28.05.2014 Views

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.0 Kelp <strong>and</strong> Macroalgae<br />

pose a significant economic problem as a fouling agent. Undaria is introduced primarily on boat<br />

hulls <strong>and</strong> in ballast water.<br />

Undaria was documented during the present study at all eight inner harbor sites <strong>and</strong> at 7 <strong>of</strong> 12<br />

outer harbor locations. Undaria has also been reported at Port Hueneme, Santa Barbara<br />

Harbor, <strong>and</strong> Catalina Isl<strong>and</strong> (MEC 2002), <strong>and</strong> as far north as Monterey Bay <strong>and</strong> as far south as<br />

Ensenada, Mexico (Chapman 2005). It is believed by many scientists that a successful<br />

eradication is not possible due to its mode <strong>of</strong> reproduction, which involves the release <strong>of</strong> millions<br />

<strong>of</strong> motile spores that are readily spread locally through natural dispersion <strong>and</strong> to remote locales<br />

by shipping traffic. If this species becomes a major competitor in the kelp forest, commercial<br />

harvesting could represent a control option, similar to an approach used in France (Chapman<br />

2005).<br />

In comparison to Sargassum <strong>and</strong> Undaria, the highly invasive green algae Caulerpa (NMFS<br />

<strong>2008</strong>) was not detected or encountered in either Port, although <strong>surveys</strong> for this species were not<br />

comprehensive or targeted during the study. The Ports are required to conduct Caulerpa<br />

<strong>surveys</strong> prior to any dredging project, in accordance with established Caulerpa protocols (NMFS<br />

<strong>2008</strong>) <strong>and</strong> have never detected Caulerpa during any <strong>of</strong> these <strong>surveys</strong>.<br />

Table 7.3-1. Relative Density <strong>of</strong> Kelp Beds Surveyed <strong>and</strong> Delineated<br />

(Percent <strong>of</strong> Total Area).<br />

February <strong>2008</strong> September <strong>2008</strong><br />

Density % <strong>of</strong> total area Density % <strong>of</strong> total area<br />

Dense 12 % Dense 0 %<br />

Moderate 71.4 % Moderate 12 %<br />

Sparse 16.6 % Sparse 88 %<br />

<strong>2008</strong> Biological Surveys <strong>of</strong> Los Angeles <strong>and</strong> Long Beach Harbors 7–9<br />

April 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!