republic of the philippines - Philippine Center for Investigative ...
republic of the philippines - Philippine Center for Investigative ...
republic of the philippines - Philippine Center for Investigative ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
from <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Philippine</strong>s Law <strong>Center</strong> to present <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
findings regarding <strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agreements. Public Respondents<br />
were also invited to comment on said findings, but <strong>the</strong>y refused to appear<br />
on orders <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> President, who earlier issued Executive Order No. 464,<br />
prohibiting Cabinet <strong>of</strong>ficials from appearing in Senate investigations<br />
without prior clearance from <strong>the</strong> Chief Executive. Thus, Petitioners are<br />
compelled to air <strong>the</strong>ir grievances through this Petition, which is based<br />
primarily on <strong>the</strong> findings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Philippine</strong>s Law <strong>Center</strong><br />
that <strong>the</strong> Northrail Agreements are illegal, unconstitutional and void.<br />
21. Meanwhile, Respondents have begun <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Northrail Contract and Loan Agreement and have commenced <strong>the</strong><br />
Northrail Project, <strong>the</strong>reby opening <strong>the</strong> channels <strong>of</strong> illegal disbursements<br />
in millions <strong>of</strong> pesos and threatening to immediately cause <strong>the</strong> demolition<br />
<strong>of</strong> Petitioner Settlers’ homes. Hence, Petitioners have no o<strong>the</strong>r recourse in<br />
law to prevent such illegal acts but to file <strong>the</strong> instant Petition.<br />
JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT<br />
22. Petitioners humbly beseech <strong>the</strong> Honorable Court to take<br />
cognizance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> instant case, invoking <strong>the</strong> Court’s power to set aside<br />
rules <strong>of</strong> procedure in assuming jurisdiction over matters <strong>of</strong> paramount<br />
public interest and when issues presented are <strong>of</strong> transcendental<br />
importance to <strong>the</strong> public. The Court, as <strong>the</strong> branch constitutionally<br />
tasked “to settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally<br />
demandable and en<strong>for</strong>ceable, and to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong>re has<br />
been a grave abuse <strong>of</strong> discretion amounting to lack or excess <strong>of</strong><br />
jurisdiction on <strong>the</strong> part <strong>of</strong> any branch or instrumentality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
9