Abstracts - Society for Developmental Biology
Abstracts - Society for Developmental Biology
Abstracts - Society for Developmental Biology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
32<br />
Deafness and Renal disease), which can include craniofacial defects. Our zebrafish gata3 mutants display the range of<br />
HDR symptoms, the severity of which is genetically modulated. Mutants in one inbred genetic background have nearly<br />
wild-type phenotypes, while a second background has profound craniofacial defects. We used a microarray approach to<br />
identify pathways that regulate this variability. Twenty-two zebrafish genes with clear human homologues were<br />
differentially expressed across mutant, but not wild-type, embryos from the “mild” and “severe” backgrounds. We found<br />
13 “protective”genes, those upregulated in mild mutants and/or downregulated in severe mutants and 9 “deleterious”<br />
genes, upregulated in severe mutants and/or downregulated in mild mutants. We show that insulin receptor a (insra) is a<br />
protective gene both necessary and sufficient <strong>for</strong> mild phenotypes and activator of Hsp90 ATPase homolog 1 (ahsa1) is a<br />
deleterious gene, necessary and sufficient <strong>for</strong> severe phenotypes. These response genes tend to be broadly expressed<br />
suggesting that they may be general regulators of craniofacial defects. Indeed, altering insra or ahsa1 levels changes the<br />
phenotypic severityof both platelet-derived growth factor aand collagen type 11 a2 mutants. Collectively, our results<br />
implicate a response gene network in regulating the phenotypic severity of craniofacial defects.<br />
Program/Abstract # 99<br />
The molecular mechanisms of SP8 activity during craniofacial development<br />
Kasberg, Abi; Brunskill, Eric; Potter, Steve, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Cincinnati, United<br />
States<br />
Craniofacial abnormalities such as cleft palate affect 1 in 700 live births. Despite recent advances, the pathways<br />
responsible <strong>for</strong> causing craniofacial disorders remain largely unknown. We have shown that the mutation of the Sp8 gene,<br />
which encodes a zinc finger transcription factor, resulted in a dramatic absence of most facial structures. Sp8 mutants<br />
exhibited a failure of fusion along the midline, excencephaly, hyperterlorism, and cleft palate. In fact, careful skeletal<br />
analysis showed a dramatic loss of many neural crest and paraxial mesoderm derived cranial bones. Analysis of SOX9<br />
expression revealed that Sp8 mutant neural crest located adjacent to the <strong>for</strong>ebrain fail to differentiate and instead remain in<br />
a multipotent state. Immunofluorescent experiments showed high SP8 expression within the neuroepithelium including the<br />
anterior neural ridge, as well as the epidermal ectoderm. Specific loss of Sp8 in the anterior neuroepithelium produced<br />
mice with severe craniofacialmal <strong>for</strong>mations most similar to the global Sp8 mutants, suggesting that anterior<br />
neuroepithelial Sp8 expression is critical during craniofacial development. Despite studies that have identified the roles of<br />
SP8 during limb outgrowth, the molecular targets of SP8 during craniofacial development remain unknown. Expression<br />
analysis at E9.5 indicated that Gli2, Gli3, Fgf8 and Fgf17 are reduced in the mutant anterior neural ridge signaling center.<br />
Gene expression analysis indicated a large reduction in the expression of Fgf17 in the olfactory pit of E10.5 mutants, but<br />
no apparent change in Fgf8. Of interest, the results also showed increased Smoothened in E10.5 mutants. The gene<br />
expression data coupled with the hypertelorism phenotype suggested an upregulation of SHH signaling in Sp8 mutants.<br />
Remarkably, embryonic exposure to cyclopamine, a SHH inhibitor, resulted in significant rescue of the craniofacial<br />
phenotype in Sp8 mutants. This suggests that elevated SHH signaling in the Sp8 mutants is a key effector of the mutant<br />
phenotype. It is interesting to note that FGF signaling has previously been reported to be able to repress the SHH pathway.<br />
There<strong>for</strong>e, the data suggests that during craniofacial development SP8 might normally activate FGF signaling, which in<br />
turn represses SHH signaling.<br />
Program/Abstract # 100<br />
Regulation of jaw development by LAR receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases<br />
Stewart, Katherine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada<br />
Mal<strong>for</strong>mations of the lower jaw are associated with many developmental syndromes, and may additionally result in<br />
secondary defects of the oral cavity, including cleft palate. As such, understanding the normal patterning and specification<br />
of the mandible, as well as the etiology of secondary defects, may provide important therapeutic opportunities to children<br />
born within this spectrum of disorders. Recently we have demonstrated a requirement <strong>for</strong> the leukocyte antigen related<br />
(LAR)- family of receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) in craniofacial development. Embryos lacking both<br />
RPTPσ and LAR exhibit micrognathia (small lower jaw), cleft palate, exencephaly (open neural tube) and open eyes at<br />
birth. We have currently extended that to include abnormalities in cranial bones and soft tissues derived from the first<br />
branchial arch, including defects in bones of the palate and mandible, as well as abnormal tongue shape. We have<br />
determined that cleft palate occurs secondary to abnormal mandible <strong>for</strong>mation as initial palatal shelf outgrowth appears<br />
normal at E12.5, whereas misspecification of cartilage and bone in the anterior mandible is already apparent. However, the<br />
initial stages of craniofacial development, including the population of the first branchial arch by cranial neural crest cells,<br />
appear normal. Interestingly, concomitant loss of RPTPσ and LAR within the first branchial arch results in aberrant FGF<br />
signaling activity, potentially altering the patterning and subsequent differentiation of the mandibular arch tissue.