01.07.2014 Views

007: Accident or Conspiracy? - The Black Vault

007: Accident or Conspiracy? - The Black Vault

007: Accident or Conspiracy? - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Three<br />

AUTHOR'S BACKGROUND AND REVIEWS OF BOOK<br />

This chapter will attempt to establish Johnson's background<br />

expertise, political bias (if any), methods of reseach and logic.<br />

This will be done by first examining what Johnson says of<br />

himself and his eff<strong>or</strong>ts in his book. Next, reviews of the book<br />

will be studied to obtain the same inf<strong>or</strong>mation, but from the view<br />

point of others. This inf<strong>or</strong>mation will serve as the starting<br />

point f<strong>or</strong> the analysis<br />

Johnson's-Background<br />

<strong>The</strong> first step in analyzing the KAL <strong>007</strong> tragedy as Johnson<br />

sees it is to try and learn something about the auth<strong>or</strong> himself.<br />

How he uses inf<strong>or</strong>mation and rep<strong>or</strong>ts it, an well as his logic, may<br />

have as much imp<strong>or</strong>tance as what he says in his book. To do this,<br />

one must look at what Johnson says of himself as he sets about<br />

his task of investigating the event. In addition, one must<br />

examine the critiques of Johnson's book from several of the<br />

reviews that came out on the w<strong>or</strong>k. From these, a rough picture<br />

of Johnson and his eff<strong>or</strong>t begins to emerge.<br />

Shootdown is an in-depth w<strong>or</strong>k. Johnson has done an<br />

exhaustive amount of research, looking at almost every piece of<br />

evidence available in the public rec<strong>or</strong>d (9t473). Other<br />

inf<strong>or</strong>mation comes from "unnamed and unidentified Intelligence<br />

sources." (7:111) <strong>The</strong> factual data and second-hand inf<strong>or</strong>mation<br />

through which Johnson must w<strong>or</strong>k have both technical and political<br />

Implications and have led most investigat<strong>or</strong>s, including Johnson,<br />

to either an accidental the<strong>or</strong>y <strong>or</strong> a conspirat<strong>or</strong>ial the<strong>or</strong>y<br />

(9:472). Johnson's book looks at both types and results in the<br />

examination ,if four hypotheses (10:67). Bef<strong>or</strong>e expl<strong>or</strong>ing these<br />

hypotheses, he first task is to determine Johnson's area of<br />

expertise in <strong>or</strong>der to gain an insight as to where his personal<br />

strength lies to deal with this mass of data.<br />

All that can be discerned about Johnson comes from the<br />

biographical inf<strong>or</strong>mation provided by the book jacket and from his<br />

reviewers. Quoting directly fzom the book jacket, "R. W. Johnson<br />

is a Fellow in Politics at Oxf<strong>or</strong>d University, in England. He is a<br />

frequent contribut<strong>or</strong> to such topical publications asTh<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!