16.06.2014 Views

RQIA Independent Review of The McDermott Brothers' Case

RQIA Independent Review of The McDermott Brothers' Case

RQIA Independent Review of The McDermott Brothers' Case

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.5.5 <strong>The</strong>re were no further requests for the WHSCT to act as an appropriate<br />

adult in the case. <strong>RQIA</strong> considers that WHSCT fully discharged its<br />

responsibilities in providing an appropriate adult for these proceedings.<br />

Fitness to Plead Hearing on 6 October 2009<br />

7.5.6 <strong>The</strong> submission <strong>of</strong> not fit to stand trial, or unfitness to plead, is made<br />

under <strong>The</strong> Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 1996. <strong>The</strong><br />

criminal procedure outlined in legislation requires that before making a<br />

determination, the court must have considered written or oral evidence<br />

from at least two registered medical practitioners, at least one <strong>of</strong> whom<br />

must have been approved by the Secretary <strong>of</strong> State as having special<br />

experience in the diagnosis and treatment <strong>of</strong> mental disorder. Such a<br />

doctor is known as a Part II Doctor in relation to mental health<br />

legislation.<br />

7.5.7 Guidance to doctors on providing reports as expert witness is available<br />

from the Acting as an Expert Witness 2008 (General Medical Council).<br />

<strong>The</strong> guidance states that:<br />

"<strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> an expert witness is to assist the court on specialist or<br />

technical matters within their expertise. <strong>The</strong> expert's duty to the court<br />

overrides any obligation to the person who is instructing or paying<br />

them. This means that you have a duty to act independently and not<br />

be influenced by the party who retains you."<br />

7.5.8 On 1 January 2004, a practice direction from the High Court <strong>of</strong> Justice<br />

in Northern Ireland (No 1. 2003) came into effect. This requires any<br />

expert witness who prepared a report for the court after that date to<br />

complete a specific signed declaration, which includes among other<br />

requirements the statement:<br />

"I understand that my primary duty in furnishing written reports and<br />

giving evidence is to assist the court and that this takes priority over<br />

any duties which I may owe to the party or parties by whom I have<br />

been engaged or by whom I have been paid or am liable to be paid. I<br />

confirm that I have complied and will continue to comply with this duty."<br />

7.5.9 It should be noted that efforts were made earlier in the case by the<br />

defence solicitors to secure a psychiatrist opinion for the assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

fitness to be interviewed. It was only when a list <strong>of</strong> other psychiatrists<br />

was exhausted that the consultant psychiatrist with a specialist interest<br />

in learning disability agreed to provide the assessment in the interests<br />

<strong>of</strong> justice. It should also be noted that in Northern Ireland, the potential<br />

cohort from whom a consultant psychiatrist with specialist interest in<br />

learning disability is small and in fact this consultant is the only one<br />

employed in the WHSCT.<br />

7.5.10 One <strong>of</strong> the private reports submitted to the court in relation to the<br />

fitness to plead hearing was prepared by a consultant psychiatrist with<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!