Abstracts - Society for Developmental Biology
Abstracts - Society for Developmental Biology
Abstracts - Society for Developmental Biology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
9<br />
Program/Abstract # 26<br />
On the combinatorial function of multiple cis-regulatory modules<br />
Nam, Jongmin, CALTECH, Pasadena, United States<br />
Cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) <strong>for</strong> gene expression control are modular in the sense that they can activate basal promoters<br />
from other genes in small reporter constructs. We have learned from decades of studies that, although only a small fraction<br />
of CRMs have been identified in the metazoan genomes, CRMs outnumber genes in the genome and that multiple CRMs<br />
control expression of a gene. Two alternative models <strong>for</strong> how multiple CRMs control gene expression prevail, each with<br />
supporting experimental data .However, little is known about the relative prevalence of the two models. In the first model<br />
different CRMs control gene expression differentially in time and space, and there is no overlapping activity between<br />
CRMs; any changes in CRM activity will result in coherent gene expression changes. In the second model multiple CRMs<br />
function in a combinatorial manner. In this model, a group of activator CRMs and/or repressor CRMs function together,<br />
and overlapping activities between CRMs may happen; changes in CRM activity may not result in coherent gene<br />
expression changes. Using high-resolution temporal activity profiles of 47 genes and their 126 CRMs in developing and<br />
perturbed sea urchin embryos, I tested the two alternative models of CRM function. The results predominantly supported<br />
the second model: Overlapping activities between CRMs located around/within the same gene were common and<br />
incoherent responses between genes and their CRMs to the same perturbation were prevalent. Functional and evolutionary<br />
significance of this finding will be discussed.<br />
Program/Abstract # 27<br />
Identifying regulators of early differentiation and primary germ layer induction<br />
Oron, Efrat, Yale University, New Haven, United States; Wu, Jiaqian; Snyder, Michael (Stan<strong>for</strong>d University, United<br />
States); Ivanova, Natalia (Yale University, New Haven, United States)<br />
Embryonic stem (ES) cell research lies at the interface between developmental biology and medicine. Fundamental<br />
questions such as how do cells become restricted in their developmental potential and differentiate giving rise to all the<br />
cells and tissues that make up an organism will ultimately help us learn how to efficiently manipulate ES cells grown in<br />
culture <strong>for</strong> therapeutic use. Among the first processes of differentiation is specification of the primary germ layers:<br />
Endoderm, Mesoderm and Ectoderm. Using an in vitro ES cell differentiation system combined with a functional genomics<br />
approach we identified genes required <strong>for</strong> ES cell differentiation and build a simplistic model of their transcription<br />
regulation hierarchy during germ layer induction. To identify genes that are important <strong>for</strong> early differentiation we<br />
generated RNAseq mRNA time course profiles from mouse embryos sampled at five developmental timepoints, and ES<br />
cells differentiated as embryoid bodies (EBs) <strong>for</strong> eleven days. Comparative analysis of expression from embryo vs. cell<br />
lines was used to identify matching developmental time windows between mouse embryos and ES cell lines and to further<br />
select a panel of 160 candidate transcription factors with expression patterns suggestive of an involvement in<br />
differentiation. Candidate genes were individually inactivated in ES cells by lentiviral shRNAs. shRNA-expressing cells<br />
were differentiated as EBs and evaluated <strong>for</strong> primary germ layers induction using a panel of markers. 44 genes were found<br />
to affect differentiation to at least one of the three primary germ layers and a simplistic model of transcription regulation<br />
hierarchy during germ layer differentiation is suggested based on germlayer-specific markers.<br />
Program/Abstract # 28<br />
Good at being bad: Counterintuitive genomic responses to developmental signals via low-affinity transcription<br />
factor binding sites.<br />
Barolo, Scott, U Michigan Med Sch, Ann Arbor, United States<br />
Signaling pathways such as Hedgehog, RTK/MAPK, Notch, BMP, and Wnt relay patterning in<strong>for</strong>mation to transcription<br />
factors (TFs), which in turn control developmental cell fate by regulating gene expression. Because these pathways are<br />
extremely pleiotropic— that is, they are active in many cell types during development and adult life—we are particularly<br />
interested in how cis-regulatory DNA sequences interpret these "generic" signals in a tissue-specific manner. By altering<br />
the affinity of signal response elements in vivo, we have discovered important, sometimes surprising roles <strong>for</strong> low-affinity,<br />
non-consensus binding sites <strong>for</strong> signal-regulated TFs in the regulation of wingless, dpp (a BMP ligand), Pax2, and patched.<br />
In certain enhancers of these genes, weak binding is specifically required <strong>for</strong> proper responses to Hedgehog or Notch<br />
signaling; improving binding affinity can either cause ectopic responses to a signal or, unexpectedly, switch the response<br />
from activation to direct repression. The regulation of the patched gene is particularly interesting: what first appeared to be<br />
a simple constitutive response to Hedgehog in all tissues is in fact mediated by a large number of enhancers, all of which<br />
respond to the same signal, but in different developing tissues and adult stem cell systems—including large numbers of<br />
"shadow" enhancers in multiple tissue types. Our preliminary data suggest fascinating new mechanisms by which the<br />
patched locus has solved the patterning problem of responding to a single generic signal across diverse tissues. I will