Organizational Justice, Ethics, and Corporate Social Responsibility
Organizational Justice, Ethics, and Corporate Social Responsibility
Organizational Justice, Ethics, and Corporate Social Responsibility
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 1 • THE FIELD OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 27<br />
dispersed—they are less vulnerable to attacks by human threats (e.g., terrorist strikes,<br />
arsonists) <strong>and</strong> natural disasters (e.g., floods, hurricanes, <strong>and</strong> tornadoes). Preparing accordingly,<br />
of course, requires some effort. For some useful guidelines in this regard, see the<br />
How to Do It section on page 28.<br />
Despite these benefits, as you might imagine, telecommuting is not for everyone; it also<br />
has its limitations. 67 It works best on jobs that require concentration, have well-defined beginning<br />
<strong>and</strong> end points, are easily portable, call for minimal amounts of special equipment, <strong>and</strong> can<br />
be done with little supervision. 68 Fortunately, at least some aspects of most sales <strong>and</strong> professional<br />
jobs meet these st<strong>and</strong>ards. Even so, making telecommuting work requires careful adjustments in<br />
the way work is done. Also, many people just don’t have the kind of self-discipline needed to get<br />
work done without direct supervision. To see if you <strong>and</strong> your associates have what it takes to<br />
succeed at telecommuting, see the Group Exercise at the end of this chapter.<br />
OB Is Responsive to People’s Changing Expectations<br />
OB scientists do not work in a vacuum. Instead, they are highly responsive to people’s<br />
changing expectations with respect to various aspects of work. This is the case with respect<br />
to three particular areas of concern to the field of OB: (1) employees’ <strong>and</strong> employers’<br />
desire for engagement, (2) the flexibility employees expect from employers, <strong>and</strong> (3) the<br />
pressure to produce high-quality goods <strong>and</strong> services. We now discuss each of these forces<br />
<strong>and</strong> their impact on modern OB.<br />
engagement<br />
A mutual commitment between<br />
employers <strong>and</strong> employees to do<br />
things to help one another achieve<br />
each other’s goals <strong>and</strong> aspirations.<br />
Employees <strong>and</strong> Employers Desire Engagement<br />
When referring to people who are preparing to wed, we say that they are “engaged.”<br />
Typically, such individuals believe in each other, they want to share a bright future<br />
together, they are respectful to each other, <strong>and</strong> they are willing to do what it takes to ensure<br />
the other’s happiness <strong>and</strong> success. We also use the term engagement to refer to employers<br />
<strong>and</strong> employees who share similar commitments to one another.<br />
In the field of OB the term engagement refers to a mutual commitment between<br />
employers <strong>and</strong> employees to do things to help one another achieve goals <strong>and</strong> aspirations. 69<br />
Thus, engagement is a two-way process. Typically, it works like this: Organizations take<br />
steps to engage their employees, <strong>and</strong> employees, in turn, respond by engaging their organizations.<br />
This takes several forms, such as the following:<br />
High levels of pride in the organization<br />
Pride in the organizations’ products <strong>and</strong> services<br />
Belief that the organization helps employees do their best<br />
Willingness to help others on the job<br />
Underst<strong>and</strong>ing “the big picture” <strong>and</strong> being willing to go beyond formal job requirements<br />
when necessary<br />
Because engagement begins with employers, it’s important to note what organizations<br />
can do to get the ball rolling. Organizations can do several specific things to promote feelings<br />
of engagement in their employees. Not surprisingly, these are practices that we will be<br />
describing (<strong>and</strong> recommending) in various places throughout this book. The four key drivers<br />
of engagement are as follows:<br />
Involving employees in making decisions (see Chapter 10)<br />
Giving employees opportunities to express their ideas <strong>and</strong> opinions (see Chapter 2)<br />
Providing opportunities for employees to develop their jobs (see Chapter 5)<br />
Showing concern for employees’ well-being as individuals (see Chapter 7)<br />
Considering this, we may ask, are today’s employees are engaged in their jobs? An extensive<br />
survey by the Gallup Organization revealed three groups of employees. 70 Only 31 percent<br />
truly were engaged. These individuals worked with passion <strong>and</strong> felt deep connections to their<br />
companies, helping move their companies forward. The majority, however, some 52 percent,<br />
were classified as not engaged. These people “checked out” of their jobs <strong>and</strong> went through the