Synthetic Biology: Public dialogue on synthetic biology

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix Q22 How would you explain synthetic biology to a friend? 15 Q23 What are your hopes, if any, for the technology? 15 Q24 What are your concerns, if any, for the technology? 14 Q25 If you have any further comments, please write them in below. 5 Thank you very much for your help. Please hand this form to one of the project team on your way out or leave it on your seat. Note: For Q22-Q25 the number relates to the number of responses given. <strong>Synthetic</strong> <strong>Biology</strong>: <strong>Public</strong> <strong>dialogue</strong> on synthetic biology 59
Appendix 8: Omnibus Survey Questions Client People Science & Policy Survey Name <strong>Synthetic</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> Survey Dates 17-19th April 09 Sample 1000 GB Adults 18+ Methodology Telephone Omnibus Q1 How much would you say that have you heard about synthetic biology? READ OUT- SINGLE CODE 1. Heard a lot 2. Heard a little 3. Heard the term only but don’t know what it means 4. Heard nothing 5. Don’t know (Do not read out) Q2 What words or phrases come to mind when I say ‘synthetic biology’? CODES OPEN – CLIENT TO CODE RESPONSES Q3 What do you think synthetic biology might be? INTERVIEWER: PROBE FOR EXPLAINATION CODES OPEN – CLIENT TO CODE RESPONSES Q4 I am now going to read out some statements and I would like you to tell me the extent to which you agree or disagree with each? READ OUT – ROTATE ORDER A. Re-designing an existing micro-organism so that it produces medicines and biofuels should not be allowed B. Creating new man-made micro-organisms that will produce medicines or biofuels should be supported C. The idea of a man-made micro-organism is worrying SINGLE CODE 1. Agree strongly 2. Agree slightly 3. Neither agree nor disagree 4. Disagree slightly 5. Disagree strongly 6. Don’t know (do not read out) INTERVIEWER NOTES: 4a ASKS ABOUT CREATING NEW MICRO-ORGANISMS; 4b ASKS ABOUT CHANGING EXISTING ORGANISMS AN EXAMPLE IS BACTERIA 60 The Royal Academy of Engineering
Page 1 and 2:
Synthetic
Page 3 and 4:
Contents Executive summary 1. Intro
Page 5 and 6:
Acknowledgements This study was com
Page 7 and 8:
Awareness, perceptions and understa
Page 9 and 10: Participant priorities, recommendat
Page 11 and 12: with whom to begin exploring attitu
Page 13 and 14: For Session 4 the participants were
Page 15 and 16: This element of the project allowed
Page 17 and 18: Table 3.2 feel that the presentatio
Page 19 and 20: 4. Awareness, perceptions and under
Page 21 and 22: most common group, was related to
Page 23 and 24: “The engineering of micro organis
Page 25 and 26: Figure 5.2 ‘Creating new man-made
Page 27 and 28: Figure 5.4 ‘Re-designing an exist
Page 29 and 30: nor disagree - a third of women (33
Page 31 and 32: Those who had more confidence in th
Page 33 and 34: “If they’re going to invest in
Page 35 and 36: important but the difficulties of p
Page 37 and 38: 7.3 Expectations - what do you expe
Page 39 and 40: “We felt that a lot of people clo
Page 41 and 42: 40 The Royal Academy of Engineering
Page 43 and 44: Q8 Science is getting out of contro
Page 45 and 46: 6.50 - 7.25pm BREAK IN TO 2 GROUPS
Page 47 and 48: Appendix 3: Professor Paul Freemont
Page 53 and 54: 7.15 - 7.50pm BREAK INTO 2 GROUPS I
Page 55 and 56: genes and adding them to yoghurt. I
Page 57 and 58: Appendix 7: Evaluation questionnair
Page 59: Q15 Do you feel there has been enou
show all

Synthetic Biology: Public dialogue on synthetic biology

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?