30.06.2014 Views

Abstracts - Society for Developmental Biology

Abstracts - Society for Developmental Biology

Abstracts - Society for Developmental Biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32<br />

Deafness and Renal disease), which can include craniofacial defects. Our zebrafish gata3 mutants display the range of<br />

HDR symptoms, the severity of which is genetically modulated. Mutants in one inbred genetic background have nearly<br />

wild-type phenotypes, while a second background has profound craniofacial defects. We used a microarray approach to<br />

identify pathways that regulate this variability. Twenty-two zebrafish genes with clear human homologues were<br />

differentially expressed across mutant, but not wild-type, embryos from the “mild” and “severe” backgrounds. We found<br />

13 “protective”genes, those upregulated in mild mutants and/or downregulated in severe mutants and 9 “deleterious”<br />

genes, upregulated in severe mutants and/or downregulated in mild mutants. We show that insulin receptor a (insra) is a<br />

protective gene both necessary and sufficient <strong>for</strong> mild phenotypes and activator of Hsp90 ATPase homolog 1 (ahsa1) is a<br />

deleterious gene, necessary and sufficient <strong>for</strong> severe phenotypes. These response genes tend to be broadly expressed<br />

suggesting that they may be general regulators of craniofacial defects. Indeed, altering insra or ahsa1 levels changes the<br />

phenotypic severityof both platelet-derived growth factor aand collagen type 11 a2 mutants. Collectively, our results<br />

implicate a response gene network in regulating the phenotypic severity of craniofacial defects.<br />

Program/Abstract # 99<br />

The molecular mechanisms of SP8 activity during craniofacial development<br />

Kasberg, Abi; Brunskill, Eric; Potter, Steve, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Cincinnati, United<br />

States<br />

Craniofacial abnormalities such as cleft palate affect 1 in 700 live births. Despite recent advances, the pathways<br />

responsible <strong>for</strong> causing craniofacial disorders remain largely unknown. We have shown that the mutation of the Sp8 gene,<br />

which encodes a zinc finger transcription factor, resulted in a dramatic absence of most facial structures. Sp8 mutants<br />

exhibited a failure of fusion along the midline, excencephaly, hyperterlorism, and cleft palate. In fact, careful skeletal<br />

analysis showed a dramatic loss of many neural crest and paraxial mesoderm derived cranial bones. Analysis of SOX9<br />

expression revealed that Sp8 mutant neural crest located adjacent to the <strong>for</strong>ebrain fail to differentiate and instead remain in<br />

a multipotent state. Immunofluorescent experiments showed high SP8 expression within the neuroepithelium including the<br />

anterior neural ridge, as well as the epidermal ectoderm. Specific loss of Sp8 in the anterior neuroepithelium produced<br />

mice with severe craniofacialmal <strong>for</strong>mations most similar to the global Sp8 mutants, suggesting that anterior<br />

neuroepithelial Sp8 expression is critical during craniofacial development. Despite studies that have identified the roles of<br />

SP8 during limb outgrowth, the molecular targets of SP8 during craniofacial development remain unknown. Expression<br />

analysis at E9.5 indicated that Gli2, Gli3, Fgf8 and Fgf17 are reduced in the mutant anterior neural ridge signaling center.<br />

Gene expression analysis indicated a large reduction in the expression of Fgf17 in the olfactory pit of E10.5 mutants, but<br />

no apparent change in Fgf8. Of interest, the results also showed increased Smoothened in E10.5 mutants. The gene<br />

expression data coupled with the hypertelorism phenotype suggested an upregulation of SHH signaling in Sp8 mutants.<br />

Remarkably, embryonic exposure to cyclopamine, a SHH inhibitor, resulted in significant rescue of the craniofacial<br />

phenotype in Sp8 mutants. This suggests that elevated SHH signaling in the Sp8 mutants is a key effector of the mutant<br />

phenotype. It is interesting to note that FGF signaling has previously been reported to be able to repress the SHH pathway.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, the data suggests that during craniofacial development SP8 might normally activate FGF signaling, which in<br />

turn represses SHH signaling.<br />

Program/Abstract # 100<br />

Regulation of jaw development by LAR receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases<br />

Stewart, Katherine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada<br />

Mal<strong>for</strong>mations of the lower jaw are associated with many developmental syndromes, and may additionally result in<br />

secondary defects of the oral cavity, including cleft palate. As such, understanding the normal patterning and specification<br />

of the mandible, as well as the etiology of secondary defects, may provide important therapeutic opportunities to children<br />

born within this spectrum of disorders. Recently we have demonstrated a requirement <strong>for</strong> the leukocyte antigen related<br />

(LAR)- family of receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) in craniofacial development. Embryos lacking both<br />

RPTPσ and LAR exhibit micrognathia (small lower jaw), cleft palate, exencephaly (open neural tube) and open eyes at<br />

birth. We have currently extended that to include abnormalities in cranial bones and soft tissues derived from the first<br />

branchial arch, including defects in bones of the palate and mandible, as well as abnormal tongue shape. We have<br />

determined that cleft palate occurs secondary to abnormal mandible <strong>for</strong>mation as initial palatal shelf outgrowth appears<br />

normal at E12.5, whereas misspecification of cartilage and bone in the anterior mandible is already apparent. However, the<br />

initial stages of craniofacial development, including the population of the first branchial arch by cranial neural crest cells,<br />

appear normal. Interestingly, concomitant loss of RPTPσ and LAR within the first branchial arch results in aberrant FGF<br />

signaling activity, potentially altering the patterning and subsequent differentiation of the mandibular arch tissue.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!