30.06.2014 Views

Pitfalls of MRI in Spondyloarthritis

Pitfalls of MRI in Spondyloarthritis

Pitfalls of MRI in Spondyloarthritis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pitfalls</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>MRI</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Spondyloarthritis</strong><br />

Dr Alex Bennett<br />

FRCP PhD<br />

Consultant Rheumatologist Headley Court<br />

Visit<strong>in</strong>g Senior Lecturer University <strong>of</strong> Leeds


ASAS classification criteria for axial SpA<br />

(chronic back pa<strong>in</strong> >3 months, age at onset


<strong>Pitfalls</strong><br />

Conform<strong>in</strong>g with widely held but <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>in</strong>correct beliefs<br />

Request<strong>in</strong>g the Wrong Scans<br />

Mis-Diagnosis<br />

Technical Errors<br />

<strong>MRI</strong> <strong>in</strong>adequacies & Disease idiosyncrasies


Conform<strong>in</strong>g with Widely Held but<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten <strong>in</strong>correct Beliefs


The Radiologist is Always Right!<br />

What the **** is<br />

this?!<br />

This is an obvious<br />

case <strong>of</strong><br />

degenerative<br />

disease<br />

The request<br />

mentioned<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g called<br />

Spondyloarthitis!?!


Don’t be a Lemm<strong>in</strong>g


Assume Noth<strong>in</strong>g


Make friends with your radiologist!


Request<strong>in</strong>g the Wrong Scan!


Protocol & Sequences<br />

• Whole Sp<strong>in</strong>e<br />

•4 sequences<br />

• cervico-thoracic – T1 and STIR<br />

• thoraco-lumbar – T1 and STIR<br />

•Sagittal only (to <strong>in</strong>clude pedicles and facets)<br />

• SIJs<br />

• 2 sequences<br />

• coronal oblique T1 and STIR<br />

• Contrast Not Required


35% AS<br />

38% axial-SpA<br />

NO ACTIVE <strong>MRI</strong> SACROILIITIS


25% AS patients<br />

SPINAL<br />

BUT NO<br />

ACTIVE SIJ LESIONS<br />

Images courtesy <strong>of</strong> Dr Alexander Bennett


Thoracic sp<strong>in</strong>e<br />

most<br />

sp<strong>in</strong>al lesions


Scan plann<strong>in</strong>g


Posterior Element Lesions<br />

STIR<br />

STIR


Inflammatory Lesions<br />

T1w<br />

STIR


Fatty Lesions<br />

T1w<br />

T1w


Mis-diagnosis


Sacroiliac Jo<strong>in</strong>ts


ASAS def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> “positive <strong>MRI</strong>”<br />

1. Sieper J et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:ii1-ii44


“Positive <strong>MRI</strong>”<br />

STIR<br />

STIR<br />

One slice sufficient<br />

2 slices required<br />

Image from ASAS handbook


Differential Diagnosis: Septic Sacroiliitis<br />

T1SE<br />

STIR


Differential Diagnosis: Insufficiency Fracture<br />

STIR<br />

T1SE


Sp<strong>in</strong>e


ASAS Def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> a Positive Sp<strong>in</strong>al <strong>MRI</strong><br />

• Inflammatory Romanus/corner lesions:<br />

• Fatty Romanus/corner lesions:<br />

≥2<br />

≥3<br />

• Posterior element lesions?<br />

ASAS Def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> a positive Sp<strong>in</strong>al <strong>MRI</strong>-In press


Differential Diagnoses<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Degenerative Disease SpA Metastases<br />

Images courtesy <strong>of</strong> Dr Alexander Bennett


Septic Discitis v Spondylodiscitis<br />

T1<br />

STIR


Septic Discitis v Spondylodiscitis<br />

T1<br />

STIR


Degenerative Disease v Spondylodiscitis<br />

T1<br />

STIR


Artefact mimick<strong>in</strong>g sp<strong>in</strong>al lesions <strong>in</strong> SpA:<br />

haemangioma<br />

T1SE<br />

STIR


Technical Glitches


Artefacts<br />

• Coil effect<br />

– Spurious high signal at the lower SIJs<br />

• Anatomical artefact<br />

– Phase encod<strong>in</strong>g artefact – adjacent structures<br />

– Mimics – subchondral blood vessels


Phase-encod<strong>in</strong>g artefact : blood flow<strong>in</strong>g through great vessels<br />

T1SE<br />

STIR


<strong>MRI</strong> Inadequacies


HISTOPATHOLOGY v <strong>MRI</strong><br />

V<br />

8<br />

3<br />

Appel H et al. Arthritis Res Ther 2006


Disease Idiosyncrasies


Fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g Disease<br />

21%<br />

Basel<strong>in</strong>e<br />

12 months<br />

46%<br />

7%<br />

Marzo-Ortega, ARD 2009<br />

Basel<strong>in</strong>e<br />

12 weeks<br />

26%<br />

Stone et al, Rheumatology 2008<br />

Images Courtesy <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong> J Sieper


“Negative” <strong>MRI</strong><br />

NOT necessarily<br />

“Normal” <strong>MRI</strong>


Summary<br />

Conform<strong>in</strong>g with widely held but <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>in</strong>correct beliefs<br />

Request<strong>in</strong>g the Wrong Scans<br />

Mis-Diagnosis<br />

Technical Errors<br />

<strong>MRI</strong> <strong>in</strong>adequacies & Disease idiosyncrasies


Thank You

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!