14.06.2014 Views

ODI Livestock breeds WP.pdf - Roger Blench

ODI Livestock breeds WP.pdf - Roger Blench

ODI Livestock breeds WP.pdf - Roger Blench

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44<br />

6. Changing <strong>Livestock</strong> Species and Breed Distribution<br />

6.1 Cattle<br />

6.1.1 'Trypanotolerant' <strong>breeds</strong><br />

Muturu or West African Dwarf shorthorn cattle were once widespread throughout southern Nigeria<br />

but are almost everywhere in retreat (<strong>Blench</strong> et al, 1998a). In the past, many villages kept muturu<br />

cattle for ceremonial purposes. In the 1960s it was common to see them in the villages and by the<br />

roadside. Testimonies to the importance and prevalence of this breed can be found in Dudgeon<br />

(1911), Bradbury (1957), Okojie (1960), Ferguson (1967), Bohannan & Bohannan (1968), Isichei<br />

(1977), Grandin (1980), Ngofa (1988). These texts describe the role of muturu in traditional society<br />

in many parts of Southern Nigeria and many comment on the inter-related disappearance of<br />

ceremonial practice and the animals themselves.<br />

A reason for their disappearance cited in many reports is low productivity. In reality, their<br />

productivity is much disputed, in part because of the great range of management systems under<br />

which they are kept. Muturu cattle were semi-feral in some areas and had to be ‘captured’ or simply<br />

shot by hunters. Elsewhere they were intensively stall-fed and had considerable levels of<br />

management inputs. The small mean size of holdings generally meant that there was a great<br />

variation between individual households. Hence the considerable differences in basic productivity<br />

parameters recorded in RIM (1992, II:76) and shown in Table 4. For example, calving interval<br />

varied between 13.9 and 26.8 months between different ecological zones.<br />

Table 4 Comparative Productivity Data for Breeding Muturu Females<br />

Race/Location Breeding<br />

Females n<br />

Mean Age<br />

(months)<br />

Mean Age at<br />

First Calving<br />

(months)<br />

No. of<br />

Previous<br />

Parities<br />

Calving<br />

Interval<br />

(months)<br />

Northeastern Muturu 41 84.9 41.8 2.8 17.1<br />

Jos Plateau Muturu 36 90.2 46.0 2.1 26.8<br />

S. Muturu (savannah) 40 na 28.3 na 13.9<br />

S. Muturu (forest) 22 na 38.0 2.4 24.5<br />

Source: RIM (1992, II:115)<br />

Research station data for comparisons is summarised in ILCA (1979). Rege et al. (1994) have<br />

recently reviewed the productivity of taurines in West Africa under both station and village<br />

conditions and note a similar variability. Ferguson (1967) gives an age at first calving of 26 months<br />

for Ado-Ekiti while Roberts and Gray (1973) recorded 21.2 months at Vom. Calving intervals for<br />

the same sites range from 11 to 13 months with a mean of 11.5 months at Vom. It can be seen that<br />

the ‘best’ figures for muturu compare very well with those for zebu under traditional management<br />

(RIM, 1992, II:76).<br />

There is little doubt, however, that the decision to keep muturu is not based on strictly economic<br />

parameters. Keeping muturu was a prestigious activity associated with chiefs and senior men and<br />

offtake associated with the ceremonial cycle rather than the market. Indeed, in many traditional<br />

production systems, muturu were never sold. At the same time, muturu were able to digest a wide

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!