16.06.2014 Views

Sabbatical Report - Oranga School Website

Sabbatical Report - Oranga School Website

Sabbatical Report - Oranga School Website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Sabbatical</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 2009<br />

process (e.g. strategies for planning, monitoring, evaluating and revising),<br />

skills for producing text (e.g., handwriting, spelling, sentence construction)<br />

and knowledge about genre and the conventions of writing. The use of a selfregulation<br />

procedure like planning and revising can transform and hugely<br />

enhance writing.<br />

When the Graham et al. (1998) study went to print there had been 20 studies<br />

using the Self Regulated Strategy Development model 1 (SRSD) to teach<br />

writing strategies for planning and revising. These have included<br />

brainstorming, self monitoring of productivity, reading for information, goal<br />

setting, revision using peer feedback, and mechanics and substance revision.<br />

The SRSD model of strategy teaching has led to quality, knowledge, approach<br />

and self-efficacy improvements in students’ writing (Graham et al., 1998).<br />

Albertson et al. (1997), De La Paz et al. (2002), and Graham et al. (1998)<br />

have shown the explicit teaching of planning strategies to be important<br />

because planning is a critical element in skilled writing and high levels of<br />

planning are particularly evident in the writing behaviour of expert writers. The<br />

studies also show the practice of strategy instruction to be important as a<br />

means of addressing students’ academic weaknesses.<br />

4.0 How is the practice of explicit writing strategy instruction<br />

defined and operationalised?<br />

The practice of explicitly teaching writing strategies is defined in studies as the<br />

explicit teaching by an adult of strategies aimed at increasing the overall<br />

quality of the students writing once the intervention has come to its<br />

completion.<br />

Albertson et al. (1997) define the practice as explicit teaching of strategies<br />

related to planning and reviewing behaviours of writers. They studied whether<br />

teaching planning and reviewing strategies would have an effect on story<br />

writing processes and outcomes in a variety of ways. The study aimed to<br />

answer a number of questions, including “Does strategy instruction increase<br />

the amount of time gifted participants planned, produced text, reviewed,<br />

edited and revised? Does strategy instruction have an affect on the frequency<br />

of words written during story time? Does strategy instruction have an affect on<br />

the number of story elements included in stories written prior to instruction<br />

and after instruction? Are stories written after instruction of a higher overall<br />

writing quality when compared to the baseline stories?” (Albertson &<br />

Billingsley, 1997).<br />

The strategy instruction was operationalised through the teaching of the story<br />

grammar C-SPACE mnemonic described in an earlier study by MacArthur,<br />

Schwartz and Graham (1991). First the verbal instruction was given to where<br />

students were asked to think about their audience and the type of story they<br />

1 SRSD is about helping students to master the ‘higher-level’ cognitive processes involved in<br />

composing and is supported through various forms of support (e.g., strategies that provide structure,<br />

helping children acquire self-regulation skills) (Graham et al., 1998).<br />

Jonathan Ramsay<br />

<strong>Oranga</strong> Primary - One Tree Hill - Auckland

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!