Kambai Forest Reserve: A biodiversity survey. - Coastal Forests of ...
Kambai Forest Reserve: A biodiversity survey. - Coastal Forests of ...
Kambai Forest Reserve: A biodiversity survey. - Coastal Forests of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Kambai</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong><br />
71<br />
7.3.4 <strong>Forest</strong> resource utilisation<br />
Tables 32 and 33 illustrates where villagers extract natural resources and consequently<br />
where the land pressure is the greatest. ‘0’ is defined as resource not taken from that land;<br />
‘l’ is defined as low levels <strong>of</strong> resource extraction; ‘ll’ is defined as moderate levels <strong>of</strong><br />
resource extraction; ‘lll’ is defined as high levels <strong>of</strong> resource extraction. These are quoted<br />
as per village agreement.<br />
Table 32. Results <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kambai</strong>, Miembeni and Msige subvillage meeting.<br />
Resource <strong>Kambai</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> Public Land SHUWIMU<br />
Agricultural land l* lll ll<br />
Building poles lll l ll<br />
Firewood 0 lll l<br />
Timber 0 0 0<br />
Medicine lll l ll<br />
Ropes lll l ll<br />
Ro<strong>of</strong>ing material 0 lll ll<br />
Vegetables 0 lll ll<br />
Meat lll l ll<br />
TOTAL 13 16 15<br />
PERCENT 30 36 34<br />
* Agricultural land was taken from the forest before it was made a forest reserve.<br />
Table 33. Results <strong>of</strong> Kweboha and Msakazi subvillage meeting.<br />
Resource <strong>Kambai</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> Public Land SHUWIMU<br />
Agricultural land 0* 0 lll<br />
Building poles 0 0 lll<br />
Firewood 0 0 lll<br />
Timber 0 0 0<br />
Medicine 0 0 lll<br />
Ropes 0 0 lll<br />
Ro<strong>of</strong>ing material 0 0 lll<br />
Vegetables 0 0 lll<br />
Meat 0 0 lll<br />
TOTAL 0 0 24<br />
PERCENT 0 0 100<br />
* Agricultural land was taken from the forest before it was made a forest reserve.<br />
Tables 32 and 33 clearly show the differences within <strong>Kambai</strong> village. Kweboha and<br />
Msakazi sub villagers get 100% <strong>of</strong> their resource needs from SHUWIMU land where they<br />
live and farm. There are still large areas which are not under agriculture and hence over the<br />
last twenty years, since Sikh Sawmills left the area, forest has been allowed to regenerate.<br />
<strong>Kambai</strong> villagers however, obtain their resource needs equally between forest reserve<br />
(30%), public land (36%) and SHUWIMU land (34%).<br />
Although the data show that pitsawing has not occurred in the forest reserves, public land or<br />
SHUWIMU land, the researchers are aware <strong>of</strong> two separate cases <strong>of</strong> illegal pitsawing<br />
which have occurred on SHUWIMU land over the last year. At the end <strong>of</strong> 1995 <strong>Kambai</strong><br />
East Usambara Catchment <strong>Forest</strong> Project Technical Paper 35