07.06.2014 Views

Lies: A Journal of Materialist Feminism - Libcom

Lies: A Journal of Materialist Feminism - Libcom

Lies: A Journal of Materialist Feminism - Libcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

historicizing, drowning in the weight <strong>of</strong> phenomena, “tripping on<br />

content” as Chris Kraus puts it. 3<br />

So then to clarify: I do not set out to reject an entire wave <strong>of</strong> feminism.<br />

Under the banner <strong>of</strong> “sex positivity,” even sexual optimism, are<br />

gestures that would be absurd to reject—the historicizing <strong>of</strong> sexuality,<br />

demystifying sexuality, giving information surrounding STDs<br />

and contraception to women and queers, disrupting reactionary<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> shame. What is necessary is far from a sectarian return to<br />

“second wave” theorists, but rather tracing the thread that gave rise<br />

to our present situation—the ways in which sex has been exalted, its<br />

relationship to senses <strong>of</strong> the Self, and the ideologies <strong>of</strong> the whole<br />

and natural. Sex positivity as a supposedly coherent social movement<br />

would be only a paper tiger; rather, the object <strong>of</strong> this essay is to<br />

disrupt the attachment to sex as it has lived in feminism and popular<br />

imagination, and it is a relation that lives well beyond the past 30<br />

years <strong>of</strong> “sex positive feminism.”<br />

Before continuing, a clarification <strong>of</strong> my use <strong>of</strong> the phrase “not-man”:<br />

“Not-man” cannot be understood as shorthand for “women & others.”<br />

It is, rather than a collection <strong>of</strong> non-male identities, a way <strong>of</strong> referring<br />

to the product <strong>of</strong> gender as a relationship <strong>of</strong> exploitation. “It is<br />

nonsensical to describe not-men as doing something—anything—or<br />

having any unity,” because not-man is a position <strong>of</strong> silence, an exclusion<br />

from subjectivity as it is put to work within gender and patriarchy.<br />

4 This cannot be confined to any group <strong>of</strong> bodies or identities,<br />

and to conflate it with a unitary womanhood would be an error on<br />

the order <strong>of</strong> conflating “proletarian” with “industrial worker.” None<br />

<strong>of</strong> us are not-men by virtue <strong>of</strong> anatomy or identification, rather notmen<br />

is a position we are forced into, to greater or lesser degree as the<br />

recipients <strong>of</strong> gendered violence.<br />

Effectively, the not-man cannot speak, cannot be represented with<br />

total accuracy, as it is defined through lack and absence. Still, it is a<br />

3 Chris Kraus, Aliens and Anorexia (Boston: MIT Press, 2000).<br />

4 P.S. De Beaufort, “Things We’ve Noticed,” Summer Camp, 1(1), 2011.<br />

UNDOING SEX: AGAINST SEXUAL OPTIMISM 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!