16.06.2014 Views

Phil pages July-Aug-Final - The Royal Philatelic Society of Canada

Phil pages July-Aug-Final - The Royal Philatelic Society of Canada

Phil pages July-Aug-Final - The Royal Philatelic Society of Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

dater at the retail counter remained<br />

unchanged. For example the number<br />

shown on the Trail Post Office dater<br />

remained 647209 but the actual 10-digit<br />

number was 0647209010 with the last<br />

three digits “010” being used to indicate<br />

counter service. <strong>The</strong> last three digits<br />

“450”, “490”, and “570” were assigned<br />

for accounting purposes to identify different<br />

section or branches within the Trail<br />

Post Office such as the Letter Carrier<br />

Depot. At the same time Retail Managers<br />

and Retail Reps are assigned RC#’s with<br />

up to eight sub numbers being used to<br />

identify the various accounts under their<br />

jurisdiction. Occasionally these numbers<br />

are used on daters and the Trail RC#<br />

051152 falls into this category. A study <strong>of</strong><br />

the 10-digit numbers shows that it is possible<br />

to identify post <strong>of</strong>fice status using<br />

the last three digits <strong>of</strong> the 10-digit numbers.<br />

For example Semi-staff <strong>of</strong>fices end<br />

in “470” while Retail Outlets end in<br />

“920” and Revenue Offices end in “480”.<br />

At the same time as the new numbers<br />

were introduced, the post <strong>of</strong>fice policy<br />

was changed and the new numbers were<br />

assigned to the operator <strong>of</strong> the retail<br />

counter rather than the actual post <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

name as was done in the past. As a result<br />

each time a retail counter (post <strong>of</strong>fice)<br />

changes ownership a new number is used.<br />

<strong>The</strong> new numbers were initially assigned<br />

as blocks <strong>of</strong> numbers to each region but<br />

this was quickly changed and at present all<br />

numbers are assigned from Ottawa. Each<br />

<strong>of</strong> the new numbers contains a check digit,<br />

designed to reduce the chances <strong>of</strong> error in<br />

recording the numbers. (A more detailed<br />

study <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> check digits can be<br />

found in the PHSC Journal, Vol. 59 page<br />

15.) As a result <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> a check digit<br />

is that about one in every eight consecutive<br />

number is assigned. <strong>The</strong> numbers,<br />

which are assigned consecutively, ignore<br />

postal regions but do give an indication as<br />

to the date when a request was made for a<br />

change in postal status.<br />

From time to time, under the new<br />

accounting system introduced in 1990,<br />

numbers are assigned to special postal<br />

functions such as Commercial Sales and<br />

these numbers are used on daters much to<br />

the confusion <strong>of</strong> postal historians. <strong>The</strong><br />

two numbers below are such numbers.<br />

<strong>The</strong> RC number 640026 was assigned to<br />

the Pacific Division Cash Accounts<br />

Section which was further divided, for<br />

accounting purposes, into 11 sub sections<br />

using the 10-digit number system. <strong>The</strong><br />

Judging Affairs<br />

640018 RC number was used at the<br />

Vancouver Postage Stamp Depot and was<br />

withdrawn before 1995 when the BC and<br />

Yukon Postage Stamp Depot was moved<br />

to Edmonton.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se in-house numbers are extremely<br />

rare but do appear from time to time on regular<br />

mail. A complete listing <strong>of</strong> all the 10<br />

digit numbers for British Columbia would<br />

run to over 30 <strong>pages</strong> and would only further<br />

muddy an already confused situation. <br />

Continued from page 161<br />

and societies in Australia are affiliated with their relevant State Council. Judges<br />

are accredited nationally in their area <strong>of</strong> expertise, or at the state level. FIP type<br />

score sheets are used for all judging classes. <strong>The</strong>y have even experimented with<br />

postcard exhibits at their national shows with separate judging guidelines, awards<br />

and teams <strong>of</strong> judges! <strong>Phil</strong>ately is therefore strongly organized in Australia.<br />

A new publication “National Exhibitions. <strong>The</strong> Jury. Its Leadership and<br />

Procedures” prepared under the direction <strong>of</strong> APF has been published by the National<br />

Association <strong>of</strong> <strong>Phil</strong>atelic Exhibitors (NAPE), as Special Paper No. 2, <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Asia<br />

Pacific Exhibitor. (This journal which is published four times a year has just completed<br />

volume 12; has 350 members and is <strong>of</strong> interest to all judges and exhibitors.)<br />

<strong>The</strong> new paper on National Exhibitions makes interesting reading, though closer to<br />

the FIP scene than occurs at Canadian national exhibitions. Available for AU $7<br />

from Hans Karmen, Secretary/Treasurer NAPE, PO Box 462, Civic Square, ACT<br />

2608, Australia (overseas membership in NAPE is AU $30/year).<br />

This new trend in developing Agreements between countries is not restricted<br />

to <strong>Canada</strong>. <strong>The</strong> APS has recently signed a similar agreement with Australia, and<br />

are about to sign an agreement with Great Britain. <strong>The</strong>se Agreements can only<br />

help develop an exchange <strong>of</strong> views, ideas and information on philatelic exhibiting<br />

and judging in our world-wide hobby. <br />

Le philatéliste canadien / <strong>The</strong> Canadian <strong>Phil</strong>atelist Juillet - Août 2000 / 163

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!