007: Accident or Conspiracy? - The Black Vault
007: Accident or Conspiracy? - The Black Vault
007: Accident or Conspiracy? - The Black Vault
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter Three<br />
AUTHOR'S BACKGROUND AND REVIEWS OF BOOK<br />
This chapter will attempt to establish Johnson's background<br />
expertise, political bias (if any), methods of reseach and logic.<br />
This will be done by first examining what Johnson says of<br />
himself and his eff<strong>or</strong>ts in his book. Next, reviews of the book<br />
will be studied to obtain the same inf<strong>or</strong>mation, but from the view<br />
point of others. This inf<strong>or</strong>mation will serve as the starting<br />
point f<strong>or</strong> the analysis<br />
Johnson's-Background<br />
<strong>The</strong> first step in analyzing the KAL <strong>007</strong> tragedy as Johnson<br />
sees it is to try and learn something about the auth<strong>or</strong> himself.<br />
How he uses inf<strong>or</strong>mation and rep<strong>or</strong>ts it, an well as his logic, may<br />
have as much imp<strong>or</strong>tance as what he says in his book. To do this,<br />
one must look at what Johnson says of himself as he sets about<br />
his task of investigating the event. In addition, one must<br />
examine the critiques of Johnson's book from several of the<br />
reviews that came out on the w<strong>or</strong>k. From these, a rough picture<br />
of Johnson and his eff<strong>or</strong>t begins to emerge.<br />
Shootdown is an in-depth w<strong>or</strong>k. Johnson has done an<br />
exhaustive amount of research, looking at almost every piece of<br />
evidence available in the public rec<strong>or</strong>d (9t473). Other<br />
inf<strong>or</strong>mation comes from "unnamed and unidentified Intelligence<br />
sources." (7:111) <strong>The</strong> factual data and second-hand inf<strong>or</strong>mation<br />
through which Johnson must w<strong>or</strong>k have both technical and political<br />
Implications and have led most investigat<strong>or</strong>s, including Johnson,<br />
to either an accidental the<strong>or</strong>y <strong>or</strong> a conspirat<strong>or</strong>ial the<strong>or</strong>y<br />
(9:472). Johnson's book looks at both types and results in the<br />
examination ,if four hypotheses (10:67). Bef<strong>or</strong>e expl<strong>or</strong>ing these<br />
hypotheses, he first task is to determine Johnson's area of<br />
expertise in <strong>or</strong>der to gain an insight as to where his personal<br />
strength lies to deal with this mass of data.<br />
All that can be discerned about Johnson comes from the<br />
biographical inf<strong>or</strong>mation provided by the book jacket and from his<br />
reviewers. Quoting directly fzom the book jacket, "R. W. Johnson<br />
is a Fellow in Politics at Oxf<strong>or</strong>d University, in England. He is a<br />
frequent contribut<strong>or</strong> to such topical publications asTh<br />
8