Pilarcitos Integrated Watershed Management Plan - San Mateo ...
Pilarcitos Integrated Watershed Management Plan - San Mateo ...
Pilarcitos Integrated Watershed Management Plan - San Mateo ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Pilarcitos</strong> <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
for rearing. If the pond does not continue to operate in the future, rearing habitat would most<br />
likely be classified as “Fair.”<br />
5.2.4.5 Apanolio Flashboard Dam and Apron Removal, Downstream of the BFI Property Line<br />
This site includes an existing flashboard dam and apron and an unstable (incising) channel grade.<br />
Channel downcutting below the concrete apron at an unused flashboard dam has produced a<br />
nearly impassable barrier to migrating adult steelhead (Alley 2007a). The apron should be<br />
removed to prevent further downcutting, and the channel grade should be stabilized.<br />
Project Rationale<br />
This project would remove a fish passage barrier, reduce sediment production from further<br />
downcutting, and improve downstream habitat if the pond continues to operate. If the<br />
downstream Barrier 1 were modified, this project would allow steelhead access to an additional<br />
one mile of potential steelhead habitat of relatively low quality before encountering the first of<br />
four barriers on BFI Property (Alley 2007a). As shown in Figures 2 and 3, spawning habitat has<br />
been rated as “Fair” upstream of this site, and rearing habitat has been rated as “Poor”.<br />
5.2.4.6 Barrier 3 on Apanolio Creek<br />
The recently installed boulder weirs at Barrier 3 on Apanolio Creek may require maintenance<br />
based upon the observations of boulder transport at similar structures on Arroyo Leon and Mills<br />
Creek in 2007 (Alley 2007b).<br />
Project Rationale<br />
Observations of channel widths upstream suggest that the reconstructed channel is likely to widen<br />
after storm flows to more than five feet. Modifications might include approaches to stabilize the<br />
existing boulder weirs, with particular attention to the stability of the weir boulders and boulders<br />
keyed into the streambanks. The weirs should be re-evaluated after large peak flows (e.g.,<br />
approximately bankfull stage) to assess upstream fish passage opportunities, particularly at the<br />
lowermost weir.<br />
Maintenance of the recently installed weirs will ensure steelhead passage past the new bridge<br />
after downstream barriers have been removed. A relatively short stretch of stream is made<br />
available by this project because the flashboard dam apron upstream (see 5.2.8) has become a<br />
substantial passage barrier due to downcutting below the apron in the last 10 years. As shown in<br />
Figures 2 and 3, spawning habitat has been rated as “Poor-Fair” immediately upstream of this<br />
site, and rearing habitat has been rated as “Fair.”<br />
Identified Priority Projects 39 October, 2008