Lies: A Journal of Materialist Feminism - Libcom
Lies: A Journal of Materialist Feminism - Libcom
Lies: A Journal of Materialist Feminism - Libcom
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
historicizing, drowning in the weight <strong>of</strong> phenomena, “tripping on<br />
content” as Chris Kraus puts it. 3<br />
So then to clarify: I do not set out to reject an entire wave <strong>of</strong> feminism.<br />
Under the banner <strong>of</strong> “sex positivity,” even sexual optimism, are<br />
gestures that would be absurd to reject—the historicizing <strong>of</strong> sexuality,<br />
demystifying sexuality, giving information surrounding STDs<br />
and contraception to women and queers, disrupting reactionary<br />
forms <strong>of</strong> shame. What is necessary is far from a sectarian return to<br />
“second wave” theorists, but rather tracing the thread that gave rise<br />
to our present situation—the ways in which sex has been exalted, its<br />
relationship to senses <strong>of</strong> the Self, and the ideologies <strong>of</strong> the whole<br />
and natural. Sex positivity as a supposedly coherent social movement<br />
would be only a paper tiger; rather, the object <strong>of</strong> this essay is to<br />
disrupt the attachment to sex as it has lived in feminism and popular<br />
imagination, and it is a relation that lives well beyond the past 30<br />
years <strong>of</strong> “sex positive feminism.”<br />
Before continuing, a clarification <strong>of</strong> my use <strong>of</strong> the phrase “not-man”:<br />
“Not-man” cannot be understood as shorthand for “women & others.”<br />
It is, rather than a collection <strong>of</strong> non-male identities, a way <strong>of</strong> referring<br />
to the product <strong>of</strong> gender as a relationship <strong>of</strong> exploitation. “It is<br />
nonsensical to describe not-men as doing something—anything—or<br />
having any unity,” because not-man is a position <strong>of</strong> silence, an exclusion<br />
from subjectivity as it is put to work within gender and patriarchy.<br />
4 This cannot be confined to any group <strong>of</strong> bodies or identities,<br />
and to conflate it with a unitary womanhood would be an error on<br />
the order <strong>of</strong> conflating “proletarian” with “industrial worker.” None<br />
<strong>of</strong> us are not-men by virtue <strong>of</strong> anatomy or identification, rather notmen<br />
is a position we are forced into, to greater or lesser degree as the<br />
recipients <strong>of</strong> gendered violence.<br />
Effectively, the not-man cannot speak, cannot be represented with<br />
total accuracy, as it is defined through lack and absence. Still, it is a<br />
3 Chris Kraus, Aliens and Anorexia (Boston: MIT Press, 2000).<br />
4 P.S. De Beaufort, “Things We’ve Noticed,” Summer Camp, 1(1), 2011.<br />
UNDOING SEX: AGAINST SEXUAL OPTIMISM 17