30.06.2014 Views

Abstracts - Society for Developmental Biology

Abstracts - Society for Developmental Biology

Abstracts - Society for Developmental Biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4<br />

Program/Abstract # 10<br />

Evolution of sex determination in animals that produce males, females and hermaphrodites<br />

da Silva, André Pires; Kache, Vikas, University of Texas, Arlington, United States; von Reuss, Stephan (Cornell<br />

University, Ithaca, United States); Chaudhuri, Jyotiska; Bateson, Christine (U Texas, Arlington, United States)<br />

The evolution of mating systems has fascinated biologists since the time of Darwin, specifically the causes and<br />

consequences of a species transition from one mating system (e.g. dioecy) to another (e.g. hermaphroditism). Theory<br />

predicts that these transitions likely involve one or more intermediates. To understand how animals transition from one<br />

mating system to another, we are studying the mechanisms by which a yet undescribed nematode generates male, female<br />

and hermaphrodite progeny. This is likely to represent a transitory system from the ancestral male/female to a<br />

hermaphroditic mode of reproduction.We found that the male /non-male decision in this nematode is chromosomally<br />

determined, whereas the hermaphrodite/female decision is epigenetic. We identified the molecular nature of a pheromone<br />

that alters the development of female-fated juveniles to develop into hermaphrodites. The study of the molecular<br />

mechanisms underlying sex determination in this and other closely species might shed some light in how mating systems<br />

evolve.<br />

Program/Abstract # 11<br />

Unraveling a transcriptional network involved in maize domestication<br />

Doebley, John, University of Wisconsin, Madison, United States<br />

Maize is a domesticated <strong>for</strong>m of a wild Mexican grass called teosinte. The domestication of maize from teosinte occurred<br />

about 9,000 years ago. As a result of human (artificial) selection during the domestication process, dramatic changes in<br />

morphology arose such that maize no longer closely resembles its teosinte ancestor in ear and plant architecture. We have<br />

identified and analyzed three of the genes involved in these morphological changes. First, teosinte branched (tb1) is<br />

largely responsible <strong>for</strong> the difference between the long branches of teosinte versus the short branches of maize. tb1 encodes<br />

a transcriptional regulator that functions as a repressor of branch elongation. Gene expression analysis indicates that the<br />

product of the teosinte allele of tb1 accumulates at about half the level of the maize allele. Fine-mapping experiments show<br />

that the differences in phenotype and gene expression are controlled in part by an upstream transposon insertion that acts<br />

as an enhancer of gene expression. Second, teosinte glume architecture (tga1) is largely responsible <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mation of a<br />

casing that surrounds teosinte seeds but is lacking in maize. tga1 also encodes a transcriptional regulator, however in this<br />

case a single amino acid change represents the functional difference between maize and teosinte. This single amino acid<br />

change appears to convert the maize allele into a transcriptional repressor of target genes. Third, grassy tillers (gt1)<br />

contributes to differences in plant architecture and encodes an HD-ZIP transcription factor. Causative changes at gt1<br />

appear to be complex, involving multiple changes. tb1, tga1 and gt1 are members of the same developmental network<br />

which regulates shade avoidance. This pathway was a target of human selection during the domestication process.<br />

Program/Abstract # 12<br />

Evolution of obligate heterodimerization among grass B class genes<br />

Whipple, Clinton J.; Bartlett, Madelaine; Williams, Steven, Brigham Young University, Provo, United States<br />

Homeotic regulation of floral organ identity, as described in the ABC model of floral development, is primarily controlled<br />

by MADS-box transcription factors. B class genes regulate second (petal) and third (stamen) whorl identities, and are<br />

represented by two paralogous gene lineages, DEF/AP3 and GLO/PI. Unlike other ABC MADS box proteins that can bind<br />

DNA as homodimers, B class proteins only bind DNA as obligate heterodimers. B class genes also undergo positive<br />

autoregulation, and it has been proposed that B class obligate heterodimerization evolved from sequential loss of the<br />

ability to homodimerize and that the unique combination of obligate heterodimerization with an autoregulatory feedback<br />

mechanism was important in the canalization of eudicot flowers. We have been examining B class function in the monocot<br />

model grass species maize (Zea mays). We have positionally cloned the sterile tassel silky ear1 (sts1), which has a<br />

phenotype similar to other B class mutants in the grass family. sts1 encodes one of three GLO/PI orthologs in maize, but<br />

shows no evidence of functional redundancy as it regulates transcription of the paralogous Zmm18 and Zmm29.<br />

Interestingly, maize B class proteins bind DNA as an obligate heterodimer, while B class proteins from close outgroups<br />

homodimerize. In order to understand the evolution of obligate heterodimerization in the grasses, we have isolated GLO/PI<br />

orthologs from diverse grasses and outgroups and assayed their dimerization specificity. Our results indicate that shifts to<br />

and from obligate heterodimerization are frequent, and controlled by a small number of amino acid changes. The possible<br />

developmental consequences of this evolution in protein binding will be discussed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!