14.06.2014 Views

Kolokuma ideophones.pdf - Roger Blench

Kolokuma ideophones.pdf - Roger Blench

Kolokuma ideophones.pdf - Roger Blench

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Roger</strong> <strong>Blench</strong> Izọn templatic <strong>ideophones</strong> Circulated for comment<br />

Static<br />

sakeléè<br />

sakaláà<br />

lower limbs are smaller<br />

than the body<br />

tall, thin with a badlyproportioned<br />

body and<br />

tiny legs<br />

not very tall; thin and<br />

delicate in posture<br />

Moving, unbalanced<br />

unbalanced person<br />

sákelesàkele not attested tall -a-e-e<br />

sákalasàkala not attested medium -a-a-a<br />

Exact segmental reduplication with a polar tone is used to contrast static and moving objects. Vowel height<br />

a→e→o indicates the height of the thing described, with the low central vowel suggesting the least height.<br />

Combinations of vowels are applied to signify elements of what is described, such ‘tall but with thin legs’,<br />

suggesting something out of proportion. Nzọn also uses the switch between ±ATR vowel qualities to signify<br />

an overall size distinction, hence the alternation o/ọ in the derivations of sókoroò. Paradigms are never<br />

perfect; two potential forms are not attested and are given in italics in a reconstructed form, following the<br />

logic of the other items.<br />

5. Are there parallels elsewhere in Njọ?<br />

Given the density of the system in Nzọn it can reasonably be asked whether such systems exist elsewhere in<br />

the Njọ group. Maduka (1988) has explored the ‘phonosemantics’ of <strong>ideophones</strong> in Nembe and reached<br />

similar conclusions concerning the correlation of vowel height with size and shape. Documentation is an<br />

issue; only very large dictionaries cite enough material to provide evidence for more recondite types of<br />

ideophone and Nembe is the other language for which such a dictionary exists (Kaliai 1964; rev. ed. Kaliai,<br />

Williamson & <strong>Blench</strong> ined.). The Nembe dictionary has the problem that <strong>ideophones</strong> are not specifically<br />

marked, and are listed under adjectives, adverbs and sometimes verbs. Moreover, Nembe has a<br />

morphological process for marking adverbs, the addition of a suffix, -mọ, which is a verbal extension in<br />

Nzọn. The revised version of the dictionary does indicate <strong>ideophones</strong> through secondary re-analysis. With<br />

these caveats in mind, it seems there are certain pan-Njọ similarities. For example, there is clearly a<br />

consonantal frame to denote unsteady walking, related to the examples in Table 8. Table 10 shows a related<br />

set of Nembe <strong>ideophones</strong> around the notion of walking an unsteady manner or tottering.<br />

̣<br />

Table 10. A Nembe template t-k-r describing unsteady entities<br />

Nembe<br />

Gloss<br />

tẹrẹ<br />

to support; keep from falling<br />

téketéke totter; walk unsteadily and fast (especially of child learning to walk, or somebody<br />

staggering)<br />

tekéke<br />

unsteady; insecure<br />

téperetépere unsteady; tottering<br />

wekélewekéle unsteady (of canoe)<br />

yẹkérẹyẹkéṛẹ<br />

unsteady; restless (behaviour)<br />

kérekére unsteady in behaviour<br />

kérekére<br />

léelée<br />

unsteady<br />

lékeléke<br />

unsteady; restless<br />

leketélekete wavering, oscillating unsteadily; becoming unsteady<br />

The basic verb underlying these may be tẹ(ke)rẹ ‘support; keep from falling’ although the ATR vowel<br />

alternation is unexplained. This can be reduplicated in various ways and then shortened to produce such<br />

forms as tekéke. The k→p alternation in téperetépere almost certainly reflects original k→kp, attested in<br />

Nzọn and then a loss of the velar onset. As with the examples in §3.5, the initial consonant can undergo<br />

mutation (t → w,y) to describe slightly different types of unsteadiness. Strikingly, in Nembe, both syllable<br />

metathesis and complete syllabic reversal (C 1 /C 2 /C 3 → C 3 /C 2 /C 1 ) are permitted, hence leketélekete, which is<br />

in turn shortened to lékeléke and then léelée, creating forms which have hardly any surface similarities to<br />

the orginal template. Nembe does not seem to use word-internal shifts in vowel height to signify size<br />

properties of the entity described. The Nembe system has yet to be fully documented, but it is clear that it<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!