 40 nautical miles from Point Fermin, the<br />

ports will pay the incremental difference between the higher cost <strong>of</strong> low-sulfur marine<br />

gas oil and bunker fuel.<br />

To participate in the <strong>Low</strong>-<strong>Sulfur</strong> Main Engine <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>Incentive</strong> <strong>Program</strong>, ships also must<br />

burn low-sulfur fuel in their electricity-generating auxiliary engines while at berth – as<br />

they do now. And the ships must participate in the ports’ Vessel Speed Reduction<br />

programs, which call for ship speeds <strong>of</strong> no more than 12 knots entering and departing<br />

the ports. Most ships already participate in the speed reduction program, which also<br />

curbs emissions. Carriers must enroll individual vessels into the incentive program in an<br />

application process. Only the ships enrolled in the program will be eligible for<br />

reimbursement. Enrollment will be based on a first-come, first-served basis until the<br />

ports’ budgeted amounts <strong>of</strong> incentives are met.<br />

For the 12 months <strong>of</strong> the program, the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Los</strong> Angeles could pay up to $8.6 million,<br />

while the <strong>Port</strong> <strong>of</strong> Long Beach could pay up to $9.9 million, in reimbursements.<br />

Environment<br />

<strong>Sulfur</strong> oxides, which contribute to the formation <strong>of</strong> health-threatening soot or<br />

particulate matter, would be cut by an expected 11 percent and particulate matter by 9<br />

percent from ships, accelerating air quality improvements. <strong>The</strong> program would provide<br />

additional emissions reductions faster than the already aggressive schedule set by the<br />

landmark San Pedro Bay <strong>Port</strong>s Clean Air Action Plan.<br />

Review Process<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Los</strong> Angeles Board <strong>of</strong> Harbor Commissioners and the Long Beach Board <strong>of</strong> Harbor<br />

Commissioners have scheduled a March 24 joint meet to consider the <strong>Low</strong>-<strong>Sulfur</strong> <strong>Fuel</strong><br />

<strong>Incentive</strong> <strong>Program</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong> meeting will start at 9 a.m. at Banning’s Landing Community Center, 100 E. Water<br />

Street, Wilmington, Calif.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!